Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
160 lines (147 loc) · 21.5 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

160 lines (147 loc) · 21.5 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for microsoft/cntk

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for Model Inference (CNTK Specific)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization for Model Inference (CNTK Specific)
  • Description:
    1. Define CNTK Model Input Schema: Understand the exact input format, data types, and expected ranges that your CNTK model is designed to process. This includes tensor shapes, data types (float, int, etc.), and any specific data preprocessing steps the model expects.
    2. Validate Input Before CNTK Inference: Before feeding input data to your CNTK model's inference engine, implement validation logic in your application code. This validation should strictly enforce the defined input schema. Check data types, tensor shapes, and value ranges to ensure they conform to the model's expectations.
    3. Sanitize Input Data for CNTK: Sanitize input data specifically in the context of how CNTK processes it. For example, if your CNTK model expects numerical input, ensure that string inputs are properly converted and validated to prevent unexpected behavior or errors within the CNTK runtime. If dealing with text input for CNTK models, consider encoding and sanitization relevant to the model's expected text representation.
    4. Error Handling for Invalid CNTK Input: Implement robust error handling when input data fails validation against the CNTK model's schema. Return informative error messages to the user or calling application and log the invalid input for debugging and security monitoring. Prevent the invalid input from being processed by the CNTK inference engine.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • CNTK Inference Errors and Crashes (Medium to High Severity): Malformed input can cause errors or crashes within the CNTK library during inference, leading to denial of service or application instability.
    • Unexpected Model Behavior (Medium Severity): Input that deviates significantly from the model's training data distribution or expected format can lead to unpredictable and potentially incorrect model outputs.
    • Exploitation of CNTK Input Processing Vulnerabilities (Potentially High Severity): In rare cases, vulnerabilities within CNTK's input processing might be exploitable through crafted malicious input. Strict validation reduces the attack surface.
  • Impact:
    • CNTK Inference Errors and Crashes: High Reduction - Significantly reduces the risk of CNTK related crashes due to bad input.
    • Unexpected Model Behavior: Medium Reduction - Improves model reliability by ensuring input is within expected bounds.
    • Exploitation of CNTK Input Processing Vulnerabilities: Medium Reduction - Reduces the attack surface by enforcing strict input format.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • Basic data type checks are in place before CNTK inference in some parts of the application.
    • Schema validation specific to CNTK model input requirements is not fully implemented.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formal definition of CNTK model input schemas for all models used.
    • Comprehensive validation logic specifically tailored to CNTK model input requirements.
    • Robust error handling for invalid input that prevents CNTK inference from processing it.

Mitigation Strategy: Model Input Size Limits (CNTK Specific Inference)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Model Input Size Limits (CNTK Specific Inference)
  • Description:
    1. Analyze CNTK Model Resource Consumption: Specifically analyze the CPU, memory (including GPU memory if applicable), and processing time consumed by your CNTK models during inference for varying input sizes and complexities. Use profiling tools if necessary to understand resource scaling with input size.
    2. Determine Safe Input Size Limits for CNTK: Based on the resource analysis and your application's performance requirements, define maximum limits for input size that are safe for your CNTK models and infrastructure. Consider limits on tensor dimensions, sequence lengths, or input data size in bytes, relevant to how your CNTK models are structured.
    3. Implement Input Size Checks Before CNTK Inference: Implement checks in your application code before calling the CNTK inference engine to ensure that the input data size and complexity are within the defined limits.
    4. Reject Oversized Input for CNTK Inference: If input exceeds the defined size limits, reject the inference request and return an error message. Prevent the oversized input from being processed by CNTK.
    5. Monitor CNTK Inference Resource Usage: Continuously monitor the resource usage of your CNTK inference processes in production to ensure that the defined input size limits are effective in preventing resource exhaustion and adjust limits if needed based on observed behavior.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • CNTK Inference Denial of Service (DoS) (High Severity): Attackers could send excessively large or complex inputs specifically designed to overload the CNTK inference engine, consuming excessive resources (CPU, memory, GPU) and causing denial of service.
    • Resource Exhaustion on CNTK Inference Infrastructure (High Severity): Uncontrolled input sizes can lead to resource exhaustion on the servers or infrastructure running CNTK inference, impacting other services or applications sharing the same resources.
  • Impact:
    • CNTK Inference Denial of Service (DoS): High Reduction - Effectively prevents DoS attacks targeting CNTK inference by limiting input size.
    • Resource Exhaustion on CNTK Inference Infrastructure: High Reduction - Protects infrastructure stability by preventing resource exhaustion due to oversized CNTK inference requests.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • Basic size limits exist for some input types used with CNTK models.
    • Limits are not consistently applied across all CNTK models and input channels.
    • Resource monitoring is not directly linked to CNTK inference input size limits.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Detailed analysis of resource consumption for each CNTK model with varying input sizes.
    • Definition and implementation of input size limits specifically for all CNTK models and relevant input types.
    • Integration of resource usage monitoring with CNTK inference input size limit enforcement.

