Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
164 lines (136 loc) · 14.2 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

164 lines (136 loc) · 14.2 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for facebook/yoga

Objective: To manipulate the application's user interface (UI) or cause denial of service (DoS) by exploiting vulnerabilities or weaknesses in the Yoga layout engine or its integration within the application. This could lead to information disclosure, UI redress attacks, or application instability.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application via Yoga Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]
├───[AND] Exploit Yoga Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]
│   ├───[OR] Exploit Input Parsing Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├─── Malformed Layout Instructions [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   ├───[AND] Send excessively complex layout instructions [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   ├─── Deeply nested layout structures [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   │   └─── Goal: Cause stack overflow or excessive resource consumption (DoS) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   ├─── Invalid property values [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   │   └─── Goal: Trigger parsing errors, unexpected behavior, or crashes (DoS or UI corruption) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └─── Large or unbounded input sizes [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │       └─── Goal: Memory exhaustion or processing delays (DoS) [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├─── Resource exhaustion during layout calculation [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └─── Goal:  Craft layouts that are computationally expensive to calculate, leading to DoS. [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├─── Exploit Memory Safety Vulnerabilities (Yoga C/C++ Core) [CRITICAL NODE]
│   │   │   ├─── Memory leaks [HIGH RISK PATH - DoS over time]
│   │   │   │   └─── Goal: Cause application instability and eventually DoS through memory exhaustion over time. [HIGH RISK PATH - DoS over time]
├───[AND] Exploit Application's Yoga Integration [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   ├───[OR] Input Data Handling Issues [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├─── Untrusted data directly used in Yoga layout definitions [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └─── Goal: Inject malicious layout instructions if application doesn't sanitize or validate input properly (similar to "Injection of malicious layout properties" but from application's perspective). [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├─── Inadequate validation of data influencing layout [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └─── Goal:  If application logic uses external data to determine layout, manipulate this data to cause unintended layout changes. [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └─── Lack of input sanitization for layout parameters [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │       └─── Goal:  Exploit any vulnerabilities in Yoga's parsing by providing unsanitized input. [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├─── UI Redress/Clickjacking via layout manipulation [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │   └───[AND] Manipulate layout to overlay UI elements [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   │       ├─── Make legitimate UI elements invisible or obscured [HIGH RISK PATH]
│   │   ├───[OR] Logic Flaws in Application's Layout Logic
│       ├─── State management issues related to layout [HIGH RISK PATH]
│       │   └─── Goal:  Manipulate application state to trigger unexpected layout behavior and potentially application logic flaws. [HIGH RISK PATH]

Attack Tree Path: Compromise Application via Yoga Exploitation [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: This is the root goal. Any successful exploitation of Yoga vulnerabilities or integration flaws leads to application compromise.
    • Potential Impact: Full application compromise, ranging from DoS and UI corruption to information disclosure and potentially more severe impacts depending on the application's functionality.
    • Mitigation: Secure coding practices throughout the application, robust input validation, regular security assessments, keeping Yoga updated, and implementing mitigations for specific vulnerabilities outlined below.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Yoga Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: Directly targeting vulnerabilities within the Yoga library itself. This could involve exploiting parsing flaws, calculation errors, or memory safety issues in Yoga's C/C++ core.
    • Potential Impact: DoS, UI corruption, application crashes, and in severe cases, potentially code execution or information disclosure if memory safety vulnerabilities are exploited.
    • Mitigation:
      • Keep Yoga library updated to the latest version.
      • Conduct security audits and code reviews of Yoga integration.
      • Implement robust error handling for Yoga operations.
      • Consider using memory safety tools during development and testing.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Input Parsing Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Sending specially crafted or malformed layout instructions to Yoga to trigger parsing errors, resource exhaustion, or unexpected behavior.

    • Potential Impact: DoS, UI corruption, application crashes.

    • Mitigation:

      • Input Validation: Implement strict input validation and sanitization for all data used to construct Yoga layout definitions.
      • Complexity Limits: Set limits on layout complexity (e.g., nesting depth, number of nodes).
      • Resource Monitoring: Monitor resource usage during layout parsing and calculation.
      • Fuzzing: Fuzz test Yoga input parsing with a wide range of inputs.

    • 3.1. Malformed Layout Instructions [HIGH RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Sending layout instructions that are syntactically incorrect or violate expected structure.

      • Potential Impact: Parsing errors, application crashes, DoS.

      • Mitigation: Strict schema validation of layout instructions, robust error handling in parsing logic.

      • 3.1.1. Send excessively complex layout instructions [HIGH RISK PATH]:

        • Attack Vector: Creating and sending extremely complex layout structures.

        • Potential Impact: Stack overflow, excessive resource consumption, DoS.

        • Mitigation: Limit layout complexity (nesting depth, node count), resource monitoring, implement timeouts for layout calculations.

        • 3.1.1.1. Deeply nested layout structures [HIGH RISK PATH]:

          • Attack Vector: Specifically crafting layouts with very deep nesting.
          • Potential Impact: Stack overflow, DoS.
          • Mitigation: Limit nesting depth, stack size monitoring (if applicable).

      • 3.2. Invalid property values [HIGH RISK PATH]:

        • Attack Vector: Providing invalid or unexpected values for layout properties.
        • Potential Impact: Parsing errors, unexpected layout behavior, UI corruption, crashes.
        • Mitigation: Strict validation of property values against expected types and ranges, robust error handling.

