Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
104 lines (87 loc) · 11.3 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

104 lines (87 loc) · 11.3 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for dotnet/aspnetcore

Attack Surface: Middleware Pipeline Misconfiguration

  • Description: Incorrectly configured or missing middleware in the ASP.NET Core pipeline can lead to security vulnerabilities by bypassing security checks or exposing unintended functionality.
  • ASP.NET Core Contribution: ASP.NET Core's middleware pipeline architecture is central to request processing and security. Developers are responsible for ordering and configuring middleware correctly.
  • Example: Placing authentication middleware after authorization middleware.
    • How it works: Requests reach authorization middleware without prior authentication, potentially allowing unauthorized access to protected resources if authorization is not correctly implemented independently.
    • Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive data or functionality.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Review Middleware Order: Carefully review the order of middleware in Startup.cs or Program.cs to ensure security middleware (authentication, authorization, CORS, security headers) is placed appropriately before request handling middleware.
      • Use Security Headers Middleware: Include and properly configure middleware like UseHsts(), UseCsp(), UseXContentTypeOptions(), UseReferrerPolicy(), and UseXXssProtection() to enable security headers.
      • Principle of Least Privilege for CORS: Configure CORS middleware (UseCors()) to allow requests only from explicitly trusted origins, avoiding wildcard (*) origins.

Attack Surface: Routing Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Flaws in route definitions or handling can allow attackers to access unintended endpoints, bypass security checks, or inject malicious data through route parameters.
  • ASP.NET Core Contribution: ASP.NET Core's routing system defines how requests are mapped to controllers and actions. Incorrect route definitions or parameter handling can create vulnerabilities.
  • Example: SQL Injection via Route Parameter.
    • How it works: A route like /products/{id} is defined, and the id parameter is directly used in a database query without sanitization. An attacker can inject SQL code in the id parameter (e.g., /products/1; DROP TABLE Products;--).
    • Impact: Data breach, data manipulation, denial of service.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Input Sanitization and Validation: Always sanitize and validate route parameters before using them in backend operations (database queries, file system access, etc.). Use parameterized queries or ORM features to prevent SQL injection.
      • Principle of Least Privilege for Routes: Define routes as narrowly as possible, only exposing necessary endpoints. Avoid overly broad or ambiguous route patterns.
      • Remove Debug Endpoints in Production: Ensure debug endpoints (e.g., those enabled during development) are disabled or removed in production deployments.

Attack Surface: Model Binding and Validation Issues

  • Description: Vulnerabilities arise from improper handling of data binding from requests to models and insufficient validation of user input.
  • ASP.NET Core Contribution: ASP.NET Core's model binding automatically maps request data to action parameters and models. Developers are responsible for configuring validation rules and handling binding securely.
  • Example: Mass Assignment (Over-posting).
    • How it works: A model has properties that should not be directly modified by users (e.g., IsAdmin). If model binding is not restricted, an attacker can send a request with extra data including IsAdmin=true, potentially elevating their privileges.
    • Impact: Unauthorized data modification, privilege escalation.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Data Transfer Objects (DTOs): Use DTOs specifically designed for request payloads, containing only properties that are intended to be modified by users. Map DTOs to domain models in the application logic.
      • Server-Side Validation (Mandatory): Always perform server-side validation, even if client-side validation is implemented. Client-side validation can be easily bypassed.
      • Whitelist Approach for Model Binding: Explicitly define which properties are allowed to be bound from requests, instead of relying on a blacklist approach.

Attack Surface: Authentication and Authorization Flaws

  • Description: Weak or improperly implemented authentication and authorization mechanisms allow unauthorized users to access protected resources or perform actions they should not be allowed to.
  • ASP.NET Core Contribution: ASP.NET Core provides a flexible authentication and authorization framework. Developers must choose appropriate schemes and implement them correctly.
  • Example: Insecure Cookie Authentication Configuration.
    • How it works: Cookie authentication is used, but the cookie is not marked as HttpOnly or Secure, or is transmitted over HTTP instead of HTTPS. This makes the cookie vulnerable to XSS attacks or network sniffing.
    • Impact: Session hijacking, unauthorized access.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Use Strong Authentication Schemes: Choose robust authentication methods like OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, or JWT Bearer Authentication, depending on the application requirements.
      • Secure Cookie Configuration: Configure cookie-based authentication to use HttpOnly, Secure, and SameSite attributes. Enforce HTTPS for all communication.
      • Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) or Policy-Based Authorization: Implement a robust authorization system using roles or policies to control access to resources based on user permissions.

