Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
265 lines (195 loc) · 24.6 KB

sec-design.md

File metadata and controls

265 lines (195 loc) · 24.6 KB

Project Design Document: FlatBuffers (Improved)

Version: 1.1 Date: 2023-10-27 Author: AI Expert

1. Introduction

This document provides an enhanced design overview of the FlatBuffers project, an efficient cross-platform serialization library. It builds upon the previous version to offer greater detail and a stronger focus on security considerations, crucial for effective threat modeling. FlatBuffers targets developers of performance-critical applications across various domains, including game development, networking, and data storage.

This document aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the system's architecture, components, and data flow, specifically tailored for security analysis and threat modeling. It emphasizes the "zero-copy" deserialization feature of FlatBuffers and its security implications.

This document covers the following aspects:

  • Project Overview and Goals (Refined)
  • System Architecture (Enhanced Diagram)
  • Component Descriptions (Detailed with Security Focus)
  • Data Flow (Security-Oriented View)
  • Technology Stack
  • Security Considerations (Expanded and Structured)

2. Project Overview and Goals (Refined)

Project Name: FlatBuffers

Project Repository: https://github.com/google/flatbuffers

Project Description (from GitHub):

FlatBuffers is an efficient cross-platform serialization library for C++, C#, Go, Java, Kotlin, Lobster, Lua, TypeScript, PHP, Python, and Rust. It was originally created at Google for game development and other performance-critical applications.

Target Audience: Developers of performance-critical applications requiring efficient data serialization and deserialization, particularly in resource-constrained environments or where latency is critical.

Key Goals (Refined):

  • Extreme Efficiency: Minimize CPU and memory overhead during serialization and, critically, deserialization.
  • Zero-Copy Deserialization: Enable direct, in-place access to serialized data, eliminating the need for parsing and unpacking, thus maximizing performance. This is a core design principle with significant security ramifications.
  • Cross-Platform & Multi-Language Support: Broad compatibility across diverse programming languages and operating systems to facilitate interoperability.
  • Schema Evolution & Compatibility: Support for evolving data structures while maintaining backward and forward compatibility to ensure system robustness over time.
  • Data Structure Flexibility: Support for optional fields, unions, and complex data types to accommodate diverse application needs.

Use Cases (Expanded):

  • High-Performance Networking: Serialization for network protocols where low latency and high throughput are paramount.
  • Game Development: Efficient data serialization for game assets, game state, and network communication in games.
  • Data Storage and Retrieval: Optimized storage format for large datasets requiring fast access and minimal storage footprint.
  • Inter-Process Communication (IPC): Efficient data exchange between processes, especially in performance-sensitive systems.
  • Resource-Constrained Environments: Suitable for mobile devices, embedded systems, and other environments with limited CPU and memory resources.

3. System Architecture (Enhanced Diagram)

The FlatBuffers system architecture is centered around schema-driven serialization and direct data access. The diagram below highlights the key stages and emphasizes the "zero-copy" aspect:

graph LR
    subgraph "Schema Definition & Compilation"
        A["Schema Definition File '.fbs'"] --> B("`flatc` Compiler");
        B --> C["Generated Code (Language Specific)"];
    end

    subgraph "Serialization (Sender Side)"
        D["Application Data"] --> E["FlatBuffers Builder Library"];
        E --> F["Serialized FlatBuffer (Binary Data)"];
    end

    subgraph "Deserialization & Direct Data Access (Receiver Side) - Zero-Copy"
        F --> G["FlatBuffers Runtime Library"];
        G --> H["Direct In-Place Data Access in Application"];
        H --> I["No Deserialization Step"];
    end

    style A fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style C fill:#ccf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style F fill:#bfc,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style H fill:#eee,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px

    linkStyle 0,1,2,3,4,5,6 stroke-width:2px,stroke:#333;
Loading

Explanation of Enhanced Architecture Diagram:

  1. Schema Definition (.fbs): Data structures are formally defined using the FlatBuffers IDL in .fbs files. This schema is the blueprint for serialization and deserialization.
  2. Schema Compilation (flatc): The flatc compiler translates the .fbs schema into optimized, language-specific code. This generated code is essential for both serialization and direct data access.
  3. Serialization (Sender):
    • The application prepares its data.
    • The FlatBuffers Builder Library, guided by the generated code, serializes this data into a binary FlatBuffer.
  4. Deserialization & Direct Data Access (Receiver) - Zero-Copy:
    • The receiving application obtains the serialized FlatBuffer.
    • The FlatBuffers Runtime Library, along with the generated code, enables direct, in-place access to the data within the binary buffer.
    • Zero-Copy Highlight: There is no explicit deserialization step that copies data into separate data structures. Data is accessed directly from the buffer, which is a key performance and security characteristic.

4. Component Descriptions (Detailed with Security Focus)

This section provides detailed descriptions of each component, emphasizing their functionality and security implications.

4.1. Schema Definition File (.fbs)

  • Functionality: Defines the data structures (tables, structs, enums, unions, vectors, etc.) and their relationships using the FlatBuffers IDL. The schema is the contract between the sender and receiver of FlatBuffers messages.

  • Security Relevance:

    • Schema Complexity & Attack Surface: Complex schemas, especially those with deep nesting, unions, or recursive structures, can increase the attack surface. They might introduce vulnerabilities in the compiler or runtime libraries when processing these complex structures.
    • Schema Injection (Indirect Vulnerability): While not directly executable code, a maliciously crafted schema could be designed to trigger vulnerabilities in the flatc compiler or the runtime libraries. For instance, a schema with extremely large vectors or deeply nested structures could lead to resource exhaustion or stack overflow during compilation or runtime processing.
    • Schema Validation & Trust: Schemas should be treated as critical configuration. Using untrusted or unvalidated schemas can be risky. Schema validation processes are important, especially in systems where schemas are dynamically loaded or received from external sources.
    • Schema Evolution & Compatibility Issues: Incorrect schema evolution or lack of proper versioning can lead to compatibility issues between sender and receiver, potentially causing data corruption or unexpected behavior, which could have security implications.

    Potential Threats:

    • Compiler crashes due to maliciously crafted schemas.
    • Resource exhaustion during compilation or runtime due to schema complexity.
    • Schema mismatch vulnerabilities leading to incorrect data interpretation.

4.2. flatc Compiler

  • Functionality: The flatc compiler is a crucial tool that parses .fbs schema files and generates optimized source code in various target languages. It performs schema validation and code generation.

  • Security Relevance:

    • Compiler Vulnerabilities (Code Injection/Exploitation): Bugs in the flatc compiler could potentially be exploited to inject malicious code into the generated output or cause the compiler to behave in an insecure manner. While less likely in mature projects, compiler security is paramount.
    • Code Generation Flaws (Vulnerable Code Output): Errors in the code generation logic could result in generated code that contains vulnerabilities, such as buffer overflows, integer overflows, or incorrect memory management.
    • Dependency Vulnerabilities: The flatc compiler itself may rely on external libraries. Vulnerabilities in these dependencies could indirectly affect the security of the compiler and its output.
    • Build Process Security: A compromised build environment for flatc could lead to a backdoored compiler, which would then generate compromised code.

    Potential Threats:

    • Compiler crashes or unexpected behavior due to malicious schemas.
    • Generation of vulnerable code (e.g., buffer overflows in generated accessors).
    • Compromise of the compiler itself leading to supply chain attacks.

4.3. Generated Code (Language Specific)

  • Functionality: The output of the flatc compiler. This code provides language-specific APIs for building and accessing FlatBuffers. It includes classes and functions that directly reflect the schema definitions.

  • Security Relevance:

    • Code Quality & Vulnerabilities: The generated code must be robust and free from common programming errors. Vulnerabilities in generated code directly translate to vulnerabilities in applications using FlatBuffers.
    • API Design & Misuse Prevention: The generated APIs should be designed to minimize the risk of misuse that could lead to security issues. For example, access methods should perform bounds checks and handle invalid data gracefully to prevent crashes or information leaks.
    • Language-Specific Security Context: The security characteristics of the target language influence the security of the generated code. For example, memory safety in C++ requires more careful attention in generated code compared to memory-managed languages like Java or Python.
    • Data Accessor Security: Generated accessor methods (e.g., GetField(), GetVector()) are critical for zero-copy access. These must be implemented securely to prevent out-of-bounds reads or other memory access violations.

