Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
70 lines (55 loc) · 8.14 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

70 lines (55 loc) · 8.14 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for fmtlib/fmt

Objective: Compromise application using fmtlib/fmt vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application via fmtlib/fmt [HR] ├─── OR ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ├─── Exploit Format String Injection (Application-Side) [HR] │ └─── AND ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │ ├─── Attacker Controls Input Data [CRITICAL - Input Control Point] │ ├─── Application Unsafely Constructs Format String with User Input [CRITICAL - Vulnerable Code Practice] │ └─── Exploit Format String Vulnerability (Indirectly via Application Logic) [HR] │ └─── OR ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │ ├─── Information Disclosure [HR] │ ├─── Denial of Service (DoS) [HR] ├─── Cause Denial of Service (DoS) via fmt [HR] │ └─── OR ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │ ├─── Resource Exhaustion (CPU) [HR] │ │ └─── AND ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │ │ ├─── Attacker Sends Maliciously Crafted Format String [CRITICAL - Input Vector for DoS] │ ├─── Resource Exhaustion (Memory) [HR] │ │ └─── AND ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── │ │ ├─── Attacker Sends Format String Leading to Extremely Large Output [CRITICAL - Input Vector for DoS]

Attack Tree Path: Exploit Format String Injection (Application-Side) [HR]

  • Description: This path focuses on vulnerabilities arising from the application's misuse of fmtlib/fmt, specifically when user-controlled input is involved in constructing format strings. Even though fmt is designed to be safer than printf, improper application-side handling can reintroduce format string injection risks.

  • Critical Node: Attacker Controls Input Data [CRITICAL - Input Control Point]

    • Significance: This node highlights the fundamental vulnerability: if an attacker can influence data that the application processes, they can potentially manipulate application behavior. This is the entry point for many attack types, not just format string injection.
    • Examples: HTTP request parameters, user form inputs, uploaded files, data from external APIs.
    • Mitigation: Implement robust input validation and sanitization at all input points. Treat all external data as potentially malicious.

  • Critical Node: Application Unsafely Constructs Format String with User Input [CRITICAL - Vulnerable Code Practice]

    • Significance: This node represents the core coding error that leads to format string injection. Directly embedding user input into format strings for fmt::format is a dangerous practice.
    • Example: fmt::format("User input: {}", user_input); where user_input comes directly from user-provided data. If user_input contains format specifiers, they will be processed.
    • Mitigation: Never construct format strings dynamically using user input. Use compile-time format strings (string literals) whenever possible. If dynamic formatting is absolutely necessary, ensure the format string itself is not user-controlled and sanitize user-provided data intended for arguments, not the format string itself.

  • High-Risk Path: Exploit Format String Vulnerability (Indirectly via Application Logic) [HR]

    • Description: Even if direct code execution is unlikely with fmt, format string injection can still lead to information disclosure or denial of service by manipulating the output or behavior of the formatting process.

    • High-Risk Path: Information Disclosure [HR]

      • Description: By injecting specific format specifiers, an attacker might be able to leak sensitive information such as memory addresses, stack data, or environment variables if the application's logic or error handling inadvertently exposes this information.
      • Example: If error messages generated by fmt processing include memory addresses or internal data due to injected format specifiers like %p (though less directly exploitable in fmt than in printf), or if application logic then exposes these error messages.
      • Mitigation: Avoid using format specifiers that could reveal sensitive information (like %p, %n in printf - less relevant in fmt but still good practice to be aware of). Carefully review error handling and logging to prevent information leakage.

    • High-Risk Path: Denial of Service (DoS) [HR]

      • Description: Crafted format strings can cause excessive resource consumption (CPU or memory) by fmt, leading to application unresponsiveness or crashes.
      • Example: Injecting format strings with extremely long width/precision specifiers, deeply nested formatting, or causing repeated formatting of large datasets.
      • Mitigation: Implement input validation to limit the complexity and size of data being formatted. Set resource limits for the application. Implement rate limiting and request throttling to prevent rapid DoS attempts.

Attack Tree Path: Cause Denial of Service (DoS) via fmt [HR]

  • Description: This path directly targets the availability of the application by exploiting fmt's processing to cause resource exhaustion.

  • High-Risk Path: Resource Exhaustion (CPU) [HR]

    • Description: Attackers send format strings that are computationally expensive for fmt to parse and format, leading to high CPU usage and application slowdown or unresponsiveness.
    • Critical Node: Attacker Sends Maliciously Crafted Format String [CRITICAL - Input Vector for DoS]
      • Significance: This node highlights the input vector for CPU-based DoS. Malicious format strings are the weapon.
      • Examples: Extremely long format strings, deeply nested format specifiers, excessive precision/width specifiers.
      • Mitigation: Implement input validation to limit the length and complexity of format strings and data being formatted. Set timeouts for formatting operations. Monitor CPU usage and implement alerts for unusual spikes.

  • High-Risk Path: Resource Exhaustion (Memory) [HR]

    • Description: Attackers send format strings that cause fmt to allocate excessive memory, leading to memory exhaustion and application crashes or instability.
    • Critical Node: Attacker Sends Format String Leading to Extremely Large Output [CRITICAL - Input Vector for DoS]
      • Significance: This node highlights the input vector for memory-based DoS. Format strings designed to generate huge outputs are the weapon.
      • Examples: Using width/precision specifiers to generate very long strings, repeated formatting of large data chunks.
      • Mitigation: Implement input validation to limit the size of data being formatted and the potential output string length. Set memory limits for the application. Monitor memory usage and implement alerts for unusual spikes.