Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
95 lines (80 loc) · 13.6 KB

attack-surface.md

File metadata and controls

95 lines (80 loc) · 13.6 KB

Attack Surface Analysis for dotnet/docfx

Attack Surface: 1. Dependency Vulnerabilities

  • Description: DocFX relies on external libraries and modules (NuGet packages, Node.js modules). Vulnerabilities in these dependencies can be exploited.
  • DocFX Contribution: DocFX's core functionality depends on these libraries, inheriting their security risks. Outdated or vulnerable dependencies directly expose the application to exploitation.
  • Example: A critical Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability is discovered in a specific version of a Markdown parsing library used by DocFX. Exploiting this allows attackers to execute arbitrary code on the server processing documentation.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), potentially leading to full system compromise, data breaches, and complete loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
  • Risk Severity: Critical
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Scanning: Implement automated dependency scanning tools (e.g., OWASP Dependency-Check, Snyk) in the development pipeline to continuously monitor DocFX's dependencies for known vulnerabilities.
    • Automated Dependency Updates: Establish a process for promptly updating DocFX and its dependencies to the latest stable versions, ideally automating this process where possible.
    • Security Advisories Monitoring: Subscribe to security advisories and vulnerability databases related to DocFX and its dependency ecosystem to proactively identify and address emerging threats.
    • Bill of Materials (BOM) and SBOM: Maintain a detailed Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) to accurately track all dependencies and facilitate rapid vulnerability response.

Attack Surface: 2. Plugin Vulnerabilities

  • Description: DocFX supports plugins to extend its functionality. Malicious or vulnerable plugins can introduce significant security flaws.
  • DocFX Contribution: DocFX's plugin architecture allows execution of external, potentially untrusted code within its context, directly expanding the attack surface if plugins are compromised or poorly secured.
  • Example: A DocFX plugin, designed for custom documentation formatting, contains a Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability. An attacker could craft a malicious plugin configuration or exploit a vulnerability in the plugin's input handling to execute arbitrary code on the server.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), potentially leading to full server compromise, data breaches, and unauthorized access to sensitive systems and data.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Strict Plugin Vetting Process: Implement a rigorous vetting process for all DocFX plugins before deployment. This includes security code reviews, static and dynamic analysis, and penetration testing.
    • Trusted Plugin Sources Only: Restrict plugin usage to only those sourced from highly trusted and reputable developers or organizations with a strong security track record.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for Plugins: Design and configure plugins with the principle of least privilege, limiting their access to system resources, network access, and sensitive data.
    • Plugin Security Sandboxing: Investigate and utilize any available plugin sandboxing or isolation mechanisms provided by DocFX or plugin frameworks to limit the impact of potential plugin vulnerabilities.
    • Regular Plugin Audits: Conduct periodic security audits of all installed DocFX plugins to identify and remediate any newly discovered vulnerabilities or misconfigurations.

Attack Surface: 3. Markdown Processing Vulnerabilities

  • Description: DocFX processes Markdown files. Critical vulnerabilities in the Markdown parser can be exploited through maliciously crafted Markdown content.
  • DocFX Contribution: Markdown processing is a core function of DocFX. Vulnerabilities in the parser directly impact DocFX's security when handling potentially untrusted or attacker-controlled Markdown input.
  • Example: A critical vulnerability in the Markdown parser allows for Remote Code Execution (RCE) when processing a specially crafted Markdown file containing malicious syntax. An attacker could inject this malicious Markdown into documentation source files or through other input vectors to compromise the server.
  • Impact: Remote Code Execution (RCE), potentially leading to full server compromise, data breaches, and unauthorized access.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep DocFX Up-to-Date: Maintain DocFX at the latest stable version to benefit from security patches and bug fixes in the Markdown processing engine.
    • Input Sanitization (Context Dependent): If DocFX is used in scenarios where it processes Markdown from untrusted sources (e.g., user-submitted documentation), implement robust input sanitization and validation to mitigate potential parser exploits. However, for documentation from trusted sources, this is less critical.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strong Content Security Policy (CSP) in the generated documentation to mitigate potential Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) risks that might arise from Markdown parsing vulnerabilities, even though RCE is the primary concern here.

Attack Surface: 4. Configuration File Vulnerabilities

  • Description: DocFX uses configuration files (e.g., docfx.json, docfx.yml). Misconfigurations or vulnerabilities in parsing these files can lead to serious security issues.
  • DocFX Contribution: DocFX's behavior and security posture are heavily influenced by its configuration files. Vulnerabilities in configuration parsing or insecure configuration practices directly impact DocFX's security.
  • Example: A vulnerability in DocFX's configuration file parsing allows for configuration injection. An attacker could manipulate configuration settings through a crafted input, potentially enabling malicious features or bypassing security controls, leading to information disclosure or other attacks. Alternatively, accidentally exposing sensitive credentials within configuration files in the output directory.
  • Impact: Information Disclosure (e.g., exposed credentials), Privilege Escalation, Bypass of Security Controls, potentially leading to further system compromise.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Configuration Management: Adopt secure configuration management practices for DocFX. Store sensitive information (API keys, credentials) outside of configuration files, using environment variables or dedicated secrets management solutions.
    • Configuration Validation and Auditing: Implement validation checks for DocFX configuration files to detect and prevent misconfigurations. Regularly audit configuration settings for security best practices.
    • Restrict Access to Configuration Files: Enforce strict access controls on DocFX configuration files, limiting access to only authorized personnel and systems.
    • Principle of Least Privilege (Configuration): Configure DocFX with the principle of least privilege, enabling only necessary features and functionalities to minimize the attack surface.

