Attack Surface: Overly Permissive Default Permissions
- Description: Default permission configurations in ABP might be too broad, granting unnecessary access by default.
- ABP Contribution: ABP's permission system's initial configuration can be overly permissive if not reviewed and tightened.
- Example: A newly created role automatically inherits permissions to access administrative functions without explicit review, leading to unintended admin access.
- Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive data, privilege escalation, data breaches.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement the Principle of Least Privilege: Grant only necessary permissions.
- Regularly review and audit default and custom permission configurations.
- Adopt a Deny-by-Default approach for permissions.
- Use automated tests to verify permission enforcement.
Attack Surface: Authorization Bypass in Custom Application Services
- Description: Developers incorrectly implement or omit authorization checks in custom application services, bypassing ABP's permission system.
- ABP Contribution: ABP provides the authorization framework, but incorrect developer usage within ABP services leads to bypasses.
- Example: A developer forgets
[Authorize]
orIPermissionChecker
in a service method, allowing unauthorized access to sensitive operations. - Impact: Unauthorized data modification, data breaches, privilege escalation, business logic compromise.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Mandatory use of
[Authorize]
or explicit permission checks in service methods. - Conduct thorough code reviews for authorization logic.
- Write unit and integration tests to verify authorization enforcement.
- Utilize static code analysis for authorization vulnerabilities.
- Mandatory use of
Attack Surface: Over-exposure of API Endpoints via AbpApiController
- Description:
AbpApiController
can unintentionally expose sensitive business logic through automatically generated endpoints without proper access control. - ABP Contribution: ABP's automatic API generation can expose more than intended if developers are not careful with service exposure and security.
- Example: An internal service is unintentionally exposed as a public API endpoint via
AbpApiController
without authorization, allowing external access to internal functions. - Impact: Data breaches, exposure of internal logic, abuse of internal functionalities.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Explicitly define and review API endpoints; avoid automatic exposure of all services.
- Apply authorization policies to all API endpoints.
- Regularly review API documentation (Swagger/OpenAPI) for unintended exposure.
- Use network segmentation to limit exposure of internal APIs.
- Description: Improper use of raw SQL or dynamic query building within ABP services can introduce ORM injection vulnerabilities.
- ABP Contribution: While ABP uses EF Core and promotes safe practices, developers can still introduce vulnerabilities within ABP service layer.
- Example: An ABP service constructs a database query by concatenating user input into raw SQL, allowing SQL injection.
- Impact: Data breaches, data manipulation, unauthorized database access, potential database compromise.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Always use parameterized queries or LINQ; avoid raw SQL.
- Validate and sanitize user inputs even with ORM.
- Thoroughly review code for raw SQL or dynamic query building.
- Follow EF Core and ORM security best practices.
Attack Surface: Insecure File Handling in AbpBlobStoring
- Description: Improper configuration of
AbpBlobStoring
can lead to vulnerabilities in file uploads, storage, and retrieval. - ABP Contribution: ABP provides
AbpBlobStoring
, but security depends on developer configuration and usage. - Example:
AbpBlobStoring
allows uploading files without file type validation, enabling malicious file uploads and potential execution. - Impact: Remote code execution, data breaches, denial of service, data integrity compromise.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement strict file type validation.
- Enforce file size limits.
- Sanitize file names and metadata.
- Securely configure blob storage access controls.
- Integrate anti-virus scanning for uploads.
- Implement Content Security Policy (CSP).
Attack Surface: Multi-Tenancy Isolation Issues
- Description: In multi-tenant ABP applications, improper tenant isolation can lead to cross-tenant data access.
- ABP Contribution: ABP provides multi-tenancy features, but correct implementation and enforcement are developer responsibility.
- Example: An application fails to filter data queries by tenant ID, allowing users from one tenant to access another tenant's data.
- Impact: Data breaches, cross-tenant data access, tenant-specific functionality compromise.
- Risk Severity: Critical
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Ensure tenant ID filtering in all data queries and operations.
- Use tenant-specific data contexts or schemas for physical isolation.
- Conduct rigorous testing, including penetration testing, for tenant isolation.
- Perform code reviews focused on multi-tenancy implementation.
- Regular security audits for multi-tenancy mechanisms.
Attack Surface: Vulnerabilities in ABP Framework Libraries and Dependencies
- Description: ABP framework libraries and dependencies may contain vulnerabilities exploitable in applications.
- ABP Contribution: ABP applications directly depend on ABP libraries and third-party packages, inheriting their vulnerabilities.
- Example: A vulnerability in a specific ABP package version or a dependency like Newtonsoft.Json affects applications using it.
- Impact: Varies, including denial of service, data breaches, remote code execution.
- Risk Severity: Critical/High (depending on the specific vulnerability)
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Regularly update ABP framework packages and dependencies.
- Use dependency scanning tools (OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk).
- Monitor security advisories for ABP and dependencies.
- Establish a patch management process for security updates.
Attack Surface: Role and Claim Management Vulnerabilities
- Description: Incorrect implementation of custom role or claim management within ABP's authorization framework can introduce vulnerabilities.
- ABP Contribution: ABP provides the framework, but custom logic flaws can lead to vulnerabilities.
- Example: Improper validation or encoding of claims allows injection attacks or authorization bypasses.
- Impact: Privilege escalation, authorization bypass, data breaches.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Thoroughly validate and sanitize claim data.
- Use secure encoding for claims.
- Conduct security reviews of custom role and claim management logic.
- Implement robust input validation for role and claim operations.
Attack Surface: Authentication Flow Weaknesses
- Description: Improper implementation or customization of ABP authentication flows can introduce weaknesses.
- ABP Contribution: ABP provides authentication modules, but vulnerabilities can arise from incorrect customization.
- Example: Insecure token handling, session fixation vulnerabilities, or weaknesses in social login integrations within ABP authentication flows.
- Impact: Unauthorized access, session hijacking, account compromise.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Follow secure authentication best practices.
- Securely handle tokens and sessions.
- Thoroughly review and test custom authentication logic.
- Use secure and updated authentication libraries and protocols.
Attack Surface: GraphQL and OData Endpoints Security
- Description: If ABP's GraphQL or OData modules are used, vulnerabilities specific to these technologies become relevant.
- ABP Contribution: ABP's GraphQL and OData modules introduce these specific attack surfaces into ABP applications.
- Example: Overly complex GraphQL queries leading to denial-of-service, injection attacks within queries, or information disclosure through unsecured schema introspection.
- Impact: Denial of service, data breaches, information disclosure, injection attacks.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Implement query complexity limits and rate limiting for GraphQL/OData.
- Sanitize and validate inputs in GraphQL/OData queries.
- Disable or secure schema introspection in production.
- Apply authorization policies to GraphQL/OData endpoints and operations.
Attack Surface: Data Leakage through Auditing and Logging
- Description: ABP's auditing and logging features, if misconfigured, can inadvertently log and expose sensitive data.
- ABP Contribution: ABP's built-in auditing and logging can become a vulnerability if not configured securely.
- Example: Auditing logs inadvertently record sensitive user data like passwords or credit card numbers, which are then exposed through insecure log access.
- Impact: Data breaches, exposure of sensitive information.
- Risk Severity: High
- Mitigation Strategies:
- Carefully configure auditing and logging to exclude sensitive data.
- Securely store and access audit logs.
- Implement log rotation and retention policies.
- Regularly review audit logs for sensitive data leakage.