Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
371 lines (342 loc) · 52.1 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

371 lines (342 loc) · 52.1 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for bitwarden/server

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing

  • Description:
    1. Schedule Regular Audits: Define a recurring schedule (e.g., annually, bi-annually) for comprehensive security audits of the Bitwarden server codebase, configuration, and infrastructure.
    2. Engage Security Experts: Hire reputable cybersecurity firms or independent security consultants with expertise in web application security and penetration testing, specifically for server-side applications.
    3. Define Scope: Clearly define the scope of the audit and penetration test, focusing on server-side components of the Bitwarden server (API, database interactions, backend logic, server configuration).
    4. Conduct Code Review: Perform thorough code reviews of the server-side codebase, especially for any custom modifications or extensions, looking for server-side vulnerabilities.
    5. Perform Penetration Testing: Execute penetration tests simulating server-side attack scenarios against the Bitwarden server to identify exploitable vulnerabilities in the server application and infrastructure. This should include both automated and manual testing focused on server weaknesses.
    6. Vulnerability Reporting and Remediation: Establish a clear process for reporting identified server-side vulnerabilities, prioritizing them based on severity, and developing server-side remediation plans.
    7. Retesting and Verification: After implementing server-side remediations, conduct retesting to verify that server-side vulnerabilities have been effectively addressed.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Zero-day vulnerabilities in Bitwarden Server code (Severity: High): Undiscovered flaws in the server-side application logic that could be exploited by attackers.
      • Configuration errors leading to server-side security breaches (Severity: High): Misconfigurations in server settings, network configurations, or database settings that expose server-side vulnerabilities.
      • Logic flaws in custom server-side extensions or modifications (Severity: High): Vulnerabilities introduced through custom server-side code added to the Bitwarden server.
      • Privilege escalation vulnerabilities on the server (Severity: High): Flaws allowing attackers to gain higher levels of access within the server or system.
      • Data breaches due to server-side application vulnerabilities (Severity: Critical): Exploitation of server-side vulnerabilities leading to unauthorized access and exfiltration of sensitive vault data.
    • Impact:
      • Zero-day vulnerabilities in Bitwarden Server code: Significantly reduces risk by proactively identifying and addressing unknown server-side flaws.
      • Configuration errors leading to server-side security breaches: Significantly reduces risk by identifying and correcting server-side misconfigurations before exploitation.
      • Logic flaws in custom server-side extensions or modifications: Significantly reduces risk by ensuring custom server-side code is secure and doesn't introduce new vulnerabilities.
      • Privilege escalation vulnerabilities on the server: Significantly reduces risk by identifying and fixing server-side flaws that could lead to unauthorized access and control.
      • Data breaches due to server-side application vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk by preventing exploitation of server-side vulnerabilities that could lead to data compromise.
    • Currently Implemented: No - Typically not implemented by default in standard Bitwarden server deployments. It's an organizational security practice focused on the server.
    • Missing Implementation: Missing in most standard server deployments. Organizations need to proactively plan and budget for regular server-focused security audits and penetration testing.

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Management and Vulnerability Scanning

  • Description:
    1. Bill of Materials (BOM): Create and maintain a comprehensive BOM listing all server-side software dependencies (libraries, packages, frameworks) used by the Bitwarden server.
    2. Automated Scanning Tools: Integrate automated Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools into the server development and deployment pipeline. These tools scan server-side dependencies for known vulnerabilities (CVEs).
    3. Continuous Monitoring: Set up continuous monitoring of server-side dependency vulnerabilities using SCA tools and vulnerability databases (e.g., National Vulnerability Database - NVD).
    4. Alerting and Notification: Configure alerts to notify security and development teams immediately when new vulnerabilities are discovered in server-side dependencies.
    5. Patching and Upgrading: Establish a process for promptly patching or upgrading vulnerable server-side dependencies. Prioritize patching based on vulnerability severity and exploitability on the server.
    6. Dependency Pinning: Use dependency pinning or version locking for server-side dependencies to ensure consistent server builds and prevent unexpected updates that might introduce server-side vulnerabilities or break server functionality.
    7. Regular Review and Updates: Periodically review and update server-side dependencies, even if no new vulnerabilities are reported, to benefit from security improvements and bug fixes in newer server-side versions.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Exploitation of known vulnerabilities in server-side dependencies (Severity: High): Attackers exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities in outdated server-side libraries used by the server.
      • Supply chain attacks via compromised server-side dependencies (Severity: High): Malicious code injected into server-side dependencies that could compromise the server.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks through vulnerable server-side dependencies (Severity: Medium): Vulnerabilities in server-side dependencies that could be exploited to cause server crashes or performance degradation.
    • Impact:
      • Exploitation of known vulnerabilities in server-side dependencies: Significantly reduces risk by proactively identifying and patching known server-side flaws.
      • Supply chain attacks via compromised server-side dependencies: Moderately reduces risk by increasing awareness and enabling faster response to compromised server-side dependencies (though detection can be challenging).
      • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks through vulnerable server-side dependencies: Moderately reduces risk by patching server-side vulnerabilities that could be exploited for DoS.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Bitwarden server development likely uses server-side dependency management. However, continuous vulnerability scanning and automated patching of server-side dependencies might not be fully implemented in all deployment scenarios, especially for self-hosted instances.
    • Missing Implementation: Automated vulnerability scanning and patching workflows for server-side dependencies might be missing in self-hosted deployments. Users need to actively manage and update server-side dependencies in their server environments.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Configuration Management