    Potential Threats:

    • Buffer overflows or out-of-bounds reads in generated accessor methods.
    • Integer overflows in size calculations within generated code.
    • Logic errors in generated code leading to incorrect data interpretation or processing.

4.4. FlatBuffers Builder Library (Runtime - Serialization)

  • Functionality: Provides the runtime logic for serializing application data into the FlatBuffers binary format. It handles buffer allocation, offset calculation, and data layout according to the schema.

  • Security Relevance:

    • Serialization Logic Vulnerabilities: Bugs in the serialization logic could lead to malformed FlatBuffers that might trigger vulnerabilities in the runtime library during deserialization/access.
    • Buffer Management Issues (Overflows/Underflows): Incorrect buffer management during serialization could lead to buffer overflows or other memory corruption issues.
    • Resource Exhaustion (DoS during Serialization): Malicious input data or excessively large data structures could be crafted to cause excessive resource consumption (CPU, memory) during serialization, leading to Denial of Service.
    • Integer Overflows in Size Calculations: Integer overflows when calculating buffer sizes or offsets during serialization could lead to buffer overflows or other memory corruption issues.

    Potential Threats:

    • Buffer overflows during serialization due to incorrect size calculations.
    • Resource exhaustion (DoS) due to processing very large or complex data structures.
    • Generation of malformed FlatBuffers that exploit vulnerabilities in the runtime library.

4.5. Serialized FlatBuffer (Binary Data)

  • Functionality: The binary representation of serialized data, structured according to the FlatBuffers format and schema. It is the unit of data exchange and storage.

  • Security Relevance:

    • Data Integrity & Tampering: The integrity of the serialized FlatBuffer is paramount. Tampering with the binary data can lead to incorrect data access, application crashes, or even security breaches if the data is used for access control or critical decision-making.
    • Data Confidentiality (Exposure of Sensitive Data): If the FlatBuffer contains sensitive information, it needs to be protected during transmission and storage. FlatBuffers itself does not provide encryption, so this must be handled externally.
    • Malicious Payloads (Exploitation Vector): A maliciously crafted FlatBuffer is the primary attack vector against the runtime library and applications using FlatBuffers. Exploits target vulnerabilities in the runtime library's data access logic.
    • Schema Mismatch Exploitation: A FlatBuffer serialized with one schema and processed with a different, incompatible schema can lead to unexpected behavior and potential vulnerabilities.

    Potential Threats:

    • Data corruption or manipulation leading to application errors or security breaches.
    • Exposure of sensitive data if confidentiality is not properly addressed.
    • Exploitation of runtime library vulnerabilities through crafted FlatBuffers.
    • Denial of Service attacks via malformed or excessively large FlatBuffers.

4.6. FlatBuffers Runtime Library (Runtime - Deserialization & Direct Data Access)

  • Functionality: Provides the core runtime logic for accessing data directly from a serialized FlatBuffer. It implements the zero-copy access mechanism, navigating the buffer based on offsets and data types defined in the schema.

  • Security Relevance:

    • Zero-Copy Access Vulnerabilities (Out-of-Bounds Reads): The zero-copy access mechanism, while efficient, requires careful bounds checking and offset validation. Vulnerabilities in this logic can lead to out-of-bounds reads, potentially leaking sensitive information or causing crashes.
    • Buffer Overflow/Underflow during Access: Incorrect handling of buffer boundaries during data access, especially when dealing with untrusted FlatBuffers, can lead to buffer overflows or underflows.
    • Denial of Service (DoS during Access): Maliciously crafted FlatBuffers can be designed to trigger expensive operations or excessive memory access within the runtime library, leading to Denial of Service. This could involve deeply nested structures, large vectors, or carefully crafted offsets.
    • Schema Mismatch Handling Vulnerabilities: If the runtime library does not properly handle schema mismatches, it could lead to incorrect data interpretation or vulnerabilities when processing FlatBuffers serialized with incompatible schemas.
    • Integer Overflows in Offset Calculations: Integer overflows when calculating offsets within the FlatBuffer during data access can lead to out-of-bounds reads or other memory corruption issues.

