Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
209 lines (160 loc) · 17.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

209 lines (160 loc) · 17.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for facebook/yoga

Mitigation Strategy: Limit Layout Complexity

  • Description:

    1. Identify key layout areas: Analyze your application's UI to pinpoint areas where Yoga layouts are dynamically generated or potentially complex (e.g., lists, grids, dynamic forms).
    2. Set maximum nesting depth: Define a maximum allowed depth for the Yoga node tree. Implement checks during Yoga layout creation to prevent exceeding this depth. If the limit is reached, log an error and potentially simplify the layout or refuse to render it.
    3. Limit child node count: Establish a maximum number of child nodes allowed for any single Yoga node. Enforce this limit during Yoga layout construction. If exceeded, log an error and handle gracefully (e.g., truncate lists, simplify complex elements).
    4. Restrict dynamic property ranges: For Yoga layout properties like flex-basis, width, and height that are dynamically set, define reasonable maximum and minimum values. Validate input data against these ranges before applying them to Yoga nodes.
    5. Regularly review layout performance: Periodically profile your application's Yoga layout performance, especially in areas identified as potentially complex. Identify and refactor Yoga layouts that are consistently slow or resource-intensive.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Complex Layout Calculations (Severity: High)
      • Memory Exhaustion due to Deeply Nested Layouts (Severity: Medium)

    • Impact:

      • DoS due to Complex Layout Calculations: High Reduction
      • Memory Exhaustion due to Deeply Nested Layouts: Medium Reduction

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented

      • Maximum nesting depth is defined in UI guidelines document.
      • Basic input validation exists for some dynamic properties in form components.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Enforcement of maximum nesting depth and child node count in Yoga layout creation code.
      • Comprehensive input validation for all dynamically set Yoga layout properties across the application.
      • Automated Yoga layout performance monitoring and alerting.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Quotas for Layout Calculations

  • Description:

    1. Implement Layout Timeout: Wrap Yoga layout calculation calls with a timeout mechanism. Use asynchronous operations or timers to interrupt Yoga layout calculations that exceed a predefined duration (e.g., 100ms, 500ms).
    2. Error Handling for Timeout: When a Yoga layout timeout occurs, log a detailed error message including the context of the Yoga layout calculation. Implement fallback behavior, such as displaying a simplified layout or an error message to the user, instead of crashing or hanging the application.
    3. CPU and Memory Monitoring: Integrate system monitoring tools or libraries to track CPU and memory usage during Yoga layout operations. Establish thresholds for acceptable resource consumption.
    4. Circuit Breaker/Throttling: If resource usage exceeds thresholds repeatedly or Yoga layout timeouts occur frequently in a specific area, implement a circuit breaker pattern to temporarily halt or throttle Yoga layout calculations in that area. This prevents cascading failures and protects system resources.
    5. Adjust Quotas Based on Performance: Continuously monitor Yoga layout performance and resource usage in production. Adjust timeout values and resource thresholds based on observed performance and user experience.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Complex Layout Calculations (Severity: High)

    • Impact:

      • DoS due to Complex Layout Calculations: High Reduction

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented

      • Basic timeout mechanism exists for initial page load layout.
      • CPU and memory monitoring is in place at the server level, but not specifically for client-side Yoga layout calculations.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Granular timeout mechanisms for individual Yoga layout components or sections.
      • Detailed error handling and fallback behavior for Yoga layout timeouts.
      • Client-side CPU and memory monitoring specifically for Yoga layout operations.
      • Circuit breaker or throttling mechanisms for excessive Yoga layout resource consumption.

Mitigation Strategy: Background Layout Processing

  • Description:

    1. Identify Blocking Layout Operations: Profile your application to identify Yoga layout operations that block the main UI thread, causing jank or unresponsiveness.
    2. Offload to Background Threads/Processes: Refactor code to move computationally intensive Yoga layout calculations to background threads or processes. Utilize threading or concurrency mechanisms provided by your development platform (e.g., Web Workers in JavaScript, threads in native languages).
    3. Asynchronous Yoga APIs: Utilize asynchronous APIs provided by your Yoga bindings if available. This allows Yoga layout calculations to run concurrently without blocking the main thread.
    4. Communication with Main Thread: Establish a communication mechanism between background threads/processes and the main UI thread to pass Yoga layout results back for rendering. Use message passing or shared memory techniques.
    5. Progressive Layout Rendering: Consider implementing progressive rendering techniques. Calculate and render initial Yoga layouts quickly in the foreground to provide immediate feedback to the user, and then refine or complete more complex Yoga layouts in the background.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Complex Layout Calculations (Severity: Medium - Reduces impact on user experience)

