Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
121 lines (84 loc) · 14.6 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

121 lines (84 loc) · 14.6 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for sqlcipher/sqlcipher

Mitigation Strategy: Robust Key Management for SQLCipher

  • Description:

    1. Strong Key Generation for SQLCipher: Utilize a cryptographically secure random number generator (CSPRNG) to generate a robust encryption key specifically for SQLCipher. Ensure the key is of sufficient length (e.g., 256-bit for AES-256) as recommended for SQLCipher.
    2. Secure Key Storage for SQLCipher Key: Choose a secure method to store the SQLCipher encryption key. Options include:
      • Key Derivation for SQLCipher: Derive the SQLCipher key from a user-provided password using a strong Key Derivation Function (KDF) like Argon2id, PBKDF2, or scrypt. Use a unique, randomly generated salt per database for SQLCipher.
      • OS Keychains/Keystores for SQLCipher Key: Store the generated SQLCipher key in platform-specific secure storage like Keychain (macOS/iOS), Credential Manager (Windows), or KeyStore (Android).
      • HSM/Secure Enclave for SQLCipher Key (Advanced): For highly sensitive data, consider using HSMs or Secure Enclaves to manage and protect the SQLCipher encryption key.
    3. SQLCipher Key Handling in Code: When using the SQLCipher API, ensure the encryption key is passed securely and handled correctly within your application code. Avoid exposing the key in logs or insecure transmissions.
    4. Avoid Hardcoding SQLCipher Key: Never hardcode the SQLCipher encryption key directly in the application source code or configuration files.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Threat: Database Compromise due to Stolen Database File (Severity: High) - If the SQLCipher database file is stolen, a weak or easily compromised key allows attackers to decrypt and access sensitive data.
      • Threat: Key Discovery through Code Analysis (Severity: High) - Hardcoded SQLCipher keys are easily discovered by reverse engineering or static analysis of the application code.
      • Threat: Key Compromise due to Insecure Storage (Severity: High) - Storing the SQLCipher key in plain text or easily accessible locations makes it vulnerable to unauthorized access.

    • Impact: Significantly reduces the risk of SQLCipher database compromise by making it computationally infeasible to decrypt the database without the securely managed SQLCipher key.

    • Currently Implemented: Yes, Password-Based Key Derivation using PBKDF2 is currently implemented for SQLCipher key generation in the user authentication module. The salt is stored alongside the encrypted database metadata.

    • Missing Implementation: Consider migrating to Argon2id for password-based SQLCipher key derivation for improved security. Explore integration with the operating system's KeyStore/Keychain for enhanced SQLCipher key storage security, especially on mobile platforms. HSM/Secure Enclave integration for SQLCipher key management is not currently considered but should be evaluated for future high-security requirements.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Password Handling for SQLCipher Key Derivation (if applicable)

  • Description:

    1. Strong KDF for SQLCipher Key: If deriving the SQLCipher key from a password, use a modern and strong Key Derivation Function (KDF) like Argon2id to derive the SQLCipher encryption key. If Argon2id is not feasible, use PBKDF2 or scrypt with appropriate parameters for SQLCipher key derivation.
    2. Salt Generation for SQLCipher Key Derivation: Generate a unique, cryptographically random salt for each SQLCipher database when using password-based key derivation.
    3. Salt Storage for SQLCipher Key Derivation: Store the salt securely alongside the encrypted SQLCipher database metadata.
    4. Iteration Count/Memory Cost/Parallelism Tuning for SQLCipher KDF: Configure the KDF with appropriate parameters (iteration count for PBKDF2, memory cost and parallelism for Argon2id/scrypt) specifically for SQLCipher key derivation. These parameters should be set high enough to make brute-force attacks on the password (to derive the SQLCipher key) computationally expensive.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Threat: Brute-Force Password Cracking to Obtain SQLCipher Key (Severity: High) - Weak KDFs or low iteration counts make password cracking attacks feasible, allowing attackers to derive the SQLCipher key from a compromised password.
      • Threat: Rainbow Table Attacks on Passwords used for SQLCipher Key Derivation (Severity: Medium) - Using a unique salt for each SQLCipher database prevents the effectiveness of pre-computed rainbow tables for cracking passwords used to derive the SQLCipher key.

