Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
82 lines (63 loc) · 6.15 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

82 lines (63 loc) · 6.15 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for ml-explore/mlx

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Input Validation and Sanitization (MLX-Focused)

Description:

  1. mlx.core.array Type Checking: Use isinstance(input, mlx.core.array) to confirm inputs are MLX arrays. Use input.dtype to verify the data type against expected values (e.g., mlx.core.float32, mlx.core.int32). Raise TypeError on mismatches.
  2. Shape Validation: Use input.shape to get the MLX array's dimensions. Compare this tuple to the expected shape. Raise ValueError for discrepancies. Create helper functions for complex shape checks.
  3. Range Checking: Use mlx.core.clip(input, min_val, max_val) to constrain input values to a valid range. Alternatively, use mlx.core.min(input) and mlx.core.max(input) to check for out-of-bounds values and raise ValueError if found.
  4. Normalization/Standardization: Before computation, normalize or standardize using MLX functions. For example, divide image data by 255 (using input / 255.0) or calculate mean/stddev with mlx.core.mean() and mlx.core.std() for standardization.
  5. Fuzz Testing (MLX Inputs): Use a fuzzing framework to generate diverse mlx.core.array inputs (various shapes, types, and values, including edge cases) and feed them to MLX operations to identify crashes or unexpected behavior.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Buffer Overflows (Severity: High): Incorrect shape validation with MLX arrays can lead to out-of-bounds memory access.
  • Integer Overflows/Underflows (Severity: High): Missing range checks on MLX array data can cause overflows/underflows.
  • Type Confusion (Severity: Medium): Using an incorrect mlx.core.dtype can lead to errors.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: Medium): Extremely large mlx.core.array inputs can cause resource exhaustion.
  • Logic Errors (Severity: Low-Medium): Incorrect input data leads to incorrect MLX model outputs.

Impact:

  • Buffer Overflows: Significantly reduces risk (near elimination with comprehensive checks).
  • Integer Overflows/Underflows: Significantly reduces risk (near elimination with comprehensive checks).
  • Type Confusion: Eliminates the risk.
  • Denial of Service: Reduces risk (requires additional resource limits).
  • Logic Errors: Reduces risk.

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: "mlx.core.array type checking and partial shape validation (dimension count only) are in models.py, MyModel.forward()."

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: "Range checking using mlx.core.clip() is missing. Fuzz testing with varied mlx.core.array inputs is not implemented. Shape validation needs to check specific dimension values."

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Model Loading (MLX Serialization)

Description:

  1. Trusted Source List: Maintain a list of allowed sources (URLs, local paths) for loading MLX models.
  2. Source Verification: Before loading, check if the source is in the trusted list. Reject untrusted sources.
  3. Checksum Calculation: After downloading/accessing the MLX model file, calculate its SHA-256 hash.
  4. Checksum Verification: Compare the calculated hash to a pre-calculated, trusted hash (stored securely).
  5. Load with mlx.core.load(): Only if the source is trusted and the checksum matches, use mlx.core.load() to load the model.
  6. Error Handling: Handle untrusted sources, checksum mismatches, and file corruption gracefully.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Arbitrary Code Execution (Severity: Critical): Loading a malicious MLX model could allow code execution.
  • Model Tampering (Severity: High): Attackers could modify a model to produce incorrect results.
  • Data Exfiltration (Severity: High): A malicious model could exfiltrate data.

Impact:

  • Arbitrary Code Execution: Significantly reduces risk (near elimination with comprehensive checks).
  • Model Tampering: Significantly reduces risk (near elimination with comprehensive checks).
  • Data Exfiltration: Reduces risk (requires additional data leakage prevention).

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: "Models are loaded from ./models using mlx.core.load(). No checksum verification."

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: "Checksum verification is missing. No explicit trusted source list. Error handling for mlx.core.load() is basic."

Mitigation Strategy: Careful Memory Management (MLX Arrays)

Description:

  1. Prefer MLX API: Use built-in MLX functions for array manipulation (e.g., mlx.core.reshape, mlx.core.transpose, mlx.core.matmul). Avoid custom low-level memory operations.
  2. In-Place Operations: Use in-place operations (e.g., a += b instead of a = a + b) with MLX arrays to minimize memory allocations and copies.
  3. Code Reviews: Thoroughly review code interacting with MLX array memory, focusing on memory safety.
  4. Avoid Raw Pointers (with MLX): If interfacing with C++, avoid raw pointers to MLX array data. If necessary, handle pointer arithmetic and memory lifetimes with extreme care.
  5. Context Managers (with MLX): Use context managers for temporary mlx.core.array objects to ensure memory release.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Buffer Overflows (Severity: High): Incorrect manipulation of MLX array memory.
  • Use-After-Free (Severity: High): Accessing freed MLX array memory.
  • Memory Leaks (Severity: Medium): Failing to release allocated MLX array memory.

Impact:

  • Buffer Overflows: Reduces risk (requires careful coding).
  • Use-After-Free: Reduces risk (requires careful coding).
  • Memory Leaks: Reduces risk (with in-place operations and resource management).

Currently Implemented:

  • Example: "Code uses MLX API functions. In-place operations are used in some areas."

Missing Implementation:

  • Example: "Code reviews don't explicitly focus on MLX array memory safety. Consistent use of in-place operations is not enforced."