Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
176 lines (133 loc) · 20.7 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

176 lines (133 loc) · 20.7 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for microsoft/vcpkg

Mitigation Strategy: Verify Package Integrity

  • Description:

    1. Utilize vcpkg's Integrity Checks: Leverage vcpkg's built-in mechanisms for verifying package integrity. This often involves checksums (like SHA256) that are checked against known values during package download and installation. Ensure these checks are enabled and not bypassed in your vcpkg configuration.
    2. Cross-reference Checksums (If Possible): For critical dependencies, attempt to cross-reference the checksums provided by vcpkg with checksums from other trusted sources, such as the upstream library's official website or repository. This adds an extra layer of verification.
    3. Implement Manual Verification for Critical Packages: For highly sensitive applications or critical dependencies, consider implementing a manual verification step. This could involve:
      • Downloading the source code of the dependency directly from the upstream repository.
      • Verifying the upstream repository's signatures (e.g., GPG signatures on releases).
      • Building the library from source and comparing the resulting binaries with those provided by vcpkg (though this is complex and resource-intensive).
    4. Monitor for Unexpected Changes: Implement monitoring to detect unexpected changes in package checksums or signatures in the vcpkg registry or mirror you are using. This could indicate a potential compromise.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Compromised Packages (High Severity): Mitigation against malicious actors injecting compromised libraries into the vcpkg distribution channels. This could lead to backdoors, malware, or supply chain attacks.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of MITM attacks during package downloads where attackers could intercept and replace legitimate packages with malicious ones.
    • Accidental Package Corruption (Low Severity): Protects against accidental corruption of packages during storage or distribution, ensuring the integrity of the libraries used.

  • Impact:

    • Compromised Packages: High Reduction - Significantly reduces the risk of using compromised packages by verifying their integrity.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Medium Reduction - Makes MITM attacks more difficult by requiring attackers to also compromise checksum or signature mechanisms.
    • Accidental Package Corruption: Low Reduction - Prevents issues caused by accidental data corruption.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes, we rely on vcpkg's built-in checksum verification. This is enabled by default in vcpkg.

  • Missing Implementation: Cross-referencing checksums with external sources and manual verification for critical packages are not currently implemented. Monitoring for unexpected checksum changes in our vcpkg mirror is also not in place.

Mitigation Strategy: Control Package Sources and Registries

  • Description:

    1. Prioritize Official vcpkg Registry: Primarily use the official Microsoft-maintained vcpkg registry (https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg) as the source for packages. This registry is generally well-maintained and subject to some level of security oversight.
    2. Evaluate Third-Party Registries Carefully: If you need to use third-party vcpkg registries or custom registries, thoroughly vet their security practices and reputation before trusting them. Consider factors like:
      • Maintainer reputation and history.
      • Security policies and procedures.
      • Transparency and community involvement.
      • History of security incidents.
    3. Use a Private vcpkg Registry or Mirror (Recommended for Sensitive Projects): For projects with high security requirements, consider setting up a private vcpkg registry or mirroring the official registry. This gives you greater control over the packages and their sources.
      • Private Registry: Host your own registry and curate the packages you allow.
      • Mirror: Create a local mirror of the official registry and control updates and package versions.
    4. Restrict Registry Access: If using a private or mirrored registry, restrict access to authorized users and systems only. Implement access controls and authentication mechanisms to prevent unauthorized modifications.
    5. Regularly Audit Registry Configuration: Periodically audit your vcpkg registry configuration to ensure you are using trusted sources and that access controls are properly configured.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Registries (High Severity): Prevents reliance on untrusted or compromised vcpkg registries that could distribute malicious packages.
    • Supply Chain Attacks (High Severity): Reduces the risk of supply chain attacks by controlling the sources of dependencies and limiting exposure to potentially compromised registries.
    • Unauthorized Package Modifications (Medium Severity): If using a private registry, access controls mitigate the risk of unauthorized users modifying or injecting malicious packages.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Registries: High Reduction - Eliminates the risk of directly using malicious registries by controlling the sources.
    • Supply Chain Attacks: Medium Reduction - Significantly reduces the supply chain attack surface by limiting dependency sources to trusted registries.
    • Unauthorized Package Modifications: Medium Reduction - Mitigates risks within a private registry environment through access controls.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes, we are currently using the official Microsoft vcpkg registry.

