Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
89 lines (76 loc) · 7.66 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

89 lines (76 loc) · 7.66 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for tencent/rapidjson

Objective: Compromise Application Using RapidJSON by Exploiting RapidJSON Weaknesses

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using RapidJSON [CRITICAL NODE]
    └── OR ── Exploit Parsing Vulnerabilities in RapidJSON [CRITICAL NODE]
        └── OR ── Trigger Parsing Vulnerability [CRITICAL NODE]
            ├── **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** Buffer Overflow Vulnerability [CRITICAL NODE]
            │   └── AND ── Vulnerability Exploitable in Application Context
            │       └── **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** [Actionable Insight 5]: Verify if a buffer overflow in RapidJSON can lead to exploitable conditions in the application's memory space (e.g., overwrite return addresses, function pointers).
            └── **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** Denial of Service (DoS) via Parsing Complexity [CRITICAL NODE]
                └── AND ── Resource Exhaustion Impacts Application
                    └── **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** [Actionable Insight 13]: Monitor application resource usage (CPU, memory) when processing complex JSON to identify potential DoS vulnerabilities.
            └── **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** Type Confusion Vulnerabilities (Application Logic Dependent)
                └── AND ── Type Confusion Exploited in Application Logic
                    └── **[HIGH-RISK PATH]** [Actionable Insight 25]: Determine if type confusion can lead to logical errors, bypasses, or vulnerabilities in the application's processing of the parsed JSON data.

Attack Tree Path: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

4. High-Risk Path & Critical Node: Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

  • Vulnerability Type: Buffer Overflow
  • Attack Steps:
    • Identify input points in the application that process JSON using RapidJSON.
    • Craft a malicious JSON payload designed to cause RapidJSON to write beyond the allocated buffer during parsing (e.g., oversized strings or arrays).
    • Send the malicious JSON payload to the application.
    • If successful, the buffer overflow can overwrite adjacent memory regions.
    • Exploit the overflow to achieve code execution by overwriting return addresses, function pointers, or other critical data in memory.
  • Potential Impact:
    • Code Execution: Attacker gains the ability to execute arbitrary code on the server, leading to full system compromise.
    • Data Breach: Attacker can access sensitive data stored or processed by the application.
    • Service Disruption: Application crashes or becomes unstable.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Fuzzing: Thoroughly fuzz RapidJSON parsing with malformed and oversized JSON inputs to identify potential buffer overflows.
    • Code Review: Conduct detailed code reviews of RapidJSON source code, focusing on string and array handling during parsing.
    • Memory Protection: Implement memory protection mechanisms like Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) and Data Execution Prevention (DEP) to make buffer overflow exploitation more difficult.
    • Input Validation: While primarily a RapidJSON issue, ensure the application has some level of input validation to reject excessively large or malformed JSON before it reaches RapidJSON parsing (as a defense-in-depth measure).
    • Sanitizers: Use memory sanitizers (e.g., AddressSanitizer) during development and testing to detect buffer overflows early.

Attack Tree Path: Denial of Service (DoS) via Parsing Complexity

5. High-Risk Path & Critical Node: Denial of Service (DoS) via Parsing Complexity

  • Vulnerability Type: Algorithmic Complexity/Resource Exhaustion (DoS)
  • Attack Steps:
    • Identify input points in the application that process JSON using RapidJSON.
    • Craft a highly complex JSON payload with deep nesting or extremely large arrays/objects.
    • Send the complex JSON payload to the application.
    • RapidJSON's parsing algorithm, or the application's processing of the parsed JSON, may exhibit quadratic or exponential time complexity for such structures.
    • This can lead to excessive CPU and memory consumption, exhausting server resources and causing a Denial of Service.
  • Potential Impact:
    • Service Unavailability: Application becomes unresponsive or crashes, preventing legitimate users from accessing it.
    • Resource Exhaustion: Server resources (CPU, memory) are depleted, potentially impacting other services running on the same server.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Performance Testing: Test RapidJSON's performance with highly complex and nested JSON payloads to identify potential DoS vulnerabilities.
    • Algorithm Analysis: Analyze RapidJSON's parsing algorithm for potential complexity issues with specific JSON structures.
    • Resource Monitoring: Monitor application resource usage (CPU, memory) when processing JSON to detect DoS conditions.
    • Input Validation and Limits: Implement input validation and limits on JSON complexity, such as:
      • Maximum nesting depth.
      • Maximum object/array size.
      • Maximum string length.
    • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to restrict the number of JSON requests from a single source, mitigating DoS attempts.

Attack Tree Path: Type Confusion Vulnerabilities (Application Logic Dependent)

6. High-Risk Path: Type Confusion Vulnerabilities (Application Logic Dependent)

  • Vulnerability Type: Type Confusion (Application Logic Flaw)
  • Attack Steps:
    • Analyze the application code to understand how it processes JSON data parsed by RapidJSON and the expected data types for different JSON fields.
    • Craft a JSON payload where data types deviate from the application's expectations (e.g., sending a string where an integer is expected, or an array instead of an object).
    • Send the crafted JSON payload to the application.
    • If the application logic does not perform proper type checking after parsing with RapidJSON, this type confusion can lead to logical errors, bypasses, or unexpected behavior.
    • Exploit these logical errors to achieve malicious goals, such as bypassing security checks, manipulating data, or causing application crashes.
  • Potential Impact:
    • Logical Errors: Application behaves in unintended ways, leading to incorrect data processing or functionality.
    • Security Bypasses: Type confusion can bypass security checks or access controls.
    • Data Manipulation: Attacker can manipulate data due to incorrect type handling.
    • Application Crashes: In some cases, type confusion can lead to crashes if the application attempts to perform operations on data of an unexpected type.
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Application Code Review: Thoroughly review application code that processes JSON data parsed by RapidJSON, focusing on type handling and data validation.
    • Input Validation and Type Checking: Implement robust input validation and type checking in the application code after parsing JSON with RapidJSON. Verify that the parsed JSON data conforms to the expected types and structure before further processing.
    • Schema Validation: If applicable, use JSON schema validation to enforce the expected structure and data types of incoming JSON requests.
    • Defensive Programming: Practice defensive programming principles by anticipating unexpected data types and handling them gracefully in the application logic.