Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
55 lines (46 loc) · 7.8 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

55 lines (46 loc) · 7.8 KB

Threat Model Analysis for google/leveldb

Threat: Denial of Service (DoS) via Resource Exhaustion

  • Description: An attacker crafts malicious requests or data patterns that exploit LevelDB's resource management, leading to excessive consumption of CPU, memory, disk I/O, or disk space. This can cause performance degradation or complete service unavailability. For example, an attacker might send a flood of write requests with specific key patterns that trigger inefficient compaction or memtable operations, overwhelming LevelDB.
  • Impact: Service downtime, application unavailability, performance degradation impacting other users, potential financial loss due to service disruption.
  • LevelDB Component Affected: Write path, Compaction module, MemTable, SSTable storage, Resource management within LevelDB.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Implement robust rate limiting and request throttling at the application level to control the volume of requests reaching LevelDB.
    • Carefully configure LevelDB's options, such as write_buffer_size, max_file_size, and compaction settings, to limit resource consumption.
    • Monitor LevelDB's resource usage (CPU, memory, disk I/O, disk space) and set up alerts for unusual spikes or exhaustion.
    • Implement input validation and sanitization to prevent excessively large keys or values that could exacerbate resource consumption.
    • Consider using resource quotas or cgroups to limit the resources available to the LevelDB process.

Threat: Database Corruption Leading to Service Downtime (due to LevelDB Bugs)

  • Description: Exploitable bugs within LevelDB's core logic, such as in the write path, compaction process, or recovery mechanisms, can lead to irreversible data corruption. This corruption can render the database unusable, preventing the application from accessing or modifying data, ultimately leading to service downtime. An attacker might trigger these bugs by providing specific data inputs or sequences of operations that expose internal vulnerabilities in LevelDB's data handling.
  • Impact: Service downtime, application unavailability, permanent data loss or requiring restoration from backups, significant business disruption and potential data integrity breaches if corrupted data is served before detection.
  • LevelDB Component Affected: Write path, Compaction module, Recovery module, SSTable format, Internal data structures and algorithms within LevelDB.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Prioritize using stable and actively maintained versions of LevelDB. Avoid using outdated or unpatched versions.
    • Stay vigilant for security advisories and promptly apply security patches released by the LevelDB development team or trusted sources.
    • Implement robust database integrity checks and validation procedures within the application to detect potential corruption early. This might involve periodic consistency checks or checksum verification beyond LevelDB's built-in mechanisms.
    • Maintain regular and tested backups of the LevelDB database to enable rapid restoration in case of severe corruption. Ensure backup procedures are reliable and backups are stored securely.
    • Thoroughly test the application's integration with LevelDB, including rigorous stress testing, fault injection, and edge case testing to uncover potential bugs or weaknesses.

Threat: Exploitable Vulnerabilities in LevelDB Code (e.g., Remote Code Execution)

  • Description: LevelDB, like any complex software, may contain exploitable vulnerabilities such as buffer overflows, integer overflows, use-after-free, or other memory safety issues. An attacker who can trigger these vulnerabilities, potentially through crafted data inputs or API calls, could achieve remote code execution on the server running LevelDB. This would allow the attacker to gain complete control over the system, compromise data confidentiality and integrity, and disrupt service availability.
  • Impact: Remote code execution, complete system compromise, privilege escalation, data breach (confidentiality and integrity), denial of service, complete loss of control over the affected system.
  • LevelDB Component Affected: Vulnerable code sections within LevelDB's core modules (e.g., parsing, data handling, memory management). Specific component depends on the nature of the vulnerability.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Aggressively monitor security advisories and vulnerability databases (CVEs) specifically for LevelDB. Subscribe to security mailing lists and follow trusted security information sources.
    • Immediately apply security patches and updates released by the LevelDB development team or operating system vendors. Establish a rapid patching process for critical security updates.
    • Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing of the application and its LevelDB integration to proactively identify potential vulnerabilities.
    • Employ static and dynamic code analysis tools to automatically detect potential vulnerabilities in LevelDB and the application code. Integrate these tools into the development pipeline.
    • Compile LevelDB with memory safety sanitizers like AddressSanitizer (ASan) and MemorySanitizer (MSan) during development and testing to detect memory errors early.
    • Consider using compiler-level mitigations like stack canaries, Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR), and Data Execution Prevention (DEP) to make exploitation more difficult. Ensure these mitigations are enabled in the build environment.

Threat: Dependency Vulnerabilities (High Severity in Critical Dependencies)

  • Description: LevelDB relies on external libraries and system components. If a critical dependency of LevelDB contains a high-severity vulnerability, and LevelDB utilizes the vulnerable functionality, this can indirectly expose the application to risk. An attacker might exploit the vulnerability in the dependency through LevelDB's usage, potentially leading to similar impacts as direct LevelDB vulnerabilities.
  • Impact: Depends on the nature of the dependency vulnerability, but can range from denial of service to remote code execution, data breach, and system compromise. Impact is amplified because it affects LevelDB users indirectly through a dependency.
  • LevelDB Component Affected: Dependencies of LevelDB, indirectly affecting LevelDB functionality that relies on the vulnerable dependency.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Maintain a comprehensive Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) for LevelDB and its dependencies. Track all direct and transitive dependencies.
    • Implement automated dependency scanning tools to continuously monitor dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Integrate these tools into the CI/CD pipeline.
    • Prioritize updating vulnerable dependencies promptly, especially critical dependencies with high-severity vulnerabilities. Have a process for quickly assessing and patching dependency vulnerabilities.
    • Follow security advisories and vulnerability disclosures for LevelDB's dependencies. Subscribe to security mailing lists and monitor vendor security bulletins.
    • Where possible, explore alternative dependencies or configurations that minimize reliance on potentially vulnerable components. Evaluate the necessity of each dependency and consider if less risky alternatives exist.