  • Missing Implementation: We are not currently using a private vcpkg registry or mirror. For highly sensitive projects, this should be considered. We also lack a formal process for vetting third-party registries if we were to use them in the future.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Dependency Pinning and Locking

  • Description:

    1. Utilize vcpkg Manifest Mode: Use vcpkg's manifest mode (vcpkg.json) to declare your project's dependencies. This is the recommended way to manage dependencies in vcpkg.
    2. Generate and Commit Lock Files: Generate vcpkg.lock.json lock files after resolving dependencies using vcpkg install. Commit these lock files to your version control system (e.g., Git). Lock files precisely specify the versions of all direct and transitive dependencies.
    3. Enforce Lock File Usage in CI/CD: Configure your CI/CD pipeline to use the committed lock files during builds. This ensures consistent builds across different environments and prevents unexpected dependency version changes.
    4. Controlled Lock File Updates: Establish a controlled process for updating lock files. Avoid automatically updating them. Instead, update them intentionally when you need to upgrade dependencies or address vulnerabilities. Review and test changes after updating lock files.
    5. Avoid Wildcard/Range Version Specifiers: In vcpkg.json, use exact version specifiers (e.g., "version>=":"1.2.3") instead of wildcard or range specifiers (e.g., "version": "*", "version": "^1.2.0") for production environments. This minimizes the risk of unintended dependency updates.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Dependency Confusion/Substitution (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of accidentally or maliciously substituting dependencies with different versions that might introduce vulnerabilities or break compatibility.
    • Non-Reproducible Builds (Medium Severity): Ensures consistent builds across different environments and over time, preventing issues caused by inconsistent dependency versions.
    • Unexpected Dependency Updates (Medium Severity): Prevents automatic or unintended updates to dependency versions that could introduce regressions, vulnerabilities, or break compatibility.

  • Impact:

    • Dependency Confusion/Substitution: Medium Reduction - Makes it harder to introduce unintended dependency versions by explicitly locking versions.
    • Non-Reproducible Builds: High Reduction - Eliminates build inconsistencies caused by varying dependency versions.
    • Unexpected Dependency Updates: Medium Reduction - Provides control over dependency updates, preventing surprises and allowing for controlled upgrades.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes, we are using vcpkg manifest mode and commit vcpkg.lock.json to version control. Our CI/CD pipeline uses the lock file for builds.

  • Missing Implementation: The process for controlled lock file updates is documented but not strictly enforced. Developers sometimes update lock files without proper review or testing. We could improve this with stricter CI/CD checks or pull request review processes.

Mitigation Strategy: Review Port Files and Build Scripts

  • Description:

    1. Prioritize Review for Critical Dependencies: Focus manual review efforts on port files (portfile.cmake) and associated build scripts for critical dependencies or dependencies with a history of security issues.
    2. Automated Static Analysis (If Possible): Explore using static analysis tools to automatically scan port files and build scripts for suspicious patterns or potentially malicious code. This is less common for CMake scripts but worth investigating.
    3. Manual Code Review Process: Implement a manual code review process for port files, especially when adding new dependencies or updating existing ones. Reviewers should look for:
      • Unusual or obfuscated code.
      • Downloads from untrusted sources (URLs should be HTTPS and point to official repositories where possible).
      • Execution of shell commands that are unnecessary or potentially dangerous.
      • Modifications to system files or directories outside the vcpkg install prefix.
      • Any attempts to access sensitive information or credentials.
    4. Community Contribution and Reporting: If you identify suspicious or potentially malicious port files in the official vcpkg registry, report them to the vcpkg community and Microsoft. Contribute to improving the security of vcpkg ports.
    5. Regularly Update Port Files: Keep your vcpkg ports updated to the latest versions. Updates may include security fixes or improvements to build scripts.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Malicious Port Files (High Severity): Prevents the execution of malicious code embedded within vcpkg port files or build scripts. This could lead to build system compromise or injection of backdoors into compiled libraries.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Port Files (High Severity): Mitigates supply chain attacks where attackers compromise vcpkg port files to distribute malicious versions of libraries.
    • Build System Exploitation (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of attackers exploiting vulnerabilities in build scripts to gain control of the build system.

