Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
131 lines (111 loc) · 18.1 KB

sec-design-deep-analysis.md

File metadata and controls

131 lines (111 loc) · 18.1 KB

Okay, let's perform a deep security analysis based on the provided design review.

1. Objective, Scope, and Methodology

  • Objective: To conduct a thorough security analysis of the Bitwarden server's key components, identify potential vulnerabilities, and propose actionable mitigation strategies. The analysis will focus on inferring the architecture, data flow, and security implications from the provided design review, codebase information (from the GitHub repository), and general knowledge of Bitwarden. We aim to identify weaknesses that could lead to data breaches, service disruption, or reputational damage.
  • Scope: The analysis will cover the server-side components of Bitwarden as described in the design review, including the Web App, API, Database, Identity Server, and Push Relay. It will also consider the deployment environment (Docker-based self-hosting) and the build process. Client-side security is acknowledged as an accepted risk, but its implications for the server will be considered. We will focus on the bitwarden/server repository.
  • Methodology:
    1. Component Decomposition: Break down the system into its core components based on the C4 diagrams and descriptions.
    2. Data Flow Analysis: Trace the flow of sensitive data between components, identifying potential points of interception or manipulation.
    3. Threat Modeling: Identify potential threats to each component and data flow, considering the business risks and accepted risks outlined in the design review. We will use a combination of STRIDE (Spoofing, Tampering, Repudiation, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Elevation of Privilege) and attack trees to systematically identify threats.
    4. Vulnerability Analysis: Analyze each component and threat for potential vulnerabilities, leveraging knowledge of common web application vulnerabilities (OWASP Top 10), .NET-specific vulnerabilities, and database security best practices.
    5. Mitigation Strategy Recommendation: Propose specific, actionable mitigation strategies for each identified vulnerability, tailored to the Bitwarden server architecture and deployment environment.

2. Security Implications of Key Components

Let's analyze each component from the C4 Container diagram, considering the data flow and potential threats:

  • Web App (ASP.NET Core):

    • Data Flow: Receives user input (login credentials, search queries, etc.) via HTTPS, interacts with the API via HTTPS. Serves the static web vault content.
    • Threats:
      • XSS (Cross-Site Scripting): If input validation and output encoding are not properly implemented, an attacker could inject malicious scripts into the web vault, potentially stealing session tokens or redirecting users to phishing sites. (Information Disclosure, Elevation of Privilege)
      • CSRF (Cross-Site Request Forgery): If CSRF protection is inadequate, an attacker could trick a user into performing unintended actions, such as changing their email address or master password. (Tampering, Elevation of Privilege)
      • Session Management Issues: Weak session management (e.g., predictable session IDs, long session timeouts) could allow attackers to hijack user sessions. (Spoofing, Elevation of Privilege)
      • Clickjacking: If proper frame options are not set, the web vault could be embedded in a malicious site, tricking users into interacting with it unknowingly. (Tampering)
      • Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR): If the web app exposes direct references to internal objects (e.g., user IDs in URLs) without proper authorization checks, an attacker could access or modify data belonging to other users. (Information Disclosure, Tampering)
    • Security Controls: CSP, XSS protection, HTTPS (mentioned in the design review).
    • Inferred Vulnerabilities: While CSP and XSS protection are mentioned, the effectiveness of these controls is unknown. We need to verify their implementation details. The design review doesn't mention specific session management controls.

  • API (ASP.NET Core):

    • Data Flow: Receives requests from the Web App, Mobile App, Browser Extension, Desktop App, and CLI (all via HTTPS). Interacts with the Database (SQL Server) via SQL, Identity Server, and Push Relay. Receives emails from the Email Server via SMTP.
    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection: If user inputs are not properly sanitized before being used in database queries, an attacker could inject malicious SQL code, potentially accessing or modifying any data in the database. (Information Disclosure, Tampering, Elevation of Privilege)
      • Authentication Bypass: Vulnerabilities in the authentication logic could allow attackers to bypass authentication and access the API as a legitimate user. (Spoofing, Elevation of Privilege)
      • Authorization Bypass (IDOR): Similar to the Web App, if the API exposes direct references to internal objects without proper authorization checks, an attacker could access or modify data belonging to other users. (Information Disclosure, Tampering)
      • Rate Limiting Bypass: If rate limiting is not effectively implemented, attackers could launch brute-force attacks against login endpoints or other API functions. (Denial of Service)
      • XML External Entity (XXE) Injection: If the API processes XML input, it could be vulnerable to XXE attacks, potentially leading to information disclosure or denial of service. (Information Disclosure, Denial of Service)
      • Denial of Service (DoS): The API could be overwhelmed by a large number of requests, making it unavailable to legitimate users. (Denial of Service)
      • Improper Error Handling: Error messages could reveal sensitive information about the system's internal workings, aiding attackers in crafting exploits. (Information Disclosure)
      • Insecure Deserialization: If the API deserializes untrusted data, it could be vulnerable to remote code execution. (Elevation of Privilege)
    • Security Controls: Input validation, secure password hashing, rate limiting, CSRF protection, authorization checks (mentioned in the design review).
    • Inferred Vulnerabilities: The effectiveness of input validation and authorization checks needs to be verified. The design review doesn't mention specific protections against XXE or insecure deserialization. The robustness of the rate limiting implementation is crucial.

