Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
116 lines (91 loc) · 9.38 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

116 lines (91 loc) · 9.38 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for abpframework/abp

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Code Reviews for Module Overrides and Customizations (ABP-Specific Focus)

  • Description:

    1. Establish a Formal Review Process (ABP-Centric): Create a documented process specifically for reviewing ABP module overrides. This process should be mandatory.
    2. Identify ABP Security Reviewers: Designate developers with specific ABP security expertise to review overrides.
    3. ABP-Specific Checklist: Develop a checklist focused on ABP security:
      • No Bypassing of ABP Authorization: Verify that overrides do not bypass or weaken [Authorize] attributes, permission checks (IPermissionChecker), or data filtering.
      • Correct Use of ABP Abstractions: Ensure overrides use ABP's abstractions (repositories, application services, etc.) correctly and don't introduce lower-level vulnerabilities.
      • Review of ABP Feature Usage: Assess how the override interacts with ABP features (localization, settings, multi-tenancy) and ensure secure usage.
    4. Review Before Merge (Enforced): Use a pull request system to enforce that no override is merged without ABP security review.
    5. Documentation of ABP-Specific Concerns: Document all review findings related to ABP security.
    6. Re-review After ABP-Related Changes: Any change affecting ABP interaction requires re-review.
    7. ABP Security Training: Provide regular training focused on secure development within the ABP Framework.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Bypassing ABP Authorization: (Severity: Critical) - Overrides could remove or weaken ABP's authorization, allowing unauthorized access.
    • Incorrect ABP Feature Usage: (Severity: High) - Overrides might misuse ABP features (e.g., data filtering), leading to vulnerabilities.
    • Weakening of ABP Security Configurations: (Severity: High) - Overrides could modify ABP's security settings insecurely.
    • Privilege Escalation (via ABP): (Severity: Critical) - Overrides could exploit ABP features to gain higher privileges.

  • Impact:

    • All ABP-Related Threats: Risk significantly reduced. Reviews ensure proper use of ABP's security mechanisms.

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) Partially implemented. Code reviews are mandatory, but the ABP-specific checklist is not consistently used. ABP security reviewers are designated, but training is infrequent.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example)

    • Consistent use of the ABP-specific checklist.
    • Regular, scheduled ABP security training.
    • Formal documentation of ABP-related review findings.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Updates and Dependency Scanning (ABP and Castle.Core)

  • Description:

    1. ABP Update Schedule: Define a schedule for checking for ABP Framework updates (e.g., monthly).
    2. Monitor ABP Channels: Subscribe to ABP's official channels (GitHub, blog) for security advisories specifically for ABP.
    3. Automated Dependency Scanning (ABP Focus): Configure a dependency scanning tool (e.g., OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk) to scan for vulnerabilities in ABP and Castle.Core.
    4. ABP Vulnerability Alerting: Configure alerts for new vulnerabilities in ABP and Castle.Core.
    5. Prioritize ABP Updates: Prioritize security updates for ABP and Castle.Core based on severity.
    6. Testing Environment (ABP-Specific): Apply ABP updates to a testing environment first.
    7. Regression Testing (ABP Focus): Perform regression testing, focusing on areas that use ABP features heavily.
    8. Rollback Plan (ABP-Specific): Have a plan to roll back ABP updates if issues arise.
    9. Production Deployment (ABP-Specific): Deploy ABP updates to production only after thorough testing.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in ABP: (Severity: High-Critical) - Outdated ABP versions expose the application to known vulnerabilities.
    • Exploitation of Known Vulnerabilities in Castle.Core: (Severity: High-Critical) - Vulnerabilities in Castle.Core (used by ABP) can be exploited.

  • Impact:

    • ABP and Castle.Core Vulnerabilities: Risk significantly reduced. Regular updates and scanning ensure timely patching.

