Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
157 lines (101 loc) · 12.8 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

157 lines (101 loc) · 12.8 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for zeromq/libzmq

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize CURVE Security Mechanism

Description:

  1. Generate Key Pairs: For each communicating peer (client and server), generate a CURVE key pair (public and secret key). libzmq provides functions for key generation.
  2. Exchange Public Keys: Securely exchange public keys between communicating peers out-of-band. This could be through secure configuration files, key exchange servers, or manual distribution.
  3. Configure Sockets for CURVE: On both sender and receiver sockets, set the ZMQ_CURVE_SERVER option appropriately (true for server, false for client).
  4. Set Server Key (Server Side): On the server socket, set the ZMQ_CURVE_SECRETKEY option to the server's secret key and ZMQ_CURVE_PUBLICKEY to the server's public key.
  5. Set Client Key and Server Public Key (Client Side): On the client socket, set the ZMQ_CURVE_PUBLICKEY to the client's public key, ZMQ_CURVE_SECRETKEY to the client's secret key, and crucially, ZMQ_CURVE_SERVERKEY to the server's public key obtained in step 2.
  6. Enable CURVE: Ensure CURVE is enabled in your libzmq build. Some distributions might require installing a specific libzmq package with CURVE support.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Eavesdropping/Data Interception (High Severity): CURVE provides encryption, preventing unauthorized parties from reading messages in transit over libzmq sockets.
  • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks (High Severity): CURVE provides mutual authentication, ensuring that both client and server are who they claim to be, mitigating MITM attacks.
  • Unauthorized Access (High Severity): Authentication provided by CURVE restricts communication to only peers with valid key pairs, preventing unauthorized access to libzmq services.

Impact:

  • Eavesdropping/Data Interception: High reduction in risk.
  • Man-in-the-Middle Attacks: High reduction in risk.
  • Unauthorized Access: High reduction in risk.

Currently Implemented:

Not implemented. CURVE security is considered for future roadmap, but currently not used in any module.

Missing Implementation:

Completely missing across all libzmq communication channels. Requires significant development effort to integrate key management, key exchange, and socket configuration for CURVE.

Mitigation Strategy: libzmq Specific Rate Limiting and Throttling

Description:

  1. Identify Vulnerable Sockets: Determine which libzmq sockets are most susceptible to message flooding DoS attacks (e.g., PULL sockets receiving external data, ROUTER sockets handling client requests).
  2. Implement Message Counting: In your application logic associated with these sockets, implement counters to track the number of messages received within a specific time window (e.g., per second, per minute).
  3. Set Message Rate Thresholds: Define acceptable message rate thresholds for each vulnerable socket. These thresholds should be based on your application's capacity and expected traffic patterns.
  4. Enforce Rate Limits: When the message count exceeds the threshold within the time window, implement throttling actions. This could involve:
    • Dropping Excess Messages: Simply discard incoming messages exceeding the rate limit. This is the simplest approach but may lead to data loss if message delivery is not guaranteed at a higher level.
    • Pausing Socket Reception: Temporarily stop receiving messages from the libzmq socket using zmq_recv with a timeout or by temporarily disconnecting and reconnecting the socket (depending on socket type and application logic).
    • Sending Backpressure Signals (If Applicable): For certain patterns (like PAIR sockets), you might implement a backpressure mechanism to signal the sender to slow down.
  5. Monitor and Adjust: Monitor the effectiveness of rate limiting and adjust thresholds as needed. Log rate limiting events for analysis and security monitoring.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • libzmq Message Flooding DoS (High Severity): Prevents attackers from overwhelming libzmq sockets and the application's message processing logic with a flood of messages, leading to service disruption. This is specific to how libzmq handles message reception and delivery.
  • Resource Exhaustion due to Message Processing (High Severity): Protects application resources from being exhausted by excessive message processing triggered by a flood of libzmq messages.

Impact:

  • libzmq Message Flooding DoS: High reduction in risk.
  • Resource Exhaustion due to Message Processing: High reduction in risk.

Currently Implemented:

Basic message counting rate limiting is implemented for the main data ingestion PULL socket. Implemented in data_ingestion/rate_limiter.py which is integrated with the data_ingestion service.

Missing Implementation:

  • Rate limiting is not applied to other libzmq sockets, including control channels and internal communication paths.
  • Throttling mechanisms are limited to dropping messages. More sophisticated mechanisms related to libzmq socket control (like pausing reception) are not implemented.

Mitigation Strategy: Keep libzmq Library Updated

Description:

  1. Track libzmq Versions: Maintain a clear record of the libzmq version used in your application and its dependencies.
  2. Monitor libzmq Security Advisories: Regularly check for security advisories specifically related to libzmq. Sources include the official zeromq project website, security mailing lists, and vulnerability databases.
  3. Establish Update Cadence: Define a schedule for checking and applying libzmq updates (e.g., monthly, quarterly, or upon release of critical security patches).
  4. Test Updates Thoroughly: Before deploying updated libzmq libraries to production, rigorously test them in a staging environment to ensure compatibility with your application and no regressions are introduced in libzmq functionality. Pay special attention to libzmq API changes if upgrading major versions.
  5. Prioritize Security Patches: Immediately apply security patches released for libzmq to address known vulnerabilities.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Exploitation of libzmq Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Prevents attackers from exploiting known security vulnerabilities present in older versions of the libzmq library itself. This directly addresses risks inherent in using a third-party library.