    • Impact:

      • DoS due to Complex Layout Calculations: Medium Reduction (Improves responsiveness under DoS conditions)

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented

      • Image loading and some data fetching are done in background threads.
      • Initial rendering of basic UI elements is prioritized.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Systematic offloading of complex Yoga layout calculations to background threads.
      • Use of asynchronous Yoga APIs where available.
      • Robust communication mechanism for passing Yoga layout results back to the main thread.
      • Progressive Yoga layout rendering strategy for complex UI components.

Mitigation Strategy: Caching Layout Results

  • Description:

    1. Identify Cacheable Layouts: Analyze your application to identify UI elements or components with static or infrequently changing Yoga layouts (e.g., navigation bars, headers, footers, static content sections).
    2. Implement Layout Cache: Create a caching mechanism to store the results of Yoga layout calculations. Use a suitable data structure like a hash map or dictionary, keyed by Yoga layout configuration or input data.
    3. Cache Invalidation Strategy: Define a clear cache invalidation strategy. Determine conditions under which cached Yoga layouts should be invalidated and recalculated (e.g., data changes, configuration updates, UI theme changes).
    4. Cache Size Limits: Implement limits on the size of the Yoga layout cache to prevent excessive memory usage. Use eviction policies (e.g., LRU - Least Recently Used) to manage cache size.
    5. Cache Persistence (Optional): For frequently accessed Yoga layouts, consider persisting the cache to local storage or disk to improve startup performance and reduce initial Yoga layout calculation time.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Complex Layout Calculations (Severity: Medium - Reduces frequency of calculations)

    • Impact:

      • DoS due to Complex Layout Calculations: Medium Reduction (Reduces load on the system)

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented

      • Browser-level caching is used for static assets.
      • Simple in-memory caching exists for some data-driven components.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Dedicated Yoga layout result caching mechanism for Yoga calculations.
      • Comprehensive cache invalidation strategy for Yoga layout caches.
      • Cache size limits and eviction policies for Yoga layout caches.
      • Persistence of Yoga layout caches for improved startup performance.

Mitigation Strategy: Schema Validation for Layout Definitions

  • Description:

    1. Define Layout Schema: Create a formal schema (e.g., JSON Schema, XML Schema) that defines the expected structure, data types, and constraints for your Yoga layout definitions, especially if they are dynamically generated or received from external sources.
    2. Schema Validation Library: Integrate a schema validation library appropriate for your chosen schema format into your application.
    3. Validate Input Layouts: Before processing any dynamically generated Yoga layout definitions with Yoga, validate them against the defined schema using the validation library.
    4. Error Handling for Validation Failures: Implement robust error handling for schema validation failures. Log detailed error messages indicating the validation errors and reject invalid Yoga layout definitions. Provide fallback behavior or error messages to the user.
    5. Schema Updates and Versioning: Establish a process for updating and versioning your Yoga layout schema. Ensure that your application can handle different schema versions gracefully and provide backward compatibility if necessary.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Input Validation Vulnerabilities in Layout Definitions (Severity: Medium - Prevents unexpected behavior and potential exploits if Yoga layout definitions are maliciously crafted)

    • Impact:

      • Input Validation Vulnerabilities in Layout Definitions: Medium Reduction (Prevents processing of malformed or malicious Yoga layouts)

    • Currently Implemented: No Implementation

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Definition of a formal schema for Yoga layout definitions.
      • Integration of a schema validation library.
      • Implementation of schema validation for dynamically generated Yoga layouts.
      • Error handling for schema validation failures.
      • Schema versioning and update process for Yoga layouts.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update Yoga Library

  • Description:

    1. Dependency Management: Use a robust dependency management system for your project (e.g., npm, Maven, Gradle).
    2. Monitor for Updates: Regularly check for updates to the Yoga library. Subscribe to Yoga project release notes, security advisories, or use dependency scanning tools to automate update notifications.
    3. Test Updates Thoroughly: Before deploying Yoga library updates to production, thoroughly test them in a staging or testing environment. Run regression tests and perform security testing to ensure the update does not introduce new issues or break existing functionality.
    4. Automated Update Process (Optional): Consider automating the Yoga library update process, including dependency updates, testing, and deployment, to ensure timely application of updates.
    5. Rollback Plan: Have a rollback plan in place in case a Yoga library update introduces critical issues or breaks your application. Be prepared to quickly revert to the previous stable version if necessary.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Vulnerabilities in Yoga Library (Severity: Varies - Depends on the specific vulnerability, can range from Low to High)

    • Impact:

      • Vulnerabilities in Yoga Library: High Reduction (Addresses known vulnerabilities in the library itself)

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented

      • Dependency management system is in place.
      • Manual checks for library updates are performed periodically.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Automated monitoring for Yoga library updates and security advisories.
      • Automated testing process for Yoga library updates.
      • Automated update process and rollback plan for Yoga library.

