Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
77 lines (53 loc) · 211 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

77 lines (53 loc) · 211 KB

Deep Analysis of Security Considerations for Entity Framework Core

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

Objective:

The objective of this deep analysis is to conduct a thorough security assessment of Entity Framework Core (EF Core) as described in the provided design document, focusing on its key components and their interactions. This analysis aims to identify potential security vulnerabilities, assess their impact, and propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to EF Core and the described deployment context (Azure App Service with Azure SQL Database). The analysis will focus on the core components: DbContext, DbSet<T>, Querying (LINQ to Entities), Change Tracking, and Saving Data (SaveChanges/SaveChangesAsync).

Scope:

This analysis covers:

  • The core components of EF Core as used within a .NET application.
  • The interaction between EF Core and the underlying database (specifically Azure SQL Database in the deployment example).
  • The build process for EF Core itself (as described in the document).
  • The deployment scenario using Azure App Service.
  • The identified business and security posture, including existing and recommended security controls.

This analysis does not cover:

  • General .NET application security best practices outside the direct use of EF Core (e.g., general web application security, authentication/authorization implementation details).
  • Security of the Azure infrastructure itself, beyond the configuration directly related to EF Core and the database connection.
  • Detailed code-level review of the EF Core source code (this is a design review analysis).

Methodology:

  1. Component Breakdown: Analyze the security implications of each key EF Core component (DbContext, DbSet<T>, Querying, Change Tracking, Saving Data).
  2. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats based on the component analysis, data flow, and deployment context. We will use a simplified STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) model.
  3. Vulnerability Assessment: Assess the likelihood and impact of each identified threat.
  4. Mitigation Recommendations: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies tailored to EF Core and the Azure App Service/Azure SQL Database environment.
  5. Architecture and Data Flow Inference: Based on the provided C4 diagrams and descriptions, infer the architecture, components, and data flow to identify potential security weaknesses.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

2.1 DbContext

  • Description: Represents a session with the database and provides access to DbSet<T> instances. It manages the connection to the database and tracks changes to entities.
  • Security Implications:
    • Connection String Management (Information Disclosure, Elevation of Privilege): The DbContext holds the connection string, which is a highly sensitive credential. Improper storage or exposure of the connection string can lead to unauthorized database access.
    • Lifetime Management (Denial of Service): Improper disposal of DbContext instances can lead to connection pool exhaustion, causing a denial-of-service condition. Long-lived DbContext instances can also hold onto resources unnecessarily.
    • Configuration Errors (Various): Misconfiguration of the DbContext (e.g., incorrect database provider, improper options) can lead to various security issues, including data loss or unexpected behavior.

2.2 DbSet

  • Description: Represents a collection of entities of a specific type (T) that can be queried from the database.
  • Security Implications:
    • Data Exposure (Information Disclosure): Carelessly exposing DbSet<T> properties publicly without proper authorization checks can lead to unintended data leakage.
    • Over-Fetching (Information Disclosure, Performance): Retrieving entire DbSet<T> instances without filtering can expose more data than necessary and impact performance.

2.3 Querying (LINQ to Entities)

  • Description: Uses LINQ (Language Integrated Query) to express queries against the database. EF Core translates LINQ queries into SQL queries.
  • Security Implications:
    • SQL Injection (Tampering, Elevation of Privilege): While EF Core uses parameterized queries by default, incorrectly using raw SQL queries (e.g., FromSqlRaw, ExecuteSqlRaw) with string concatenation can introduce SQL injection vulnerabilities. This is a critical risk if user input is directly incorporated into raw SQL strings.
    • Inefficient Queries (Denial of Service): Poorly constructed LINQ queries can lead to inefficient SQL queries that consume excessive database resources, potentially causing a denial-of-service condition. This includes issues like N+1 queries.
    • Data Leakage through Projection (Information Disclosure): Projecting sensitive data into anonymous types or DTOs (Data Transfer Objects) without proper sanitization can expose that data if those objects are inadvertently logged or returned to the client.

2.4 Change Tracking

  • Description: EF Core automatically tracks changes made to entities retrieved from the database.
  • Security Implications:
    • Unauthorized Modification (Tampering): If change tracking is accidentally or maliciously disabled, modifications to entities might not be persisted to the database, leading to data inconsistencies. Conversely, unintended changes could be saved if not properly handled.
    • Sensitive Data in Snapshots (Information Disclosure): The change tracker maintains snapshots of entity data, which could potentially contain sensitive information. This is primarily a concern if the application's memory is compromised.
    • Performance Overhead (Denial of Service): Tracking a large number of entities can introduce performance overhead, potentially contributing to a denial-of-service condition in extreme cases.

2.5 Saving Data (SaveChanges/SaveChangesAsync)

  • Description: Persists changes tracked by the DbContext to the database.
  • Security Implications:
    • Data Validation Bypass (Tampering): If data validation is only performed on the client-side, malicious users could bypass validation and send invalid data directly to the server, potentially corrupting the database. SaveChanges would then persist this invalid data.
    • Concurrency Issues (Tampering): Without proper handling of concurrency conflicts (e.g., using optimistic concurrency), multiple users could overwrite each other's changes, leading to data loss or inconsistency.
    • Transaction Management Errors (Tampering, Data Loss): Incorrect use of transactions (e.g., not using transactions when multiple operations need to be atomic) can lead to partial updates and data inconsistencies.

3. Threat Modeling and Vulnerability Assessment

| Threat | STRIDE Category | Component(s) Affected | Likelihood | Impact | Description