  • Database (SQL Server):

    • Data Flow: Receives SQL queries from the API. Stores encrypted user data, organization data, and other application data.
    • Threats:
      • SQL Injection (via API): As mentioned above, SQL injection vulnerabilities in the API could compromise the database.
      • Unauthorized Access: If the database is not properly secured (e.g., weak passwords, exposed ports), an attacker could gain direct access to it. (Information Disclosure, Tampering)
      • Data Breach: If an attacker gains access to the database, they could steal the encrypted user data. While the data is encrypted, this is still a major concern. (Information Disclosure)
      • Data Corruption: An attacker could intentionally or unintentionally corrupt the data in the database. (Tampering)
    • Security Controls: Encryption at rest, access controls, auditing (mentioned in the design review).
    • Inferred Vulnerabilities: The strength of the encryption at rest implementation (e.g., key management) is critical. The effectiveness of access controls and auditing needs to be verified. The database configuration should be hardened to prevent unauthorized access.

  • Identity Server (IdentityServer4):

    • Data Flow: Interacts with the API and Authentication Providers. Manages user accounts and authentication tokens.
    • Threats:
      • Compromise of Identity Server: If the Identity Server is compromised, an attacker could gain control over user accounts and authentication tokens, potentially accessing all user data. (Spoofing, Elevation of Privilege, Information Disclosure)
      • Vulnerabilities in IdentityServer4: IdentityServer4 itself could have vulnerabilities that could be exploited.
      • Weak Token Management: If authentication tokens are not securely generated, stored, and validated, they could be compromised. (Spoofing)
      • Open Redirect Vulnerabilities: If redirect URIs after login/logout are not properly validated, attackers could redirect users to malicious sites. (Information Disclosure, Phishing)
    • Security Controls: Secure authentication protocols, secure token management (mentioned in the design review).
    • Inferred Vulnerabilities: The specific authentication protocols and token management mechanisms used need to be reviewed for security. Regular security updates for IdentityServer4 are crucial. The configuration of IdentityServer4 should be hardened to prevent common attacks.

  • Push Relay:

    • Data Flow: Interacts with the API. Sends push notifications to clients.
    • Threats:
      • Compromise of Push Relay: If the Push Relay is compromised, an attacker could send malicious notifications to clients. (Tampering)
      • Denial of Service: The Push Relay could be overwhelmed by a large number of requests. (Denial of Service)
    • Security Controls: Secure communication channels, authentication of clients (mentioned in the design review).
    • Inferred Vulnerabilities: The specific mechanisms used for secure communication and client authentication need to be reviewed. The Push Relay should be monitored for performance and availability.

3. Actionable Mitigation Strategies

Based on the identified threats and inferred vulnerabilities, here are specific, actionable mitigation strategies:

  • General:

    • Dependency Management: Implement a robust process for managing third-party dependencies, including regular scanning for known vulnerabilities (using tools like Dependabot, Snyk, or OWASP Dependency-Check) and timely updates. This is critical for all components, especially IdentityServer4.
    • Logging and Monitoring: Implement comprehensive logging and monitoring across all components. Logs should include security-relevant events (e.g., failed login attempts, authorization failures, SQL errors). Monitor logs for suspicious activity and set up alerts for critical events. Use a centralized logging solution (e.g., ELK stack, Splunk).
    • Security Audits and Penetration Testing: Continue regular security audits and penetration testing, focusing on the identified threat areas. Address any findings promptly.
    • Threat Modeling Updates: Regularly update the threat model as the system evolves and new threats emerge.

  • Web App:

    • Strengthen CSP: Review and tighten the Content Security Policy (CSP) to restrict the sources from which the browser can load resources. Use a strict CSP that minimizes the risk of XSS. Test the CSP thoroughly to ensure it doesn't break functionality.
    • Robust XSS Protection: Implement robust input validation and output encoding to prevent XSS attacks. Use a well-vetted library for output encoding (e.g., the AntiXSS library in .NET). Consider using a templating engine that automatically handles output encoding.
    • Secure Session Management: Use a secure session management library (e.g., the built-in session management in ASP.NET Core). Generate strong session IDs, set appropriate session timeouts, use HTTPS-only cookies, and implement session invalidation on logout. Consider using session fixation protection.
    • CSRF Protection Verification: Verify that CSRF protection is correctly implemented and enabled for all relevant forms and API endpoints. Use a well-vetted library for CSRF protection (e.g., the built-in CSRF protection in ASP.NET Core).
    • Frame Options: Set the X-Frame-Options header to DENY or SAMEORIGIN to prevent clickjacking attacks.
    • HSTS: Implement HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) to force browsers to use HTTPS.

