Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
49 lines (38 loc) · 5.54 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

49 lines (38 loc) · 5.54 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for bchavez/bogus

Objective: Compromise Application Using Bogus

Attack Tree Visualization

Compromise Application Using Bogus [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR]─ Exploit Bogus Configuration/Customization [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR]─ Malicious Custom Rules/Functions [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├───[AND]─ Inject Malicious Rule Definition [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └───[Step 2]─ Inject Malicious Code/Logic within Rule (e.g., using RuleFor with arbitrary code) [CRITICAL NODE] ├───[OR]─ Exploit Generated Data Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ ├───[OR]─ Maliciously Crafted Fake Data (Injection Attacks) [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ ├───[AND]─ Craft Bogus Rules to Generate Malicious Payloads [CRITICAL NODE] │ │ │ └───[Step 2]─ Design Rules to Produce Injection Payloads (e.g., SQL, XSS, Command Injection) within Fake Data [CRITICAL NODE]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit Bogus Configuration/Customization [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: This high-risk path focuses on exploiting vulnerabilities arising from how the application configures or customizes the Bogus library. If the application allows external or untrusted sources to influence the definition of Bogus rules or functions, it becomes vulnerable.

  • Critical Nodes within this Path:

    • Exploit Bogus Configuration/Customization [CRITICAL NODE]: This is the entry point to this high-risk path. The attacker aims to manipulate the configuration mechanisms related to Bogus.
    • Malicious Custom Rules/Functions [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]: This node represents the core threat within configuration exploitation. The attacker's goal is to inject malicious code or logic into custom rules or functions used by Bogus.
    • Inject Malicious Rule Definition [CRITICAL NODE]: This step is crucial. The attacker must find a way to inject their malicious rule definition into the application's configuration. This could be through:
      • Manipulating configuration files if they are externally accessible or modifiable.
      • Exploiting API endpoints that allow rule definition or modification.
      • Leveraging vulnerabilities in the application's configuration management system.
    • Inject Malicious Code/Logic within Rule (e.g., using RuleFor with arbitrary code) [CRITICAL NODE]: This is the specific action of injecting the malicious payload. Bogus allows defining rules using code (like lambda expressions). If an attacker can inject code here, they can achieve:
      • Remote Code Execution (RCE): By injecting code that executes system commands or interacts with the application's environment.
      • Data Exfiltration: By injecting code that sends sensitive data to an attacker-controlled server.
      • Application Manipulation: By injecting code that alters the application's behavior or data.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Generated Data Vulnerabilities [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]

  • Attack Vector: This high-risk path centers on vulnerabilities arising from the application's use of data generated by Bogus. Even though Bogus generates "fake" data, if this data is used in security-sensitive contexts without proper handling, it can be exploited.

  • Critical Nodes within this Path:

    • Exploit Generated Data Vulnerabilities [CRITICAL NODE]: This is the entry point to this high-risk path. The attacker targets the application's processing of Bogus-generated data.
    • Maliciously Crafted Fake Data (Injection Attacks) [HIGH RISK PATH] [CRITICAL NODE]: This node represents the core threat. The attacker aims to craft Bogus rules that generate fake data containing malicious payloads designed to exploit injection vulnerabilities in the application.
    • Craft Bogus Rules to Generate Malicious Payloads [CRITICAL NODE]: This step is crucial. The attacker needs to design Bogus rules that will produce the desired malicious payloads within the generated data. This involves:
      • Understanding Bogus rule syntax and the Faker API to control data generation.
      • Designing payloads for specific injection types (e.g., SQL injection, XSS, Command Injection).
    • Design Rules to Produce Injection Payloads (e.g., SQL, XSS, Command Injection) within Fake Data [CRITICAL NODE]: This is the specific action of designing the rules to create the injection payloads. Examples include:
      • SQL Injection Payloads: Crafting rules to generate strings that, when used in SQL queries without parameterization, will execute malicious SQL code.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) Payloads: Crafting rules to generate strings containing JavaScript code that, when displayed in a web page without proper encoding, will execute in the user's browser.
      • Command Injection Payloads: Crafting rules to generate strings that, when used in system commands without proper sanitization, will execute attacker-controlled commands on the server.

These high-risk paths and critical nodes highlight the most important areas to focus on when securing an application that uses the bogus library. Prioritizing mitigations for these specific attack vectors will significantly reduce the overall risk of compromise.