    • Impact: Moderately to Significantly reduces the risk of successful password-based key derivation attacks to obtain the SQLCipher key, making it harder for attackers to decrypt the SQLCipher database even if they compromise user passwords.

    • Currently Implemented: Yes, PBKDF2 with a randomly generated salt and a configurable iteration count is implemented for SQLCipher key derivation in the user authentication module.

    • Missing Implementation: Migrate from PBKDF2 to Argon2id for SQLCipher key derivation for improved resistance against modern attacks. Implement adaptive iteration count adjustment based on server load to maintain performance while maximizing security of SQLCipher key derivation.

Mitigation Strategy: SQLCipher Library Integrity and Updates

  • Description:

    1. Official Source Verification for SQLCipher: Download SQLCipher libraries and dependencies only from official and trusted sources like the official SQLCipher GitHub repository or verified package managers.
    2. Checksum/Signature Verification for SQLCipher: Verify the integrity of downloaded SQLCipher libraries using checksums (SHA-256 or stronger) or digital signatures provided by the official source.
    3. Dependency Management for SQLCipher: Use a robust dependency management system to track and manage SQLCipher and its dependencies.
    4. SQLCipher Security Monitoring: Subscribe to security advisories and release notes from the SQLCipher project. Monitor for reported vulnerabilities and security updates specific to SQLCipher.
    5. Regular SQLCipher Updates: Establish a process for regularly updating SQLCipher and its dependencies to the latest stable versions. Prioritize security updates for SQLCipher and apply them promptly.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Threat: Supply Chain Attacks Targeting SQLCipher (Severity: High) - Compromised or malicious SQLCipher libraries from untrusted sources can introduce vulnerabilities or backdoors into the application, directly impacting the security of the encrypted database.
      • Threat: Exploitation of Known SQLCipher Vulnerabilities (Severity: High) - Using outdated versions of SQLCipher with known vulnerabilities exposes the application and the encrypted database to potential exploits.
      • Threat: Library Tampering of SQLCipher (Severity: Medium) - Downloading SQLCipher libraries from insecure sources without verification increases the risk of using tampered libraries containing malware or vulnerabilities that could compromise the database encryption.

    • Impact: Significantly reduces the risk of using compromised or vulnerable SQLCipher libraries, protecting against supply chain attacks and exploitation of known vulnerabilities in SQLCipher itself.

    • Currently Implemented: Yes, SQLCipher is downloaded from the official GitHub repository and managed using [Package Manager Name]. Dependency versions are tracked in [Dependency File Name].

    • Missing Implementation: Automate checksum verification for SQLCipher during the build process. Implement automated checks for new SQLCipher versions and security advisories as part of the CI/CD pipeline. Establish a documented procedure for promptly applying security updates to SQLCipher and its dependencies.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Compilation of SQLCipher

  • Description:

    1. Compiler Security Flags for SQLCipher Compilation: When compiling SQLCipher from source (if applicable), use compiler security flags to enhance the security of the compiled SQLCipher library. Examples include flags for stack protection, address space layout randomization (ASLR), and data execution prevention (DEP).
    2. Secure Build Environment for SQLCipher: Ensure your build environment used to compile SQLCipher (if applicable) is secure and free from malware or tampering. Use trusted build tools and dependencies for SQLCipher compilation.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Threat: Exploitation of Memory Corruption Vulnerabilities in SQLCipher (Severity: High) - Compiler security flags mitigate the risk of exploitation of memory corruption vulnerabilities like buffer overflows and format string bugs within the SQLCipher library itself.
      • Threat: Build System Compromise Affecting SQLCipher (Severity: Medium) - A secure build environment reduces the risk of malicious code injection or tampering during the compilation of SQLCipher.

    • Impact: Moderately reduces the risk of exploitation of memory corruption vulnerabilities within the SQLCipher library and vulnerabilities introduced during the SQLCipher build process.