Mitigation Strategy: Model Output Validation and Sanitization (CNTK Specific)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Model Output Validation and Sanitization (CNTK Specific)
  • Description:
    1. Define CNTK Model Output Schema: Understand the expected output format, data types, and value ranges produced by your CNTK models. This includes tensor shapes, data types, and the semantic interpretation of the output values (e.g., probabilities, class labels, bounding box coordinates).
    2. Validate CNTK Model Output: After receiving output from the CNTK inference engine, implement validation logic to check if the output conforms to the defined output schema. Verify data types, tensor shapes, and value ranges to ensure they are within expected bounds and formats.
    3. Sanitize CNTK Model Output: Sanitize the output from your CNTK models before using it in your application or presenting it to users. This is crucial if the output is used in contexts where it could be misinterpreted or exploited. For example, if CNTK output is used to construct URLs or commands, sanitize it to prevent injection vulnerabilities. If displaying output to users, sanitize to prevent cross-site scripting (XSS) or other presentation-layer attacks.
    4. Handle Invalid CNTK Model Output: Define how to handle cases where the CNTK model output fails validation. Log the invalid output for investigation and debugging. Implement fallback mechanisms or error handling to prevent the application from malfunctioning due to unexpected CNTK output.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Misinterpretation of CNTK Output (Medium Severity): Unexpected or malformed CNTK output, if not validated, can lead to misinterpretations in the application logic, causing incorrect actions or data corruption.
    • Downstream Exploitation via CNTK Output (Medium to High Severity): If CNTK model output is used in downstream systems or processes without sanitization, vulnerabilities in those systems could be exploited through crafted or unexpected CNTK output (e.g., command injection, SQL injection if output is used in queries).
    • Information Leakage via CNTK Output (Medium Severity): Unvalidated or unsanitized CNTK output might unintentionally reveal sensitive information contained within the model or training data.
  • Impact:
    • Misinterpretation of CNTK Output: Medium Reduction - Improves application reliability by ensuring CNTK output is as expected.
    • Downstream Exploitation via CNTK Output: Medium to High Reduction - Reduces the risk of vulnerabilities in downstream systems caused by unsanitized CNTK output.
    • Information Leakage via CNTK Output: Medium Reduction - Reduces the risk of unintentional data exposure through CNTK model outputs.
  • Currently Implemented: Minimal Implementation.
    • Limited output validation is performed in specific parts of the application using CNTK models.
    • Output sanitization for CNTK model outputs is largely missing.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Formal definition of CNTK model output schemas for all models.
    • Comprehensive output validation logic covering all output fields and data types from CNTK models.
    • Consistent and robust output sanitization for CNTK model outputs, especially when used in downstream systems or presented to users.
    • Clear error handling and logging for invalid CNTK model outputs.

