Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
40 lines (33 loc) · 5 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

40 lines (33 loc) · 5 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for ml-explore/mlx

Attack Surface: Unsafe Model Loading and Deserialization

Description: Loading and processing model files from untrusted sources can lead to vulnerabilities if the model file is maliciously crafted to exploit weaknesses in the model loading process.

  • MLX Contribution: MLX provides the core functionality to load and deserialize model files. Vulnerabilities in MLX's model loading code directly create this attack surface.
  • Example: An attacker crafts a malicious MLX model file. When an application uses mlx.load() to load this file, it triggers a buffer overflow vulnerability within MLX's model parsing logic, allowing for arbitrary code execution on the server.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution, Denial of Service (DoS), data exfiltration, full system compromise.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Model Source Validation: Strictly validate the source and integrity of model files. Only load models from trusted and verified origins. Implement checksums or digital signatures.
    • Sandboxing/Containerization: Isolate the model loading process within sandboxed environments or containers to limit the potential damage from exploits.
    • Regular MLX Updates: Keep MLX updated to the latest version to benefit from security patches and bug fixes in model loading and parsing functionalities.

Attack Surface: Adversarial Inputs during Model Inference

Description: Crafted or malicious inputs designed to exploit vulnerabilities during the model inference process within MLX, leading to crashes, resource exhaustion, or unexpected behavior.

  • MLX Contribution: MLX is the engine responsible for performing model inference. Vulnerabilities in MLX's numerical operations, tensor handling, or control flow during inference can be triggered by adversarial inputs.
  • Example: An attacker crafts a specific input tensor that, when processed by an MLX model, triggers an integer overflow or division-by-zero error within a custom MLX operation. This leads to a crash of the MLX application or unpredictable behavior that can be further exploited.
  • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS), application instability, potential for exploitation based on unexpected model behavior or outputs.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Input Validation and Sanitization: Implement rigorous input validation and sanitization before feeding data to MLX models. Define and enforce input schemas and ranges.
    • Robust Error Handling: Implement comprehensive error handling within the application to gracefully manage unexpected model outputs or errors during MLX inference.
    • Resource Limits: Set resource limits (memory, compute time) for MLX inference operations to prevent resource exhaustion attacks.
    • Model Security Analysis: Conduct security analysis of the ML model itself to understand its behavior with unusual or adversarial inputs and identify potential weaknesses in conjunction with MLX's processing.

Attack Surface: Memory Management Vulnerabilities in MLX

Description: Bugs or flaws in MLX's memory management routines (allocation, deallocation, buffer handling) can lead to memory corruption vulnerabilities like buffer overflows, use-after-free, or memory leaks.

  • MLX Contribution: MLX, being implemented in C++ and Python, directly manages memory for tensors, model weights, and intermediate computations. Memory management vulnerabilities within MLX's core C++ code are a direct and critical attack surface.
  • Example: A vulnerability in MLX's tensor allocation logic causes a buffer overflow when processing a large or specially crafted input tensor. An attacker can exploit this overflow to overwrite adjacent memory regions, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or data corruption.
  • Impact: Arbitrary code execution, Denial of Service (DoS), data corruption, information leakage, potential for privilege escalation.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Regular MLX Updates: Ensure MLX is updated to the latest version to benefit from bug fixes and security patches addressing memory management issues.
    • Memory Safety Tools (MLX Development): If contributing to or modifying MLX, utilize memory safety tools (e.g., AddressSanitizer, MemorySanitizer) during development and testing to proactively detect and fix memory errors.
    • Fuzzing MLX: Consider fuzzing MLX's core components, especially memory-intensive operations, to uncover potential memory management vulnerabilities.
    • Secure Coding Practices (MLX Development): Adhere to strict secure coding practices within the MLX codebase, particularly in memory management routines, to minimize the introduction of vulnerabilities.