  • Description:
    1. Centralized Configuration: Utilize a configuration management system (e.g., Ansible, Chef, Puppet, Docker Compose) to manage server configurations in a centralized and version-controlled manner.
    2. Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC): Define server infrastructure and configurations as code, allowing for automated server provisioning, consistent server deployments, and easier server configuration auditing.
    3. Configuration Hardening: Implement server security hardening best practices in server configurations, including:
      • Disabling unnecessary server services and ports.
      • Restricting server network access using firewalls and access control lists.
      • Setting strong passwords and access controls for server system accounts.
      • Configuring secure server logging and auditing.
      • Setting appropriate server file permissions.
    4. Regular Configuration Audits: Periodically audit server configurations against server security baselines and best practices to identify and remediate server misconfigurations.
    5. Configuration Drift Detection: Implement mechanisms to detect server configuration drift (unauthorized changes) and automatically revert to the desired secure server configuration.
    6. Immutable Infrastructure (Optional): Consider using immutable server infrastructure principles where server configurations are baked into images, reducing server configuration drift and improving server consistency.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Security breaches due to server misconfigurations (Severity: High): Exploitable vulnerabilities arising from incorrect or insecure server settings.
      • Unauthorized server access due to weak access controls (Severity: High): Insufficiently restricted access to server resources and functionalities.
      • Lateral movement after initial server compromise (Severity: Medium): Server misconfigurations allowing attackers to move laterally within the network after gaining initial server access.
      • Data leaks due to insecure server logging or exposed services (Severity: Medium): Sensitive information inadvertently exposed through insecure server logging practices or unnecessary server services.
    • Impact:
      • Security breaches due to server misconfigurations: Significantly reduces risk by enforcing secure server configurations and preventing common server misconfiguration errors.
      • Unauthorized server access due to weak access controls: Significantly reduces risk by implementing strong server access controls and limiting unnecessary server access.
      • Lateral movement after initial server compromise: Moderately reduces risk by limiting the impact of a breach through network segmentation and hardened server configurations.
      • Data leaks due to insecure server logging or exposed services: Moderately reduces risk by ensuring secure server logging practices and minimizing exposed server services.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Bitwarden server Docker images and documentation provide some baseline server configurations. However, full secure server configuration management requires user implementation and customization.
    • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive secure server configuration management is often missing in user server deployments. Users need to actively implement server hardening measures and server configuration management tools.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Output Encoding (Server-Side Focus)

  • Description:
    1. Server-Side Input Validation: Implement robust input validation on the server-side for all data received from clients or external sources, especially at server API endpoints and internal server processing functions.
      • Data Type Validation: Ensure data conforms to expected server-side types (e.g., integer, string, email).
      • Range Validation: Verify data falls within acceptable server-side ranges (e.g., length limits, numerical bounds).
      • Format Validation: Validate data against expected server-side formats (e.g., regular expressions for email, URLs).
      • Sanitization: Sanitize input data on the server-side to remove or escape potentially harmful characters or code.
    2. Output Encoding: Implement output encoding on the server-side when processing and displaying data in server logs, error messages, or internal server-to-server communications.
      • Context-Aware Encoding: Use context-aware server-side encoding appropriate for the output context (e.g., HTML encoding for web output, URL encoding for URLs).
      • Prevent Injection: Encode server-side output to prevent injection vulnerabilities like Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in server logs or command injection in internal server processes.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Server-Side Injection Vulnerabilities (Severity: High): SQL Injection, Command Injection, Log Injection, etc., arising from unsanitized input processed by the server.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in server logs or error messages (Severity: Medium): Malicious scripts injected into server logs or error messages that could be executed by administrators viewing these server logs.
      • Data corruption or unexpected server behavior due to invalid input (Severity: Medium): Server processing invalid data leading to server application errors or data integrity issues.
    • Impact:
      • Server-Side Injection Vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk by preventing attackers from injecting malicious code or commands into the server.
      • Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in server logs or error messages: Moderately reduces risk by preventing potential exploitation of administrators viewing server logs.
      • Data corruption or unexpected server behavior due to invalid input: Moderately reduces risk by ensuring server data integrity and server application stability.
    • Currently Implemented: Likely Partially - Bitwarden server codebase likely includes server-side input validation and output encoding to some extent. However, the thoroughness and coverage might vary across all server components.
    • Missing Implementation: May require further review and enhancement, especially in less frequently used server API endpoints or internal server processes. Developers should ensure comprehensive server-side input validation and output encoding across the entire server codebase.

