Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
62 lines (51 loc) · 4.64 KB

File metadata and controls

62 lines (51 loc) · 4.64 KB

Threat Model Analysis for ml-explore/mlx

Description: An attacker replaces a legitimate ML model with a malicious one by compromising model storage or loading processes. This allows the attacker to manipulate the application's behavior through the model's outputs, potentially leading to data exfiltration, incorrect results, or further exploitation. Impact: Application malfunction, data breaches, generation of incorrect or biased outputs, potential for arbitrary code execution if model loading is vulnerable. MLX Component Affected: Model loading mechanisms (e.g., functions used to load model weights, model file parsing). Risk Severity: High to Critical Mitigation Strategies: * Implement strong access controls for model storage. * Use secure channels for model transfer and storage. * Implement model validation and integrity checks (e.g., checksums, digital signatures) before loading. * Regularly audit model storage access.

Description: Sensitive data processed by MLX is inadvertently logged to files or console output due to verbose logging configurations or unintentional logging of input/output data. An attacker accessing these logs can extract sensitive information. Impact: Confidentiality breach, exposure of sensitive user data, violation of privacy regulations. MLX Component Affected: Logging mechanisms within MLX or application code interacting with MLX. Risk Severity: High Mitigation Strategies: * Minimize logging of sensitive data. * Implement secure logging practices (e.g., log rotation, access controls for log files). * Sanitize or mask sensitive data before logging if necessary. * Regularly audit logging configurations.

Description: An attacker exploits a buffer overflow or other memory corruption vulnerability within the MLX library itself by providing crafted inputs or exploiting weaknesses in MLX's data handling. Successful exploitation can lead to arbitrary code execution or denial of service. Impact: Arbitrary code execution, complete system compromise, denial of service, data breaches, application instability. MLX Component Affected: Core MLX C++ library, Python bindings, specific functions handling input data or computations. Risk Severity: Critical Mitigation Strategies: * Keep MLX library updated to the latest version with security patches. * Monitor security advisories for MLX and its dependencies. * Perform security testing and code reviews of application code interacting with MLX. * Implement input validation and sanitization for data passed to MLX functions.

Description: An attacker sends requests that trigger MLX operations requiring excessive memory allocation, such as loading very large models or processing huge datasets. This can exhaust server memory, leading to application crashes or unresponsiveness and denying service to legitimate users. Impact: Application unavailability, denial of service for legitimate users, system instability. MLX Component Affected: Model loading, memory allocation within MLX, functions performing computationally intensive operations. Risk Severity: High Mitigation Strategies: * Implement resource limits (memory limits) for MLX processes. * Monitor memory usage of MLX operations. * Implement request rate limiting and throttling. * Optimize model sizes and computational complexity.

Description: MLX relies on external libraries and dependencies. An attacker exploits known vulnerabilities in these dependencies to compromise the application. This could involve vulnerabilities in Python libraries or system libraries used by MLX, leading to various impacts depending on the vulnerability. Impact: Arbitrary code execution, denial of service, data breaches, application instability, depending on the dependency vulnerability. MLX Component Affected: MLX dependencies (Python packages, system libraries). Risk Severity: Critical Mitigation Strategies: * Regularly audit and update MLX dependencies to their latest secure versions. * Use dependency scanning tools to identify known vulnerabilities. * Implement dependency management best practices (e.g., using virtual environments, dependency pinning). * Monitor security advisories for MLX dependencies.