Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
178 lines (135 loc) · 159 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

178 lines (135 loc) · 159 KB

Okay, let's dive deep into the security analysis of Sunshine, building upon the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The primary objective of this deep analysis is to perform a thorough security assessment of Sunshine's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities, and propose actionable mitigation strategies. This analysis will focus on:

  • Confidentiality: Protecting user data (PINs, configuration, potentially streamed content) from unauthorized access.
  • Integrity: Ensuring that the application and its data are not tampered with.
  • Availability: Maintaining the availability of the streaming service and preventing denial-of-service attacks.
  • Authentication & Authorization: Verifying the identity of clients and ensuring they have appropriate access levels.
  • Input Validation: Preventing injection attacks and other vulnerabilities arising from malformed input.
  • Web UI Security: Protecting the configuration interface from common web vulnerabilities.
  • Build Process Security: Ensuring the integrity of the build artifacts.

Scope:

This analysis will cover the following components of Sunshine, as inferred from the provided documentation and C4 diagrams:

  • Web Server (Configuration UI): The interface for configuring Sunshine.
  • Streaming Server: The core component handling the game stream.
  • Input Handler: Processing client input and translating it to game input.
  • Encoder: Compressing the video stream.
  • Capture: Capturing frames from the game.
  • Client Application (Moonlight - External): While external, its interaction with Sunshine is crucial.
  • Build Process (GitHub Actions): The automated build pipeline.
  • Deployment Model (Direct Installation): The most common deployment scenario.
  • UPnP Implementation: The automatic port forwarding mechanism.

Methodology:

  1. Architecture and Data Flow Review: Analyze the C4 diagrams and descriptions to understand the interaction between components and the flow of data.
  2. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the architecture, data flow, and identified business/security risks. We'll use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees.
  3. Codebase Inference: Since we don't have direct access to the codebase, we'll infer potential vulnerabilities based on common patterns in similar applications and the technologies used (C++, Web UI, streaming protocols).
  4. Mitigation Strategy Proposal: For each identified threat, we'll propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to Sunshine.
  5. Prioritization: We'll prioritize vulnerabilities based on their potential impact and likelihood of exploitation.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's break down the security implications of each component:

  • Web Server (Configuration UI):

    • Threats:

      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS): An attacker could inject malicious JavaScript into the Web UI, potentially stealing session cookies or redirecting the user to a phishing site.
      • Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF): An attacker could trick a logged-in user into performing unintended actions on the Web UI (e.g., changing settings).
      • Authentication Bypass: Weak authentication mechanisms could allow an attacker to gain access to the Web UI without valid credentials.
      • Command Injection: If input fields in the Web UI are not properly sanitized, an attacker might be able to inject OS commands.
      • Information Disclosure: The Web UI might inadvertently expose sensitive information about the system or configuration.
      • Session Management Vulnerabilities: Weak session management (e.g., predictable session IDs, lack of proper timeouts) could allow session hijacking.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Implement a strict Content Security Policy (CSP): This is the most crucial mitigation for XSS. The CSP should restrict the sources from which the browser can load resources (scripts, stylesheets, images, etc.).
      • Use HTTP-only and Secure cookies: Prevent JavaScript from accessing cookies (mitigating XSS impact) and ensure cookies are only sent over HTTPS.
      • Implement CSRF tokens: Generate unique, unpredictable tokens for each session and include them in forms to prevent CSRF attacks.
      • Strong Input Validation (Whitelist-based): Validate all input received from the user on the server-side, using a whitelist approach (accepting only known-good patterns). This is critical for preventing command injection and other injection attacks.
      • Sanitize Output: Encode all output displayed in the Web UI to prevent XSS. Use a templating engine that automatically handles escaping.
      • Robust Authentication: Go beyond the simple PIN. Implement per-client authorization tokens, consider rate limiting, and potentially offer two-factor authentication (2FA) options in the future.
      • Secure Session Management: Use strong, randomly generated session IDs, implement proper session timeouts, and invalidate sessions upon logout.
      • Regularly update web server dependencies: Keep the web server and any associated libraries up-to-date to patch vulnerabilities.