    Potential Threats:

    • Out-of-bounds reads leading to information disclosure or crashes.
    • Buffer overflows or underflows during data access.
    • Denial of Service attacks through crafted FlatBuffers.
    • Exploitation of schema mismatch vulnerabilities.
    • Integer overflows in offset calculations.

4.7. Application Data

  • Functionality: The raw data that the application intends to serialize and deserialize using FlatBuffers. This is the application's domain-specific data.

  • Security Relevance:

    • Data Validation & Sanitization (Input to Serialization): Applications should validate and sanitize data before serialization to ensure it conforms to expected formats and constraints. This helps prevent issues arising from unexpected or malicious data being serialized and potentially triggering vulnerabilities later during deserialization/access.
    • Sensitive Data Handling (Confidentiality & Integrity): Applications are responsible for handling sensitive data appropriately both before serialization and after deserialization/access. This includes implementing encryption, access control, and other security measures as needed.
    • Data Interpretation & Trust (Output of Deserialization): Applications must carefully interpret the data accessed from FlatBuffers and not blindly trust it, especially if the FlatBuffer originates from an untrusted source. Data validation after deserialization/access is also important.

    Potential Threats:

    • Injection of malicious data through application inputs that are then serialized.
    • Exposure of sensitive data if not properly handled by the application.
    • Application logic vulnerabilities due to incorrect interpretation of deserialized data.

5. Data Flow (Security-Oriented View)

The data flow, viewed through a security lens, highlights critical points where vulnerabilities could be introduced or exploited:

  1. Untrusted Schema Input to flatc: If the .fbs schema file comes from an untrusted source, it could be malicious and exploit vulnerabilities in the flatc compiler. Security Control: Schema validation, trusted schema sources.
  2. Unvalidated Application Data to Builder Library: If application data is not validated before serialization, it could contain malicious content that triggers vulnerabilities during serialization or later during deserialization/access. Security Control: Input validation before serialization.
  3. Serialized FlatBuffer Transmission/Storage (Untrusted Channel): If the serialized FlatBuffer is transmitted over an untrusted network or stored in an insecure location, it is vulnerable to tampering or eavesdropping. Security Control: Encryption, integrity checks (checksums, signatures), secure channels.
  4. Untrusted Serialized FlatBuffer to Runtime Library: The runtime library receives the serialized FlatBuffer, which could be maliciously crafted. This is the primary point of attack. Security Control: Robust runtime library implementation, input validation within the runtime library (bounds checks, offset validation), sandboxing/isolation.
  5. Application Direct Data Access (Untrusted Data): The application accesses data directly from the FlatBuffer buffer. The application must treat this data as potentially untrusted, especially if the FlatBuffer source is untrusted. Security Control: Output validation, secure data handling within the application, principle of least privilege.

Key Data Flow Points for Security Consideration (Expanded):

  • Schema Input: Threat: Malicious schema exploits compiler vulnerabilities. Mitigation: Schema validation, trusted schema repository.
  • Serialization Input: Threat: Malicious data triggers serialization vulnerabilities or creates exploitable FlatBuffers. Mitigation: Input validation before serialization, resource limits during serialization.
  • Transmission/Storage: Threat: Tampering or eavesdropping on serialized data. Mitigation: Encryption, integrity checks, secure transport/storage.
  • Deserialization/Access Input: Threat: Malicious FlatBuffer exploits runtime library vulnerabilities. Mitigation: Robust runtime library, input validation within runtime library, sandboxing.
  • Application Data Output: Threat: Application vulnerabilities due to mishandling of potentially malicious data from FlatBuffers. Mitigation: Output validation, secure coding practices in application, principle of least privilege.