Mitigation Strategy: Model Access Control and Authorization (CNTK Models)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Model Access Control and Authorization (CNTK Models)
  • Description:
    1. Define Access Roles for CNTK Models: Define roles with specific permissions related to CNTK models. This could include roles for model developers (who can train and modify models), model deployers (who can deploy models to inference servers), and applications/users (who can only perform inference using deployed CNTK models).
    2. Implement Authentication for CNTK Model Access: Implement authentication mechanisms to verify the identity of users, applications, or services attempting to access or interact with CNTK models. This could involve API keys, OAuth 2.0, or other authentication protocols.
    3. Implement Authorization for CNTK Model Operations: Implement authorization controls to restrict access to CNTK models and their operations based on defined roles. Use access control lists (ACLs) or role-based access control (RBAC) to manage permissions for operations like model deployment, modification, deletion, and inference. Ensure that only authorized entities can perform specific actions on CNTK models.
    4. Secure Storage for CNTK Model Files: Store CNTK model files (e.g., .dnn files) in secure storage locations with appropriate access permissions. Prevent unauthorized access, modification, or deletion of model files. Use encryption at rest for model files if they contain sensitive information or represent valuable intellectual property.
    5. Audit Logging for CNTK Model Access: Implement audit logging to track all access attempts and authorization decisions related to CNTK models. Log who accessed which model, when, and what operation was attempted (e.g., inference, deployment). Regularly review audit logs for security monitoring and incident response.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Unauthorized CNTK Model Access (Medium to High Severity): Prevents unauthorized users or applications from accessing sensitive CNTK models, potentially leading to misuse of model capabilities, data breaches (if models contain or reveal sensitive information), or intellectual property theft.
    • CNTK Model Tampering (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of unauthorized modification or replacement of CNTK models, which could lead to model poisoning, malicious model behavior, or disruption of application functionality.
    • Insider Threats to CNTK Models (Medium Severity): Mitigates insider threats by limiting access to CNTK models based on the principle of least privilege and auditing access activities.
  • Impact:
    • Unauthorized CNTK Model Access: Medium to High Reduction - Significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized access to CNTK models.
    • CNTK Model Tampering: Medium Reduction - Reduces the risk of unauthorized modification of CNTK models.
    • Insider Threats to CNTK Models: Medium Reduction - Mitigates insider threats related to CNTK models by enforcing access control.
  • Currently Implemented: Basic Implementation.
    • Some level of authentication exists for accessing application features that use CNTK models.
    • Authorization for direct CNTK model access is rudimentary and not role-based.
    • Model files are stored with standard file system permissions, but not specifically secured.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Implementation of role-based access control (RBAC) specifically for CNTK model access and operations.
    • Fine-grained authorization policies for different CNTK model operations (deployment, modification, inference).
    • Secure storage for CNTK model files with stricter access controls and potentially encryption at rest.
    • Comprehensive audit logging of CNTK model access and authorization events.

Mitigation Strategy: Model Provenance and Integrity Checks (CNTK Models)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Model Provenance and Integrity Checks (CNTK Models)
  • Description:
    1. Track CNTK Model Provenance: Implement a system to meticulously track the origin and lifecycle of each CNTK model used in your application. This includes:
      • Training data used to create the CNTK model.
      • Specific CNTK training scripts and configurations used.
      • CNTK library version used for training.
      • Versioning of the CNTK model itself.
      • Training environment details (hardware, software).
      • Personnel responsible for training and deploying the model.
    2. Generate CNTK Model Hashes: Generate cryptographic hashes (e.g., SHA-256) of the compiled CNTK model files (e.g., .dnn files) immediately after training and before deployment. These hashes serve as fingerprints of the legitimate models.
    3. Securely Store CNTK Model Provenance and Hashes: Store the collected provenance information and the generated model hashes securely, linking them to each deployed CNTK model version. Use a secure database or configuration management system to store this metadata.
    4. Implement CNTK Model Integrity Checks at Load Time: Before loading a CNTK model for inference in your application, implement integrity checks. Recalculate the cryptographic hash of the model file being loaded and compare it to the securely stored hash for that model version.
    5. Automate CNTK Model Provenance and Integrity Checks: Automate the processes of provenance tracking and integrity checks as part of your CNTK model training, deployment, and update pipelines. Integrate these checks into your CI/CD system to ensure consistent and reliable model integrity.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • CNTK Model Tampering (High Severity): Detects unauthorized modification or corruption of CNTK model files, ensuring that the models used for inference are authentic and haven't been compromised or altered maliciously.
    • CNTK Model Poisoning (Medium Severity): While not directly preventing model poisoning during the training phase, provenance tracking helps in investigating and identifying potentially poisoned CNTK models by providing a traceable history back to the training data and processes.
    • Supply Chain Attacks Targeting CNTK Models (Medium Severity): Helps detect if CNTK models have been tampered with during storage, transfer, or deployment, potentially as part of a supply chain attack aimed at compromising your ML system.
  • Impact:
    • CNTK Model Tampering: High Reduction - Effectively detects CNTK model tampering by verifying integrity using cryptographic hashes.
    • CNTK Model Poisoning: Medium Reduction - Aids in investigation and detection of potential CNTK model poisoning by providing provenance information.
    • Supply Chain Attacks Targeting CNTK Models: Medium Reduction - Detects CNTK model tampering during deployment, which could be a result of a supply chain attack.
  • Currently Implemented: Minimal Implementation.
    • Basic CNTK model versioning is used.
    • No formal provenance tracking system is in place for CNTK models.
    • CNTK model integrity checks using hashes are not implemented.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Implementation of a comprehensive CNTK model provenance tracking system.
    • Automated generation and secure storage of CNTK model hashes.
    • Integration of CNTK model integrity checks into the model loading process within the application.
    • Automation of provenance tracking and integrity checks in the CNTK model training and deployment CI/CD pipeline.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits for CNTK Model Inference Processes