      • 3.3. Large or unbounded input sizes [HIGH RISK PATH]:

        • Attack Vector: Sending very large layout definitions or data sets.
        • Potential Impact: Memory exhaustion, processing delays, DoS.
        • Mitigation: Limit input sizes, implement pagination or streaming for large datasets, resource monitoring.

    • 3.4. Resource exhaustion during layout calculation [HIGH RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Crafting layout definitions that are computationally expensive for Yoga to calculate.
      • Potential Impact: CPU exhaustion, DoS.
      • Mitigation: Limit layout complexity, implement timeouts for layout calculations, resource monitoring.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Memory Safety Vulnerabilities (Yoga C/C++ Core) [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting memory management errors in Yoga's C/C++ core, such as buffer overflows, use-after-free, double-free, or memory leaks.

    • Potential Impact: Application crashes, DoS, code execution, information disclosure.

    • Mitigation:

      • Keep Yoga updated to benefit from security patches.
      • Use memory safety tools (AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer) during development and testing.
      • Conduct thorough code reviews focusing on memory management.
      • Employ secure C/C++ coding practices.

    • 4.1. Memory leaks [HIGH RISK PATH - DoS over time]:

      • Attack Vector: Triggering memory leaks in Yoga through specific input or usage patterns.
      • Potential Impact: Gradual memory exhaustion leading to application instability and eventual DoS over time.
      • Mitigation: Memory leak detection tools, regular memory profiling, code reviews focusing on memory allocation and deallocation.

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Application's Yoga Integration [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]

  • Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in the application's code that integrates with Yoga, rather than in Yoga itself. This often involves issues in how the application handles input data, manages layout state, or interprets Yoga's output.

    • Potential Impact: UI corruption, logic flaws, UI Redress/Clickjacking, information disclosure, DoS.

    • Mitigation:

      • Secure coding practices in application's Yoga integration code.
      • Thorough testing of Yoga integration logic.
      • Input validation and sanitization at the application level.
      • Security reviews of application's layout logic and data handling.

    • 5.1. Input Data Handling Issues [CRITICAL NODE] [HIGH RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Flaws in how the application handles input data that influences Yoga layout. This includes using untrusted data directly, inadequate validation, or lack of sanitization.

      • Potential Impact: UI corruption, logic flaws, DoS, potentially injection vulnerabilities if application misinterprets layout properties.

      • Mitigation:

        • Input Sanitization: Sanitize and validate all external input before using it in Yoga layout definitions.
        • Abstraction Layer: Create an abstraction layer between external data and Yoga layout definitions.
        • Secure Data Handling Practices: Follow secure data handling principles throughout the application.

      • 5.1.1. Untrusted data directly used in Yoga layout definitions [HIGH RISK PATH]:

        • Attack Vector: Directly using untrusted data (e.g., user input, data from external sources) to construct Yoga layout definitions without proper sanitization or validation.
        • Potential Impact: Injection of malicious layout instructions, UI corruption, logic flaws.
        • Mitigation: Never directly use untrusted data in layout definitions. Always sanitize and validate input.

      • 5.1.2. Inadequate validation of data influencing layout [HIGH RISK PATH]:

        • Attack Vector: Insufficient validation of data that is used to determine layout properties or structure, even if not directly injected into layout definitions.
        • Potential Impact: Unintended layout changes, UI corruption, logic flaws.
        • Mitigation: Implement thorough validation of all data that influences layout, even indirectly.

      • 5.1.3. Lack of input sanitization for layout parameters [HIGH RISK PATH]:

        • Attack Vector: Failing to sanitize layout parameters before passing them to Yoga, potentially allowing exploitation of Yoga's parsing vulnerabilities.
        • Potential Impact: DoS, UI corruption, application crashes, depending on Yoga vulnerabilities.
        • Mitigation: Sanitize all layout parameters to ensure they conform to expected formats and values.

    • 5.2. UI Redress/Clickjacking via layout manipulation [HIGH RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Manipulating the layout to overlay malicious UI elements on top of legitimate ones, or to make legitimate elements invisible, leading to clickjacking or UI redress attacks.

      • Potential Impact: UI Redress, Clickjacking, tricking users into performing unintended actions, potentially leading to account compromise or malicious actions.

      • Mitigation:

        • UI Review: Regularly review UI design for potential redress vulnerabilities.
        • Security Headers: Implement X-Frame-Options and Content-Security-Policy (CSP) to mitigate clickjacking at the web application level (if applicable).
        • Layout Integrity Checks: Implement checks to ensure critical UI elements are not obscured or manipulated unexpectedly.

      • 5.2.1. Make legitimate UI elements invisible or obscured [HIGH RISK PATH]:

        • Attack Vector: Manipulating layout properties to make legitimate UI elements invisible or obscured by other elements.
        • Potential Impact: UI Redress, Clickjacking.
        • Mitigation: Ensure critical UI elements are always visible and interactable, implement layout integrity checks.

    • 5.3. Logic Flaws in Application's Layout Logic -> State management issues related to layout [HIGH RISK PATH]:

      • Attack Vector: Exploiting flaws in the application's state management related to layout updates. Inconsistent or incorrect state management can lead to unexpected layout behavior and potentially exploitable logic flaws.
      • Potential Impact: UI corruption, logic flaws, unexpected application behavior.
      • Mitigation:
        • Robust State Management: Use well-defined state management patterns and libraries.
        • State Transition Testing: Thoroughly test state transitions related to layout updates.
        • Code Reviews: Review application logic for state management issues.