Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
50 lines (43 loc) · 7.5 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

50 lines (43 loc) · 7.5 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for tencent/ncnn

Attack Surface: 1. Maliciously Crafted Input Data (Image/Video/Audio)

Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in ncnn's or underlying libraries' handling of image, video, or audio input formats by providing specially crafted files. This targets weaknesses in data parsing and processing routines within ncnn or its direct dependencies when handling multimedia input.

  • How ncnn contributes to the attack surface: ncnn is designed to process multimedia data as input for neural network inference. If ncnn's internal input processing logic or the libraries it relies on for decoding these formats have vulnerabilities, malicious input can trigger critical issues.
  • Example: An application uses ncnn for image classification. A specially crafted JPEG image is provided as input. This JPEG exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability within ncnn's JPEG decoding routine (or a directly used image decoding library triggered by ncnn's processing), leading to arbitrary code execution on the device.
  • Impact:
    • Code Execution: Attackers can gain complete control over the application and potentially the underlying system.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Malicious input can cause ncnn to consume excessive resources or crash, rendering the application unusable.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Input Validation: Implement robust input validation before data reaches ncnn. Verify file formats, sizes, and basic structural integrity. However, rely less on application-level validation to catch deep parsing vulnerabilities within ncnn itself.
    • Use Latest ncnn and Dependencies: Crucially, keep ncnn and its direct multimedia processing dependencies (if any are bundled or directly used for decoding within ncnn) updated to the latest versions. This is the primary defense against known vulnerabilities in these components.
    • Sandboxing: Execute ncnn inference in a sandboxed environment with restricted privileges. This limits the damage if a vulnerability is exploited, preventing full system compromise.
    • Fuzzing ncnn Input Processing: Proactively fuzz ncnn's input processing routines with a wide range of malformed and malicious multimedia files to uncover potential vulnerabilities before attackers do.

Attack Surface: 2. Malicious Model Files - Code Execution via Parsing Vulnerabilities

Description: Exploiting vulnerabilities in ncnn's model file parsing logic to achieve code execution. This focuses on flaws within ncnn's code that handles the .param and .bin model file formats.

  • How ncnn contributes to the attack surface: ncnn's core functionality involves loading and parsing neural network models from .param and .bin files. Vulnerabilities in the code responsible for parsing these specific formats within ncnn itself can be directly exploited by malicious model files.
  • Example: A malicious .param file is crafted to exploit a buffer overflow vulnerability in ncnn's parsing routine for network layer definitions. When ncnn attempts to load this malicious model, the overflow occurs, allowing the attacker to overwrite memory and inject and execute arbitrary code within the application's process.
  • Impact:
    • Code Execution: Attackers can gain complete control over the application and potentially the underlying system.
    • Data Exfiltration: After gaining code execution, attackers can steal sensitive data processed by the application or stored on the device.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Model Integrity Checks: Implement strong cryptographic hash verification (e.g., SHA256) for model files before they are loaded by ncnn. This ensures that only trusted and unmodified models are used, preventing the loading of malicious files.
    • Trusted Model Sources: Strictly control the sources from which model files are obtained. Only load models from highly trusted and verified origins. Avoid loading models from untrusted or public internet locations.
    • Regularly Update ncnn: Keep ncnn updated to the latest version. Security patches for model parsing vulnerabilities are likely to be addressed in updates.
    • Fuzzing ncnn Model Parsing: Employ fuzzing techniques specifically targeting ncnn's model parsing functionality. Generate a wide variety of malformed and malicious .param and .bin files to proactively identify parsing vulnerabilities.
    • Sandboxing: Run ncnn model loading and inference in a sandboxed environment to limit the impact if a parsing vulnerability is exploited, restricting potential code execution.

Attack Surface: 3. Vulnerabilities in Critical ncnn Dependencies - Leading to Code Execution

Description: Critical vulnerabilities present in essential third-party libraries that ncnn directly depends on for core functionalities, which can lead to code execution when triggered through ncnn's operations. This focuses on dependencies that are integral to ncnn's operation, not just optional or build-time dependencies.

  • How ncnn contributes to the attack surface: ncnn, like many complex libraries, relies on external libraries for fundamental operations. If a critical dependency used by ncnn for core tasks (e.g., memory management, core math operations, or essential data handling) has a code execution vulnerability, ncnn applications become vulnerable.
  • Example: ncnn relies on a specific version of a linear algebra library (BLAS/LAPACK implementation) that contains a known buffer overflow vulnerability in a core matrix multiplication routine. If ncnn uses this vulnerable routine in a way that can be triggered by attacker-controlled input or model parameters, it can lead to code execution.
  • Impact:
    • Code Execution: Attackers can gain complete control over the application and potentially the underlying system.
    • Data Exfiltration: After gaining code execution, attackers can steal sensitive data.
    • Denial of Service (DoS): Exploiting dependency vulnerabilities can also lead to crashes and DoS.
  • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on the specific dependency vulnerability)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Scanning (Focused on Critical Dependencies): Prioritize scanning ncnn's essential runtime dependencies for known vulnerabilities. Focus on libraries used for core functionalities like linear algebra, memory management, and fundamental data structures.
    • Dependency Updates (Critical Dependencies): Keep ncnn's critical runtime dependencies updated to the latest versions. Pay close attention to security advisories for these core libraries.
    • Vendor Security Advisories (ncnn and Dependencies): Actively monitor security advisories from the ncnn project and the vendors of its critical dependencies.
    • Static Analysis (ncnn and Integration): Use static analysis tools to examine ncnn's code and its integration within the application to identify potential usage patterns that might trigger vulnerabilities in dependencies.
    • Sandboxing: Run ncnn inference in a sandboxed environment to limit the impact of potential exploits originating from dependency vulnerabilities.