  • Mitigation Strategy: Resource Limits for CNTK Model Inference Processes
  • Description:
    1. Choose Resource Limiting for CNTK Inference: Select a suitable mechanism to enforce resource limits specifically on the processes running CNTK model inference. Containerization (Docker, Kubernetes) is a strong option, providing process isolation and resource control. Operating system-level resource limits (cgroups on Linux) can also be used.
    2. Define Resource Limits for CNTK Inference: Determine appropriate resource limits (CPU cores, RAM, GPU memory if applicable, maximum execution time) for CNTK model inference processes. These limits should be based on the resource requirements of your models, the expected inference load, and the available infrastructure resources.
    3. Configure Resource Limits for CNTK Inference Processes: Configure the chosen resource limiting mechanism to enforce the defined limits specifically for the processes that execute CNTK model inference. For containers, this involves setting resource requests and limits in container configurations. For OS-level limits, use tools like cgroups.
    4. Monitor Resource Usage of CNTK Inference: Implement monitoring to track the resource usage (CPU, memory, GPU) of your CNTK inference processes in real-time. This allows you to verify that resource limits are being enforced and to identify potential resource bottlenecks or anomalies.
    5. Handle CNTK Inference Resource Limit Exceeded: Define how your application should handle situations where CNTK inference processes exceed their resource limits. Options include:
      • Process Termination: The resource limiting mechanism might automatically terminate the process if it exceeds limits. Your application should be designed to handle such terminations gracefully (e.g., retry the inference, return an error to the user).
      • Error Handling: The CNTK inference process itself might throw an error when resource limits are approached. Implement error handling to catch these exceptions and respond appropriately.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • CNTK Inference Denial of Service (DoS) via Resource Exhaustion (High Severity): Prevents DoS attacks where a single or multiple CNTK inference requests consume excessive resources, starving other application components or making the entire application unavailable.
    • Resource Starvation of Other Application Components (Medium Severity): Prevents CNTK inference processes from monopolizing system resources and causing resource starvation for other essential parts of your application or other applications sharing the same infrastructure.
  • Impact:
    • CNTK Inference Denial of Service (DoS): High Reduction - Effectively prevents resource exhaustion DoS attacks targeting CNTK inference.
    • Resource Starvation of Other Application Components: Medium Reduction - Ensures fair resource allocation and prevents CNTK inference from negatively impacting other parts of the application.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented.
    • Application is containerized, providing some level of resource isolation for CNTK inference.
    • Specific resource limits are not explicitly configured for CNTK inference processes within containers.
  • Missing Implementation:
    • Explicit configuration of resource limits (CPU, memory, GPU) specifically for CNTK inference processes within containers or using OS-level mechanisms.
    • Fine-tuning of resource limits based on performance testing and resource usage monitoring of CNTK inference.
    • Implementation of robust error handling and recovery mechanisms when CNTK inference processes approach or exceed resource limits.