Mitigation Strategy: Rate Limiting and API Abuse Prevention (Server-Side)

  • Description:
    1. Identify Critical Server API Endpoints: Determine server API endpoints that are most susceptible to abuse (e.g., login, password reset, vault access).
    2. Implement Rate Limiting: Configure server-side rate limiting for critical server API endpoints to restrict the number of requests from a single IP address or user within a specific time window.
      • Threshold Setting: Define appropriate server rate limits based on normal server usage patterns and server security considerations.
      • Granularity: Implement server rate limiting at different levels (e.g., per IP address, per user, per server API endpoint).
      • Response Handling: Configure the server to respond with appropriate error codes (e.g., 429 Too Many Requests) when server rate limits are exceeded.
    3. API Usage Monitoring: Implement server-side monitoring of server API usage patterns to detect anomalies and suspicious activities.
      • Log Analysis: Analyze server API access logs for unusual request patterns, high error rates, or requests from suspicious IP addresses.
      • Alerting: Set up alerts to notify security teams when suspicious server API usage patterns are detected.
    4. Account Lockout Policies: Implement server account lockout policies to temporarily disable server accounts after multiple failed login attempts, preventing brute-force password attacks on the server.
    5. CAPTCHA or Similar Mechanisms: Consider implementing CAPTCHA or similar challenge-response mechanisms for sensitive server API endpoints (e.g., login, registration) to prevent automated bot attacks on the server.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Brute-force password attacks against server accounts (Severity: High): Attackers attempting to guess user passwords through repeated login attempts to the server.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks targeting the server (Severity: High): Attackers overwhelming the server with excessive API requests, causing server service disruption.
      • Server API abuse and resource exhaustion (Severity: Medium): Malicious or unintentional overuse of server API resources, leading to server performance degradation or service unavailability.
      • Credential stuffing attacks against server accounts (Severity: High): Attackers using lists of compromised credentials from other breaches to attempt logins to the server.
    • Impact:
      • Brute-force password attacks against server accounts: Significantly reduces risk by making brute-force attacks against the server computationally infeasible.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks targeting the server: Moderately reduces risk by limiting the impact of volumetric DoS attacks targeting server API endpoints.
      • Server API abuse and resource exhaustion: Moderately reduces risk by preventing excessive server resource consumption due to server API misuse.
      • Credential stuffing attacks against server accounts: Moderately reduces risk by making credential stuffing attacks against the server less effective.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Bitwarden server likely has some basic server rate limiting and server account lockout features. However, the level of configuration and granularity might vary.
    • Missing Implementation: Advanced server rate limiting configurations, granular control over different server API endpoints, and sophisticated server API usage monitoring might be missing or require further configuration in self-hosted server deployments.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Session Management (Server-Side)

  • Description:
    1. Strong Session ID Generation: Use cryptographically secure random number generators on the server to create strong and unpredictable session IDs.
    2. Session ID Confidentiality: Protect session IDs from server-side exposure. Transmit session IDs securely over HTTPS only. Store session IDs securely on the server-side (e.g., in memory, database, or secure session store).
    3. Session Timeouts: Implement appropriate server-side session timeouts to limit the lifespan of server sessions.
      • Idle Timeout: Set a timeout for server session inactivity.
      • Absolute Timeout: Set a maximum server session lifetime, regardless of activity.
    4. Session Invalidation: Implement server-side mechanisms to invalidate server sessions upon logout, password change, or account compromise.
    5. Session Hijacking Prevention: Implement server-side measures to prevent session hijacking attacks:
      • HTTP-Only Flag: Set the HTTP-Only flag for server session cookies to prevent client-side JavaScript access.
      • Secure Flag: Set the Secure flag for server session cookies to ensure transmission only over HTTPS.
      • IP Address Binding (Consideration): Optionally consider binding server sessions to the user's IP address (with caution, as IP addresses can change).
    6. Session Regeneration: Regenerate server session IDs after critical actions like login or password change to prevent server session fixation attacks.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Session hijacking of server sessions (Severity: High): Attackers stealing or intercepting valid server session IDs to gain unauthorized access to user accounts via the server.
      • Server session fixation attacks (Severity: High): Attackers forcing a user to use a known server session ID to gain unauthorized access via the server.
      • Brute-force server session ID guessing (Severity: Low): Attempting to guess valid server session IDs (mitigated by strong server session ID generation).
      • Server session replay attacks (Severity: Medium): Attackers replaying captured server session IDs to gain unauthorized access via the server (mitigated by short server session timeouts and server session invalidation).
    • Impact:
      • Session hijacking of server sessions: Significantly reduces risk by making it much harder for attackers to steal or reuse server session IDs.
      • Server session fixation attacks: Significantly reduces risk by preventing attackers from forcing users to use attacker-controlled server session IDs.
      • Brute-force server session ID guessing: Minimally reduces risk (already low due to strong server session IDs).
      • Server session replay attacks: Moderately reduces risk by limiting the window of opportunity for server session replay.
    • Currently Implemented: Likely Yes - Secure server session management is a fundamental security requirement for web applications, and Bitwarden server should implement these server-side practices.
    • Missing Implementation: May require review and verification to ensure all aspects of secure server session management are correctly implemented and configured on the server-side, especially regarding server session timeouts and invalidation mechanisms.

Mitigation Strategy: Error Handling and Logging (Security Focused)

  • Description:
    1. Secure Error Handling: Implement secure error handling practices on the server to avoid exposing sensitive server information in error messages.
      • Generic Error Messages: Display generic error messages to users, avoiding detailed technical server information that could aid attackers.
      • Detailed Logging: Log detailed server error information server-side for debugging and security analysis, but do not expose this server information to users.
    2. Comprehensive Security Logging: Configure server-side logging to capture server security-relevant events:
      • Authentication Events: Successful and failed server login attempts, logout events, password changes on the server.
      • Authorization Events: Server access control decisions, authorization failures, privilege escalations on the server.
      • API Access: Requests to sensitive server API endpoints, including request parameters and user information processed by the server.
      • Configuration Changes: Modifications to server configurations, user permissions on the server, or server security settings.
      • Security Incidents: Detected attacks against the server, intrusion attempts on the server, vulnerability exploitation attempts on the server.
    3. Secure Logging Practices:
      • Centralized Logging: Aggregate server logs from all server components into a centralized logging system for easier server log analysis and correlation.
      • Log Integrity: Protect server log integrity to prevent tampering or deletion by attackers. Consider using server log signing or immutable server logging solutions.
      • Log Retention: Define appropriate server log retention policies based on server security and compliance requirements.
      • Secure Log Storage: Store server logs securely, protecting them from unauthorized server access.
    4. Log Monitoring and Alerting: Implement server log monitoring and alerting systems to automatically detect and respond to server security incidents.
      • Security Information and Event Management (SIEM): Consider using a SIEM system for advanced server log analysis, correlation, and server incident detection.
      • Real-time Alerts: Configure alerts to notify security teams immediately when suspicious server events are detected in server logs.
    5. Regular Log Review: Periodically review server logs manually to identify trends, anomalies, and potential server security issues that might not trigger automated alerts.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Information disclosure through verbose server error messages (Severity: Medium): Attackers gaining sensitive server information from detailed server error messages, aiding in reconnaissance or exploitation of the server.
      • Delayed server incident detection and response (Severity: High): Lack of comprehensive server logging hindering timely detection and response to server security incidents.
      • Compromised server audit trails (Severity: Medium): Insufficient or insecure server logging preventing accurate server incident investigation and forensic analysis.
      • Server insider threats and unauthorized activities (Severity: Medium): Lack of server logging hindering detection of malicious activities by insiders or compromised server accounts.
    • Impact:
      • Information disclosure through verbose server error messages: Moderately reduces risk by preventing attackers from gaining unnecessary server information.
      • Delayed server incident detection and response: Significantly reduces risk by enabling faster detection and response to server security incidents.
      • Compromised server audit trails: Moderately reduces risk by ensuring server log integrity and enabling effective server incident investigation.
      • Server insider threats and unauthorized activities: Moderately reduces risk by providing visibility into server user and system activities.
    • Currently Implemented: Likely Partially - Bitwarden server likely has basic server error handling and server logging. However, the level of detail, server security focus, and centralized server logging might vary.
    • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive server security-focused logging, centralized server logging, server log integrity measures, and automated server log monitoring and alerting might be missing or require further configuration in self-hosted server deployments.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Update and Patch Management Process (Server-Specific)

  • Description:
    1. Establish Server Update Process: Define a clear and documented process for applying updates and security patches to the Bitwarden server application and its underlying server operating system.
    2. Staging Environment: Set up a staging server environment that mirrors the production server environment to test updates and patches before deploying them to production.
    3. Testing and Validation: Thoroughly test updates in the staging server environment to ensure they do not introduce regressions, break server functionality, or cause server instability.
    4. Automated Updates (Consideration): Explore automating the server update process where possible, especially for server security patches, to ensure timely application. However, carefully consider automated server updates for critical systems and test thoroughly.
    5. Rollback Plan: Develop a server rollback plan to quickly revert to the previous server version in case an update causes issues in production.
    6. Communication and Notification: Establish a communication channel to notify users and administrators about upcoming server updates, potential server downtime, and any required server actions.
    7. Regular Monitoring After Updates: Monitor the server closely after applying updates to ensure server stability and identify any unexpected server issues.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Exploitation of known vulnerabilities in outdated server software (Severity: High): Attackers exploiting publicly known vulnerabilities in unpatched Bitwarden server software or server operating system components.
      • Unplanned server downtime due to unstable updates (Severity: Medium): Server updates introducing bugs or instability leading to server service disruptions.
      • Security breaches due to delayed server patching (Severity: High): Prolonged exposure to known server vulnerabilities due to slow or inconsistent server patching processes.
    • Impact:
      • Exploitation of known vulnerabilities in outdated server software: Significantly reduces risk by proactively patching known server flaws and minimizing the window of server vulnerability.
      • Unplanned server downtime due to unstable updates: Moderately reduces risk by testing server updates in a staging server environment before production deployment.
      • Security breaches due to delayed server patching: Significantly reduces risk by ensuring timely application of server security patches.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Bitwarden project releases server updates and server security patches. However, the process of applying these server updates to self-hosted instances is the responsibility of the user.
    • Missing Implementation: Automated server update mechanisms and streamlined server patching processes might be missing in self-hosted server deployments. Users need to actively monitor for server updates and manually apply them.

Mitigation Strategy: Network Segmentation and Firewalling (Server-Centric)

  • Description:
    1. Network Segmentation: Implement network segmentation to isolate the Bitwarden server infrastructure from other parts of the network, limiting the potential impact of a server breach.
    2. Firewalling: Configure firewalls to restrict network access to the Bitwarden server, allowing only necessary ports and protocols from trusted sources.
      • Ingress Filtering: Block all inbound traffic to the server by default and explicitly allow only necessary ports (e.g., HTTPS - 443) from authorized networks or IP addresses.
      • Egress Filtering: Restrict outbound traffic from the server to only necessary destinations, preventing compromised servers from communicating with command-and-control servers or exfiltrating data.
    3. Web Application Firewall (WAF): Consider using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to protect the server from common web attacks, specifically tailored to Bitwarden server's architecture if possible.
      • WAF Rulesets: Configure WAF rulesets to detect and block common web attacks like SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and other OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities targeting the server.
      • Virtual Patching: Utilize WAF virtual patching capabilities to mitigate known server vulnerabilities before official patches are applied.
    4. Intrusion Detection/Prevention System (IDS/IPS): Consider deploying an IDS/IPS to monitor network traffic to and from the server for malicious activity and automatically block or alert on suspicious traffic.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Unauthorized network access to the server (Severity: High): Attackers gaining network access to the server from untrusted networks or sources.
      • Lateral movement to other systems after server compromise (Severity: High): Attackers using a compromised server as a pivot point to attack other systems within the network.
      • Data exfiltration from the server (Severity: High): Attackers exfiltrating sensitive data from the server over the network.
      • Web application attacks targeting the server (Severity: High): Common web attacks like SQL injection, XSS, and others targeting the server application.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks targeting the server network (Severity: High): Network-level DoS attacks aimed at disrupting server availability.
    • Impact:
      • Unauthorized network access to the server: Significantly reduces risk by limiting network exposure and preventing unauthorized connections to the server.
      • Lateral movement to other systems after server compromise: Significantly reduces risk by containing breaches within the server segment and preventing wider network compromise.
      • Data exfiltration from the server: Moderately reduces risk by limiting outbound network connections and potentially detecting exfiltration attempts.
      • Web application attacks targeting the server: Moderately to Significantly reduces risk depending on WAF effectiveness and configuration, by blocking common web attacks.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks targeting the server network: Moderately reduces risk by mitigating some network-level DoS attacks (WAF and network firewalls can help).
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Network segmentation and firewalling are standard security practices, but their implementation for Bitwarden servers depends on the deployment environment and user configuration. Basic firewalling is often present, but advanced segmentation and WAF are less common in standard self-hosted setups.
    • Missing Implementation: Advanced network segmentation, WAF deployment, and IDS/IPS are often missing in standard self-hosted Bitwarden server deployments. Users need to actively implement these infrastructure-level security measures.

Mitigation Strategy: Database Security Hardening (Server-Side Database)

  • Description:
    1. Database Server Hardening: Harden the database server used by Bitwarden server by following database security best practices:
      • Strong Passwords: Use strong, unique passwords for database administrator accounts and application database users.
      • Access Control Lists (ACLs): Implement strict ACLs to restrict database access to only authorized users and applications (primarily the Bitwarden server).
      • Disable Unnecessary Features: Disable unnecessary database features, stored procedures, and network protocols to reduce the attack surface.
      • Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular security audits of the database server configuration and access controls.
    2. Database Encryption at Rest: Enable database encryption at rest to protect sensitive vault data stored in the database files.
      • Transparent Data Encryption (TDE): Utilize database TDE features if available to encrypt data at rest.
      • File System Encryption: Consider encrypting the file system where the database files are stored as an alternative or additional layer of security.
    3. Database Encryption in Transit: Ensure database connections from the Bitwarden server to the database are encrypted in transit using TLS/SSL.
    4. Regular Database Backups: Regularly back up the database and store backups securely, considering encryption for backups as well.
      • Automated Backups: Implement automated database backup schedules.
      • Secure Backup Storage: Store backups in a secure location, separate from the primary database server, with appropriate access controls.
      • Backup Encryption: Encrypt database backups to protect sensitive data in case backups are compromised.
    5. Database Vulnerability Scanning and Patching: Regularly scan the database server for vulnerabilities and apply security patches promptly.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Unauthorized database access (Severity: High): Attackers gaining unauthorized access to the database server and sensitive vault data.
      • Data breaches due to database compromise (Severity: Critical): Compromise of the database leading to exfiltration of sensitive vault data.
      • Data leaks from unencrypted database storage (Severity: High): Sensitive data exposed if database storage is not encrypted and physical access is gained.
      • Data loss due to database failures or attacks (Severity: High): Lack of backups leading to permanent data loss in case of database corruption, hardware failure, or ransomware attacks.
      • Data interception during database communication (Severity: Medium): Sensitive data intercepted during unencrypted communication between the Bitwarden server and the database.
    • Impact:
      • Unauthorized database access: Significantly reduces risk by preventing unauthorized access to the database and sensitive data.
      • Data breaches due to database compromise: Significantly reduces risk by making database compromise more difficult and protecting data even if compromised (encryption at rest).
      • Data leaks from unencrypted database storage: Significantly reduces risk by protecting data at rest from physical access or theft.
      • Data loss due to database failures or attacks: Significantly reduces risk by ensuring data recoverability through regular backups.
      • Data interception during database communication: Moderately reduces risk by protecting data in transit between the server and database.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Bitwarden server documentation likely recommends some database security practices. However, full database security hardening, encryption at rest, and robust backup strategies require user implementation and configuration.
    • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive database security hardening, database encryption at rest, and automated secure backup solutions are often missing in user deployments. Users need to actively implement these database security measures.

Mitigation Strategy: Secrets Management for Server Credentials

  • Description:
    1. Identify Server Secrets: Identify all sensitive credentials used by the Bitwarden server, such as:
      • Database passwords.
      • API keys for external services.
      • Encryption keys used by the server.
      • Service account credentials.
    2. Secure Secrets Storage: Implement a secure secrets management solution to store and manage server credentials.
      • Dedicated Secrets Vaults: Utilize dedicated secrets management tools or services (e.g., HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, Azure Key Vault).
      • Environment Variables: Store secrets as environment variables instead of hardcoding them in configuration files or code (less secure than dedicated vaults, but better than hardcoding).
    3. Avoid Hardcoding Secrets: Never hardcode secrets directly in configuration files, code repositories, or container images.
    4. Access Control: Implement strict access control to secrets, granting access only to authorized server components and administrators.
    5. Secrets Rotation: Rotate secrets regularly, especially for critical credentials like database passwords and encryption keys.
    6. Auditing and Logging: Enable auditing and logging of secret access and modifications to track usage and detect potential misuse.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Credential theft and exposure (Severity: High): Attackers gaining access to sensitive server credentials due to insecure storage or hardcoding.
      • Unauthorized access due to compromised credentials (Severity: High): Attackers using stolen server credentials to gain unauthorized access to the server or related systems.
      • Privilege escalation due to exposed administrative credentials (Severity: High): Exposure of administrative credentials leading to privilege escalation and full server control.
      • Data breaches due to compromised encryption keys (Severity: Critical): Compromise of encryption keys leading to decryption of sensitive vault data.
    • Impact:
      • Credential theft and exposure: Significantly reduces risk by securely storing and managing server credentials, making them harder to steal.
      • Unauthorized access due to compromised credentials: Significantly reduces risk by limiting the impact of credential theft through secure storage and access control.
      • Privilege escalation due to exposed administrative credentials: Significantly reduces risk by protecting administrative credentials and limiting their exposure.
      • Data breaches due to compromised encryption keys: Significantly reduces risk by securely managing and rotating encryption keys, protecting sensitive data.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Bitwarden server likely uses environment variables for some configuration, but comprehensive secrets management with dedicated vaults and rotation is not typically implemented by default in self-hosted setups.
    • Missing Implementation: Dedicated secrets management solutions and automated secrets rotation are often missing in user deployments. Users need to actively implement secure secrets management practices for their Bitwarden servers.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Server Security Scanning and Monitoring

  • Description:
    1. Vulnerability Scanning: Implement automated vulnerability scanning tools to regularly scan the Bitwarden server infrastructure for vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.
      • Infrastructure Scanning: Scan server operating systems, network services, and configurations for known vulnerabilities.
      • Web Application Scanning: Scan the Bitwarden server web application for web application vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10, etc.).
      • Frequency: Schedule regular scans (e.g., weekly, daily) and trigger scans after any server configuration changes or updates.
    2. Security Monitoring: Set up security monitoring and alerting systems to detect and respond to server security incidents in real-time.
      • Intrusion Detection System (IDS): Monitor network traffic and server logs for suspicious activity.
      • Security Information and Event Management (SIEM): Aggregate and analyze security logs from various server components for threat detection.
      • Real-time Alerts: Configure alerts to notify security teams immediately when suspicious events or potential security incidents are detected.
    3. Performance and Resource Monitoring: Monitor server performance and resource utilization (CPU, memory, disk, network) to identify anomalies that could indicate security issues or denial-of-service attacks.
    4. Log Analysis and Correlation: Regularly analyze server logs for security-relevant events, suspicious patterns, and potential security incidents. Correlate logs from different server components to gain a holistic view of server security.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Exploitation of known server vulnerabilities (Severity: High): Attackers exploiting known vulnerabilities in the server operating system, web application, or services.
      • Active attacks and intrusions against the server (Severity: High): Real-time detection of ongoing attacks and intrusion attempts targeting the server.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks against the server (Severity: High): Detection of DoS attacks targeting server resources or network connectivity.
      • Server misconfigurations and security weaknesses (Severity: Medium): Identification of server misconfigurations and security weaknesses through vulnerability scanning.
      • Insider threats and unauthorized activities on the server (Severity: Medium): Monitoring server activity for suspicious behavior that could indicate insider threats or compromised accounts.
    • Impact:
      • Exploitation of known server vulnerabilities: Significantly reduces risk by proactively identifying and addressing known server flaws.
      • Active attacks and intrusions against the server: Significantly reduces risk by enabling real-time detection and response to ongoing attacks.
      • Denial of Service (DoS) attacks against the server: Moderately reduces risk by detecting DoS attacks and enabling mitigation efforts.
      • Server misconfigurations and security weaknesses: Moderately reduces risk by identifying and highlighting server security weaknesses for remediation.
      • Insider threats and unauthorized activities on the server: Moderately reduces risk by providing visibility into server activity and detecting suspicious behavior.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Basic server monitoring (performance, resource utilization) is often implemented. However, comprehensive server security scanning and real-time security monitoring with SIEM and IDS are less common in standard self-hosted setups.
    • Missing Implementation: Automated server vulnerability scanning, real-time security monitoring, SIEM integration, and IDS/IPS deployment are often missing in user deployments. Users need to actively implement these server security monitoring and scanning solutions.

Mitigation Strategy: Least Privilege Principle (Server Access)

  • Description:
    1. Identify Server Roles and Permissions: Define different roles and permissions required for accessing and managing the Bitwarden server.
    2. Principle of Least Privilege: Apply the principle of least privilege to server access control. Grant users and processes only the minimum necessary permissions required to perform their tasks on the server.
      • User Accounts: Create separate user accounts for different roles (e.g., server administrators, application users, monitoring systems).
      • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): Implement RBAC to manage server access based on roles rather than individual users.
      • Service Accounts: Use dedicated service accounts with limited permissions for server processes and applications.
    3. Regular Access Reviews: Regularly review and audit user access rights to the Bitwarden server and related infrastructure.
      • Access Recertification: Periodically recertify user access rights to ensure they are still necessary and appropriate.
      • User Account Management: Implement processes for onboarding and offboarding server users, ensuring timely provisioning and revocation of access.
    4. Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Enforce multi-factor authentication for all server administrative access to add an extra layer of security.
    5. Privilege Access Management (PAM): Consider implementing a PAM solution to further control and monitor privileged access to the server.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Unauthorized server access (Severity: High): Attackers gaining unauthorized access to the server due to overly permissive access controls.
      • Privilege escalation by compromised accounts (Severity: High): Attackers leveraging compromised accounts with excessive privileges to escalate their access and control.
      • Insider threats and accidental misuse of privileges (Severity: Medium): Reduced risk of insider threats and accidental damage due to limited user privileges.
      • Lateral movement after initial server compromise (Severity: Medium): Limited lateral movement potential if compromised accounts have restricted server privileges.
    • Impact:
      • Unauthorized server access: Significantly reduces risk by limiting who can access the server and its resources.
      • Privilege escalation by compromised accounts: Significantly reduces risk by limiting the impact of compromised accounts through restricted privileges.
      • Insider threats and accidental misuse of privileges: Moderately reduces risk by minimizing the potential for damage from insider actions or mistakes.
      • Lateral movement after initial server compromise: Moderately reduces risk by limiting the attacker's ability to move laterally within the server environment.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Operating systems and server environments typically support basic user access control. However, granular RBAC, MFA for all server admin access, and PAM solutions are less common in standard self-hosted setups.
    • Missing Implementation: Granular RBAC, enforced MFA for all server administrative access, regular access reviews, and PAM solutions are often missing in user deployments. Users need to actively implement least privilege principles for their Bitwarden servers.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Deployment Practices

  • Description:
    1. Automated Deployment: Automate the server deployment process to ensure consistent and repeatable deployments, reducing the risk of manual errors that could introduce vulnerabilities.
      • Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC): Use IaC tools to define and manage server infrastructure and deployments as code.
      • Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD): Implement CI/CD pipelines to automate the build, test, and deployment process.
    2. Immutable Infrastructure: Consider using immutable infrastructure principles for server deployments, where server configurations are baked into images, reducing configuration drift and improving consistency.
    3. Minimal Attack Surface: Minimize the server attack surface by deploying only necessary components and services on the Bitwarden server.
      • Remove Unnecessary Software: Remove any unnecessary software packages or services from the server operating system.
      • Disable Unused Ports and Services: Disable any unused network ports and services on the server.
    4. Secure Baseline Images: Use secure baseline server images or container images as a starting point for deployments, ensuring they are hardened and patched.
    5. Security Scanning in Deployment Pipeline: Integrate security scanning tools into the deployment pipeline to automatically scan server images and configurations for vulnerabilities before deployment.
    6. Version Control and Auditing: Manage server deployment configurations and scripts in version control systems to track changes and enable auditing.
    • List of Threats Mitigated:
      • Vulnerabilities introduced through manual deployment errors (Severity: Medium): Manual configuration errors during deployment leading to security weaknesses.
      • Configuration drift and inconsistencies across servers (Severity: Medium): Inconsistent server configurations due to manual deployments, leading to security gaps.
      • Increased attack surface due to unnecessary software (Severity: Medium): Unnecessary software and services on the server increasing the potential attack surface.
      • Deployment of vulnerable server images (Severity: High): Deploying server images with known vulnerabilities due to lack of scanning or secure baseline images.
    • Impact:
      • Vulnerabilities introduced through manual deployment errors: Moderately reduces risk by automating deployments and eliminating manual configuration errors.
      • Configuration drift and inconsistencies across servers: Moderately reduces risk by ensuring consistent server configurations through automated deployments and IaC.
      • Increased attack surface due to unnecessary software: Moderately reduces risk by minimizing the software footprint on the server.
      • Deployment of vulnerable server images: Significantly reduces risk by preventing deployment of vulnerable server images through scanning and secure baselines.
    • Currently Implemented: Partially - Bitwarden server Docker deployments provide some level of automation. However, full CI/CD pipelines, immutable infrastructure, and comprehensive security scanning in the deployment pipeline are less common in standard self-hosted setups.
    • Missing Implementation: Fully automated CI/CD pipelines, immutable server infrastructure, integrated security scanning in deployment pipelines, and minimal attack surface configurations are often missing in user deployments. Users need to actively implement secure deployment practices for their Bitwarden servers.