- Description: An attacker exploits a vulnerability in a loaded authentication plugin (e.g., a custom PAM module, a flawed implementation of a standard authentication method) to bypass authentication entirely or authenticate as a different user without valid credentials. The attacker might send crafted authentication packets or exploit a buffer overflow in the plugin.
- Impact: Complete database compromise. The attacker gains unauthorized access with potentially full privileges, allowing data theft, modification, or deletion.
- Affected Component: Authentication plugins (e.g.,
auth_socket
,mysql_native_password
, PAM plugins, custom plugins). Specifically, the code within the plugin that handles authentication requests and responses. - Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Use only well-vetted and actively maintained authentication plugins from trusted sources.
- Regularly update MariaDB and all installed plugins to the latest versions to patch known vulnerabilities.
- If using custom plugins, conduct thorough security audits and penetration testing.
- Minimize the use of custom authentication plugins if standard, well-tested options are available.
- Monitor plugin loading and configuration for unauthorized changes.
- Implement strict input validation within custom authentication plugins.
- Description: An attacker exploits a vulnerability in a User-Defined Function (UDF) to execute arbitrary code with the privileges of the MariaDB server process. This could involve a buffer overflow, format string vulnerability, or other code injection flaw within the UDF.
- Impact: Complete server compromise. The attacker gains control of the operating system running the MariaDB server, potentially leading to access to other systems on the network.
- Affected Component: User-Defined Functions (UDFs), specifically the compiled code of the UDF. The
mysql.func
table, which stores UDF information, is also relevant. - Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Disable UDFs if they are not absolutely necessary.
- If UDFs are required, use only UDFs from trusted sources and ensure they are thoroughly vetted and regularly updated.
- Conduct security audits and penetration testing of any custom UDFs.
- Restrict the privileges of the MariaDB server process itself (e.g., run MariaDB as a non-root user).
- Use a secure compilation environment for UDFs and implement strong compiler security flags.
- Implement file system permissions to prevent unauthorized modification of UDF libraries.
- Description: An attacker floods the MariaDB server with connection requests, exceeding the configured maximum number of connections (
max_connections
). This prevents legitimate users from connecting to the database. - Impact: Database unavailability. Legitimate users cannot access the database, causing service disruption.
- Affected Component: The connection handling mechanism within MariaDB (network listener, thread pool). The
max_connections
andmax_user_connections
system variables are directly relevant. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Configure
max_connections
to a reasonable value based on expected load and server resources. - Configure
max_user_connections
to limit the number of connections per user, preventing a single compromised account from exhausting all connections. - Use a firewall to restrict connections to trusted IP addresses.
- Implement connection pooling on the application side to reuse existing connections and reduce the overhead of establishing new connections.
- Monitor connection counts and implement alerting for unusual spikes.
- Consider using a load balancer to distribute connections across multiple MariaDB servers.
- Configure
- Description: An attacker submits complex, poorly optimized, or intentionally malicious queries that consume excessive server resources (CPU, memory, I/O), slowing down or crashing the server. This could involve queries with large joins, full table scans, or complex regular expressions.
- Impact: Database slowdown or unavailability. Legitimate users experience poor performance or are unable to access the database.
- Affected Component: The query optimizer, query executor, storage engine (e.g., InnoDB, MyISAM), and the server's resource management mechanisms. System variables like
max_statement_time
,innodb_buffer_pool_size
, andtmp_table_size
are relevant. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement query timeouts (
max_statement_time
). - Monitor slow queries using the slow query log and optimize them.
- Use appropriate indexes to improve query performance.
- Limit the size of temporary tables (
tmp_table_size
,max_heap_table_size
). - Tune the server's configuration parameters (e.g., buffer pool size, thread cache size) for optimal performance.
- Restrict the privileges of database users to prevent them from executing potentially harmful queries (e.g.,
SELECT BENCHMARK()
). - Use resource limits (e.g., cgroups on Linux) to constrain the resources available to the MariaDB process.
- Consider using a query analysis tool to identify and prevent resource-intensive queries.
- Implement query timeouts (
- Description: An attacker eavesdrops on unencrypted network traffic between a client and the MariaDB server, capturing sensitive data such as usernames, passwords, and query results.
- Impact: Data breach. Sensitive information is exposed to the attacker.
- Affected Component: The network communication layer of MariaDB. The TLS/SSL implementation and configuration are critical.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Enforce TLS/SSL encryption for all client connections.
- Use strong TLS/SSL ciphers and protocols.
- Configure clients to require encrypted connections and to verify the server's certificate.
- Use a trusted Certificate Authority (CA) for server certificates.
- Regularly update MariaDB and OpenSSL (or the TLS library used) to address known vulnerabilities.
- Disable support for older, insecure TLS/SSL protocols (e.g., SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1).
Threat: Configuration File Tampering
- Description: An attacker gains access to the MariaDB configuration file (e.g.,
my.cnf
) and modifies it to weaken security, enable unauthorized access, or alter server behavior. For example, they might disable TLS, enableskip-grant-tables
, or change thebind-address
. - Impact: Varies depending on the specific changes made, but can range from minor information disclosure to complete database compromise.
- Affected Component: The MariaDB configuration file (
my.cnf
or similar) and the server's configuration parsing and loading mechanism. - Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Restrict file system access to the MariaDB configuration file using appropriate permissions.
- Implement file integrity monitoring (FIM) to detect unauthorized changes to the configuration file.
- Regularly audit the server configuration for unauthorized changes.
- Use a configuration management system (e.g., Ansible, Puppet, Chef) to enforce a known-good configuration.
- Back up the configuration file to a secure location.