  • Impact:

    • Malicious Port Files: High Reduction - Directly addresses the risk of malicious code in port files through manual review and potentially automated analysis.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via Port Files: High Reduction - Makes it more difficult for attackers to inject malicious code through compromised port files.
    • Build System Exploitation: Medium Reduction - Reduces the attack surface of build scripts by identifying and mitigating potentially exploitable code patterns.

  • Currently Implemented: No, we do not currently have a formal process for reviewing vcpkg port files and build scripts. Reviews are done ad-hoc and inconsistently.

  • Missing Implementation: A formal code review process for vcpkg port files needs to be implemented, especially for new or updated dependencies. Automated static analysis tools for CMake scripts should be explored.

Mitigation Strategy: Minimize Build Dependencies

  • Description:

    1. Install Only Necessary Features: When installing libraries with vcpkg, use feature selection (vcpkg install <port>[feature1,feature2]) to install only the features and components that are actually required by your application. Avoid installing default or all features if not needed.
    2. Regularly Review vcpkg.json: Periodically review your vcpkg.json manifest file and remove any dependencies that are no longer used by your application.
    3. Analyze Dependency Graph: Use vcpkg's dependency graph visualization tools (or other dependency analysis tools) to understand the transitive dependencies of your project. Identify and remove any unnecessary transitive dependencies if possible.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Increased Attack Surface (Medium Severity): Reduces the overall attack surface of your application by minimizing the number of dependencies and features included via vcpkg. Fewer dependencies mean fewer potential vulnerabilities to manage within vcpkg context.
    • Transitive Dependency Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Minimizing dependencies also reduces the risk of vulnerabilities in transitive dependencies managed by vcpkg.
    • Dependency Complexity (Low Severity): Simplifies dependency management within vcpkg and reduces the complexity of your project's dependency tree, making it easier to understand and maintain in relation to vcpkg.

  • Impact:

    • Increased Attack Surface: Medium Reduction - Reduces the attack surface by limiting the number of dependencies managed by vcpkg.
    • Transitive Dependency Vulnerabilities: Medium Reduction - Indirectly reduces the risk of transitive dependency vulnerabilities within vcpkg context.
    • Dependency Complexity: Low Reduction - Improves maintainability and understanding of dependencies managed by vcpkg.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Developers are generally encouraged to install only necessary features, but this is not strictly enforced. Regular reviews of vcpkg.json are not consistently performed.

  • Missing Implementation: Formal guidelines and training on minimizing build dependencies within vcpkg are missing. Regular scheduled reviews of vcpkg.json and dependency graph analysis should be implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure vcpkg Configuration

  • Description:

    1. Principle of Least Privilege for vcpkg Operations: Run vcpkg commands (install, update, etc.) with the minimum necessary privileges. Avoid running vcpkg as root or administrator unless absolutely required. Use dedicated build users with restricted permissions when interacting with vcpkg.
    2. Secure Storage of Credentials (If Needed): If vcpkg needs to access private registries or repositories that require authentication, securely store credentials using secrets management tools (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, Azure Key Vault, AWS Secrets Manager) or environment variables. Avoid hardcoding credentials in vcpkg configuration files or scripts.
    3. Restrict Access to vcpkg Configuration Files: Limit access to vcpkg configuration files (vcpkg.json, vcpkg-configuration.json, etc.) to authorized users and systems only. Use file system permissions to control access to vcpkg related configuration.
    4. Regularly Audit vcpkg Configuration: Periodically audit your vcpkg configuration to ensure it is securely configured and follows security best practices specifically for vcpkg usage. Check for misconfigurations, overly permissive settings, or insecure credential handling related to vcpkg.
    5. Use HTTPS for vcpkg Registries and Downloads: Ensure that vcpkg is configured to use HTTPS for accessing vcpkg registries and downloading packages. This protects against man-in-the-middle attacks during package downloads initiated by vcpkg.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Privilege Escalation (Medium Severity): Running vcpkg with excessive privileges could allow attackers to escalate privileges if they compromise the build process through vcpkg.
    • Credential Exposure (High Severity): Hardcoding or insecurely storing credentials in vcpkg configuration could lead to credential theft and unauthorized access to private registries or repositories accessed by vcpkg.
    • Configuration Tampering (Medium Severity): Unauthorized modification of vcpkg configuration could lead to the use of malicious registries, compromised packages, or insecure build settings within vcpkg context.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (Medium Severity): Using insecure protocols (like HTTP) for vcpkg operations could expose package downloads initiated by vcpkg to MITM attacks.