Attack Surface: 5. Theme Vulnerabilities

  • Description: DocFX themes, often built with HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, control the presentation of documentation. Vulnerabilities in themes can introduce critical Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) risks.
  • DocFX Contribution: DocFX uses themes to render the final documentation output. Vulnerable themes directly inject security flaws into the generated documentation, affecting all users who view it.
  • Example: A DocFX theme contains a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in its JavaScript code. An attacker could exploit this XSS vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into the documentation, potentially stealing user credentials, redirecting users to malicious sites, or performing other harmful actions.
  • Impact: Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), potentially leading to account compromise, data theft from users viewing the documentation, malware distribution, and reputational damage.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Security-Focused Theme Selection: Prioritize using official, well-maintained, and security-audited DocFX themes. Avoid using themes from untrusted or unknown sources.
    • Rigorous Theme Security Audits: Conduct thorough security audits of any custom or less-known themes, focusing on identifying and remediating XSS vulnerabilities in HTML, CSS, and JavaScript code. Utilize static analysis security testing (SAST) tools.
    • Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement a strong Content Security Policy (CSP) in the generated documentation to significantly mitigate XSS risks from themes by controlling the sources from which the browser is permitted to load resources and execute scripts.
    • Subresource Integrity (SRI): Use Subresource Integrity (SRI) for any external resources (CSS, JavaScript libraries) included in themes to ensure their integrity and prevent tampering or malicious injection.

Attack Surface: 6. Build Process Vulnerabilities

  • Description: The DocFX build process, especially when incorporating custom scripts or external tools, can introduce high-severity vulnerabilities if not properly secured.
  • DocFX Contribution: DocFX's build process executes code and scripts to generate documentation. Vulnerabilities in this process can directly compromise the build environment and potentially inject malicious content into the documentation output.
  • Example: A custom build script used with DocFX to process documentation contains a command injection vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious commands into the script, gaining control of the build server and potentially modifying the generated documentation with malicious content.
  • Impact: Compromised Build Environment, Injection of Malicious Content into Documentation (potentially leading to widespread impact on users), Unauthorized Access to build systems, Data Breaches.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Secure Build Environment Hardening: Harden the build environment where DocFX is executed. Implement strong access controls, regular security patching, intrusion detection, and monitoring.
    • Mandatory Security Review of Build Scripts: Require mandatory security reviews and code audits of all custom build scripts and tools used with DocFX, focusing on preventing injection vulnerabilities, insecure file handling, and other common security flaws.
    • Principle of Least Privilege for Build Processes: Run DocFX build processes and custom scripts with the minimum necessary privileges required for their operation. Avoid running build processes as highly privileged users.
    • Input Validation and Output Encoding in Build Scripts: Implement robust input validation and output encoding within custom build scripts to prevent injection attacks and ensure data integrity.
    • Build Process Isolation and Containerization: Isolate the DocFX build process in a containerized environment to limit the potential impact of any compromise and enhance security through isolation and resource control.

Attack Surface: 7. Update Mechanism Vulnerabilities

  • Description: Insecure DocFX update mechanisms can be exploited to deliver compromised versions, leading to critical system compromise.
  • DocFX Contribution: DocFX, like any software, requires updates. If the update process is vulnerable, it becomes a direct attack vector against systems using DocFX.
  • Example: An attacker performs a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack during a DocFX update process, redirecting the download to a malicious version of DocFX that contains malware, backdoors, or other malicious components.
  • Impact: Installation of a Compromised DocFX Version, leading to potential Remote Code Execution (RCE), persistent backdoors, data exfiltration, and full system compromise.
  • Risk Severity: High
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Official and Trusted Update Sources: Always download DocFX updates exclusively from official and highly trusted sources, such as the official GitHub repository or verified package repositories (e.g., NuGet).
    • Enforce Secure Channels (HTTPS) for Updates: Ensure that all DocFX update processes utilize secure channels (HTTPS) to prevent Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks during download and installation.
    • Integrity Verification of Updates: Implement integrity verification mechanisms for downloaded DocFX updates. Verify checksums or digital signatures provided by the official source to ensure the integrity and authenticity of the update packages before installation.
    • Automated Updates with Secure Verification: If using automated update mechanisms, ensure they include robust security verification steps, including integrity checks and source validation, before applying updates.
    • Software Supply Chain Security Best Practices: Implement broader software supply chain security best practices to minimize the risk of compromised software throughout the entire lifecycle, including updates.