Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
253 lines (186 loc) · 25.4 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

253 lines (186 loc) · 25.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for aspnet/entityframeworkcore

Mitigation Strategy: Always Utilize Parameterized Queries

  • Description:

    1. Default LINQ Usage: Developers should primarily use LINQ syntax for data access as EF Core inherently parameterizes queries generated from LINQ. This is the default secure approach within EF Core.
    2. Avoid String Manipulation with EF Core Methods: Strictly avoid building SQL queries using string concatenation or interpolation when using EF Core methods like FromSqlRaw or ExecuteSqlRaw, especially when incorporating user-provided data.
    3. Parameterized Raw SQL within EF Core: If raw SQL queries (FromSqlRaw, ExecuteSqlRaw) are absolutely necessary within EF Core:
      • Use parameter placeholders (e.g., @p0, @p1, :param1) within the SQL string.
      • Provide parameter values separately using the appropriate method overload (e.g., FromSqlRaw("SELECT * FROM Users WHERE Username = @username", new SqlParameter("@username", username))). This is crucial for secure raw SQL in EF Core.
    4. Code Reviews Focusing on EF Core Data Access: Implement mandatory code reviews specifically targeting EF Core data access code to identify and rectify any instances of non-parameterized queries within EF Core contexts.
    5. Developer Training on Secure EF Core Practices: Train developers on the importance of parameterized queries and secure coding practices specifically within EF Core.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • SQL Injection: High Severity - Exploiting SQL injection through vulnerabilities in EF Core query construction can lead to complete database compromise, data breaches, data manipulation, and denial of service.

  • Impact:

    • SQL Injection: High Risk Reduction - Parameterized queries, when correctly used within EF Core, effectively prevent most common SQL injection attacks by treating user inputs as data, not executable code in the context of EF Core generated SQL.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Largely implemented in new feature development and core data access components that utilize EF Core. LINQ is the standard query method in most modules using EF Core.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Legacy modules using EF Core might contain older code patterns using string concatenation for queries within FromSqlRaw or similar methods. Need to conduct a code audit of older sections using EF Core and refactor to use parameterized queries or LINQ.

Mitigation Strategy: Exercise Caution with Raw SQL Queries (in EF Core)

  • Description:

    1. Minimize Raw SQL Usage within EF Core: Reduce the usage of FromSqlRaw, ExecuteSqlRaw, and similar EF Core methods to an absolute minimum. Prioritize LINQ and other EF Core features for data access.
    2. Justification and Review for Raw SQL in EF Core: Require justification and mandatory security review for any instance where raw SQL is deemed necessary within EF Core.
    3. Strict Parameterization (If Used in EF Core): If raw SQL is unavoidable within EF Core, enforce strict parameterization as described in the "Always Utilize Parameterized Queries" strategy. Double-check parameterization in raw SQL sections within EF Core code.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • SQL Injection: High Severity - Raw SQL used within EF Core, even with attempts at parameterization, can be more prone to errors and bypasses if not handled with extreme care, increasing SQL injection risk through EF Core.
    • Accidental SQL Syntax Errors: Medium Severity - Manual SQL construction within EF Core increases the risk of syntax errors that could lead to application malfunctions or unexpected behavior when using EF Core data access.

  • Impact:

    • SQL Injection: Medium Risk Reduction - While parameterization helps, raw SQL used in EF Core still introduces a higher risk compared to pure LINQ due to manual construction within the EF Core context.
    • Accidental SQL Syntax Errors: Medium Risk Reduction - Reducing raw SQL usage within EF Core minimizes the chance of manual syntax errors in EF Core data access.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Generally discouraged in development guidelines for EF Core data access. Code reviews usually flag excessive raw SQL usage within EF Core contexts.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • No formal process to strictly justify and review raw SQL usage specifically within EF Core. Need to implement a mandatory review step for code introducing raw SQL queries in EF Core.