  • Impact:

    • Privilege Escalation: Medium Reduction - Reduces the risk of privilege escalation by limiting privileges for vcpkg operations.
    • Credential Exposure: High Reduction - Prevents credential exposure by promoting secure credential management practices for vcpkg related credentials.
    • Configuration Tampering: Medium Reduction - Mitigates configuration tampering related to vcpkg through access controls and regular audits.
    • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: Medium Reduction - Protects against MITM attacks during vcpkg operations by enforcing HTTPS.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. We generally follow the principle of least privilege for build processes, but this could be further hardened in relation to vcpkg usage. We are using HTTPS for vcpkg operations.

  • Missing Implementation: Formal guidelines on secure vcpkg configuration are missing. Secure credential management for vcpkg is not fully implemented (we are not currently using private registries requiring authentication, but this should be addressed proactively). Regular audits of vcpkg configuration are not performed.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep vcpkg Updated

  • Description:

    1. Regularly Update vcpkg: Establish a process for regularly updating your local vcpkg installation to the latest stable version. Check for updates at least monthly or whenever security advisories are released for vcpkg.
    2. Subscribe to vcpkg Release Notes and Security Announcements: Subscribe to vcpkg release notes, security mailing lists, or GitHub notifications to stay informed about new releases, security patches, and potential security issues in vcpkg itself.
    3. Test vcpkg Updates in a Non-Production Environment: Before updating vcpkg in your production build environment, test the update in a non-production or staging environment to ensure compatibility and identify any potential issues related to vcpkg updates.
    4. Automate vcpkg Updates (Carefully): Consider automating vcpkg updates as part of your regular maintenance process. However, automate updates cautiously and ensure proper testing and rollback mechanisms are in place in case of issues arising from vcpkg updates.
    5. Monitor for vcpkg Vulnerabilities: Actively monitor for any reported vulnerabilities in vcpkg itself. Security advisories for vcpkg will typically be published on the vcpkg GitHub repository or Microsoft Security Response Center.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Vulnerabilities in vcpkg (Medium to High Severity): Addresses vulnerabilities that may be present in vcpkg itself. Outdated versions of vcpkg could contain known security flaws that could be exploited.
    • Build Toolchain Vulnerabilities (Medium Severity): Updating vcpkg may also include updates to underlying build tools or dependencies used by vcpkg, which could address vulnerabilities in the build toolchain used by vcpkg.
    • Lack of Security Features (Low Severity): Newer versions of vcpkg may include improved security features or mitigations that are not present in older versions of vcpkg.

  • Impact:

    • Vulnerabilities in vcpkg: Medium to High Reduction - Directly addresses vulnerabilities in vcpkg itself by applying security patches and updates.
    • Build Toolchain Vulnerabilities: Medium Reduction - Indirectly reduces the risk of build toolchain vulnerabilities by keeping vcpkg and its dependencies updated.
    • Lack of Security Features: Low Reduction - Improves overall security posture of vcpkg usage by adopting new security features and mitigations in vcpkg.

  • Currently Implemented: No, vcpkg updates are not performed regularly or automatically. Updates are done manually and infrequently.

  • Missing Implementation: A process for regularly updating vcpkg needs to be established. Subscription to vcpkg release notes and security announcements should be set up. Automated vcpkg updates (with proper testing) should be considered for the future.