Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
60 lines (47 loc) · 5.58 KB

File metadata and controls

60 lines (47 loc) · 5.58 KB

Threat Model Analysis for milostosic/mtuner

  • Threat: Unauthorized Access to mtunergui Web Interface

    • Description: An attacker gains access to the mtunergui web interface, either by guessing weak credentials, exploiting a vulnerability in the web server, or bypassing authentication mechanisms altogether. The attacker then browses the memory profiling data, viewing stack traces, allocation sizes, and other sensitive information.
    • Impact: Leakage of sensitive information about the application's internal workings, data structures, and potentially sensitive data present in memory. This can be used for reverse engineering, vulnerability discovery, and data exfiltration.
    • Affected Component: mtunergui (the web interface component, specifically the HTTP server and data rendering logic).
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement strong authentication (robust password policies, multi-factor authentication).
      • Use a dedicated, secure web server configuration (avoid default configurations).
      • Restrict network access to the interface (firewall, network segmentation, only allow access from localhost or a trusted network).
      • Disable the web interface when not actively in use.
      • Regularly audit the web server and mtunergui code for vulnerabilities.
  • Threat: mtuner Data File Exfiltration

    • Description: An attacker gains unauthorized file system access (e.g., through a separate vulnerability, compromised credentials, or misconfigured permissions) and copies the .dat or .mtuner files to an external location. The attacker then analyzes these files offline.
    • Impact: Complete exposure of the memory allocation data, allowing for detailed analysis of the application's behavior and potential extraction of sensitive information.
    • Affected Component: The data files generated by the mtuner instrumentation library (e.g., .dat, .mtuner files). The specific functions affected are those related to writing and storing these files.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Store data files in a secure directory with restricted file system permissions (only the application user and mtuner analysis user should have access).
      • Implement file system monitoring and alerting for unauthorized access attempts.
      • Consider encrypting the data files at rest (though this adds complexity to the analysis workflow).
      • Regularly review and audit file system permissions.
  • Threat: mtuner Data File Corruption/Tampering

    • Description: An attacker gains write access to the mtuner data files and modifies them. This could involve deleting data, injecting false data, or corrupting the file format. The goal might be to disrupt analysis, hide malicious activity, or potentially trigger vulnerabilities in the analysis tools.
    • Impact: Incorrect memory analysis results, potentially masking real memory leaks or performance issues. May lead to incorrect conclusions about the application's behavior. In rare cases, crafted malicious data might be exploitable, but this is less likely.
    • Affected Component: The data files generated by the mtuner instrumentation library (e.g., .dat, .mtuner files), and the file writing functions within the library.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement File Integrity Monitoring (FIM) to detect unauthorized modifications.
      • Use digital signatures or checksums to verify file integrity before analysis.
      • Restrict write access to the data files to the absolute minimum (ideally, only the instrumented application process).
      • Regularly back up the data files to a secure location.
  • Threat: Exploitation of Vulnerabilities in mtuner Itself (e.g., mtunergui)

    • Description: An attacker discovers a vulnerability in mtuner itself (e.g., a buffer overflow in the data parsing logic of mtunergui or a command injection vulnerability in the web interface). The attacker crafts a malicious .dat file or sends a specially crafted HTTP request to exploit the vulnerability.
    • Impact: Remote code execution on the server running mtunergui or, less likely, on the server running the instrumented application. This could lead to complete system compromise.
    • Affected Component: Potentially any part of mtuner, but most likely the mtunergui web interface (due to its network exposure) or the data parsing functions within mtuner and mtunergui.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Keep mtuner updated to the latest version.
      • Perform regular security audits and penetration testing of mtuner, especially mtunergui.
      • Run mtunergui with the least necessary privileges (avoid running as root).
      • Use a sandboxed environment or container to isolate mtunergui.
      • Implement a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to filter malicious requests to mtunergui.