Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
92 lines (77 loc) · 8.61 KB

threat-modeling.md

File metadata and controls

92 lines (77 loc) · 8.61 KB

Threat Model Analysis for cefsharp/cefsharp

Threat: Outdated Chromium Version

  • Threat: Outdated Chromium Engine
    • Description: Attackers exploit known vulnerabilities in the outdated Chromium version embedded within CefSharp. They can craft malicious web pages or inject malicious scripts into loaded content to target these vulnerabilities. Exploits can range from simple XSS to Remote Code Execution.
    • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure, potentially compromising the application and the user's system.
    • Affected CefSharp Component: CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe, libcef.dll (Chromium Engine core)
    • Risk Severity: Critical to High (depending on the specific vulnerability)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Regularly update CefSharp to the latest stable version.
      • Monitor CefSharp release notes and Chromium security advisories for updates.
      • Implement a process for quickly patching CefSharp when updates are available.

Threat: Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in Chromium

  • Threat: Chromium Zero-Day Exploit
    • Description: Attackers utilize newly discovered, unpatched vulnerabilities in the Chromium engine. They can deliver exploits through malicious websites, compromised advertisements, or other web-based attack vectors loaded within CefSharp.
    • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Denial of Service (DoS), Information Disclosure, potentially leading to full system compromise before patches are available.
    • Affected CefSharp Component: CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe, libcef.dll (Chromium Engine core)
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement strong Content Security Policy (CSP) to limit the capabilities of loaded web content.
      • Utilize sandboxing techniques at the OS level to restrict the CefSharp process's access to system resources.
      • Employ robust input validation and output encoding in the application's .NET code interacting with CefSharp.
      • Consider using a Web Application Firewall (WAF) if CefSharp is loading external web content.

Threat: Exploitation of Browser Features (JavaScript, Plugins)

  • Threat: Malicious JavaScript Execution
    • Description: Attackers inject or host malicious JavaScript code within web content loaded by CefSharp. This JavaScript can then perform actions such as stealing user data, manipulating the application's UI, or attempting to exploit further vulnerabilities.
    • Impact: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), Session Hijacking, Data Exfiltration, Client-Side Denial of Service, potentially leading to account compromise or data breaches.
    • Affected CefSharp Component: ChromiumWebBrowser control, JavaScript engine within libcef.dll
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement strict Content Security Policy (CSP) to control JavaScript execution sources and capabilities.
      • Carefully control the origin and trustworthiness of web content loaded in CefSharp.
      • Sanitize and validate any data passed between JavaScript and the .NET application via JavascriptResponse and EvaluateScriptAsync.
      • Disable unnecessary browser features like plugins if they are not required.

Threat: Insecure IPC Channels

  • Threat: IPC Channel Hijacking
    • Description: Attackers, if they can execute code on the same system as the application, attempt to intercept or manipulate communication over CefSharp's Inter-Process Communication (IPC) channels. They might try to inject malicious messages or eavesdrop on sensitive data being exchanged.
    • Impact: Privilege Escalation, Data Injection, Command Injection, Application Control Bypass, potentially allowing attackers to control the application or gain elevated privileges.
    • Affected CefSharp Component: CefSharp's internal IPC mechanisms, specifically channels used for communication between .NET and CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Ensure CefSharp's IPC mechanisms are used securely as per documentation.
      • Limit permissions of the CefSharp.BrowserSubprocess.exe process to the minimum necessary.
      • Implement process isolation and sandboxing at the OS level to limit the impact of a compromised process.
      • Avoid exposing sensitive data directly through IPC if possible.

Threat: API Misuse Leading to IPC Vulnerabilities

  • Threat: Insecure CefSharp API Usage
    • Description: Developers incorrectly use CefSharp APIs, creating vulnerabilities in IPC communication. For example, mishandling browser events or data passed through JavascriptResponse without proper validation can open attack vectors.
    • Impact: Data Corruption, Unexpected Application Behavior, Potential for Code Execution if vulnerabilities are severe, potentially leading to application instability or security breaches.
    • Affected CefSharp Component: CefSharp .NET API (ChromiumWebBrowser, JavascriptResponse, RegisterJsObject, etc.), developer-written code interacting with the API.
    • Risk Severity: High (in severe cases of misuse leading to code execution)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Thoroughly understand the CefSharp API and follow secure coding practices.
      • Implement robust input validation and output encoding for data exchanged via IPC, especially when using JavascriptResponse and RegisterJsObject.
      • Conduct code reviews and security testing focusing on CefSharp API usage patterns.
      • Follow principle of least privilege when granting permissions to JavaScript code interacting with .NET via RegisterJsObject.

Threat: Data Injection/Manipulation through IPC

  • Threat: IPC Data Injection
    • Description: Attackers attempt to inject malicious data or manipulate commands being passed through IPC channels. This could involve crafting specific messages to alter application logic or influence the Chromium browser's behavior in unintended ways.
    • Impact: Application Logic Bypass, Data Tampering, Potential for RCE or XSS depending on the context and how injected data is processed, potentially leading to data integrity issues or security breaches.
    • Affected CefSharp Component: CefSharp's internal IPC mechanisms, data serialization/deserialization within IPC communication.
    • Risk Severity: High (in scenarios leading to RCE or significant application control bypass)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Implement strong input validation and sanitization for all data received from the CefSharp browser process via IPC.
      • Use secure serialization/deserialization methods for IPC communication to prevent data tampering.
      • Apply the principle of least privilege to IPC communication, limiting the commands and data that can be exchanged.
      • Use message authentication codes (MACs) or digital signatures to verify the integrity and authenticity of IPC messages.

Threat: Bugs in CefSharp Code

  • Threat: CefSharp Library Bug
    • Description: Vulnerabilities exist within the CefSharp .NET code itself or in its Chromium integration layer. These bugs could be exploited by attackers if they can trigger specific code paths within CefSharp, potentially through crafted web content or API interactions.
    • Impact: Application Crashes, Unexpected Behavior, Potential Security Vulnerabilities (RCE, DoS, etc.) depending on the nature of the bug, potentially leading to application instability or security breaches.
    • Affected CefSharp Component: CefSharp .NET library code, C++ Chromium integration code within CefSharp.
    • Risk Severity: High (for bugs leading to RCE or significant security bypasses)
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Stay updated with CefSharp releases and bug fixes.
      • Monitor CefSharp issue trackers and security advisories.
      • Participate in the CefSharp community to report and address potential issues.
      • Conduct security testing and code audits of the application's CefSharp integration.