Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
139 lines (110 loc) · 11.6 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

139 lines (110 loc) · 11.6 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for taichi-dev/taichi

Objective: Execute Arbitrary Code on Server/Client via Taichi Exploitation

Attack Tree Visualization

Goal: Execute Arbitrary Code on Server/Client via Taichi Exploitation ├── 1. Exploit Taichi Compiler/Runtime Vulnerabilities │ ├── 1.1 Buffer Overflow in Taichi's JIT Compiler [CRITICAL] │ │ ├── 1.1.1 Craft Malicious Taichi Kernel Code │ │ ├── 1.1.2 Trigger JIT Compilation of Malicious Code │ │ ├── 1.1.3 Overwrite Return Address/Function Pointers │ │ └── 1.1.4 Redirect Execution to Shellcode │ ├── 1.2 Type Confusion in Taichi's Type System [CRITICAL] │ │ ├── 1.2.1 Craft Taichi Code that Violates Type Safety │ │ ├── 1.2.2 Bypass Taichi's Type Checking Mechanisms │ │ ├── 1.2.3 Cause Misinterpretation of Data in Memory │ │ └── 1.2.4 Leverage Misinterpretation for Arbitrary Memory Access/Write │ ├── 1.5 Unsafe Deserialization of Taichi Programs/Data [CRITICAL] │ │ ├── 1.5.1 Provide Malicious Serialized Taichi Program/Data │ │ ├── 1.5.2 Trigger Deserialization by Application │ │ └── 1.5.3 Execute Arbitrary Code During Deserialization ├── 2. Exploit Taichi's API Misuse (by the Application Developer) [HIGH RISK] │ ├── 2.1 Insufficient Input Validation of User-Provided Data Used in Taichi Kernels [CRITICAL] [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 2.1.1 Application Accepts Untrusted Input │ │ ├── 2.1.2 Input Directly Used in Taichi Kernel Arguments or Dimensions │ │ ├── 2.1.3 Attacker Controls Kernel Behavior │ │ └── 2.1.4 Trigger Vulnerabilities in Taichi Compiler/Runtime (Go to Branch 1) │ ├── 2.2 Using Taichi's ti.init(debug=True) in Production [CRITICAL] [HIGH RISK] │ │ ├── 2.2.1 Application Deployed with Debug Mode Enabled │ │ ├── 2.2.2 Attacker Gains Access to Internal Taichi State/Memory │ │ └── 2.2.3 Exploit Debug Features for Information Disclosure or Code Execution │ ├── 2.4 Loading Untrusted AOT Modules [CRITICAL] [HIGH RISK] │ ├── 2.4.1 Application loads AOT modules from untrusted sources. │ ├── 2.4.2 Attacker provides a malicious AOT module. │ └── 2.4.3 The malicious module executes arbitrary code upon loading. └── 3. Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Taichi Dependencies ├── 3.1 Compromised Dependency in Taichi's Build Process [CRITICAL] │ ├── 3.1.1 Attacker Compromises a Build Tool or Library Used by Taichi │ ├── 3.1.2 Malicious Code Injected into Taichi During Build │ └── 3.1.3 Application Uses Compromised Taichi Build └── 3.2 Compromised Third-Party Library Used by Taichi [CRITICAL] ├── 3.2.1 Attacker Exploits Vulnerability in a Taichi Dependency ├── 3.2.2 Taichi Inherits Vulnerability from Dependency └── 3.2.3 Attacker Exploits Vulnerability Through Taichi

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Taichi Compiler/Runtime Vulnerabilities

Description: This encompasses vulnerabilities within the Taichi compiler or runtime itself. Successful exploitation leads directly to arbitrary code execution.

  • Mitigation: Fuzzing, static analysis, code reviews, sandboxing, stricter type checking, safe deserialization practices.

Attack Tree Path: 1.1 Buffer Overflow in Taichi's JIT Compiler

Description: The attacker crafts malicious Taichi kernel code (e.g., using excessively large array accesses or deeply nested loops) designed to cause a buffer overflow within Taichi's JIT compiler. If successful, this allows overwriting memory, including return addresses or function pointers, leading to arbitrary code execution.

  • Steps:
    • 1.1.1 Craft Malicious Taichi Kernel Code: Develop Taichi code specifically designed to trigger a buffer overflow.
    • 1.1.2 Trigger JIT Compilation of Malicious Code: Submit the malicious code to the application, causing Taichi to compile it.
    • 1.1.3 Overwrite Return Address/Function Pointers: The overflow overwrites critical memory locations.
    • 1.1.4 Redirect Execution to Shellcode: Control flow is hijacked to execute the attacker's shellcode.
  • Mitigation: Fuzzing, static analysis, code reviews, sandboxing.

Attack Tree Path: 1.2 Type Confusion in Taichi's Type System

Description: The attacker crafts Taichi code that violates type safety, potentially through incorrect type hints or unsafe casting. The goal is to bypass Taichi's type checking and cause the runtime to misinterpret data in memory, leading to arbitrary memory access or writes.

