Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
122 lines (97 loc) · 12.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

122 lines (97 loc) · 12.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for microsoft/win2d

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation for Image Sources (Win2D Specific)

  • Description:

    1. Identify Win2D Image Loading Points: Locate all code sections where CanvasBitmap.LoadAsync, CanvasBitmap.CreateFromBytes, CanvasBitmap.CreateFromStream, or similar Win2D methods are used to load images. These are the primary entry points for image data into Win2D.
    2. Validate Input Paths/URLs for Win2D: If image sources are user-provided paths or URLs used with Win2D loading functions:
      • Use path canonicalization functions (Path.GetFullPath) before passing paths to Win2D to prevent path traversal.
      • Validate against an allowlist of allowed base directories or URL domains before Win2D attempts to load from them.
      • Reject paths or URLs containing suspicious characters or patterns (e.g., "..", "//", "file://") before Win2D processes them.
    3. Filter File Extensions and MIME Types for Win2D:
      • Check the file extension of loaded images against an allowlist of allowed image extensions (e.g., ".png", ".jpg", ".bmp") before passing the file to Win2D's loading functions.
      • If possible, verify the MIME type of image data received from network sources against an allowlist of allowed image MIME types (e.g., "image/png", "image/jpeg") before Win2D processes the data.
    4. File Header Verification Before Win2D Processing:
      • For critical image processing, consider implementing checks on image file headers (magic numbers) to confirm the file type and detect potential file format spoofing attempts before handing the data to Win2D for decoding.
    5. Handle Win2D Image Loading Errors Gracefully: Implement robust error handling specifically for Win2D image loading failures. Do not expose detailed Win2D error messages to users that could reveal internal paths or system information.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Path Traversal (High Severity): Attackers could potentially read arbitrary files if Win2D is used to load images from unvalidated user-provided paths.
    • Remote File Inclusion (Medium Severity): If Win2D loads from URLs, attackers could potentially load and process malicious images from untrusted remote sources via Win2D.
    • File Format Exploits (Medium to High Severity): Processing maliciously crafted image files through Win2D could exploit vulnerabilities in Win2D's image decoding or underlying libraries.

  • Impact:

    • Path Traversal: Mitigation significantly reduces the risk by validating paths before Win2D interacts with them.
    • Remote File Inclusion: Mitigation significantly reduces the risk by controlling allowed sources before Win2D attempts to load.
    • File Format Exploits: Mitigation reduces the risk by limiting processed file types and adding a layer of defense before Win2D decodes the image.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in the image upload feature of the application backend API endpoint, which is before Win2D is used to process the uploaded image (backend uses different image processing library).
    • Path validation and file extension filtering are applied in the API endpoint before any Win2D processing.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in the image preview functionality within the user interface, where Win2D is directly used to load images from temporary storage without strict validation before Win2D loading.
    • MIME type and file header verification are not currently implemented anywhere before Win2D image processing.

Mitigation Strategy: Sanitization of Text Input for Win2D Text Rendering

  • Description:

    1. Identify Win2D Text Rendering Points: Locate all code sections where user-provided text is used with CanvasTextLayout or CanvasTextFormat for rendering using Win2D.
    2. Sanitize Text Input Before Win2D Rendering:
      • Apply HTML encoding or similar sanitization techniques to user-provided text before passing it to Win2D text rendering APIs.
      • Consider using a character allowlist to restrict the characters allowed in user-provided text before Win2D renders it, if specific character sets are expected.
    3. Limit Text Length for Win2D Rendering:
      • Enforce a maximum length for user-provided text before it is used with Win2D text rendering to prevent excessive resource consumption within Win2D's text layout and rendering engine.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Text Injection (Low Severity): Malicious users could potentially inject control characters or escape sequences into text fields, potentially causing unexpected rendering behavior in Win2D.
    • Denial of Service (Medium Severity): Extremely long text inputs could potentially consume excessive resources during Win2D text layout and rendering, leading to performance degradation or denial of service within Win2D's rendering pipeline.

  • Impact:

    • Text Injection: Mitigation effectively eliminates the risk of basic text injection issues in Win2D rendered text.
    • Denial of Service: Mitigation significantly reduces the risk of DoS related to Win2D text rendering by limiting text length before Win2D processes it.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic text length limits are implemented on text input fields in the user interface before the text is passed to Win2D for rendering.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Text sanitization is not currently implemented before passing text to Win2D rendering APIs.
    • No specific character allowlist is in place before Win2D text rendering.