  • Streaming Server:

    • Threats:

      • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: If TLS is not properly configured or certificates are not validated, an attacker could intercept and modify the game stream.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): An attacker could flood the server with requests, making it unavailable to legitimate clients.
      • Buffer Overflow Attacks: Malformed packets could potentially exploit buffer overflows in the streaming server code.
      • Replay Attacks: An attacker could capture and replay legitimate packets to disrupt the stream or gain unauthorized access.
      • Information Disclosure: The streaming protocol might leak information about the game or system.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Enforce TLS 1.3 (or latest secure version): Ensure that only strong cipher suites are used and that certificate validation is strictly enforced. Do not allow fallback to weaker TLS versions.
      • Implement Rate Limiting and Connection Limits: Prevent DoS attacks by limiting the number of connections and requests from a single IP address or client.
      • Robust Input Validation (Packet Level): Thoroughly validate the structure and content of all incoming packets to prevent buffer overflows and other injection vulnerabilities.
      • Use a Memory-Safe Language (where possible): While C++ is used, consider using memory-safe wrappers or libraries for critical network handling code. If parts can be rewritten in Rust, that would significantly improve memory safety.
      • Implement Anti-Replay Mechanisms: Use sequence numbers or timestamps to detect and reject replayed packets.
      • Minimize Information Leakage: Review the streaming protocol to ensure it doesn't unnecessarily expose sensitive information.

  • Input Handler:

    • Threats:

      • Command Injection: If the input handler doesn't properly sanitize input before passing it to the game or operating system, an attacker could inject malicious commands.
      • Input Validation Bypass: An attacker might find ways to bypass input validation checks, potentially leading to unexpected behavior or crashes.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Strict Input Sanitization and Validation: Use a whitelist approach to define the allowed set of input characters and commands. Never directly construct OS commands from user input.
      • Context-Aware Input Handling: Understand the context in which input is used and apply appropriate validation rules. For example, keyboard input should be treated differently than mouse input.
      • Isolate Input Handling: Consider running the input handler in a separate process or sandbox with limited privileges to minimize the impact of a compromise.

  • Encoder:

    • Threats:

      • Vulnerabilities in Encoding Libraries: Third-party encoding libraries (e.g., H.264, H.265 encoders) may have vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Specially crafted input could cause the encoder to consume excessive resources or crash.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Use Up-to-Date and Secure Encoding Libraries: Keep the encoding libraries updated to the latest versions to patch vulnerabilities. Monitor security advisories for the chosen libraries.
      • Fuzz Testing: Use fuzz testing to test the encoder with a wide range of invalid and unexpected inputs to identify potential vulnerabilities.
      • Resource Limits: Implement resource limits (e.g., CPU usage, memory allocation) to prevent the encoder from consuming excessive resources.

  • Capture:

    • Threats:

      • Vulnerabilities in Graphics APIs: Exploits in the graphics APIs used for frame capture could potentially lead to privilege escalation.
      • Denial of Service (DoS): Malicious input could cause the capture component to crash or hang.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Use Secure and Up-to-Date Graphics Drivers and APIs: Keep the graphics drivers and APIs updated to the latest versions.
      • Minimize Privileges: Run the capture component with the least necessary privileges.
      • Input Validation (if applicable): If the capture component receives any input, validate it thoroughly.

  • Client Application (Moonlight - External):

    • Threats:

      • Compromised Client: A compromised client could be used to attack the Sunshine server.
      • Reverse Engineering: An attacker could reverse engineer the client to understand the communication protocol and potentially identify vulnerabilities in the server.

    • Mitigation Strategies (for Sunshine):

      • Strong Authentication and Authorization: Ensure that only authorized clients can connect to the server.
      • Input Validation (on the server-side): Never trust input from the client. Validate all input received from the client on the server-side.
      • Regular Security Audits of Client-Server Interaction: Analyze the communication between the client and server to identify potential vulnerabilities.