    • Currently Implemented: Yes, basic compiler security flags like -fstack-protector-strong are enabled in the build process, including when compiling SQLCipher dependencies.

    • Missing Implementation: Enable more comprehensive compiler security flags (e.g., -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2, -fPIE -pie) specifically when compiling SQLCipher dependencies or SQLCipher itself if compiled from source. Document the secure build process and environment for SQLCipher compilation.

Mitigation Strategy: Error Handling and Logging for SQLCipher Operations

  • Description:

    1. Secure Error Handling for SQLCipher: Implement robust error handling specifically for all SQLCipher API calls and database operations. Catch exceptions and handle errors gracefully.
    2. Avoid Sensitive Information in SQLCipher Errors: Do not expose sensitive information like SQLCipher encryption keys, database paths, or internal SQLCipher details in error messages displayed to users or logged in application logs. Use generic error messages for user-facing SQLCipher errors.
    3. Detailed Security Logging for SQLCipher: Log relevant security events specifically related to SQLCipher, such as:
      • SQLCipher database opening and closing attempts (successful and failed).
      • SQLCipher key derivation attempts (successful and failed - log attempts, not the key itself).
      • SQLCipher encryption and decryption errors.
      • SQLCipher authentication failures related to database access.
      • Configuration changes related to SQLCipher.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Threat: Information Disclosure through SQLCipher Error Messages (Severity: Medium) - Verbose error messages related to SQLCipher can leak sensitive information to attackers, aiding in reconnaissance or exploitation of the encrypted database.
      • Threat: Delayed Detection of Security Incidents Related to SQLCipher (Severity: Medium) - Insufficient logging and monitoring of SQLCipher operations can delay the detection of security breaches or attacks targeting the encrypted database.

    • Impact: Moderately reduces the risk of information disclosure through SQLCipher error messages and improves the ability to detect and respond to security incidents specifically related to SQLCipher.

    • Currently Implemented: Yes, basic error handling is implemented for SQLCipher operations. Application logs capture some database-related events.

    • Missing Implementation: Review and sanitize error messages specifically related to SQLCipher to prevent information disclosure. Implement detailed security logging specifically for SQLCipher related events as described above. Integrate log monitoring and alerting for security-relevant SQLCipher events.

Mitigation Strategy: Developer Training and Secure Coding Practices for SQLCipher Usage

  • Description:

    1. SQLCipher Security Training for Developers: Provide developers with specific training on secure usage of SQLCipher, covering:
      • Best practices for SQLCipher key management and secure key storage.
      • Secure password handling and KDF usage in the context of SQLCipher key derivation.
      • Proper SQLCipher API usage and common security pitfalls.
      • Security considerations related to SQLCipher configuration and deployment.
    2. Secure Coding Guidelines for SQLCipher: Establish and enforce secure coding guidelines that include best practices specifically for SQLCipher integration and usage.
    3. Code Reviews (Security Focused on SQLCipher): Conduct mandatory code reviews for all code changes related to SQLCipher integration, focusing on security aspects and adherence to secure coding guidelines for SQLCipher.

    • List of Threats Mitigated:

      • Threat: Security Vulnerabilities due to Developer Mistakes in SQLCipher Usage (Severity: Medium to High) - Lack of training and awareness can lead to developers making security mistakes when integrating and using SQLCipher, potentially weakening database encryption.
      • Threat: Misconfiguration of SQLCipher (Severity: Medium) - Incorrect configuration of SQLCipher by developers can weaken security and introduce vulnerabilities in the database encryption.

    • Impact: Moderately reduces the risk of security vulnerabilities arising from developer errors, misconfigurations, and lack of security awareness specifically related to SQLCipher.

    • Currently Implemented: Yes, basic secure coding guidelines are in place. Code reviews are conducted for all code changes.

    • Missing Implementation: Develop and deliver specific SQLCipher security training for developers. Formalize secure coding guidelines with specific sections on SQLCipher best practices. Implement security-focused code reviews specifically for SQLCipher related code.