Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
51 lines (42 loc) · 6.92 KB

File metadata and controls

51 lines (42 loc) · 6.92 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for microsoft/vcpkg

  • Description: A malicious actor gains control of an upstream repository (e.g., a GitHub repository) hosting a library used by your project. The attacker modifies the library's source code to include malicious functionality.
  • How vcpkg Contributes: vcpkg directly downloads and builds code from these upstream repositories, acting as the primary conduit for the compromised code to enter your application's build process. This is the core of the supply chain risk.
  • Example: An attacker compromises the repository for a widely-used JSON parsing library and injects code that sends parsed data to an attacker-controlled server. vcpkg downloads and builds this compromised library, integrating the malicious code into your application.
  • Impact: Code execution, data exfiltration, system compromise, privilege escalation. The impact is broad and depends on the nature of the injected code.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Vetting: Rigorously research and select well-established, actively maintained libraries with a strong security history. Prioritize libraries with frequent security audits.
    • Version Pinning (with Baselines): Use specific version numbers (e.g., library#1.2.3) in your vcpkg.json (manifest mode). Leverage vcpkg's baselines feature for consistent and controlled versioning across your projects and teams. This prevents automatic updates to potentially compromised versions.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Integrate automated vulnerability scanning tools (e.g., Snyk, Dependabot, OWASP Dependency-Check) into your CI/CD pipeline. These tools can detect known vulnerabilities in your dependencies before they are deployed.
    • Monitor Security Advisories: Actively monitor security mailing lists, vulnerability databases (e.g., CVE), and news sources related to your dependencies. Be prepared to react quickly to newly discovered vulnerabilities.
  • Description: An attacker creates a malicious package with a name deceptively similar to a legitimate package, hoping developers will accidentally install the malicious one.
  • How vcpkg Contributes: vcpkg's package search and installation mechanism, while convenient, can be exploited if a developer makes a typographical error or is misled by a similar name. vcpkg is the direct tool used to install the malicious package.
  • Example: An attacker publishes a package named libcur1 (note the 1 instead of l), mimicking the legitimate libcurl package. A developer mistyping the name during installation via vcpkg install libcur1 would install the malicious package.
  • Impact: Code execution, data exfiltration, system compromise – the same broad impact as a compromised upstream dependency.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Careful Package Name Verification: Meticulously double-check package names before executing any vcpkg install command. Pay extreme attention to spelling, capitalization, and special characters.
    • Use Manifest Mode (vcpkg.json): Always use vcpkg.json (manifest mode) to explicitly list your dependencies and their exact versions. This eliminates the need to type package names during installation, significantly reducing the risk of typos.
    • Automated Checks (Pre-Commit Hooks): Consider implementing pre-commit hooks or other automated checks in your development workflow that analyze your vcpkg.json for potential typosquatting attempts (e.g., by comparing package names against a list of known legitimate packages).

Attack Surface: Malicious Portfile

  • Description: The portfile.cmake (and related files) within a vcpkg port contains malicious build instructions, designed to compromise the build process or the resulting binary.
  • How vcpkg Contributes: vcpkg directly executes the instructions contained within the portfile during the build process. The portfile is the mechanism by which malicious code is introduced.
  • Example: A compromised portfile for a cryptography library could include a build step that downloads and executes a script from an attacker-controlled server, or it could subtly modify compiler flags to weaken the cryptographic algorithms.
  • Impact: Code execution on the build machine, system compromise, weakened security of the built library (potentially bypassing intended security features).
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Sandboxing: Run vcpkg build processes within a strictly isolated environment (e.g., a container with minimal privileges and network access). This contains the impact of a malicious portfile, preventing it from compromising the host system.
    • Rely on the vcpkg Community: The vcpkg community and maintainers actively work to identify and remove malicious portfiles. Prioritize using ports from the official vcpkg registry.
    • Report Suspicious Portfiles: If you encounter a portfile that appears suspicious or exhibits unusual behavior, report it immediately to the vcpkg maintainers.

Attack Surface: Compromised Binary Cache

  • Description: An attacker gains unauthorized access to the vcpkg binary cache and replaces legitimate pre-built binaries with maliciously crafted versions.
  • How vcpkg Contributes: vcpkg directly uses the binary cache to retrieve and install pre-built binaries, making it the direct pathway for compromised binaries to be introduced.
  • Example: An attacker compromises a shared binary cache server and replaces the pre-built binary for a networking library with a version containing a backdoor that allows remote access.
  • Impact: Code execution, system compromise, data exfiltration – the same broad impact as a compromised upstream dependency.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Cache Location: Use a highly secure and trusted location for your binary cache. This should be a private server or a reputable cloud storage service with strict access controls.
    • Strong Authentication and Authorization: Implement robust authentication and authorization mechanisms for your binary cache to prevent unauthorized access and modification.
    • Binary Verification (x-hashes): Always use vcpkg's x-hashes feature to cryptographically verify the integrity of downloaded binaries. This involves specifying the expected SHA-512 hash of the binary in the portfile or triplet file. vcpkg will then verify the downloaded binary against this hash, ensuring it hasn't been tampered with. This is a critical mitigation.