Mitigation Strategy: Code Reviews Focused on Yoga Usage

  • Description:

    1. Establish Yoga-Specific Review Checklist: Create a checklist of items to specifically review during code reviews related to Yoga usage. This checklist should include items like:
      • Proper Yoga API usage (node creation, property setting, layout calculation).
      • Memory management and resource cleanup for Yoga objects.
      • Handling of dynamically generated Yoga layout definitions.
      • Error handling for Yoga operations.
      • Performance considerations for Yoga layout calculations.
    2. Train Developers on Yoga Security: Provide training to developers on potential security risks associated with Yoga usage and best practices for secure development with Yoga.
    3. Dedicated Yoga Code Reviewers: Identify team members with expertise in Yoga and assign them as dedicated reviewers for code changes that involve Yoga usage.
    4. Regular Code Review Cadence: Incorporate code reviews into your development workflow as a standard practice for all code changes, including those related to Yoga.
    5. Document Yoga Best Practices: Document best practices for secure and efficient Yoga usage within your project's development guidelines.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Vulnerabilities due to Misuse of Yoga API (Severity: Medium - Prevents errors and potential vulnerabilities arising from incorrect API usage)
      • Inefficient Layouts Leading to DoS (Severity: Low - Identifies and prevents performance bottlenecks that could be exploited)

    • Impact:

      • Vulnerabilities due to Misuse of Yoga API: Medium Reduction
      • Inefficient Layouts Leading to DoS: Low Reduction

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented

      • Code reviews are a standard practice in the development process.
      • Basic coding guidelines exist.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Yoga-specific code review checklist.
      • Developer training on Yoga security best practices.
      • Dedicated Yoga code reviewers.
      • Documented Yoga best practices in development guidelines.

Mitigation Strategy: Static Analysis and Fuzzing (If Applicable)

  • Description:

    1. Static Analysis Tool Integration: Integrate static analysis tools into your development pipeline. Choose tools that can analyze code for potential vulnerabilities, coding errors, and style violations in the languages used with Yoga (e.g., JavaScript, C++, Java).
    2. Configure Static Analysis Rules: Configure static analysis tools with rules that are relevant to secure Yoga usage, such as checks for memory leaks related to Yoga objects, resource leaks, input validation issues in Yoga layout definitions, and potential performance bottlenecks in Yoga layout calculations.
    3. Automated Static Analysis: Run static analysis tools automatically as part of your build process or CI/CD pipeline. Fail builds or generate alerts for detected issues related to Yoga usage.
    4. Fuzzing for Layout Input (If Applicable): If your application dynamically generates Yoga layout definitions based on external input, consider using fuzzing techniques to test the robustness of your Yoga layout generation logic. Generate a wide range of valid and invalid input data to identify crashes, errors, or unexpected behavior in Yoga.
    5. Analyze Fuzzing Results: Analyze the results of fuzzing tests to identify and fix any vulnerabilities or weaknesses in Yoga layout handling revealed by the fuzzer.

    • Threats Mitigated:

      • Vulnerabilities due to Code Errors in Yoga Usage (Severity: Medium - Detects potential bugs and vulnerabilities in application code interacting with Yoga)
      • Input Validation Vulnerabilities in Layout Definitions (Severity: Medium - Fuzzing can uncover unexpected behavior with various inputs to Yoga layouts)

    • Impact:

      • Vulnerabilities due to Code Errors in Yoga Usage: Medium Reduction
      • Input Validation Vulnerabilities in Layout Definitions: Medium Reduction

    • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented

      • Static analysis tools are used for general code quality checks.

    • Missing Implementation:

      • Static analysis rules specifically configured for secure Yoga usage.
      • Automated static analysis in the CI/CD pipeline for Yoga related code.
      • Fuzzing of Yoga layout input generation logic.
      • Analysis and remediation of fuzzing results related to Yoga.