Impact:

  • Exploitation of libzmq Vulnerabilities: High reduction in risk.

Currently Implemented:

Monthly dependency update checks are performed, including libzmq. Version pinning is used to manage libzmq version in project configuration.

Missing Implementation:

  • Automated monitoring of libzmq specific security advisories is not in place. Monitoring is currently manual.
  • Testing of libzmq updates could be more comprehensive, specifically focusing on testing libzmq related functionalities after an update.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure libzmq Socket Options Configuration

Description:

  1. Review Socket Options: Thoroughly review all libzmq socket options used in your application code. Consult the libzmq documentation for each option to understand its purpose and security implications.
  2. Set Appropriate Security-Relevant Options: Configure security-relevant socket options to enhance security. Examples include:
    • ZMQ_SNDHWM and ZMQ_RCVHWM (High Water Mark): Set appropriate high water marks to limit buffering and prevent excessive memory usage, which can be exploited in DoS attacks.
    • ZMQ_LINGER: Set a reasonable linger period for sockets to control how long sockets wait to send pending messages before closing. Setting it to 0 can prevent resource leaks in some scenarios but might lead to message loss if not handled carefully.
    • ZMQ_MAXMSGSIZE: Set a maximum message size limit to prevent processing of excessively large messages, which can lead to buffer overflows or resource exhaustion.
    • ZMQ_TCP_KEEPALIVE (and related TCP options): Configure TCP keep-alive options appropriately for TCP-based transports to detect and close dead connections, preventing resource leaks and potential connection hijacking in long-lived connections.
  3. Avoid Unnecessary Privileged Options: Avoid using socket options that might grant unnecessary privileges or weaken security unless absolutely required and fully understood.
  4. Document Socket Option Configuration: Document the rationale behind the chosen socket option configurations, especially those related to security.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Improperly configured socket options (e.g., unbounded buffers) can lead to resource exhaustion, contributing to DoS vulnerabilities.
  • Buffer Overflow (Medium Severity): Lack of message size limits can potentially lead to buffer overflows if the application doesn't handle large messages correctly.
  • Connection Management Issues (Medium Severity): Incorrect TCP keep-alive settings can lead to resource leaks and vulnerabilities related to connection management.

Impact:

  • Resource Exhaustion: Medium reduction in risk.
  • Buffer Overflow: Medium reduction in risk.
  • Connection Management Issues: Medium reduction in risk.

Currently Implemented:

Basic socket options are configured, primarily for performance tuning (e.g., SNDHWM, RCVHWM). Security-specific socket options are not systematically reviewed or configured.

Missing Implementation:

A systematic security review of all libzmq socket options and their configuration is missing. Security-focused options like MAXMSGSIZE and TCP keep-alive settings are not consistently applied across all sockets.

Mitigation Strategy: Network Segmentation for libzmq Communication

Description:

  1. Identify libzmq Network Boundaries: Determine which libzmq sockets communicate across network boundaries, especially those exposed to less trusted networks or the internet.
  2. Isolate libzmq Traffic: Use network segmentation techniques (e.g., VLANs, subnets, firewalls) to isolate libzmq traffic to dedicated network segments.
  3. Implement Firewall Rules: Configure firewalls to restrict network access to libzmq ports and services. Only allow communication from authorized sources and to authorized destinations. Use the principle of least privilege for firewall rules.
  4. Network Access Control Lists (ACLs): Implement Network ACLs on network devices to further control access to libzmq communication based on IP addresses, ports, and protocols.
  5. VPNs or Secure Tunnels (If Necessary): If libzmq communication must traverse untrusted networks (like the internet), consider using VPNs or other secure tunneling technologies to encrypt and protect the network traffic at the transport layer. While not directly libzmq, this secures the network layer beneath libzmq.

List of Threats Mitigated:

  • Unauthorized Network Access to libzmq Services (Medium Severity): Prevents unauthorized network entities from connecting to and interacting with libzmq services exposed on the network.
  • Lateral Movement (Medium Severity): Limits the potential for attackers who have compromised one part of the network to move laterally and access libzmq services in other segments.
  • Network-Level Eavesdropping (Medium Severity): Network segmentation, especially when combined with VPNs or tunnels, reduces the risk of network-level eavesdropping on libzmq traffic.

Impact:

  • Unauthorized Network Access to libzmq Services: Medium reduction in risk.
  • Lateral Movement: Medium reduction in risk.
  • Network-Level Eavesdropping: Medium reduction in risk (especially with VPNs/tunnels).

Currently Implemented:

Basic network segmentation is in place, with different services running in separate containers and network namespaces. Firewall rules are configured at the container orchestration level to restrict inter-container communication.

Missing Implementation:

  • Network segmentation is not specifically designed and configured with libzmq traffic in mind. Rules are more general container-level rules.
  • Fine-grained firewall rules specifically for libzmq ports and protocols are not implemented.
  • VPNs or secure tunnels are not used for libzmq traffic that might traverse less trusted networks.