Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
42 lines (33 loc) · 5.69 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

42 lines (33 loc) · 5.69 KB

Threat Model Analysis for zeromq/libzmq

Threat: Threat 1: Eavesdropping on Unencrypted Channels

  • Description: An attacker with network access (for TCP) or access to the inter-process communication mechanism (for IPC) passively monitors the communication between ZeroMQ sockets. If encryption is not enabled within libzmq, the attacker can read the content of the messages. This is a direct threat because libzmq provides the transport, and the lack of encryption is a direct consequence of not using libzmq's security features.
    • Impact: Information disclosure. Sensitive data transmitted over ZeroMQ is exposed to the attacker.
    • Affected libzmq Component: Affects all transport mechanisms (TCP, IPC, inproc) when encryption is not used. All socket types are potentially vulnerable. The zmq_bind and zmq_connect functions, along with the underlying transport implementations, are directly involved.
    • Risk Severity: Critical (if sensitive data is transmitted) or High (if potentially sensitive data is transmitted).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • CurveZMQ: Use CurveZMQ (libzmq's built-in encryption) for all communication. This provides authenticated encryption. Use ZMQ_CURVE_SERVER and ZMQ_CURVE_CLIENT socket options, and properly configure server and client keys.

Threat: Threat 2: Message Injection/Modification (Without libzmq Authentication)

  • Description: An attacker with network access (for TCP) or access to the IPC mechanism (for IPC) injects forged messages into the communication stream or modifies existing messages in transit. This is possible if message authentication is not enabled within libzmq. The threat is direct because libzmq provides the transport and lacks inherent integrity protection without specific configuration.
    • Impact: Data tampering, potential code execution (if the application processes injected messages without further validation), loss of data integrity.
    • Affected libzmq Component: Affects all transport mechanisms (TCP, IPC, inproc) when authentication is not used. All socket types are potentially vulnerable. The zmq_bind, zmq_connect, zmq_send, and zmq_recv functions are directly involved.
    • Risk Severity: Critical (can lead to arbitrary code execution or data corruption).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • CurveZMQ: Use CurveZMQ for authenticated encryption. This provides both confidentiality and integrity protection, directly addressing the threat within libzmq.

Threat: Threat 3: Lack of Authentication (Using Unprotected Transports)

  • Description: The application uses libzmq without enabling any of its built-in authentication mechanisms (like CurveZMQ or, less securely, ZMQ_PLAIN with CurveZMQ), allowing any process or network endpoint to connect to the ZeroMQ sockets. This is a direct libzmq threat because the library provides the connection mechanisms, and the lack of authentication is a direct result of not using libzmq's security features.
    • Impact: Unauthorized access to the application's communication channels, leading to potential message injection, eavesdropping, or denial of service.
    • Affected libzmq Component: Affects all transport mechanisms and socket types. The zmq_bind and zmq_connect functions are directly relevant, as they establish the connections.
    • Risk Severity: Critical (allows unauthorized access).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • CurveZMQ: Use CurveZMQ for strong authentication and encryption. This is the primary and recommended mitigation within libzmq.
      • ZMQ_PLAIN (with Encryption): If, and only if, CurveZMQ is absolutely not feasible, use ZMQ_PLAIN exclusively in conjunction with encryption (provided by CurveZMQ or, less ideally, a separate, carefully integrated encryption layer). Never use ZMQ_PLAIN alone, as it transmits credentials in plain text.

Threat: Threat 4: libzmq Vulnerability Exploitation

  • Description: An attacker exploits a vulnerability within the libzmq library itself (e.g., a buffer overflow, integer overflow, use-after-free, or other security flaw). This is inherently a direct libzmq threat.
    • Impact: Varies depending on the vulnerability. Could lead to denial of service, code execution, information disclosure, or other security compromises. The impact is often severe due to the low-level nature of the library.
    • Affected libzmq Component: Depends on the specific vulnerability. Could affect any part of the library, including core messaging logic, transport implementations, or specific socket types.
    • Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the vulnerability).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Keep libzmq Updated: Regularly update libzmq to the latest stable version to incorporate security patches. This is the most crucial mitigation.
      • Monitor Security Advisories: Monitor security advisories and mailing lists related to libzmq to stay informed about potential vulnerabilities and available patches.
      • Static Analysis (If Contributing to libzmq): If you are modifying or contributing to the libzmq codebase, use static analysis tools to scan for potential vulnerabilities.
      • Fuzzing (If Contributing to libzmq): If you are modifying or contributing to the libzmq codebase, consider fuzzing libzmq to identify potential vulnerabilities.