  • Build Process (GitHub Actions):

    • Threats:

      • Compromised Build Server: An attacker could compromise the build server and inject malicious code into the build artifacts.
      • Dependency Hijacking: An attacker could compromise a dependency and inject malicious code.
      • Tampering with Build Scripts: An attacker could modify the build scripts to introduce vulnerabilities.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Use a Trusted Build Environment: GitHub Actions provides a reasonably secure build environment, but consider using self-hosted runners with enhanced security measures if higher assurance is needed.
      • Dependency Pinning and Verification: Pin the versions of all dependencies and verify their integrity using checksums or cryptographic signatures. Use tools like Dependabot to automatically check for vulnerable dependencies.
      • Code Review: Require code reviews for all changes to the build scripts and configuration.
      • Signed Releases: Digitally sign the released binaries to ensure their authenticity and prevent tampering. This is critical for user trust.
      • Least Privilege for Build Scripts: Ensure build scripts only have the necessary permissions.

  • Deployment Model (Direct Installation):

    • Threats:

      • Installation of Malicious Software: Users might be tricked into installing a malicious version of Sunshine.
      • Insecure Default Configuration: The default configuration might have insecure settings.

    • Mitigation Strategies:

      • Provide Clear Installation Instructions: Guide users on how to securely download and install Sunshine.
      • Secure Default Configuration: Ensure that the default configuration is secure by default. For example, disable UPnP by default and require users to manually configure port forwarding.
      • User Education: Educate users about the risks of downloading software from untrusted sources.

  • UPnP Implementation:

    • Threats:
      • Router Vulnerabilities: UPnP implementations in routers are often vulnerable, allowing attackers to bypass firewall rules and gain access to internal network services.
      • Unintentional Exposure: UPnP can expose Sunshine to the public internet without the user's explicit knowledge or consent.
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Disable UPnP by Default: This is the most important mitigation. Provide clear instructions for manual port forwarding as an alternative.
      • Warn Users about UPnP Risks: If UPnP is enabled, display a prominent warning to the user about the potential security risks.
      • Use a Secure UPnP Library: If UPnP is absolutely required, use a well-maintained and secure UPnP library.
      • Limit UPnP Functionality: Restrict the UPnP functionality to only the necessary ports and protocols.

3. Prioritized Vulnerabilities and Mitigation Table

| Vulnerability | Component(s) | Threat Level | Mitigation Strategy

4. Conclusion and Further Steps

This deep analysis has revealed several potential security vulnerabilities within Sunshine, primarily focused on the Web UI, the streaming server, and the reliance on UPnP. The most critical vulnerabilities are XSS and CSRF in the Web UI, potential MitM attacks on the streaming server, and the inherent risks associated with UPnP. The proposed mitigation strategies provide a strong foundation for improving Sunshine's security posture.

The next steps should be:

  1. Code Review: A thorough code review by the development team, guided by this analysis, is essential to confirm the presence and severity of the inferred vulnerabilities.
  2. Implementation of Mitigations: Prioritize and implement the mitigation strategies, starting with the highest-priority items (CSP, disabling UPnP by default, TLS 1.3 enforcement, input validation).
  3. Penetration Testing: After implementing mitigations, conduct penetration testing by security professionals to identify any remaining vulnerabilities.
  4. Security-Focused Development Practices: Integrate security best practices into the development lifecycle, including secure coding guidelines, regular security training, and automated security testing.
  5. Community Engagement: Encourage security researchers to review the code and report vulnerabilities through a responsible disclosure program.
  6. Documentation Updates: Update the project's documentation to clearly outline security best practices for users, including firewall configuration and the risks of UPnP.
  7. Consideration of Sandboxing/Containerization: Explore the feasibility and benefits of sandboxing or containerizing Sunshine to limit the potential impact of a compromise. This is a longer-term, but potentially very impactful, improvement.
  8. Authorization improvements: Implement authorization tokens.

By addressing these vulnerabilities and adopting a security-first mindset, Sunshine can significantly reduce its attack surface and provide a more secure game streaming experience for its users. The open-source nature of the project allows for community involvement in identifying and addressing security concerns, which is a significant strength.