Mitigation Strategy: Scrutinize Dynamic LINQ Usage (with EF Core)

  • Description:

    1. Avoid Dynamic LINQ from User Input with EF Core: Refrain from constructing LINQ queries dynamically based directly on unsanitized user input (e.g., user-selected column names, sort orders) when using EF Core.
    2. Input Validation and Whitelisting for Dynamic LINQ in EF Core: If dynamic LINQ is necessary for features like advanced filtering or sorting with EF Core:
      • Thoroughly validate and sanitize all user inputs used to build dynamic queries within EF Core.
      • Whitelist allowed properties, operators, and values that are used in dynamic LINQ queries for EF Core. Do not allow arbitrary user-provided strings to be directly injected into LINQ expressions used with EF Core.
    3. Abstraction Layers for Dynamic EF Core Queries: Create abstraction layers or helper functions that handle dynamic query construction for EF Core in a controlled and secure manner, limiting the scope of dynamic behavior within EF Core data access.
    4. Security Testing of Dynamic EF Core LINQ: Specifically test dynamic LINQ functionalities used with EF Core for potential vulnerabilities by attempting to manipulate query logic through input manipulation within the EF Core context.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • SQL Injection (Indirect via Dynamic LINQ in EF Core): Medium Severity - While not direct SQL injection, vulnerabilities in dynamic LINQ construction within EF Core can allow attackers to manipulate query logic in unintended ways, potentially leading to data breaches or manipulation through EF Core.
    • Authorization Bypass (via Dynamic LINQ in EF Core): Medium Severity - Maliciously crafted dynamic queries in EF Core might bypass intended authorization checks by altering the query's scope or conditions when using EF Core for data access.

  • Impact:

    • SQL Injection (Indirect via Dynamic LINQ in EF Core): Medium Risk Reduction - Careful input validation and whitelisting significantly reduce the risk of malicious manipulation of dynamic LINQ queries used with EF Core.
    • Authorization Bypass (via Dynamic LINQ in EF Core): Medium Risk Reduction - Controlled dynamic query construction and validation help maintain intended authorization boundaries when using EF Core.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Dynamic LINQ usage with EF Core is limited in the project. Where used with EF Core, basic input validation is present.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Lack of strict whitelisting for dynamic LINQ inputs used with EF Core. Need to implement a more robust whitelisting approach for properties and operators used in dynamic queries within EF Core. No specific security testing focused on dynamic LINQ manipulation in the EF Core context.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Code Reviews Focused on Data Access (using EF Core)

  • Description:

    1. Dedicated Review Focus on EF Core: Incorporate specific checkpoints in code review processes to focus on data access code using EF Core.
    2. Security Checklist for EF Core Reviews: Develop a checklist for reviewers to specifically look for in EF Core code:
      • Proper use of parameterized queries in EF Core.
      • Justification and secure implementation of raw SQL within EF Core.
      • Secure handling of dynamic LINQ with EF Core.
      • Potential mass assignment vulnerabilities related to EF Core entities.
      • Over-fetching of data and potential information disclosure through EF Core queries.
      • Efficient query design to prevent performance issues when using EF Core.
    3. Security Expertise in EF Core Reviews: Involve team members with security expertise in code reviews, especially for critical data access components using EF Core.
    4. Regular Training on Secure EF Core Practices: Provide regular security training to developers, emphasizing secure EF Core practices and common vulnerabilities specific to EF Core.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • All EF Core related threats: Severity varies (SQL Injection, Mass Assignment, Information Disclosure, DoS, IDOR) - Code reviews act as a general preventative measure across all threat categories arising from EF Core usage.

  • Impact:

    • All EF Core related threats: Medium Risk Reduction - Code reviews are effective in catching a wide range of security and coding errors related to EF Core before they reach production.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Code reviews are a standard part of the development process, but security aspects are not always explicitly emphasized for data access using EF Core.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • No dedicated security checklist for data access code reviews specifically for EF Core. Need to create and integrate a checklist into the review process. Need to enhance developer training specifically on EF Core security.

