Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
46 lines (37 loc) · 4.85 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

46 lines (37 loc) · 4.85 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for signalapp/signal-android

Attack Surface: Cryptographic Implementation Flaws

  • Description: Errors in the implementation of the Signal Protocol or supporting cryptographic functions within the Signal Android app itself.
    • How Signal-Android Contributes: This is entirely within Signal-Android's codebase. The app's core function is secure messaging, making cryptographic flaws extremely dangerous.
    • Example: A bug in the key ratcheting mechanism could break forward secrecy. An integer overflow in a cryptographic calculation could lead to key compromise. Incorrect handling of pre-keys could lead to decryption failures or impersonation.
    • Impact: Complete compromise of message confidentiality, integrity, and/or authenticity. Potential for impersonation.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers: Rigorous code review (focused on crypto). Extensive unit/integration testing, including fuzzing. Use well-vetted cryptographic libraries (and keep them updated). Formal verification (where feasible). Independent security audits by cryptography experts.
      • Users: Keep the Signal app updated.

Attack Surface: Local Data Storage Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Weaknesses in how Signal stores data (messages, attachments, keys) on the device. This is specifically about the Signal app's handling of local data.
    • How Signal-Android Contributes: Signal-Android is responsible for encrypting and storing message history locally. The security of this storage depends on the app's implementation.
    • Example: A weak key derivation function for database encryption (e.g., using a short PIN) allows brute-forcing. A vulnerability in SQLCipher (used by Signal) could bypass encryption. Improper handling of file permissions could expose encrypted data.
    • Impact: Exposure of message history and attachments to an attacker with physical access (or a backup).
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers: Use strong key derivation functions (PBKDF2 with high iterations). Audit/update SQLCipher regularly. Implement robust database integrity checks. Consider hardware-backed encryption. Secure file handling practices.
      • Users: Use a strong device PIN/passcode/biometric lock. Enable full-disk encryption. Be cautious about physical device security. Use a long Signal passphrase (if enabled).

Attack Surface: WebRTC Vulnerabilities (Voice/Video Calls)

  • Description: Security flaws in the Signal Android app's integration with and use of the WebRTC library for calls.
    • How Signal-Android Contributes: While WebRTC is a separate library, Signal-Android's implementation of how it uses WebRTC is crucial. This includes handling of media streams, signaling, and interaction with STUN/TURN servers.
    • Example: A buffer overflow in Signal's handling of WebRTC media data could allow code execution. A flaw in how Signal sets up WebRTC connections could leak the user's IP address. Incorrect handling of WebRTC error conditions could lead to a crash or denial-of-service.
    • Impact: Potential for eavesdropping on calls, remote code execution, denial-of-service, IP address leakage.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers: Keep WebRTC library updated. Thoroughly review/test WebRTC integration. Robust input validation/sanitization for WebRTC data. Consider process isolation for WebRTC.
      • Users: Keep the Signal app updated.

Attack Surface: Verification Code Phishing/Social Engineering (Signal App UI/UX)

  • Description: While primarily a user-focused attack, the Signal app's UI/UX plays a role in mitigating or exacerbating this risk.
    • How Signal-Android Contributes: The app's design and warnings (or lack thereof) regarding verification codes directly impact the user's susceptibility to these attacks.
    • Example: If the app doesn't clearly and repeatedly warn users never to share their verification code, users are more likely to fall victim to scams.
    • Impact: Account takeover.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Developers: Implement clear, prominent, and repeated warnings about verification code scams within the app. Consider two-factor authentication options. Improve user education materials within the app.
      • Users: Never share your verification code. Be suspicious of unsolicited requests. Enable Registration Lock.