Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
64 lines (53 loc) · 7.59 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

64 lines (53 loc) · 7.59 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for microsoft/cntk

Attack Surface: Malicious Model Files

  • Description: Loading model files from untrusted sources can lead to exploitation of vulnerabilities during model deserialization within CNTK.
  • CNTK Contribution to Attack Surface: CNTK's model loading functionality parses and deserializes model files. Vulnerabilities in this process within CNTK can be exploited.
  • Example: An attacker provides a crafted model file that exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability in CNTK's model loading code when the application attempts to load it.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Model Source Validation: Strictly load models only from trusted and verified sources. Implement cryptographic verification if possible.
    • Input Sanitization (Model Path): If the model file path is derived from user input, rigorously sanitize and validate the input to prevent path traversal or injection attacks.
    • Sandboxing Model Loading: Isolate the model loading process within a heavily sandboxed environment with minimal permissions to contain potential exploits.
    • Regular Updates: Maintain CNTK and its dependencies at the latest versions to benefit from security patches addressing deserialization vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Model File Format Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Vulnerabilities may exist in the parsers for specific model file formats supported by CNTK (e.g., protobuf, ONNX), which are part of CNTK's functionality.
  • CNTK Contribution to Attack Surface: CNTK directly includes and utilizes parsers for various model formats. Bugs in these parsers within CNTK can be exploited.
  • Example: A critical vulnerability exists in CNTK's ONNX parser. An attacker provides a malicious ONNX model file specifically crafted to trigger this vulnerability when loaded by a CNTK application.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Use Trusted Model Formats: Prioritize using well-established and less complex model formats where possible.
    • Model Format Validation: Implement checks to validate the model file format before loading, ensuring it strictly conforms to expected specifications and rejecting unexpected or malformed formats.
    • Regular Updates: Ensure CNTK and its format parsing libraries are consistently updated to patch any discovered vulnerabilities in format handling.

Attack Surface: Custom Data Reader/Preprocessing Vulnerabilities (C++ Implementations)

  • Description: Insecurely implemented custom data readers or preprocessing functions, particularly when written in C++ and directly integrated with CNTK's data pipeline, can introduce critical vulnerabilities.
  • CNTK Contribution to Attack Surface: CNTK's architecture allows for tight integration of custom C++ data readers and preprocessing. Vulnerabilities in developer-written C++ code integrated with CNTK become part of the application's CNTK-related attack surface.
  • Example: A custom C++ data reader used with CNTK contains a buffer overflow vulnerability due to improper memory management. An attacker provides specially crafted input data that triggers this overflow during data loading within the CNTK application.
  • Impact: Code Execution, Denial of Service, Data Corruption.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure C++ Coding Practices: Mandate and enforce rigorous secure coding practices for all custom C++ components integrated with CNTK. Focus on memory safety, input validation, and robust error handling.
    • Memory Safety Tools: Utilize memory safety tools (e.g., AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer) during development and testing of custom C++ data readers to detect memory-related vulnerabilities.
    • Code Review and Security Audits: Conduct thorough code reviews and consider security audits specifically for custom C++ components to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities before deployment.
    • Sandboxing Custom C++ Code: Explore sandboxing or isolation techniques to limit the potential impact of vulnerabilities within custom C++ data readers.

Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in CNTK Dependencies (High Severity Cases)

  • Description: CNTK relies on third-party libraries, and high severity vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be indirectly exploited through CNTK.
  • CNTK Contribution to Attack Surface: CNTK's functionality is built upon and linked to these dependencies. High severity vulnerabilities within CNTK's dependencies become a relevant attack vector for applications using CNTK.
  • Example: A critical Remote Code Execution vulnerability is discovered in a specific version of the protobuf library that CNTK depends on. An attacker exploits this vulnerability through a CNTK application by triggering code paths that utilize the vulnerable protobuf functionality.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure (depending on the dependency vulnerability).
  • Risk Severity: High (when dependency vulnerability is high/critical)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Proactive Dependency Management: Implement a robust dependency management strategy to track, monitor, and promptly update CNTK's dependencies.
    • Vulnerability Scanning and Alerts: Regularly scan CNTK's dependencies for known vulnerabilities using automated vulnerability scanning tools and set up alerts for newly discovered high severity issues.
    • Automated Updates: Automate the process of updating CNTK and its dependencies to ensure timely patching of security vulnerabilities.

Attack Surface: Bugs in CNTK Native Code

  • Description: Critical bugs (e.g., buffer overflows, use-after-free, integer overflows) within CNTK's core native C++ codebase can be directly exploited.
  • CNTK Contribution to Attack Surface: CNTK's core implementation is in C++. Bugs in CNTK's own C++ code represent a direct and potentially critical attack surface.
  • Example: A use-after-free vulnerability exists in a core CNTK C++ function related to graph operations. An attacker crafts a specific model or input sequence that triggers this use-after-free, leading to arbitrary code execution within the CNTK process.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Denial of Service (DoS), Memory Corruption, Potential Privilege Escalation (in specific contexts).
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular Updates: Maintain CNTK at the latest version. Updates frequently include critical bug fixes and security patches for the core C++ codebase.
    • Input Validation (Internal): While challenging, consider implementing input validation and sanitization even for internal CNTK operations where feasible to mitigate the impact of unexpected or malicious inputs reaching vulnerable code paths.
    • Security Audits (Community/Vendor): Rely on and support security audits of the CNTK codebase performed by the CNTK development team and the broader security community to identify and address critical bugs.