Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
196 lines (147 loc) · 19 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

196 lines (147 loc) · 19 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for dotnet/efcore

Mitigation Strategy: Parameterized Queries

  • Description:

    • Mitigation Strategy: Enforce the use of parameterized queries for all database interactions within EF Core applications.
    • Step-by-step:
      • 1. Utilize LINQ: Primarily use LINQ queries as EF Core inherently parameterizes LINQ expressions.
      • 2. Parameterized Raw SQL: When using raw SQL (via FromSqlInterpolated or FromSqlRaw), always use parameters (@p0, @p1, or named parameters) for user-provided inputs. Pass input values as arguments to these methods, not by embedding them directly into the SQL string.
      • 3. Code Review Focus: During code reviews, specifically check for any instances of string interpolation or concatenation used to build SQL queries, especially within FromSqlRaw or FromSqlInterpolated. Flag and refactor these immediately.
      • 4. Static Analysis (Optional): Consider using static code analysis tools that can detect potential SQL injection vulnerabilities by identifying unsafe string manipulation patterns in query construction.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • SQL Injection (Severity: High) - Attackers can inject malicious SQL code through user inputs if queries are not parameterized, leading to unauthorized data access, modification, or deletion.

  • Impact:

    • SQL Injection: High Reduction - Parameterized queries effectively eliminate SQL injection vulnerabilities by treating user inputs as data, not executable SQL code, within EF Core interactions.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Largely implemented by default due to the prevalent use of LINQ in the application for data access.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: Potentially in less common scenarios where raw SQL queries (FromSqlRaw, FromSqlInterpolated) might be used without proper parameterization. Requires targeted code review to ensure 100% coverage, especially in older or less frequently modified code sections.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation Before EF Core Interaction

  • Description:

    • Mitigation Strategy: Implement robust input validation before data is used in EF Core queries or to update entities.
    • Step-by-step:
      • 1. Validate at Input Points: Validate all user inputs at the application's entry points (e.g., controllers, API endpoints) before they are passed to services or data access layers that use EF Core.
      • 2. Define Validation Rules: Establish clear validation rules for each input field based on expected data type, format, length, range, and allowed characters.
      • 3. Validation Mechanisms: Utilize validation attributes on ViewModels/DTOs, FluentValidation, or manual validation logic in your application services before interacting with EF Core context.
      • 4. Error Handling: If validation fails, return informative error messages to the user and prevent the invalid data from reaching EF Core and the database.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Data Integrity Issues (Severity: Medium) - Invalid data reaching EF Core can lead to database corruption, application errors, and inconsistent data states.
    • Application Logic Errors (Severity: Medium) - Unexpected data formats or values can cause EF Core queries or entity updates to fail or behave unpredictably.

  • Impact:

    • Data Integrity Issues: High Reduction - Prevents invalid data from being persisted in the database via EF Core, maintaining data consistency and reliability.
    • Application Logic Errors: High Reduction - Ensures EF Core operations receive data in the expected format, reducing errors and improving application stability.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Basic validation using Data Annotations on ViewModels is likely in place for common input fields in web forms and APIs.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: More comprehensive and consistent validation is needed across all input points. Validation logic should be enforced rigorously before any EF Core operations are performed. Consider expanding validation to service layer to ensure validation occurs regardless of the entry point.

Mitigation Strategy: Data Transfer Objects (DTOs) or ViewModels for EF Core Entities

  • Description:

    • Mitigation Strategy: Use Data Transfer Objects (DTOs) or ViewModels to mediate data exchange between application layers and EF Core entities. Avoid directly binding request data to EF Core entities.
    • Step-by-step:
      • 1. Create DTO/ViewModel Classes: Define DTOs/ViewModels that represent the data to be transferred, separate from your EF Core entity classes.
      • 2. Map Data: In controllers or services, map data from requests to DTOs/ViewModels. Then, map data from DTOs/ViewModels to EF Core entities only for necessary properties when updating or creating entities. Libraries like AutoMapper can assist with this.
      • 3. Use DTOs/ViewModels in APIs and Views: Ensure APIs and views interact with DTOs/ViewModels, not directly with EF Core entities.
      • 4. Limit Properties in DTOs/ViewModels: DTOs/ViewModels should only contain properties relevant to the specific use case, preventing over-exposure of entity properties.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Mass Assignment Vulnerabilities (Severity: Medium) - Attackers might attempt to modify entity properties they shouldn't have access to by sending extra data in requests if directly bound to entities.
    • Over-posting (Severity: Medium) - Similar to mass assignment, attackers could try to update more entity properties than intended through form submissions or API requests if directly bound to entities.

  • Impact:

    • Mass Assignment Vulnerabilities: High Reduction - DTOs/ViewModels act as a protective layer, preventing direct manipulation of EF Core entities and limiting the properties that can be modified via external requests.
    • Over-posting: High Reduction - By controlling the properties exposed in DTOs/ViewModels and mapped to entities, you prevent unintended updates and over-posting vulnerabilities when using EF Core.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Partially implemented in API controllers where DTOs are often used for request and response bodies. ViewModels are used for some views.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: Consistent use of DTOs/ViewModels is needed across all API endpoints, views, and data transfer operations involving EF Core entities. Ensure backend services also operate on DTOs/ViewModels rather than directly on entities for data transfer.

Mitigation Strategy: Optimize EF Core Queries for Performance

  • Description:

    • Mitigation Strategy: Optimize EF Core queries to prevent performance bottlenecks that could lead to denial-of-service (DoS) scenarios.
    • Step-by-step:
      • 1. Profile EF Core Queries: Use database profiling tools or EF Core's built-in logging to identify slow-performing queries.
      • 2. Analyze Query Plans: Examine the execution plans of slow EF Core queries to understand performance bottlenecks (e.g., full table scans, inefficient joins).
      • 3. Apply EF Core Optimization Techniques:
        • Eager Loading (.Include()): Use .Include() and .ThenInclude() to load related data efficiently when needed, reducing round trips.
        • Projection (.Select()): Use .Select() to retrieve only necessary columns, minimizing data transfer.
        • Filtering (.Where()): Apply filters as early as possible in the query to reduce data processing.
        • AsNoTracking(): Use .AsNoTracking() for read-only queries to disable change tracking overhead.
        • Raw SQL (Parameterized): For complex scenarios, consider parameterized raw SQL (FromSqlInterpolated, FromSqlRaw) if LINQ generates inefficient SQL.
      • 4. Regular Performance Monitoring: Continuously monitor EF Core query performance and re-optimize queries as application usage patterns change.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: High) - Inefficient EF Core queries can consume excessive database resources, leading to slow response times and potential application unavailability.

  • Impact:

    • Denial of Service (DoS): High Reduction - Optimized EF Core queries reduce database load and improve response times, making the application more resilient to DoS attacks related to query performance.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Basic query optimization is considered during development, with some use of eager loading and projection.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: Systematic EF Core query performance profiling and monitoring are needed. Establish a process for analyzing slow queries and applying EF Core-specific optimization techniques. Integrate performance testing into the development lifecycle.

Mitigation Strategy: Database Indexing for EF Core Queries

  • Description:

    • Mitigation Strategy: Ensure appropriate database indexes are in place to support efficient execution of EF Core queries.
    • Step-by-step:
      • 1. Analyze EF Core Query Patterns: Identify columns frequently used in WHERE clauses, JOIN conditions, and ORDER BY clauses within your EF Core LINQ queries.
      • 2. Review Query Execution Plans: Examine query execution plans to identify missing index recommendations from the database system for EF Core generated SQL.
      • 3. Create Indexes: Create indexes on relevant database columns based on query analysis and execution plan recommendations. Consider composite indexes for multi-column filtering or sorting in EF Core queries.
      • 4. EF Core Migrations for Index Management: Use EF Core Migrations to manage index creation and updates as part of your database schema, ensuring indexes are consistently deployed.
      • 5. Regular Index Review: Periodically review database indexes to ensure they remain effective as EF Core query patterns and data volumes evolve.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: High) - Missing indexes can cause EF Core queries to perform full table scans, drastically slowing down queries and contributing to DoS vulnerabilities.
    • Performance Degradation (Severity: Medium) - Lack of proper indexing results in slow EF Core query performance, impacting user experience and application responsiveness.

  • Impact:

    • Denial of Service (DoS): High Reduction - Indexes significantly improve EF Core query performance, reducing the risk of DoS attacks caused by slow database interactions.
    • Performance Degradation: High Reduction - Indexes dramatically speed up EF Core query execution, enhancing application performance and user experience when using EF Core.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Basic indexes are likely created by EF Core Migrations based on primary and foreign key relationships.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: Systematic index analysis and optimization specifically tailored to EF Core query patterns are not regularly performed. Need to conduct a database index audit focused on EF Core query performance and create missing indexes using EF Core Migrations.

Mitigation Strategy: Caching Strategies for EF Core Data

  • Description:

    • Mitigation Strategy: Implement caching mechanisms to reduce database load from EF Core queries and improve application responsiveness, mitigating potential DoS risks.
    • Step-by-step:
      • 1. Identify Caching Opportunities: Analyze EF Core data access patterns to identify frequently accessed, relatively static data that can be cached.
      • 2. Implement Caching Layers:
        • Application-Level Caching (IMemoryCache): Use IMemoryCache for caching data retrieved by EF Core in application memory for short durations.
        • Distributed Caching (Redis, Memcached): Consider a distributed cache for shared data across multiple application instances, especially for session data or frequently accessed lookup data retrieved via EF Core.
        • Database Query Caching (Database Dependent): Explore database-level query caching if supported by your database system, to cache results of frequently executed EF Core queries at the database level.
      • 3. Cache Expiration: Set appropriate cache expiration times (TTL) based on data volatility and consistency requirements for data accessed through EF Core.
      • 4. Cache Invalidation: Implement strategies to invalidate or update the cache when underlying data managed by EF Core changes to maintain data consistency.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Severity: High) - Caching reduces database load from EF Core queries, making the application more resilient to DoS attacks by serving data from the cache instead of repeatedly querying the database.
    • Performance Degradation (Severity: Medium) - Caching significantly improves response times for data retrieved via EF Core, enhancing user experience.

  • Impact:

    • Denial of Service (DoS): High Reduction - Caching drastically reduces database load from EF Core operations, improving resilience against DoS attacks.
    • Performance Degradation: High Reduction - Caching significantly improves response times for data accessed through EF Core, leading to a faster and more responsive application.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Basic HTTP caching for static assets might be in place. IMemoryCache might be used in limited scenarios for short-term caching of some data.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: A comprehensive caching strategy specifically for EF Core data is not implemented. Need to identify caching opportunities for EF Core entities and implement application-level and potentially distributed caching. Develop a cache invalidation strategy for EF Core data updates.

Mitigation Strategy: Custom Error Handling for EF Core Exceptions

  • Description:

    • Mitigation Strategy: Implement custom error handling to prevent exposing detailed EF Core exception messages to users, which could reveal sensitive information.
    • Step-by-step:
      • 1. Global Exception Handler: Implement global exception handling in your ASP.NET Core application.
      • 2. Catch EF Core Exceptions: Specifically catch exceptions thrown by EF Core operations (e.g., DbUpdateException, DbConcurrencyException, SqlException) within your exception handler.
      • 3. Secure Logging: Log detailed EF Core exception information (including stack traces and inner exceptions) to a secure logging system for debugging and analysis by authorized personnel only.
      • 4. Generic Error Responses: Return generic, user-friendly error messages to clients in API responses or web pages when EF Core exceptions occur. Avoid exposing specific details from EF Core exceptions.
      • 5. Environment-Specific Handling: Configure different error handling behavior for development and production environments. Show more detailed EF Core error information in development for debugging, but only generic messages in production.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure (Severity: Medium) - Exposing detailed EF Core exception messages can reveal sensitive information about database schema, connection strings, or internal application logic, aiding attackers in reconnaissance.

  • Impact:

    • Information Disclosure: High Reduction - Custom error handling prevents the exposure of detailed EF Core exception messages to users, significantly reducing the risk of information leakage related to EF Core operations.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Basic exception handling middleware is likely configured in ASP.NET Core. Default error pages might be in use.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: Need to implement custom exception handling specifically tailored to EF Core exceptions. Ensure detailed EF Core error logging is in place and secure. Configure environment-specific error handling to show generic messages in production and more details in development for EF Core related errors.

Mitigation Strategy: Regular Updates of EF Core and Provider Libraries

  • Description:

    • Mitigation Strategy: Maintain up-to-date versions of EF Core and its database provider libraries to patch known security vulnerabilities and benefit from security improvements.
    • Step-by-step:
      • 1. Monitor Security Advisories: Regularly monitor security advisories and release notes specifically for EF Core and your chosen EF Core database provider (e.g., Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.SqlServer, Npgsql.EntityFrameworkCore.PostgreSQL).
      • 2. Update Schedule: Establish a schedule for regularly updating EF Core and provider libraries. Prioritize applying security patches and updates promptly.
      • 3. Testing Updates: Thoroughly test updates in a staging or testing environment before deploying to production to ensure compatibility and prevent regressions in EF Core functionality.
      • 4. Dependency Management: Use NuGet Package Manager or similar tools to easily update and manage EF Core and provider library dependencies in your project.

  • Threats Mitigated:

    • Exploitation of Known EF Core Vulnerabilities (Severity: High) - Outdated EF Core or provider libraries may contain known security vulnerabilities that attackers can exploit to compromise the application or database.

  • Impact:

    • Exploitation of Known EF Core Vulnerabilities: High Reduction - Regular updates patch known vulnerabilities in EF Core and provider libraries, significantly reducing the risk of exploitation of these specific vulnerabilities.

  • Currently Implemented:

    • Implemented in: Updates are applied periodically, but might not be on a strict schedule or proactively monitored for EF Core specific security advisories.

  • Missing Implementation:

    • Missing in: Need to establish a formal process for monitoring security advisories specifically for EF Core and its providers. Implement a regular update schedule and testing process for EF Core library updates. Consider automated dependency scanning tools to detect outdated EF Core packages.