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) Partially implemented. Updates are performed, but not on a strict schedule. Dependency scanning is used, but alerting is not fully configured for ABP specifically.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example)

    • Formalized ABP update schedule.
    • Fully configured vulnerability alerting for ABP and Castle.Core.
    • Regression testing suite focused on ABP functionality.
    • Documented ABP-specific rollback plan.

Mitigation Strategy: Strict Adherence to ABP Configuration Best Practices

  • Description:

    1. ABP Documentation Review: Thoroughly review ABP's documentation on security, authorization, data filtering, auditing, and multi-tenancy.
    2. ABP Configuration Templates: Use ABP's provided configuration templates as a starting point.
    3. Least Privilege (ABP): Grant only the minimum necessary ABP permissions to users and modules.
    4. ABP Audit Logging Configuration: Enable and configure ABP's audit logging, setting log rotation and retention.
    5. ABP Data Filtering Configuration: Ensure correct and consistent application of ABP's data filtering mechanisms.
    6. Regular ABP Configuration Audits: Periodically review the application's ABP configuration files.
    7. Automated ABP Configuration Checks (If Possible): Explore tools to check for common ABP misconfigurations.
    8. ABP Multi-Tenancy Configuration (If Applicable): Meticulously configure ABP's tenant isolation settings.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access (ABP Misconfiguration): (Severity: High) - Incorrect ABP authorization settings can allow unauthorized access.
    • Data Leakage (ABP Misconfiguration): (Severity: High) - Incorrect ABP data filtering can expose data.
    • Insufficient Auditing (ABP): (Severity: Medium) - Without proper ABP audit logging, investigation is difficult.
    • Cross-Tenant Data Access (ABP Multi-Tenancy): (Severity: Critical) - Misconfigured ABP multi-tenancy allows cross-tenant access.

  • Impact:

    • All ABP Configuration-Related Threats: Risk significantly reduced. Correct configuration enforces ABP's security policies.

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) Partially implemented. Initial configuration followed ABP documentation, but regular audits are not performed. ABP audit logging is enabled, but retention policies are not defined.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example)

    • Regular, scheduled ABP configuration audits.
    • Defined log rotation and retention policies for ABP audit logs.
    • Automated ABP configuration checks (if feasible).
    • Thorough review of ABP multi-tenancy configuration (if applicable).

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Event Bus Usage (Leveraging ABP Authorization)

  • Description:

    1. Identify Sensitive ABP Events: Identify events that carry sensitive data or trigger critical actions within the ABP context.
    2. Authorize Event Handlers (ABP): Use ABP's [Authorize] attribute or IPermissionChecker within event handlers to ensure only authorized users/services can trigger actions.
    3. Validate Event Data (ABP Context): Validate event data, considering ABP's data types and structures.
    4. Minimize Sensitive Data (ABP): Avoid including sensitive data in ABP event payloads. If necessary, use ABP's secure mechanisms.
    5. Audit Event Handling (ABP): Leverage ABP's audit logging to track event handling.
    6. Asynchronous Handling (ABP): Use ABP's asynchronous event handling for long-running handlers.
    7. Review ABP Event Subscriptions: Regularly review event subscriptions to minimize unnecessary handlers, focusing on ABP-provided events.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Action Execution (via ABP Events): (Severity: High) - Malicious users could trigger ABP events for unauthorized actions.
    • Data Injection (into ABP): (Severity: High) - Malicious data in ABP events could exploit vulnerabilities.
    • Information Disclosure (via ABP Events): (Severity: Medium) - Sensitive data in ABP event payloads could be exposed.

  • Impact:

    • ABP Event-Related Threats: Risk significantly reduced. Authorization and validation within the ABP context prevent misuse.

  • Currently Implemented: (Example) Partially implemented. Some event handlers use ABP's [Authorize], but not all. Event data validation is inconsistent.

  • Missing Implementation: (Example)

    • Consistent use of ABP's [Authorize] or IPermissionChecker in all event handlers.
    • Comprehensive data validation for all ABP event payloads.
    • Review and minimization of sensitive data in ABP events.
    • Consistent use of ABP's audit logging for event handling.