Mitigation Strategy: Parameterized Queries and Safe SQL Generation
Description:
- Identify all Raw SQL: Search the codebase for all instances of
FromSqlRaw
andExecuteSqlRaw
. These are the primary areas of concern within EF Core. - Replace with Interpolated Versions: Replace
FromSqlRaw
withFromSqlInterpolated
andExecuteSqlRaw
withExecuteSqlInterpolated
wherever possible. This allows using string interpolation in a safe, parameterized manner within EF Core's API. - Use SqlParameter Objects (If Interpolation Isn't Feasible): If string interpolation is not suitable (e.g., complex dynamic queries), use
SqlParameter
objects to explicitly define parameters. Pass these parameters toFromSqlRaw
orExecuteSqlRaw
using EF Core's methods. - Review LINQ Queries: Examine LINQ queries for any manual string concatenation or building of query strings. Refactor these to use standard LINQ operators, letting EF Core's LINQ provider handle the SQL generation.
- Code Reviews: Mandate code reviews that specifically check for proper parameterization and safe SQL generation practices within the context of EF Core usage.
- Automated Scanning (Optional): Consider using static analysis tools that can detect potential SQL injection vulnerabilities, including those related to EF Core.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- SQL Injection: (Severity: Critical) Directly injecting malicious SQL code into the database through EF Core's methods.
- Data Exposure: (Severity: High) Revealing sensitive data through error messages or unintended query results due to manipulated SQL executed via EF Core.
-
Impact:
- SQL Injection: Risk reduction: Very High. Parameterized queries using EF Core's mechanisms are the primary defense.
- Data Exposure: Risk reduction: High. Preventing SQL injection through EF Core prevents associated data exposure.
-
Currently Implemented: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Implemented in all API controllers. Verified through code reviews that
FromSqlInterpolated
is used consistently." ] -
Missing Implementation: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Not yet implemented in the legacy reporting module (
ReportingService.cs
). Needs refactoring to useFromSqlInterpolated
." ]
Mitigation Strategy: View Models / DTOs (Data Transfer Objects)
Description:
- Identify Entity Exposure: Locate all instances where EF Core entities are directly used in views (for MVC/Razor Pages) or returned from API controllers. This is about preventing direct interaction with the objects managed by EF Core.
- Create View Models/DTOs: For each exposed EF Core entity, create a corresponding View Model or DTO. These classes should contain only the properties needed, and not expose the full entity managed by the context.
- Mapping: Implement mapping logic between EF Core entities and View Models/DTOs.
- Update Controllers/Views: Modify controllers and views to use the View Models/DTOs instead of the EF Core entities. This prevents direct binding to tracked objects.
- Input Validation: Ensure View Models/DTOs have appropriate data annotations or validation logic.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Over-Posting / Mass Assignment: (Severity: High) Attackers modifying properties they shouldn't have access to by submitting data that binds directly to EF Core's tracked entities.
- Information Disclosure: (Severity: Medium) Unintentionally exposing sensitive data from EF Core entities in views or API responses.
-
Impact:
- Over-Posting / Mass Assignment: Risk reduction: Very High. Prevents direct modification of EF Core-managed objects.
- Information Disclosure: Risk reduction: High. Limits exposure of entity properties.
-
Currently Implemented: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Implemented for all new API endpoints." ]
-
Missing Implementation: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Legacy MVC views still use entities directly." ]
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Error Handling (EF Core Configuration)
Description:
- Disable Detailed Errors in Production (EF Core Setting): In your production configuration, ensure that
EnableSensitiveDataLogging
is set tofalse
for yourDbContext
options within the EF Core configuration. This is a direct setting within EF Core.// In Startup.cs or Program.cs services.AddDbContext<MyDbContext>(options => { options.UseSqlServer(Configuration.GetConnectionString("MyConnectionString")); #if !DEBUG options.EnableSensitiveDataLogging(false); // Disable in production - EF Core specific setting #endif });
- Global Exception Handler: Implement a global exception handler.
- Catch Specific EF Core Exceptions: Within the handler, catch EF Core exceptions like
DbUpdateException
. - Log Details Securely: Log the full exception details (securely).
- User-Friendly Error Messages: Return generic error messages to the client.
- Correlation IDs: Include a correlation ID.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Sensitive Data Exposure in Error Messages (EF Core-Generated): (Severity: High) Revealing database schema details, SQL queries, or other sensitive information generated by EF Core in error messages.
- Information Disclosure: (Severity: Medium) Providing attackers with clues through EF Core's error output.
-
Impact:
- Sensitive Data Exposure in Error Messages (EF Core-Generated): Risk reduction: Very High. The
EnableSensitiveDataLogging(false)
setting directly controls this. - Information Disclosure: Risk reduction: High.