Mitigation Strategy: Employ Static Code Analysis Tools (for EF Core Security)

  • Description:

    1. Tool Integration for EF Core Analysis: Integrate static code analysis tools into the development pipeline (e.g., build process, CI/CD) and configure them to analyze EF Core code.
    2. Rule Configuration for EF Core Vulnerabilities: Configure the tools to detect:
      • Potential SQL injection vulnerabilities in EF Core queries (e.g., string concatenation in FromSqlRaw, insecure raw SQL usage).
      • Potential mass assignment vulnerabilities related to EF Core entities (e.g., direct binding to entities without DTOs).
      • Basic security coding flaws in data access logic using EF Core.
    3. Regular Scans of EF Core Code: Run static code analysis scans regularly (e.g., on every commit, nightly builds) focusing on EF Core code.
    4. Vulnerability Remediation for EF Core Issues: Establish a process for reviewing and remediating vulnerabilities identified by static analysis tools in EF Core code.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • SQL Injection: Medium Severity - Static analysis can detect some, but not all, SQL injection vulnerabilities in EF Core queries.
    • Mass Assignment: Low to Medium Severity - Tools can help identify potential mass assignment issues related to EF Core entities.
    • Other Coding Flaws in EF Core Data Access: Low Severity - Can detect basic coding errors in EF Core data access logic that might indirectly lead to security issues.

  • Impact:

    • SQL Injection: Medium Risk Reduction - Static analysis provides an automated layer of defense but might miss complex injection scenarios in EF Core.
    • Mass Assignment: Medium Risk Reduction - Can proactively identify potential mass assignment issues related to EF Core.
    • Other Coding Flaws in EF Core Data Access: Low Risk Reduction - Contributes to overall code quality of EF Core data access and reduces the likelihood of subtle vulnerabilities.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic static code analysis is used for general code quality, but not specifically configured for EF Core security vulnerabilities.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Need to configure static analysis tools with rules specifically targeting EF Core security vulnerabilities (SQL injection patterns in EF Core, mass assignment risks related to EF Core). Need to integrate security-focused static analysis of EF Core code into the CI/CD pipeline.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Projection (.Select()) in LINQ Queries (in EF Core)

  • Description:

    1. Selective Data Retrieval with EF Core: When fetching data using LINQ with EF Core, use the .Select() method to explicitly specify only the properties needed for the current operation.
    2. Avoid ToList() or ToArray() on Entire EF Core Entities: Avoid fetching entire entities using .ToList() or .ToArray() when only a subset of properties is required when using EF Core.
    3. DTO Projection in EF Core: Project data directly into DTOs/ViewModels within the .Select() method in EF Core LINQ queries for efficient data retrieval and shaping.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure: Medium Severity - Reduces the risk of accidentally exposing sensitive data by fetching only necessary properties through EF Core queries.
    • Performance Issues (DoS): Medium Severity - Improves query performance of EF Core queries by reducing the amount of data transferred from the database.

  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure: Medium Risk Reduction - Significantly reduces the chance of over-fetching and exposing sensitive data via EF Core.
    • Performance Issues (DoS): Medium Risk Reduction - Improves query performance of EF Core applications and reduces database load, mitigating potential DoS risks related to inefficient EF Core queries.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Projection is used in some areas of EF Core data access, especially for API endpoints, but not consistently applied across all data retrieval operations using EF Core.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Need to promote and enforce the consistent use of projection in all LINQ queries within EF Core. Need to review existing EF Core queries and refactor to use projection where full entity retrieval is unnecessary.

