Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
58 lines (47 loc) · 6.83 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

58 lines (47 loc) · 6.83 KB

Threat Model Analysis for tencent/ncnn

Threat: Malicious Model Substitution

  • Description: An attacker replaces a legitimate ncnn model file (.param and/or .bin) with a crafted malicious model. While the attack vector might be external (e.g., compromising a server), the vulnerability lies in ncnn loading and trusting the malicious file without sufficient verification. The malicious model could be designed to produce incorrect outputs, leak information, or even contain embedded code to exploit vulnerabilities during inference.
    • Impact: Loss of application integrity, incorrect results, potential data leakage, and potential for arbitrary code execution (if combined with other vulnerabilities within ncnn's parsing or execution logic).
    • Affected ncnn Component: Net::load_param, Net::load_model, model loading and parsing logic in general. Specifically, the lack of built-in, robust integrity checks within these functions is the core issue.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Cryptographic Hashing (Mandatory): The application must calculate and verify SHA-256 (or stronger) hashes of the .param and .bin files before passing them to Net::load_param or Net::load_model. Compare against a securely stored, trusted hash. This is not optional; ncnn does not do this automatically.
      • Digital Signatures (Strongly Recommended): Digitally sign the model files and verify the signature within the application before loading. This provides stronger protection than hashing alone.
      • Do NOT rely solely on file size or other weak checks.

Threat: ncnn Library Tampering

  • Description: An attacker modifies the compiled ncnn library (e.g., .so, .dll, .a) on the target system. Again, the attack vector might be external, but the vulnerability is the lack of built-in self-integrity checks within the ncnn library. A modified library could introduce arbitrary malicious behavior during inference.
    • Impact: Loss of application integrity, arbitrary control over inference, potential for code execution, and data leakage.
    • Affected ncnn Component: The entire ncnn library (all compiled components).
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Library Integrity Verification (Mandatory): The application must calculate and verify cryptographic hashes of the ncnn library files before loading (or linking). This is crucial to detect tampering.
      • Secure Build Environment (If compiling from source): If compiling ncnn from source, ensure a secure and isolated build environment, free from malware.
      • Use Official Releases (and verify): Prefer official, pre-built releases from Tencent and verify their authenticity (e.g., check digital signatures if provided by Tencent; if not, strongly consider compiling from source with integrity checks).

Threat: Input Data Manipulation (Buffer Overflow)

  • Description: An attacker crafts malicious input data (e.g., an image with excessively large dimensions or specially crafted pixel values) that exploits a buffer overflow vulnerability within ncnn's input processing or layer implementations. This is a direct vulnerability in ncnn's code.
    • Impact: Denial of service (crash), potential for arbitrary code execution.
    • Affected ncnn Component: Input layers (e.g., ncnn::Mat), image processing functions (if used), and potentially any layer that handles input data directly. Specific vulnerable functions would depend on the discovered vulnerability.
    • Risk Severity: High (potentially Critical if code execution is possible)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict Input Validation (Application-Level, but crucial): Enforce strict size and type checks on all input data before passing it to ncnn. This is the first line of defense.
      • Fuzz Testing (of ncnn): Perform extensive fuzz testing of ncnn's input handling, focusing on edge cases and boundary conditions. This should target ncnn's code directly.
      • Memory Safety Audits (of ncnn): Regularly audit ncnn's C++ code for potential buffer overflows and other memory safety issues. This requires expertise in C++ security.

Threat: Input Data Manipulation (Integer Overflow)

  • Description: An attacker provides input data that causes integer overflows or underflows within ncnn's calculations, leading to unexpected behavior or vulnerabilities. This is a direct vulnerability in ncnn's code.
    • Impact: Denial of service, incorrect results, potential for exploitation (depending on how the overflow is handled).
    • Affected ncnn Component: Any layer or function that performs arithmetic operations on input data or intermediate results. Potentially vulnerable areas include convolution layers, pooling layers, and custom layers.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Input Validation (Application-Level, but crucial): Validate input data to ensure it falls within expected ranges and does not cause integer overflows within ncnn's expected operational parameters.
      • Checked Arithmetic (within ncnn - requires code modification): Ideally, ncnn should use checked arithmetic operations (e.g., detecting overflows) where possible. This would require modifying ncnn's source code.
      • Fuzz Testing (of ncnn): Fuzz test ncnn with inputs designed to trigger integer overflows.

Threat: Use-After-Free Vulnerability in ncnn

  • Description: A bug within ncnn causes memory to be accessed after it has been freed. This is a direct vulnerability in ncnn's code.
    • Impact: Denial of service, potential for arbitrary code execution.
    • Affected ncnn Component: Any component that manages memory dynamically. Specific layers or operations that allocate and deallocate memory are potential targets.
    • Risk Severity: High (potentially Critical if code execution is possible)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Memory Analysis Tools (on ncnn): Use memory analysis tools (e.g., Valgrind, AddressSanitizer) to detect use-after-free errors during ncnn's development and testing.
      • Code Reviews (of ncnn): Carefully review ncnn's code for potential use-after-free vulnerabilities. This requires C++ security expertise.
      • Fuzz Testing (of ncnn): Fuzz test ncnn to try to trigger use-after-free errors.
      • Regular Updates: Keep ncnn updated to the latest version to benefit from any bug fixes related to memory management.