Mitigation Strategy: Resource Quotas for Win2D CanvasBitmaps

  • Description:

    1. Track Win2D CanvasBitmap Usage: Implement mechanisms to track the number and size of CanvasBitmap objects created within the Win2D rendering context in the application.
    2. Set Win2D Resource Limits: Define reasonable limits specifically for Win2D CanvasBitmap resources:
      • Maximum number of CanvasBitmap objects allowed to be active simultaneously within Win2D.
      • Maximum total memory (RAM and GPU memory) that can be used by CanvasBitmap objects managed by Win2D.
      • Maximum dimensions (width and height) for individual CanvasBitmap objects created in Win2D.
    3. Enforce Win2D Resource Limits:
      • Before creating a new CanvasBitmap using Win2D APIs, check if Win2D resource limits are exceeded.
      • If limits are exceeded, implement a strategy to either:
        • Reject the creation of the new CanvasBitmap in Win2D and display an error message.
        • Automatically dispose of older, less frequently used CanvasBitmap objects managed by Win2D to free up resources (implement a resource eviction policy, e.g., LRU for Win2D bitmaps).
    4. Monitor Win2D Resource Usage: Implement monitoring of resource usage (memory, GPU memory) specifically by Win2D to detect potential resource leaks or excessive consumption within the Win2D rendering pipeline.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (High Severity): Attackers could intentionally or unintentionally cause the application to consume excessive memory through Win2D by loading or creating a large number of CanvasBitmap objects, leading to out-of-memory errors, crashes, or system instability related to Win2D resource exhaustion.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Uncontrolled resource consumption by Win2D can lead to performance degradation and application instability over time, even without malicious intent, specifically due to Win2D resource management issues.

  • Impact:

    • Denial of Service: Mitigation significantly reduces the risk of DoS related to Win2D resource exhaustion by preventing uncontrolled resource consumption within Win2D.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Mitigation helps prevent resource exhaustion within Win2D and improves application stability and performance related to Win2D resource management.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic limits on the maximum dimensions of uploaded images are implemented in the backend before Win2D is involved. These indirectly limit Win2D bitmap sizes for uploaded images.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • No tracking of the number of CanvasBitmap objects created and managed by Win2D is currently implemented.
    • No limits on the total memory used by CanvasBitmap objects within Win2D are in place.
    • No resource eviction policy is implemented for Win2D CanvasBitmaps.

Mitigation Strategy: Win2D API Usage Best Practices and Focused Code Reviews

  • Description:

    1. Developer Training on Secure Win2D API Usage: Provide developers with training specifically on secure coding practices when using Win2D APIs, focusing on resource management (especially Dispose()), input validation in the context of Win2D data loading, and error handling for Win2D API calls.
    2. Establish Win2D Specific Coding Guidelines: Create and enforce coding guidelines that emphasize secure Win2D API usage, including recommendations for:
      • Properly disposing of ICanvasResource objects (like CanvasBitmap, CanvasRenderTarget, etc.) to prevent resource leaks.
      • Validating inputs before using them with Win2D APIs.
      • Handling exceptions and error codes returned by Win2D APIs.
      • Avoiding deprecated or potentially unsafe Win2D API patterns.
    3. Conduct Win2D-Focused Code Reviews: Implement code reviews specifically focused on the correct and secure usage of Win2D APIs. Reviewers should be trained to identify potential security vulnerabilities arising from improper Win2D usage, such as resource leaks, incorrect input handling for Win2D, and error handling gaps in Win2D code.
    4. Static Code Analysis for Win2D Specific Issues: Integrate static code analysis tools into the development pipeline and configure them to automatically detect potential security issues and coding errors specifically related to Win2D API usage. Configure the tools to check for:
      • Missing Dispose() calls on ICanvasResource objects.
      • Potential null dereferences when using Win2D objects.
      • Incorrect usage patterns of Win2D APIs that could lead to vulnerabilities or instability.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Introduction of Vulnerabilities through Improper Win2D API Usage (Medium to High Severity): Developer errors in using Win2D APIs can inadvertently introduce security vulnerabilities, such as resource leaks within Win2D, improper input handling for Win2D functions, or logic flaws in Win2D related code that attackers could exploit.

  • Impact:

    • Introduction of Vulnerabilities through Improper Win2D API Usage: Mitigation significantly reduces the likelihood of introducing vulnerabilities through coding errors specifically related to Win2D by improving developer awareness of secure Win2D practices and improving code quality in Win2D related sections.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Code reviews are conducted for all code changes, but they do not have a specific focus on Win2D security or API usage.
    • Basic coding guidelines are in place, but they do not specifically address Win2D API security best practices.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • No specific developer training on secure Win2D API coding is provided.
    • Coding guidelines are not detailed enough regarding Win2D API security.
    • Code reviews are not specifically focused on Win2D security aspects and API usage patterns.
    • Static code analysis tools are not currently configured to specifically check for Win2D related API usage issues like resource leaks or incorrect API calls.