  • API:

    • Parameterized Queries: Use parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database interactions to prevent SQL injection. Never concatenate user input directly into SQL queries.
    • Input Validation (API): Implement strict input validation for all API endpoints, using a whitelist approach (i.e., define what is allowed, rather than what is disallowed). Validate data types, lengths, formats, and ranges.
    • Authorization Checks: Implement robust authorization checks for all API endpoints, ensuring that users can only access data and perform actions that they are authorized to. Use a consistent authorization framework (e.g., role-based access control).
    • Rate Limiting: Strengthen the rate limiting implementation to protect against brute-force attacks and denial-of-service attacks. Use different rate limits for different API endpoints based on their sensitivity and expected usage. Consider using IP-based rate limiting and user-based rate limiting.
    • XXE Protection: Disable external entity processing in any XML parsers used by the API.
    • Insecure Deserialization Protection: Avoid deserializing untrusted data. If deserialization is necessary, use a secure deserialization library and validate the data before deserialization.
    • Error Handling: Implement secure error handling that does not reveal sensitive information to users. Log detailed error information internally, but return generic error messages to users.
    • API Gateway: Consider using an API gateway to centralize security concerns such as authentication, authorization, rate limiting, and request/response validation.

  • Database:

    • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant the API database user only the minimum necessary privileges (e.g., SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE on specific tables). Do not grant administrative privileges.
    • Database Hardening: Harden the SQL Server configuration by disabling unnecessary features, changing default passwords, and applying security patches. Follow Microsoft's security best practices for SQL Server.
    • Encryption Key Management: Implement a secure key management system for the encryption at rest keys. Use a hardware security module (HSM) or a key management service (KMS) to protect the keys. Regularly rotate encryption keys.
    • Auditing: Enable auditing in SQL Server to track all database activity. Monitor audit logs for suspicious activity.
    • Network Segmentation: Isolate the database server on a separate network segment from the web server and API server. Use a firewall to restrict access to the database server to only the API server.

  • Identity Server:

    • IdentityServer4 Updates: Keep IdentityServer4 up to date with the latest security patches. Monitor the IdentityServer4 security advisories for any vulnerabilities.
    • Secure Configuration: Review and harden the IdentityServer4 configuration. Disable any unnecessary features. Use strong cryptographic algorithms and key lengths.
    • Open Redirect Prevention: Strictly validate redirect URIs after login and logout to prevent open redirect vulnerabilities. Use a whitelist of allowed redirect URIs.
    • Token Validation: Implement robust token validation, including signature verification, audience validation, and expiration checks.
    • Two-Factor Authentication (2FA): Enforce or strongly encourage the use of 2FA for all users.

  • Push Relay:

    • Secure Communication: Use TLS for all communication between the Push Relay and the API, and between the Push Relay and the client devices.
    • Client Authentication: Implement strong client authentication to prevent unauthorized clients from sending push notifications.
    • Message Validation: Validate the content of push notifications to prevent malicious messages from being sent.
    • Rate Limiting (Push Relay): Implement rate limiting to prevent denial-of-service attacks against the Push Relay.

  • Deployment (Docker):

    • Docker Security Best Practices: Follow Docker security best practices, such as using official base images, minimizing the size of images, running containers as non-root users, and regularly scanning images for vulnerabilities.
    • Network Segmentation (Docker): Use Docker networks to isolate containers from each other. Only allow necessary communication between containers.
    • Secrets Management: Use a secure secrets management solution (e.g., Docker Secrets, HashiCorp Vault) to store sensitive information such as database passwords and API keys. Do not store secrets in environment variables or in the Dockerfile.
    • Reverse Proxy Configuration: Securely configure the Nginx reverse proxy. Use strong TLS ciphers and protocols. Implement a Web Application Firewall (WAF) to protect against common web attacks. Regularly update Nginx.

  • Build Process:

    • SAST: Integrate Static Application Security Testing (SAST) tools into the build pipeline to identify vulnerabilities in the source code.
    • SCA: Integrate Software Composition Analysis (SCA) tools to scan dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    • Code Signing: Digitally sign Docker images to ensure their integrity and authenticity.
    • Build Server Hardening: Secure the build server itself by applying security patches, disabling unnecessary services, and restricting access.

This deep analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the security considerations for the Bitwarden server. By implementing these mitigation strategies, the Bitwarden team can significantly enhance the security of the platform and protect user data. The most critical areas to focus on are input validation, secure database interactions (preventing SQL injection), robust authentication and authorization, and secure dependency management. Continuous monitoring and regular security assessments are essential for maintaining a strong security posture.