  • Steps:
    • 1.2.1 Craft Taichi Code that Violates Type Safety: Write Taichi code that attempts to trick the type system.
    • 1.2.2 Bypass Taichi's Type Checking Mechanisms: Exploit a flaw in the type checker to allow the malicious code to pass.
    • 1.2.3 Cause Misinterpretation of Data in Memory: The incorrect type information leads to misinterpretation of data.
    • 1.2.4 Leverage Misinterpretation for Arbitrary Memory Access/Write: Use the misinterpretation to read or write to arbitrary memory locations.
  • Mitigation: Fuzzing, static analysis, code reviews, stricter type checking.

Attack Tree Path: 1.5 Unsafe Deserialization of Taichi Programs/Data

Description: If the application deserializes Taichi programs or data (e.g., AOT compiled modules) from untrusted sources, an attacker can provide a maliciously crafted serialized object. If the deserialization process is vulnerable, this can lead to arbitrary code execution during deserialization.

  • Steps:
    • 1.5.1 Provide Malicious Serialized Taichi Program/Data: Create a specially crafted serialized object.
    • 1.5.2 Trigger Deserialization by Application: Submit the malicious object to the application.
    • 1.5.3 Execute Arbitrary Code During Deserialization: The vulnerability in the deserialization process allows code execution.
  • Mitigation: Safe deserialization practices, input validation, sandboxing, use of safer serialization formats.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Taichi's API Misuse (by the Application Developer)

Description: This category covers vulnerabilities arising from incorrect or insecure use of the Taichi API by the application developer. These are often easier to exploit than core compiler/runtime bugs.

  • Mitigation: Strict input validation, never use debug mode in production, never load AOT modules from untrusted sources.

Attack Tree Path: 2.1 Insufficient Input Validation of User-Provided Data Used in Taichi Kernels

Description: The application accepts untrusted input (e.g., from a user, a network request, or a file) and uses this input directly in Taichi kernel arguments or to determine array dimensions or loop iterations without proper validation. This allows an attacker to control the behavior of the Taichi kernel, potentially triggering vulnerabilities in the compiler or runtime (e.g., buffer overflows, out-of-bounds access). This is the most likely attack vector.

  • Steps:
    • 2.1.1 Application Accepts Untrusted Input: The application receives input from an untrusted source.
    • 2.1.2 Input Directly Used in Taichi Kernel Arguments or Dimensions: The untrusted input is used without sanitization.
    • 2.1.3 Attacker Controls Kernel Behavior: The attacker can manipulate kernel parameters.
    • 2.1.4 Trigger Vulnerabilities in Taichi Compiler/Runtime: The manipulated input triggers a vulnerability (e.g., a buffer overflow).
  • Mitigation: Strict input validation and sanitization. Whitelisting is preferred over blacklisting. Use Taichi's type system to enforce constraints.

Attack Tree Path: 2.2 Using Taichi's ti.init(debug=True) in Production

Description: The application is deployed with Taichi's debug mode enabled (ti.init(debug=True)). Debug mode exposes internal Taichi state and memory, making it easier for an attacker to gain information and potentially exploit vulnerabilities.

  • Steps:
    • 2.2.1 Application Deployed with Debug Mode Enabled: The application is running in debug mode.
    • 2.2.2 Attacker Gains Access to Internal Taichi State/Memory: The attacker uses debug features to inspect memory.
    • 2.2.3 Exploit Debug Features for Information Disclosure or Code Execution: The attacker leverages the exposed information.
  • Mitigation: Never use ti.init(debug=True) in production. Use environment variables or configuration files to control debug mode.

Attack Tree Path: 2.4 Loading Untrusted AOT Modules

Description: The application loads Ahead-of-Time (AOT) compiled Taichi modules from untrusted sources. An attacker can provide a malicious AOT module that, when loaded, executes arbitrary code.

  • Steps:
    • 2.4.1 Application loads AOT modules from untrusted sources.
    • 2.4.2 Attacker provides a malicious AOT module.
    • 2.4.3 The malicious module executes arbitrary code upon loading.
  • Mitigation: Never load AOT modules from untrusted sources. Implement code signing and verification.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Taichi Dependencies

Description: These attacks target the integrity of Taichi itself or its dependencies, compromising the software before it even reaches the application.

  • Mitigation: Secure build environment, signed commits and builds, monitor for unauthorized changes, regularly audit and update dependencies, use dependency scanning tools.

Attack Tree Path: 3.1 Compromised Dependency in Taichi's Build Process

Description: An attacker compromises a tool or library used in Taichi's build process (e.g., a compiler, a build script, a dependency management tool). This allows them to inject malicious code into Taichi itself during the build process.

  • Steps:
    • 3.1.1 Attacker Compromises a Build Tool or Library Used by Taichi
    • 3.1.2 Malicious Code Injected into Taichi During Build
    • 3.1.3 Application Uses Compromised Taichi Build
  • Mitigation: Secure build environment, signed commits and builds, monitor for unauthorized changes.

Attack Tree Path: 3.2 Compromised Third-Party Library Used by Taichi

Description: Taichi relies on third-party libraries (e.g., LLVM, numerical libraries). If one of these libraries has a vulnerability, and Taichi uses the vulnerable part of the library, an attacker can exploit the vulnerability through Taichi.

  • Steps:
    • 3.2.1 Attacker Exploits Vulnerability in a Taichi Dependency
    • 3.2.2 Taichi Inherits Vulnerability from Dependency
    • 3.2.3 Attacker Exploits Vulnerability Through Taichi
  • Mitigation: Regularly audit and update dependencies, use dependency scanning tools.