Mitigation Strategy: Optimize Database Queries (Generated by EF Core)

  • Description:

    1. Query Performance Analysis for EF Core Queries: Regularly analyze the performance of EF Core queries, especially for frequently executed or critical operations.
    2. Eager Loading (Include, ThenInclude) in EF Core: Use eager loading in EF Core to prevent N+1 query problems when related data is needed.
    3. Explicit Loading in EF Core: Use explicit loading in EF Core for related data when eager loading is not feasible or efficient.
    4. Indexing for EF Core Queries: Ensure appropriate indexes are created on database columns frequently used in WHERE clauses, JOIN conditions, and ORDER BY clauses in queries generated by EF Core.
    5. Asynchronous Operations with EF Core: Use asynchronous operations (async/await) for database interactions using EF Core to prevent blocking threads and improve application responsiveness.
    6. Query Profiling Tools for EF Core: Utilize database query profiling tools to identify slow queries generated by EF Core and analyze their execution plans.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Performance Issues (DoS): High Severity - Inefficient queries generated by EF Core can lead to performance bottlenecks, resource exhaustion, and contribute to Denial of Service vulnerabilities.

  • Impact:

    • Performance Issues (DoS): High Risk Reduction - Query optimization of EF Core queries significantly improves application performance and reduces the risk of DoS attacks related to resource exhaustion caused by inefficient EF Core usage.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic query optimization is considered during development of EF Core data access, but systematic performance analysis and optimization of EF Core queries are not consistently performed. Eager loading is used in some areas of EF Core usage.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Need to implement a process for regular query performance analysis and optimization specifically for EF Core queries. Need to integrate query profiling tools into the development and monitoring process for EF Core applications. Need to provide developer training on EF Core performance best practices.

Mitigation Strategy: Utilize Query Profiling Tools (for EF Core Queries)

  • Description:

    1. Tool Selection for EF Core Query Profiling: Choose appropriate database query profiling tools that work with the database system and EF Core.
    2. Integration into Development/Testing for EF Core: Integrate profiling tools into development and testing environments to identify slow EF Core queries early in the development cycle.
    3. Production Monitoring of EF Core Queries: Consider using profiling tools in production environments (with appropriate performance considerations) to monitor EF Core query performance and detect regressions.
    4. Performance Analysis and Remediation of EF Core Queries: Establish a process for analyzing query profiles of EF Core queries, identifying slow queries, and implementing optimizations.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Performance Issues (DoS): High Severity - Profiling tools are essential for identifying and addressing performance bottlenecks in EF Core queries that can lead to DoS.

  • Impact:

    • Performance Issues (DoS): High Risk Reduction - Profiling tools are crucial for proactively identifying and resolving performance issues related to EF Core queries, significantly reducing DoS risks.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Basic database monitoring is in place, but dedicated query profiling tools are not routinely used for EF Core applications.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Need to select and integrate query profiling tools specifically for EF Core into development, testing, and potentially production environments. Need to train developers on using profiling tools and interpreting query profiles for EF Core queries.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Caching Mechanisms (for EF Core Data)

  • Description:

    1. Identify Caching Opportunities for EF Core Data: Identify frequently accessed data retrieved by EF Core that is relatively static or changes infrequently.
    2. Caching Layers for EF Core: Implement caching mechanisms at different layers for data accessed via EF Core:
      • Distributed Cache (e.g., Redis, Memcached): For data shared across multiple application instances using EF Core.
      • In-Memory Cache (e.g., MemoryCache in .NET): For caching within a single application instance using EF Core.
      • EF Core Caching (Second-Level Cache): Explore using EF Core's built-in caching features or third-party second-level caching providers specifically for EF Core.
    3. Cache Invalidation Strategies for EF Core Data: Implement appropriate cache invalidation strategies to ensure data consistency for cached data retrieved by EF Core (e.g., time-based expiration, event-based invalidation).
    4. Cache Monitoring for EF Core Data: Monitor cache hit rates and performance to ensure caching of EF Core data is effective and not introducing new issues.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Performance Issues (DoS): High Severity - Caching data accessed by EF Core significantly reduces database load and improves application responsiveness, mitigating DoS risks related to EF Core performance.