- Sensitive Data Exposure in Error Messages (EF Core-Generated): Risk reduction: Very High. The
-
Currently Implemented: [ Placeholder: e.g., "
EnableSensitiveDataLogging
is set tofalse
inappsettings.Production.json
." ] -
Missing Implementation: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Need to review all
catch
blocks to ensure they are not exposing sensitive information." ]
Mitigation Strategy: Optimized Queries and Pagination (LINQ and EF Core Methods)
Description:
- Identify Potential N+1 Problems (Using EF Core Profiling): Use EF Core's built-in logging or profiling tools to identify inefficient queries.
- Use Eager Loading (EF Core Methods): Use
.Include()
and.ThenInclude()
within your EF Core LINQ queries to eagerly load related data. - Projection (EF Core LINQ): Use
.Select()
in your LINQ queries to project only the necessary columns. - Avoid Client-Side Evaluation (LINQ Best Practices): Ensure that your LINQ queries can be fully translated to SQL by EF Core. Avoid premature use of
AsEnumerable()
orToList()
. - Pagination (EF Core Methods): Use
Skip()
andTake()
within your EF Core queries to implement pagination. - Query Timeouts (EF Core Configuration): Configure database query timeouts on the
DbContext
options using EF Core's configuration API. - Code Reviews: Include query performance and efficiency (specifically within LINQ to Entities) as part of code reviews.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) via Inefficient Queries: (Severity: Medium) Attackers crafting requests that trigger slow queries handled by EF Core.
- Performance Degradation: (Severity: Low to Medium) Slow queries generated by EF Core impacting responsiveness.
-
Impact:
- Denial of Service (DoS) via Inefficient Queries: Risk reduction: Medium to High. Optimized EF Core queries and pagination reduce the risk.
- Performance Degradation: Risk reduction: High. Optimized LINQ to Entities queries improve performance.
-
Currently Implemented: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Pagination implemented using
Skip()
andTake()
." ] -
Missing Implementation: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Need to profile and optimize queries. Suspect N+1 problem." ]
Mitigation Strategy: AsNoTracking() for Read-Only Operations (EF Core Method)
Description:
- Identify Read-Only Queries: Locate all queries where data is retrieved but not modified.
- Apply AsNoTracking() (EF Core Method): Add
.AsNoTracking()
to these EF Core queries. This is a direct method call on theDbSet
orIQueryable
.var users = context.Users.AsNoTracking().Where(u => u.IsActive).ToList(); // EF Core method
- Code Reviews: Enforce the use of
AsNoTracking()
during code reviews.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Denial of Service (DoS) via Memory Exhaustion: (Severity: Low) Excessive memory usage due to EF Core tracking unnecessary entities.
- Performance Degradation: (Severity: Low) Unnecessary EF Core tracking overhead.
-
Impact:
- Denial of Service (DoS) via Memory Exhaustion: Risk reduction: Low.
AsNoTracking()
reduces EF Core's memory footprint. - Performance Degradation: Risk reduction: Low to Medium.
AsNoTracking()
improves performance by avoiding EF Core's change tracking.
- Denial of Service (DoS) via Memory Exhaustion: Risk reduction: Low.
-
Currently Implemented: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Implemented in most read-only API endpoints." ]
-
Missing Implementation: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Need to review and update queries to use
AsNoTracking()
." ]
Mitigation Strategy: Secure Second-Level Caching (If Using EF Core-Compatible Provider)
Description:
- Assess Necessity: Determine if second-level caching is truly required.
- Choose Secure Provider: If using it, select a reputable caching provider that integrates with EF Core and has built-in security features.
- Data Validation: Implement mechanisms to validate the integrity of cached data (this might involve interaction with the EF Core caching provider).
- Short Expiration: Use short cache expiration times.
- Cache Invalidation: Implement robust cache invalidation strategies integrated with EF Core's change tracking (if supported by the provider).
- Configuration Review: Regularly review the caching provider's configuration (as it relates to EF Core integration).
- Monitoring: Monitor cache access.
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Cache Poisoning: (Severity: Medium to High) Attackers manipulating data cached by EF Core's second-level cache.
- Data Tampering: (Severity: Medium) Unauthorized modification of data in EF Core's cache.
-
Impact:
- Cache Poisoning: Risk reduction: High (if properly secured and integrated with EF Core).
- Data Tampering: Risk reduction: Medium to High (if properly secured).
-
Currently Implemented: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Second-level caching is not currently used." OR e.g., "Using a distributed cache provider with EF Core integration." ]
-
Missing Implementation: [ Placeholder: e.g., "Need to implement data validation for cached entities." ]