Attack Surface: Razor Pages and MVC View Engine Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Improper handling of user input within Razor views can lead to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities.
  • ASP.NET Core Contribution: Razor Pages and MVC views are used to render dynamic content. Developers must ensure proper encoding and sanitization of data displayed in views.
  • Example: XSS in Razor View.
    • How it works: User-provided data is displayed in a Razor view using @Model.UserName without proper HTML encoding. If Model.UserName contains malicious JavaScript code (e.g., <script>alert('XSS')</script>), it will be executed in the user's browser.
    • Impact: Account compromise, data theft, website defacement.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • HTML Encoding by Default: Razor views automatically HTML-encode output by default using @. Rely on this default encoding for most scenarios.
      • Avoid Html.Raw() (or use with extreme caution): Html.Raw() bypasses HTML encoding. Only use it when you are absolutely certain that the data is already safe HTML and you explicitly need to render HTML markup. Sanitize data before using Html.Raw() if necessary.
      • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement CSP headers to further mitigate XSS risks by controlling the sources from which the browser is allowed to load resources.

Attack Surface: SignalR Specific Vulnerabilities

  • Description: SignalR applications can be vulnerable to injection attacks through hub methods, denial of service, and authorization bypass if not properly secured.
  • ASP.NET Core Contribution: ASP.NET Core SignalR provides real-time communication capabilities. Developers need to secure hub methods and connections.
  • Example: Injection Attack via SignalR Hub Method.
    • How it works: A SignalR hub method receives user input and directly uses it in a database query without sanitization. An attacker can inject malicious code through the hub method parameters.
    • Impact: Data breach, data manipulation, denial of service.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Input Sanitization and Validation in Hub Methods: Sanitize and validate all input received by SignalR hub methods before using it in backend operations.
      • Authorization for Hub Methods: Implement authorization checks within hub methods to ensure only authorized users can invoke them. Use [Authorize] attribute or custom authorization logic.

Attack Surface: Blazor Specific Vulnerabilities (Server-Side Blazor)

  • Description: Server-Side Blazor applications introduce state management vulnerabilities.
  • ASP.NET Core Contribution: Server-Side Blazor relies on SignalR for communication and maintains state on the server. Developers must manage state securely.
  • Example: State Injection.
    • How it works: A Blazor component stores user-specific state on the server. If this state is not properly isolated or validated, an attacker might be able to manipulate or inject state belonging to another user.
    • Impact: Data corruption, unauthorized access, session hijacking.
    • Risk Severity: High
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure State Management: Implement secure state management practices, ensuring state is properly scoped to user sessions and protected from unauthorized access or modification.
      • Input Validation in Components: Validate all user input within Blazor components, both on the client-side and server-side.

Attack Surface: Configuration Security

  • Description: Insecure configuration settings, especially within ASP.NET Core configuration files, can expose sensitive information.
  • ASP.NET Core Contribution: ASP.NET Core applications rely on configuration files like appsettings.json and secrets.json. Developers must ensure secure configuration practices.
  • Example: Exposure of appsettings.json in Production.
    • How it works: The appsettings.json file, containing connection strings and API keys, is accidentally deployed to a publicly accessible location in the production environment.
    • Impact: Data breach, unauthorized access to external services.
    • Risk Severity: Critical
    • Mitigation Strategies:
      • Secure Storage for Secrets: Use secure configuration providers like Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, or environment variables to store sensitive information (connection strings, API keys, etc.) instead of plain text configuration files.
      • Separate Development and Production Configurations: Maintain separate configuration files for development and production environments. Ensure production configurations are hardened and do not contain debug settings.
      • Principle of Least Privilege for File System Permissions: Restrict file system permissions on configuration files and application directories to prevent unauthorized access.