6. Technology Stack

  • Core Language: C++ (for flatc compiler and core runtime libraries). Security Implication: Requires careful memory management and secure coding practices to mitigate memory safety vulnerabilities inherent in C++.
  • Target Languages: C++, C#, Go, Java, Kotlin, Lobster, Lua, TypeScript, PHP, Python, Rust. Security Implication: Security characteristics vary by target language. Memory-managed languages (Java, Go, Python, Rust) offer some inherent safety advantages compared to C++ and C#.
  • Build System: CMake. Security Implication: Build process security is important to prevent supply chain attacks. Ensure CMake scripts and build environment are secure.
  • Testing Frameworks: Language-specific testing frameworks (e.g., Google Test for C++). Security Implication: Thorough testing, including security-focused testing (fuzzing, static analysis), is crucial for identifying and mitigating vulnerabilities.
  • Dependencies: External libraries used by flatc and runtime libraries. Security Implication: Dependency management and vulnerability scanning are essential to address vulnerabilities in third-party components.

7. Security Considerations (Expanded and Structured)

This section expands on the initial security considerations, providing a more structured and detailed view.

7.1. Input Validation & Sanitization:

  • Schema Validation: Rigorous validation of .fbs schema files to detect and reject malicious or malformed schemas.
  • Serialization Input Validation: Validate application data before serialization to ensure it conforms to expected types and ranges.
  • Deserialization Input Validation (within Runtime Library): The runtime library should perform internal validation of the FlatBuffer structure and offsets to detect malformed or malicious FlatBuffers.

7.2. Memory Safety & Buffer Management (C++ Focus):

  • Buffer Overflow Prevention: Implement robust bounds checking and size validation in both the builder and runtime libraries to prevent buffer overflows.
  • Out-of-Bounds Read Prevention: Carefully validate offsets and indices during data access to prevent out-of-bounds reads.
  • Memory Leak Prevention: Ensure proper memory management in C++ components to prevent memory leaks, which can lead to resource exhaustion and potentially other vulnerabilities.
  • Integer Overflow Prevention: Use safe integer arithmetic and validation to prevent integer overflows in size and offset calculations.

7.3. Denial of Service (DoS) Mitigation:

  • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits (e.g., memory allocation limits, processing time limits) during compilation, serialization, and deserialization/access to prevent resource exhaustion attacks.
  • Schema Complexity Limits: Consider imposing limits on schema complexity (e.g., maximum nesting depth, vector sizes) to mitigate DoS risks associated with overly complex schemas.
  • Rate Limiting: In network-facing applications, consider rate limiting FlatBuffer processing to prevent DoS attacks.

7.4. Data Integrity & Confidentiality:

  • Integrity Checks: Implement or recommend mechanisms for verifying the integrity of serialized FlatBuffers (e.g., checksums, digital signatures) to detect tampering.
  • Encryption: Recommend and document best practices for encrypting sensitive data within FlatBuffers or encrypting the entire serialized FlatBuffer when confidentiality is required. FlatBuffers itself does not provide encryption.
  • Secure Storage & Transmission: Advise users on secure storage and transmission practices for serialized FlatBuffers, especially when handling sensitive data.

7.5. Schema Management & Versioning:

  • Secure Schema Distribution: Establish secure channels for distributing and updating schemas to prevent schema tampering or unauthorized schema modifications.
  • Schema Versioning: Implement and enforce schema versioning to ensure compatibility and manage schema evolution securely.
  • Schema Registry/Repository: Consider using a secure schema registry or repository to manage and control access to schemas.

7.6. Vulnerability Management & Security Updates:

  • Security Audits & Code Reviews: Conduct regular security audits and code reviews of the flatc compiler and runtime libraries to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.
  • Fuzzing & Penetration Testing: Employ fuzzing and penetration testing techniques to proactively discover vulnerabilities.
  • Vulnerability Disclosure & Response: Establish a clear vulnerability disclosure and response process to handle reported security issues promptly and effectively.
  • Security Patching & Updates: Provide timely security patches and updates to address identified vulnerabilities.

This improved design document provides a more detailed and security-focused foundation for threat modeling the FlatBuffers project. It highlights key components, data flows, and security considerations, enabling a more comprehensive and effective threat analysis. The next step is to perform a detailed threat modeling exercise based on this document, identifying specific threats, vulnerabilities, and mitigation strategies.