Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
40 lines (33 loc) · 4.28 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

40 lines (33 loc) · 4.28 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for zeromq/zeromq4-x

Attack Surface: Denial of Service (DoS) / Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) via ZeroMQ Mechanisms

  • Description: Attackers exploit ZeroMQ's queuing and connection handling to overwhelm the application, making it unavailable.
    • ZeroMQ Contribution: ZeroMQ's high-performance design, without proper configuration, makes it susceptible to resource exhaustion through its socket mechanisms. Specifically, the queuing behavior of ROUTER, DEALER, PULL, and even PUB (with slow consumers) can be abused.
    • Example: An attacker floods a ROUTER socket with messages, exceeding the HWM and causing memory exhaustion. Or, numerous rapid connection attempts to a REP socket overwhelm the application's ability to accept new connections.
    • Impact: Application unavailability, service disruption.
    • Risk Severity: High to Critical (depending on application criticality).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Strict HWM Configuration: Mandatory, well-defined HWM values for all sockets to limit queue sizes. Values should be determined through testing and monitoring.
      • Rate Limiting (Application-Level, leveraging ZeroMQ): Implement rate limiting using ZeroMQ's connection events or message metadata to restrict the number of messages/connections from a single source.
      • Message Size Limits (Enforced via ZeroMQ): Enforce maximum message sizes at the ZeroMQ level (if possible, through filtering or custom socket logic) to prevent memory exhaustion.
      • Connection Timeouts (ZeroMQ-Level): Use ZeroMQ's built-in timeout options for connections and send/receive operations to prevent indefinite blocking.
      • Heartbeats (ZeroMQ-Level): Implement ZeroMQ heartbeats to detect and close dead connections, freeing resources.
      • Monitoring (ZeroMQ Metrics): Actively monitor ZeroMQ-specific metrics (queue lengths, connection counts) to detect anomalies.

Attack Surface: Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (Unencrypted tcp:// Transport)

  • Description: Attackers intercept and potentially modify communication when unencrypted tcp:// transport is used.
    • ZeroMQ Contribution: ZeroMQ's tcp:// transport, by itself, provides no encryption. This is a direct and inherent risk of using this transport without additional security measures.
    • Example: An attacker uses a network sniffer to capture sensitive data transmitted over an unencrypted tcp:// connection.
    • Impact: Data breach, unauthorized access, potential for message modification.
    • Risk Severity: Critical (if sensitive data is transmitted).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Mandatory CurveZMQ: Strictly enforce the use of CurveZMQ for all tcp:// connections. Disallow unencrypted tcp:// communication entirely.
      • Secure Key Management: Implement robust key generation, storage, and distribution procedures. This is crucial for CurveZMQ's effectiveness.

Attack Surface: ZeroMQ Library Vulnerabilities (CVEs)

  • Description: Exploiting known vulnerabilities (CVEs) directly within the zeromq4-x library code.
    • ZeroMQ Contribution: This is a direct vulnerability of the library itself.
    • Example: An attacker exploits a known buffer overflow vulnerability in a specific version of zeromq4-x to gain code execution.
    • Impact: Arbitrary code execution, denial of service, data breaches.
    • Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the specific CVE).
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Continuous Updates: Maintain a strict policy of updating zeromq4-x and its dependencies to the latest patched versions immediately upon release.
      • Vulnerability Scanning (Dependency Analysis): Use software composition analysis (SCA) tools to identify and track vulnerabilities in zeromq4-x and its dependencies.
      • Security Advisory Monitoring: Actively monitor security advisories and mailing lists related to ZeroMQ.