Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
134 lines (97 loc) · 7.87 KB

File metadata and controls

134 lines (97 loc) · 7.87 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for ml-explore/mlx

Objective: To exfiltrate sensitive data processed by the MLX model, manipulate the model's output to produce incorrect or malicious results.

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise MLX Application
├── 1. Exfiltrate Sensitive Data
│   ├── 1.1. Exploit Array Data Handling [CRITICAL]
│   │   ├── 1.1.1. Memory Corruption in mlx.core.array
│   │   │   ├── 1.1.1.1. Buffer Overflow/Underflow during array creation/manipulation (C++/Python boundary) [HIGH RISK]
│   │   │   └── 1.1.1.2. Type Confusion in array operations (e.g., treating an integer array as a float array) [HIGH RISK]
│   │   └── 1.1.3. Exploit Lazy Evaluation
│   │       └── 1.1.3.1.  Intercept intermediate array results before they are consumed (if not properly secured) [HIGH RISK]
│   ├── 1.2.  Abuse Unified Memory Access
│   │    └── 1.2.1.  Craft a malicious process that reads MLX array data directly from shared memory (requires elevated privileges) [HIGH RISK]
│   └── 1.3. Exploit Model Loading/Saving [CRITICAL]
│       ├── 1.3.1.  Supply a malicious model file that, when loaded, triggers a vulnerability (e.g., pickle deserialization vulnerability) [HIGH RISK]
├── 2. Manipulate Model Output
│   ├── 2.1. Adversarial Input Attacks [CRITICAL]
│   │   ├── 2.1.1.  Craft input data that causes the model to misclassify or produce incorrect results (classic adversarial example) [HIGH RISK]
│   ├── 2.2.  Poison Training Data (if application allows retraining)
│   │   └── 2.2.1.  Introduce subtly modified data that biases the model's output [HIGH RISK]
│   ├── 2.3.  Manipulate Model Weights
│   │   ├── 2.3.1.  Directly modify the model file (requires file system access) [HIGH RISK]
│   │   └── 2.3.2.  Exploit vulnerabilities in the model loading/saving process to inject malicious weights [HIGH RISK]
  • Description: This node represents vulnerabilities related to how MLX handles its core mlx.core.array objects. These arrays are fundamental to MLX's operation, and vulnerabilities here can have a wide-reaching impact, potentially leading to data exfiltration or code execution.
  • Description: A buffer overflow occurs when data written to a buffer exceeds its allocated size, overwriting adjacent memory. A buffer underflow occurs when data is read from a location before the beginning of the buffer. The C++/Python boundary is a common area for these vulnerabilities due to the interaction between different memory management systems.
  • Likelihood: Low
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: High
  • Skill Level: Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: Type confusion occurs when a piece of memory is interpreted as a data type different from its intended type. For example, treating an array of integers as an array of floating-point numbers. This can lead to data corruption and potentially arbitrary code execution.
  • Likelihood: Low
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: High
  • Skill Level: Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: MLX uses lazy evaluation, meaning computations are only performed when the result is needed. If intermediate results are not properly secured, an attacker could potentially intercept them and access sensitive data.
  • Likelihood: Low
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: High
  • Skill Level: Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard
  • Description: MLX leverages Apple silicon's unified memory architecture. An attacker with elevated privileges could craft a malicious process to directly read MLX array data from shared memory.
  • Likelihood: Low
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Medium
  • Skill Level: Advanced
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: This node represents vulnerabilities related to how MLX loads and saves models. These are common operations and represent a significant entry point for attackers.
  • Description: An attacker could provide a maliciously crafted model file that, when loaded by MLX, triggers a vulnerability (e.g., a pickle deserialization vulnerability or a vulnerability in a custom model format). This could lead to arbitrary code execution.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Medium
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: This node represents the threat of adversarial input attacks, where carefully crafted input data is designed to cause the model to produce incorrect results.
  • Description: An attacker crafts input data that is subtly different from normal input but causes the model to misclassify it or produce an incorrect output. This is a classic adversarial example attack.
  • Likelihood: High
  • Impact: Medium to High
  • Effort: Low to Medium
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium

Attack Tree Path: 2.2. Poison Training Data

  • Description: If the application allows retraining, an attacker could introduce subtly modified data into the training set that biases the model's output in a desired direction.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Medium
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard
  • Description: An attacker with file system access could directly modify the model file, altering the model's weights and completely changing its behavior.
  • Likelihood: Low
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Medium
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Description: Similar to 1.3.1, but instead of just triggering a vulnerability, the attacker injects malicious weights during the model loading or saving process.
  • Likelihood: Low
  • Impact: High
  • Effort: Medium
  • Skill Level: Intermediate
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium