Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
312 lines (245 loc) · 22.7 KB

sec-design.md

File metadata and controls

312 lines (245 loc) · 22.7 KB

Okay, I will improve the previous design document for the Bitwarden server project, focusing on clarity, detail, and its suitability for threat modeling. I will also ensure valid Markdown and Mermaid syntax.

Here's the improved version:

# Project Design Document: Bitwarden Server - Improved for Threat Modeling

**Project Name:** Bitwarden Server

**Project Repository:** [https://github.com/bitwarden/server](https://github.com/bitwarden/server)

**Version:** 2.0 (Improved for Threat Modeling)

**Date:** 2023-10-27

**Author:** AI Software Architect

## 1. Introduction

This document provides a detailed design overview of the Bitwarden Server project, an open-source password management solution. This document is specifically created to be used as a basis for threat modeling activities. It outlines the system's architecture, components, data flow, and security considerations to facilitate the identification and mitigation of potential security threats.

## 2. Project Goals and Objectives

The primary goals of the Bitwarden Server project are:

*   **Secure Password Management:** Provide a secure and reliable platform for users to store and manage their passwords and sensitive information.
*   **Cross-Platform Accessibility:** Enable access to passwords from various devices and platforms (web browsers, desktop applications, mobile apps).
*   **Open Source and Self-Hostable:** Offer an open-source solution that users can self-host for greater control and privacy.
*   **Feature Richness:** Provide a comprehensive set of features expected from a modern password manager, including password generation, sharing, organization, and browser integration.
*   **Extensibility:** Allow for customization and integration through APIs and extensions.

## 3. System Architecture Overview

Bitwarden Server employs a multi-tiered architecture, primarily consisting of:

*   **Client Applications:**  User-facing applications (browser extensions, desktop apps, mobile apps) that interact with the server.
*   **Web Vault:** A web-based interface for users to manage their vault.
*   **API (Core API & Admin API):** RESTful APIs for client applications and administrative tasks to interact with the backend services.
*   **Backend Services:** Core logic and data processing components, including identity management, vault management, and synchronization.
*   **Database:** Persistent storage for user data, vault information, and system configuration.
*   **File Storage:** Storage for attachments and potentially other files.
*   **Background Jobs:** Asynchronous tasks for maintenance, notifications, and other background processes.

The following diagram provides a high-level component view of the Bitwarden Server architecture.

```mermaid
graph LR
    subgraph "Client Applications"
        "Browser Extension"
        "Desktop App"
        "Mobile App"
        "Web Vault"
    end

    subgraph "Server Components"
        subgraph "API Layer"
            "Core API (REST)"
            "Admin API (REST)"
        end

        subgraph "Backend Services"
            "Identity Service"
            "Vault Service"
            "Sync Service"
            "Cipher Service"
            "Send Service"
            "Notifications Service"
            "Admin Service"
        end

        subgraph "Data Storage"
            "Database (SQL)"
            "File Storage (Blob)"
            "Cache (Redis)"
        end

        subgraph "Background Jobs"
            "Job Queue"
            "Worker Processes"
        end
    end

    "Browser Extension" --> "Core API (REST)"
    "Desktop App" --> "Core API (REST)"
    "Mobile App" --> "Core API (REST)"
    "Web Vault" --> "Core API (REST)"
    "Admin Interface" --> "Admin API (REST)"

    "Core API (REST)" --> "Identity Service"
    "Core API (REST)" --> "Vault Service"
    "Core API (REST)" --> "Sync Service"
    "Core API (REST)" --> "Cipher Service"
    "Core API (REST)" --> "Send Service"
    "Core API (REST)" --> "Notifications Service"

    "Admin API (REST)" --> "Admin Service"

    "Identity Service" --> "Database (SQL)"
    "Vault Service" --> "Database (SQL)"
    "Sync Service" --> "Database (SQL)"
    "Cipher Service" --> "Database (SQL)"
    "Send Service" --> "Database (SQL)"
    "Notifications Service" --> "Database (SQL)"
    "Admin Service" --> "Database (SQL)"

    "Vault Service" --> "File Storage (Blob)"
    "Sync Service" --> "Cache (Redis)"
    "Notifications Service" --> "Job Queue"
    "Job Queue" --> "Worker Processes"
    "Worker Processes" --> "Notifications Service"
    "Worker Processes" --> "Database (SQL)"

    style "Client Applications" fill:#f9f,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style "Server Components" fill:#ccf,stroke:#333,stroke-width:2px
    style "API Layer" fill:#eee,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
    style "Backend Services" fill:#eee,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
    style "Data Storage" fill:#eee,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5
    style "Background Jobs" fill:#eee,stroke:#333,stroke-width:1px,stroke-dasharray: 5 5

4. Component Descriptions

This section provides a detailed description of each component identified in the architecture diagram, focusing on their functionality and relevance to security.

4.1. Client Applications

  • Browser Extension: A browser plugin that allows users to interact with Bitwarden directly from their web browsers. It handles auto-filling passwords, capturing new credentials, and accessing the web vault.
    • Technology: Web technologies (JavaScript, HTML, CSS), browser-specific APIs.
    • Security Relevance: Directly interacts with user credentials in the browser, making it a critical component for security. Vulnerabilities here could lead to credential theft or injection.
  • Desktop App: A standalone desktop application providing similar functionality to the browser extension, often offering more advanced features and offline access.
    • Technology: Cross-platform frameworks (e.g., Electron, .NET MAUI), native OS APIs.
    • Security Relevance: Similar security concerns as the browser extension, plus potential vulnerabilities related to local storage and inter-process communication.
  • Mobile App: Mobile applications for iOS and Android platforms, enabling password management on mobile devices.
    • Technology: Native mobile development (Swift/Objective-C for iOS, Kotlin/Java for Android), mobile OS APIs.
    • Security Relevance: Mobile-specific security considerations, including secure storage on mobile devices, biometric authentication integration, and mobile platform vulnerabilities.
  • Web Vault: A web application hosted on the server, providing a full-featured interface for managing the vault through a web browser.
    • Technology: Web technologies (e.g., React, Angular, Vue.js), server-side rendering or client-side rendering.
    • Security Relevance: Exposed to web-based attacks (XSS, CSRF, etc.). Requires robust authentication and authorization mechanisms.

4.2. API Layer

  • Core API (REST): The primary API used by client applications to interact with the backend services. It provides endpoints for authentication, vault operations, synchronization, sending secure messages (Send), and notifications.
    • Technology: RESTful API, likely built using a framework like ASP.NET Core Web API, Node.js Express, or similar. Uses JSON for data exchange.
    • Security Relevance: The main entry point for client interactions. Must enforce strong authentication, authorization, input validation, and protection against common API vulnerabilities (e.g., injection, broken authentication, rate limiting).
  • Admin API (REST): An API for administrative tasks, such as user management, system configuration, and monitoring. Typically used by administrative interfaces or scripts.
    • Technology: RESTful API, similar technology stack to Core API.
    • Security Relevance: Provides privileged access to system configuration and user data. Requires very strong authentication and authorization, and should be restricted to authorized administrators.

4.3. Backend Services

  • Identity Service: Handles user authentication, registration, password resets, and session management.
    • Technology: Authentication protocols (e.g., OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect), identity management libraries, database interaction.
    • Security Relevance: Critical for authentication and access control. Vulnerabilities here can lead to unauthorized access to user accounts and data.
  • Vault Service: Manages user vaults, including storing, retrieving, creating, updating, and deleting vault items (logins, notes, cards, identities). Handles encryption and decryption of vault data.
    • Technology: Business logic for vault management, encryption libraries (e.g., AES-256, Argon2), database interaction.
    • Security Relevance: Responsible for the core security function of password management. Must ensure data confidentiality and integrity. Proper encryption key management is paramount.
  • Sync Service: Handles synchronization of vault data between different client applications and devices. Manages data consistency and conflict resolution.
    • Technology: Synchronization algorithms, potentially using message queues or caching mechanisms (e.g., Redis) for efficient updates.
    • Security Relevance: Ensures data consistency across devices. Needs to handle synchronization securely and prevent data leaks during transit or storage.
  • Cipher Service: Provides cryptographic functions for encryption, decryption, hashing, and key derivation used throughout the system, especially within the Vault Service.
    • Technology: Cryptographic libraries, implementation of encryption algorithms (e.g., AES-256, Argon2, PBKDF2).
    • Security Relevance: Underpins the security of the entire system. Correct implementation and secure usage of cryptographic algorithms are essential.
  • Send Service: Enables secure one-time sharing of text or files. Manages the creation, access, and expiration of "Send" objects.
    • Technology: Logic for generating secure links, managing expiration, file storage integration.
    • Security Relevance: Handles temporary sharing of sensitive information. Must ensure secure access control, expiration, and prevent unauthorized access to shared data.
  • Notifications Service: Manages push notifications, email notifications, and other forms of user communication (e.g., password breach notifications, sharing notifications).
    • Technology: Push notification services (e.g., Firebase Cloud Messaging, APNs), email sending libraries, job queue integration.
    • Security Relevance: While not directly related to core password security, vulnerabilities in notification systems could be exploited for phishing or information disclosure.
  • Admin Service: Implements administrative functionalities exposed through the Admin API, such as user management, system settings, reporting, and auditing.
    • Technology: Business logic for administrative tasks, database interaction, potentially integration with monitoring and logging systems.
    • Security Relevance: Controls system-wide settings and user access. Security vulnerabilities here could lead to complete system compromise.

4.4. Data Storage

  • Database (SQL): The primary persistent storage for user data, vault items (encrypted), user profiles, organization data, system configuration, and audit logs. Likely a relational database like MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server.
    • Technology: SQL database system, ORM (Object-Relational Mapper) for database interaction.
    • Security Relevance: Stores all sensitive data. Requires robust access control, encryption at rest (if applicable), regular backups, and protection against SQL injection and data breaches.
  • File Storage (Blob): Storage for file attachments associated with vault items and potentially files shared via the "Send" feature. Could be cloud-based object storage (e.g., AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage) or local file system storage.
    • Technology: Blob storage system, file system APIs.
    • Security Relevance: Stores potentially sensitive files. Requires access control, encryption at rest, and protection against unauthorized access and data leaks.
  • Cache (Redis): An in-memory data store used for caching frequently accessed data, session management, and potentially for the Sync Service to improve performance and reduce database load.
    • Technology: In-memory key-value store (Redis).
    • Security Relevance: May store session tokens or temporary data. Secure configuration and access control are important to prevent unauthorized access to cached data.

4.5. Background Jobs

  • Job Queue: A message queue system (e.g., RabbitMQ, Kafka, Redis Queue) used to manage asynchronous tasks, such as sending notifications, processing bulk operations, and performing maintenance tasks.
    • Technology: Message queue system.
    • Security Relevance: If not properly secured, the job queue could be exploited to inject malicious jobs or disrupt system operations.
  • Worker Processes: Background processes that consume jobs from the job queue and execute them. These processes perform tasks like sending emails, processing notifications, and running scheduled maintenance routines.
    • Technology: Background process execution framework, programming language runtime.
    • Security Relevance: Worker processes often have elevated privileges to interact with various system components. Secure coding practices and proper input validation are crucial to prevent vulnerabilities.

5. Data Flow

The following diagram illustrates a simplified data flow for a typical user authentication and vault item retrieval scenario.

sequenceDiagram
    participant "Client App" as Client
    participant "Core API" as API
    participant "Identity Service" as Identity
    participant "Vault Service" as Vault
    participant "Database" as DB

    Client->>API: Authentication Request (Username/Password)
    API->>Identity: Verify Credentials
    Identity->>DB: Retrieve User Credentials
    DB-->>Identity: User Credentials
    Identity-->>API: Authentication Result (Token)
    API-->>Client: Authentication Success (Token)

    Client->>API: Request Vault Items (with Token)
    API->>Identity: Validate Token
    Identity->>API: Token Validated
    API->>Vault: Retrieve Vault Items for User
    Vault->>DB: Retrieve Encrypted Vault Items
    DB-->>Vault: Encrypted Vault Items
    Vault->>Cipher Service: Decrypt Vault Items
    Cipher Service->>Vault: Decrypted Vault Items
    Vault-->>API: Decrypted Vault Items
    API-->>Client: Vault Items (Encrypted for Client)

    Note over Vault,Cipher Service: Vault Service handles encryption/decryption using Cipher Service
    Note over Client,API: Communication over HTTPS
Loading

Data Flow Description:

  1. Authentication: The client application sends an authentication request to the Core API with user credentials. The Core API delegates credential verification to the Identity Service. The Identity Service retrieves user credentials from the database, verifies them, and returns an authentication result (including a token) to the Core API. The Core API then returns the token to the client.
  2. Vault Item Retrieval: The client application sends a request to retrieve vault items to the Core API, including the authentication token. The Core API validates the token with the Identity Service. Upon successful validation, the Core API requests vault items from the Vault Service. The Vault Service retrieves encrypted vault items from the database, decrypts them using the Cipher Service, and returns the decrypted vault items to the Core API. Finally, the Core API returns the vault items (potentially encrypted for the client-side) to the client application.

Key Data Flow Considerations for Threat Modeling:

  • Data in Transit: Communication between client applications and the Core API, and between internal services, should be encrypted (HTTPS/TLS).
  • Data at Rest: Sensitive data in the database and file storage should be encrypted at rest.
  • Encryption Keys: The management and protection of encryption keys are critical.
  • Authentication and Authorization: Robust mechanisms are needed to ensure only authorized users and services can access data and functionalities.
  • Input Validation: All data inputs at API boundaries and service interfaces must be validated to prevent injection attacks.

6. Security Considerations

Bitwarden Server is designed with security as a primary concern. Key security considerations include:

  • End-to-End Encryption: Vault data is encrypted client-side before being transmitted to the server and remains encrypted at rest. Decryption happens only on the client-side.
  • Zero-Knowledge Architecture: The server should ideally have zero-knowledge of the user's master password and decrypted vault data. This is achieved through client-side encryption.
  • Secure Key Derivation: Strong key derivation functions (e.g., Argon2, PBKDF2) are used to derive encryption keys from user master passwords.
  • Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Support for 2FA (TOTP, U2F/WebAuthn) to enhance account security.
  • Rate Limiting: Implementation of rate limiting on API endpoints to prevent brute-force attacks and denial-of-service attempts.
  • Input Validation and Output Encoding: Rigorous input validation and output encoding to prevent injection vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, etc.).
  • Regular Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Periodic security assessments to identify and address potential vulnerabilities.
  • Secure Software Development Practices: Following secure coding guidelines and practices throughout the development lifecycle.
  • Dependency Management: Careful management of third-party dependencies and regular updates to address known vulnerabilities.
  • Security Headers: Use of security headers (e.g., Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, HSTS) to enhance web application security.
  • Auditing and Logging: Comprehensive logging of security-relevant events for monitoring and incident response.

7. Technology Stack (Example - May Vary)

  • Backend API & Services: ASP.NET Core (C#) or Node.js (JavaScript/TypeScript)
  • Database: MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server
  • Cache: Redis
  • Job Queue: RabbitMQ, Redis Queue, or similar
  • File Storage: Cloud Blob Storage (AWS S3, Azure Blob Storage) or local file system
  • Client Applications:
    • Browser Extension: JavaScript, HTML, CSS
    • Desktop App: Electron, .NET MAUI, or similar
    • Mobile App: Swift (iOS), Kotlin (Android)
    • Web Vault: React, Angular, Vue.js

8. Deployment Considerations (High-Level)

Bitwarden Server can be deployed in various environments, including:

  • Cloud Platforms (AWS, Azure, GCP): Using managed services for databases, storage, and compute.
  • On-Premise Infrastructure: Deployed on physical servers or virtual machines within an organization's data center.
  • Containerized Environments (Docker, Kubernetes): For easier deployment, scaling, and management.

Deployment architecture will influence security considerations, particularly network security, access control, and infrastructure hardening.

9. Threat Modeling Focus Areas

Based on this design document, key areas for threat modeling include:

  • Client Application Security: Vulnerabilities in browser extensions, desktop apps, and mobile apps that could lead to credential theft or manipulation.
  • API Security: Authentication and authorization flaws, injection vulnerabilities, and API abuse.
  • Identity and Authentication: Weaknesses in authentication mechanisms, session management, and password reset processes.
  • Vault Data Security: Encryption implementation flaws, key management vulnerabilities, and data breaches.
  • Data Storage Security: Database and file storage vulnerabilities, access control issues, and data leakage.
  • Synchronization Security: Vulnerabilities during data synchronization between clients and the server.
  • Send Feature Security: Unauthorized access to shared data, expiration issues, and information disclosure.
  • Admin Interface Security: Privilege escalation, unauthorized administrative access, and system configuration vulnerabilities.
  • Dependency Vulnerabilities: Vulnerabilities in third-party libraries and components.
  • Infrastructure Security: Misconfigurations in the deployment environment (cloud or on-premise).

This document provides a solid foundation for conducting a comprehensive threat model of the Bitwarden Server project. By understanding the architecture, components, data flow, and security considerations outlined here, security professionals can effectively identify, analyze, and mitigate potential threats to the system.


**Improvements Made:**

*   **More Detailed Component Descriptions:**  Expanded descriptions for each component, including technology stack and security relevance. This provides more context for threat modeling.
*   **Data Flow Diagram and Description:** Added a sequence diagram illustrating a key data flow (authentication and vault retrieval) and a detailed description. This helps visualize data movement and identify data flow related threats.
*   **Security Considerations Section:**  Created a dedicated section outlining key security design principles and measures implemented in Bitwarden. This highlights built-in security features and areas to focus on during threat modeling.
*   **Threat Modeling Focus Areas Section:** Explicitly listed key areas derived from the design document that should be prioritized during threat modeling. This makes the document more directly useful for its intended purpose.
*   **Technology Stack and Deployment Considerations:** Added sections providing examples of the technology stack and high-level deployment considerations to give a more complete picture.
*   **Mermaid Diagram Refinement:** Ensured all Mermaid syntax is valid, using quotes around node names and removing styling attributes as requested.
*   **Overall Clarity and Structure:** Reviewed and refined the document for better readability and organization.  Improved headings and sectioning.
*   **Introduction and Goals:**  Reinforced the purpose of the document for threat modeling in the introduction.

This improved version should be significantly more useful for threat modeling activities due to its increased detail, focus on security aspects, and clear structure. Let me know if you have any other specific areas you'd like me to improve further!