Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
52 lines (39 loc) · 4.91 KB

File metadata and controls

52 lines (39 loc) · 4.91 KB

Threat Model Analysis for protocolbuffers/protobuf

  • Threat: Maliciously Crafted Large Message

    • Description: An attacker sends an extremely large protobuf message, exceeding expected size limits. The attacker crafts a message with many fields, large string values, or large repeated fields, specifically targeting the protobuf deserialization process.
    • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) due to excessive memory allocation on the server during protobuf deserialization, potentially crashing the application or the entire server.
    • Protobuf Component Affected: Deserialization process (e.g., ParseFromString in C++, parseFrom in Java, decode in Python). The core parsing logic is directly affected.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement strict message size limits on both the client and server. Reject messages exceeding this limit before attempting protobuf parsing.
      • Use streaming APIs (if available and appropriate) to process the protobuf message in chunks, avoiding loading the entire message into memory at once.
  • Threat: Deeply Nested Message Attack

    • Description: An attacker sends a protobuf message with excessive nesting depth, exploiting the recursive nature of protobuf message handling. The attacker crafts a message with many nested message types, potentially exploiting recursive definitions within the .proto file.
    • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) due to excessive CPU consumption and potential stack overflow during protobuf deserialization, potentially crashing the application.
    • Protobuf Component Affected: Deserialization process, specifically the recursive handling of nested message types within the protobuf parsing library.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Limit the maximum nesting depth allowed during protobuf deserialization. Reject messages exceeding this limit before deep parsing occurs.
      • Avoid recursive message definitions in your .proto files whenever possible. If recursion is necessary, implement strict validation within your application logic to prevent infinite loops, in addition to the protobuf library's depth limit.
  • Threat: Repeated Field Overflow

    • Description: An attacker sends a protobuf message with an excessively large number of elements in a repeated field, directly targeting the memory allocation behavior of the protobuf deserialization process.
    • Impact: Denial of Service (DoS) due to excessive memory allocation and CPU consumption during protobuf deserialization of the repeated field.
    • Protobuf Component Affected: Deserialization of repeated fields (handling of the repeated keyword in the .proto definition and the corresponding parsing logic within the protobuf library).
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Enforce limits on the maximum number of elements allowed in repeated fields within the protobuf deserialization process. This may require configuration options specific to your chosen protobuf library.
      • Consider using alternative data structures (e.g., maps) if the number of elements is potentially unbounded and can be controlled by an attacker.
  • Threat: Vulnerabilities in Protobuf Library or Extensions

    • Description: A security vulnerability is discovered in the core protobuf library itself (e.g., a buffer overflow in the parsing logic) or in a custom protobuf extension that you are using. This is a direct vulnerability within the protobuf code.
    • Impact: Potentially arbitrary code execution, depending on the nature of the vulnerability. This could lead to complete system compromise.
    • Protobuf Component Affected: The specific vulnerable component within the protobuf library or extension (e.g., a specific parsing function, a particular extension module).
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Keep the protobuf library and all related dependencies (including any extensions) updated to the latest versions. Prioritize security updates.
      • Monitor security advisories for the protobuf library and any extensions you use. Subscribe to relevant mailing lists or security feeds.
      • Use a software composition analysis (SCA) tool to identify and track vulnerabilities in your dependencies, including the protobuf library.
      • If using custom extensions, conduct thorough security reviews and fuzz testing of the extension code.