  • Impact:

    • Performance Issues (DoS): High Risk Reduction - Caching is a highly effective strategy for improving performance of EF Core applications and reducing the impact of DoS attempts targeting application performance related to EF Core data access.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • In-memory caching is used in some limited areas for static data accessed by EF Core. Distributed caching is not widely implemented for EF Core data.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Need to conduct a comprehensive analysis to identify caching opportunities across the application for data accessed via EF Core. Need to implement distributed caching for shared data accessed by EF Core and consider EF Core second-level caching. Need to develop and implement cache invalidation strategies for cached EF Core data.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Authorization Checks at the Application Level (for EF Core Entities)

  • Description:

    1. Authorization Logic for EF Core Entities: Implement robust authorization logic in the application code to control access to data and functionalities related to EF Core entities.
    2. Check Permissions Before EF Core Data Access: Before performing any EF Core operations (retrieval, modification, deletion) based on entity IDs or user input, verify that the current user has the necessary permissions to access or manipulate the specific EF Core entity.
    3. Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) or Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) for EF Core Entities: Implement RBAC or ABAC mechanisms to manage user permissions and roles effectively for accessing EF Core entities.
    4. Centralized Authorization for EF Core Data Access: Centralize authorization logic in a dedicated service or module to ensure consistency and maintainability for EF Core data access.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) via EF Core: High Severity - Authorization checks are the primary defense against IDOR vulnerabilities when accessing EF Core entities.
    • Unauthorized Data Access via EF Core: High Severity - Prevents users from accessing or manipulating EF Core entities they are not authorized to access.

  • Impact:

    • Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) via EF Core: High Risk Reduction - Authorization checks effectively prevent IDOR attacks by ensuring only authorized users can access specific EF Core entities.
    • Unauthorized Data Access via EF Core: High Risk Reduction - Robust authorization significantly reduces the risk of unauthorized data access and manipulation of EF Core entities.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Authorization checks are implemented in many parts of the application, but consistency and granularity might vary across different modules using EF Core.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Need to conduct a comprehensive review of authorization logic across the application to ensure consistent and robust authorization checks are in place for all data access points involving EF Core entities. Need to potentially centralize authorization logic for better maintainability of EF Core data access authorization.

Mitigation Strategy: Validate User Permissions Before Data Operations (on EF Core Entities)

  • Description:

    1. Granular Permission Checks for EF Core Entities: Implement granular permission checks that validate user permissions not just at a high level (e.g., "user can access users") but also at the individual entity level (e.g., "user can access user with ID X using EF Core").
    2. Context-Aware Authorization for EF Core Operations: Ensure authorization checks are context-aware, considering the specific operation being performed (read, update, delete) and the EF Core entity being accessed.
    3. Data-Driven Authorization for EF Core Access: Implement authorization logic that can be driven by data (e.g., user roles, group memberships, entity ownership) rather than hardcoded rules when accessing EF Core entities.
    4. Consistent Enforcement of Authorization for EF Core: Enforce authorization checks consistently across all data access points and API endpoints that interact with EF Core entities.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) via EF Core: High Severity - Granular permission checks are essential for preventing IDOR attacks and ensuring users can only access authorized data through EF Core.
    • Unauthorized Data Access via EF Core: High Severity - Prevents users from accessing or manipulating EF Core entities beyond their authorized scope.

  • Impact:

    • Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) via EF Core: High Risk Reduction - Granular permission checks are highly effective in preventing IDOR exploitation related to EF Core entities.
    • Unauthorized Data Access via EF Core: High Risk Reduction - Ensures users operate within their authorized data access boundaries when interacting with EF Core.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Permission checks are implemented, but granularity might be limited in some areas of EF Core data access. Context-awareness and data-driven authorization might not be fully implemented everywhere EF Core is used.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Need to review and enhance permission checks to ensure granular, context-aware, and data-driven authorization is consistently implemented across all data access operations involving EF Core entities.