Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
168 lines (119 loc) · 9.42 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

168 lines (119 loc) · 9.42 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for bchavez/bogus

Mitigation Strategy: Environment-Specific Configuration Management for Bogus Data Generation

Description:

  1. Identify Environments: Define development, staging, and production environments.
  2. Configuration Mechanism: Use environment variables or configuration files.
  3. Define Configuration Keys: Create keys like USE_BOGUS_DATA (boolean) and BOGUS_DATA_PROVIDER (string).
  4. Environment-Specific Values: Set USE_BOGUS_DATA=true, BOGUS_DATA_PROVIDER=bogus for development and staging. Set USE_BOGUS_DATA=false, BOGUS_DATA_PROVIDER=real for production.
  5. Application Logic: Code reads config and uses bogus or real data accordingly.
  6. Deployment Automation: Scripts apply environment-specific configs.
  7. Verification: Check data source post-deployment in each environment.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production (High Severity)
    • Data Inconsistency between Environments (Medium Severity)

  • Impact:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production: High Reduction
    • Data Inconsistency between Environments: Medium Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: No

  • Missing Implementation: Needs configuration system update for bogus across environments, code modification to use config, and deployment pipeline updates.

Mitigation Strategy: Bogus-Specific Code Review Checklist

Description:

  1. Create Checklist: Checklist includes: "Are there bogus calls?", "Is bogus isolated to dev/test?", "Are bogus configs correct?", "No hardcoded bogus in production?".
  2. Developer Training: Train on bogus risks in production and checklist importance.
  3. Integrate into Review Process: Mandate checklist use in code reviews before production merges.
  4. Reviewer Focus: Reviewers flag inappropriate bogus usage based on checklist.
  5. Documentation: Document checklist and bogus review process.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production (High Severity)

  • Impact:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production: Medium Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - Standard reviews exist, but not bogus-focused.

  • Missing Implementation: Create and integrate bogus checklist into reviews, developer training.

Mitigation Strategy: Production-Like Environment Integration Tests with Real Data Validation

Description:

  1. Set up Staging Environment: Staging mirrors production (config, data, infra).
  2. Integration Tests: Automated tests in staging.
  3. Real Data Sources in Tests: Tests use real/production-like data (mock services, staging DB).
  4. Validation of Data Flow: Tests verify real data source interaction, no bogus.
  5. Data Integrity Checks: Tests verify data consistency with real data flow.
  6. Automated Execution: Tests in CI/CD before production deployments.
  7. Failure Thresholds: Prevent deployment on test failures.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production (High Severity)
    • Data Inconsistency between Environments (Medium Severity)
    • Unexpected Behavior in Production (Medium Severity)

  • Impact:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production: High Reduction
    • Data Inconsistency between Environments: Medium Reduction
    • Unexpected Behavior in Production: Medium Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - Tests exist, but may not target bogus or use prod-like data fully.

  • Missing Implementation: Enhance tests to validate against bogus in staging, ensure prod-like staging and data, integrate into CI/CD.

Mitigation Strategy: Automated Bogus Code Detection in Build/Deployment Pipeline

Description:

  1. Static Analysis Tooling: Integrate linters/scanners in build pipeline.
  2. Custom Scripts: Scan codebase for bogus keywords, calls, configs (e.g., import bogus, bogus., USE_BOGUS_DATA=true in prod).
  3. Pipeline Integration: Add checks as CI/CD steps.
  4. Failure Condition: Pipeline fails if bogus code/configs detected in production builds.
  5. Reporting: Reports highlight detected bogus usage.
  6. Regular Updates: Update detection rules for new patterns.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production (High Severity)

  • Impact:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production: High Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - Static analysis might exist, but not for bogus specifically.

  • Missing Implementation: Configure static analysis or create scripts to detect bogus patterns, integrate into CI/CD.

Mitigation Strategy: Feature Flags for Bogus Data Control

Description:

  1. Feature Flag System: Implement feature flags.
  2. Define Bogus Feature Flag: Create bogus_data_generation flag.
  3. Wrap Bogus Logic: Wrap bogus code in if feature.is_enabled('bogus_data_generation'):.
  4. Environment-Specific Flag Configuration: Enable in dev/staging, disable in production by default.
  5. Runtime Control: Allow runtime flag control (config files, env vars, admin UI).
  6. Documentation: Document flag and purpose.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production (High Severity)

  • Impact:

    • Accidental Use of Bogus Data in Production: High Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: No - No bogus feature flag system.

  • Missing Implementation: Implement feature flags, define bogus_data_generation flag, wrap bogus code, configure flags per environment.

Mitigation Strategy: Automated Log Data Sanitization for Bogus Data

Description:

  1. Identify Bogus Data Patterns: Analyze bogus data patterns (prefixes, formats, values).
  2. Log Scrubbing Mechanism: Implement scrubbing in logging library, aggregation system, or tool.
  3. Define Scrubbing Rules: Rules to redact/replace bogus data in logs based on regex, whitelists/blacklists, data type detection.
  4. Testing and Validation: Test rules to remove bogus data without impacting legitimate logs.
  5. Regular Review: Update rules as bogus patterns or logging changes.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exposure of Bogus Data in Logs (Medium Severity)

  • Impact:

    • Exposure of Bogus Data in Logs: High Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - General scrubbing might exist, not for bogus patterns.

  • Missing Implementation: Develop bogus-specific scrubbing rules, test and validate in logging pipeline.

Mitigation Strategy: Error Message Sanitization for Bogus Data Removal

Description:

  1. Review Error Handling Code: Review error paths, especially user-facing/logged errors.
  2. Identify Bogus Data Exposure Points: Find where bogus data might be in error messages (inputs, queries, state).
  3. Sanitize Error Messages: Modify error logic to sanitize messages: remove/replace bogus values, use generic messages, log detailed errors (with bogus if needed) internally only.
  4. Testing Error Scenarios: Test error handling with bogus data to ensure sanitization.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Exposure of Bogus Data in Error Messages (Medium Severity)

  • Impact:

    • Exposure of Bogus Data in Error Messages: High Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: Partially - General error handling exists, but not bogus sanitization.

  • Missing Implementation: Review error paths, sanitize bogus data in messages, implement sanitization logic, test with bogus data.

Mitigation Strategy: Version Controlled and Deterministic Bogus Seed Data

Description:

  1. Centralized Seed Data Scripts: Create dedicated bogus seeding scripts, centralize them.
  2. Deterministic Seed Generation: Use consistent seeds or deterministic bogus generation (fixed seed for bogus.Faker).
  3. Version Control Seed Scripts: Version control seed scripts (Git).
  4. Environment-Specific Seed Data (Optional): Separate scripts or env vars for different env data needs.
  5. Documentation: Document seed process, seeds used, env configs.
  6. Regular Review and Updates: Review/update seed scripts, version control changes.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Inconsistency between Environments (Medium Severity)
    • Unexpected Behavior in Production (Low Severity)

  • Impact:

    • Data Inconsistency between Environments: High Reduction
    • Unexpected Behavior in Production: Low Reduction

  • Currently Implemented: No - bogus seed data management likely ad-hoc, not versioned.

  • Missing Implementation: Create centralized, version-controlled seed scripts with deterministic bogus, document process, integrate into env setup.