Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
114 lines (98 loc) · 11.7 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

114 lines (98 loc) · 11.7 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for dotnet/maui

Objective: Compromise MAUI Application by Exploiting MAUI-Specific Weaknesses

Attack Tree Visualization

Root Goal: Compromise MAUI Application
    ├── 1. Exploit MAUI Framework Vulnerabilities
    │   └── **[CRITICAL NODE]** 1.1.2. Leverage Publicly Available Exploits **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │       └── 1.1.2.1. Exploit Code Execution Vulnerability
    │       └── 1.1.2.2. Exploit Privilege Escalation Vulnerability
    ├── 2. Exploit Native Interop Vulnerabilities **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   ├── 2.1. Insecure Platform API Calls from MAUI Code **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │   ├── **[CRITICAL NODE]** 2.1.2. Exploit Insecure Parameter Handling **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │   │   └── 2.1.2.1. Inject Malicious Input into API Parameters **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │   ├── **[CRITICAL NODE]** 2.1.3. Exploit Missing Input Validation/Sanitization **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │       └── 2.1.3.1. Bypass Security Checks in Native Code **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    ├── 3. Exploit MAUI Configuration and Deployment Weaknesses **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   ├── 3.1. Insecure Default Configurations **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │   └── 3.1.2. Leverage Insecure Defaults for Initial Access **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │       └── **[CRITICAL NODE]** 3.1.2.2. Exploit Insecure Default Permissions (File System, Network) **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   ├── 3.2. Misconfigurations by Developers **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │   ├── 3.2.2. Exploit Misconfigurations for Privilege Escalation **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │       └── **[CRITICAL NODE]** 3.2.2.1. Exploit Overly Permissive File System Access **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    ├── 4. Exploit Third-Party Dependencies (NuGet Packages) **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   ├── **[CRITICAL NODE]** 4.1. Vulnerable NuGet Packages **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │   ├── **[CRITICAL NODE]** 4.1.2. Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in NuGet Packages **[HIGH RISK PATH]**
    │   │       └── 4.1.2.1. Leverage Publicly Available Exploits for NuGet Package Vulnerabilities **[HIGH RISK PATH]**

Attack Tree Path: 1. Exploit MAUI Framework Vulnerabilities -> 1.1.2. Leverage Publicly Available Exploits (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: Attackers exploit publicly known vulnerabilities (CVEs) in the MAUI framework itself. This relies on the application using an outdated or vulnerable version of MAUI. Public exploits may be readily available or easily adapted.
  • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Depends on MAUI vulnerability landscape and application update practices)
  • Impact: High to Critical (Code execution, privilege escalation, full system compromise possible)
  • Effort: Medium (Finding and adapting exploits might require some effort)
  • Skill Level: Medium to High (Understanding exploits and adapting them to the target application)
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Intrusion detection systems might detect exploit attempts, but successful exploitation can be subtle)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Keep MAUI Framework Updated: Regularly update to the latest stable MAUI version and apply security patches.
    • Vulnerability Scanning: Implement automated vulnerability scanning to identify outdated MAUI versions in deployed applications.
    • Security Monitoring: Monitor for unusual application behavior that might indicate exploit attempts.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Exploit Native Interop Vulnerabilities (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: This path targets vulnerabilities arising from the interaction between .NET MAUI code and native platform APIs. The complexity of this bridge and potential for insecure coding practices in handling native calls create numerous attack opportunities.

    • 2.1. Insecure Platform API Calls from MAUI Code -> 2.1.2. Exploit Insecure Parameter Handling (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

      • Attack Vector Description: Attackers inject malicious input into parameters passed to native platform APIs from MAUI code. This can lead to various vulnerabilities like code execution, buffer overflows, or logic bypasses in the native layer.
      • Likelihood: Medium to High (Common vulnerability in interop scenarios)
      • Impact: High to Critical (Code execution, data breach, system compromise)
      • Effort: Low to Medium (Simple injection techniques to more complex exploits)
      • Skill Level: Low to Medium (Basic injection skills to advanced exploitation techniques)
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Input validation and logging can help, but sophisticated attacks can be harder to detect)
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Input Validation and Sanitization: Rigorously validate and sanitize all input passed to native platform APIs.
        • Secure Coding Practices: Follow secure coding guidelines for native API interactions, including parameter validation and error handling.
        • Security Testing: Conduct penetration testing specifically targeting native API interactions and input injection vulnerabilities.

    • 2.1. Insecure Platform API Calls from MAUI Code -> 2.1.3. Exploit Missing Input Validation/Sanitization (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

      • Attack Vector Description: Attackers exploit the lack of input validation or sanitization in MAUI code before calling native platform APIs. This allows malicious or unexpected data to be passed to the native layer, potentially bypassing security checks or triggering vulnerabilities in native code.
      • Likelihood: Medium to High (Common developer oversight)
      • Impact: High (Bypass security features, unauthorized data access, potential native code vulnerabilities)
      • Effort: Low to Medium (Identifying missing validation and crafting bypass payloads)
      • Skill Level: Low to Medium (Basic understanding of input validation and security checks)
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Code review and security testing are crucial for detection)
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Implement Input Validation: Enforce strict input validation and sanitization for all data used in native API calls.
        • Code Reviews: Conduct thorough code reviews to identify areas where input validation might be missing.
        • Security Testing: Perform security testing to identify bypasses of security checks due to missing validation.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Exploit MAUI Configuration and Deployment Weaknesses (High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: This path exploits vulnerabilities arising from insecure configurations and deployment practices of MAUI applications. Misconfigurations can create easy entry points for attackers.

    • 3.1. Insecure Default Configurations -> 3.1.2. Leverage Insecure Defaults for Initial Access -> 3.1.2.2. Exploit Insecure Default Permissions (File System, Network) (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

      • Attack Vector Description: Attackers exploit overly permissive default file system or network permissions granted to the MAUI application. This can allow unauthorized access to sensitive data, application files, or network resources.
      • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Platform defaults vary, but misconfigurations are possible)
      • Impact: Medium to High (Data access, potential for further compromise, limited system control)
      • Effort: Low to Medium (Identifying default permissions and exploiting them)
      • Skill Level: Low to Medium (Basic understanding of file system and network permissions)
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (System monitoring and permission checks can detect anomalies)
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Principle of Least Privilege: Configure the application with the minimum necessary permissions.
        • Secure Default Configuration: Review and harden default MAUI project configurations.
        • Permission Auditing: Regularly audit application permissions to ensure they are appropriate and secure.

    • 3.2. Misconfigurations by Developers -> 3.2.2. Exploit Misconfigurations for Privilege Escalation -> 3.2.2.1. Exploit Overly Permissive File System Access (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

      • Attack Vector Description: Developers unintentionally configure the MAUI application with overly permissive file system access. Attackers can exploit this to gain access to sensitive files, modify application code, or escalate privileges within the application's context.
      • Likelihood: Low to Medium (Depends on developer practices and application design)
      • Impact: Medium to High (Data access, potential code execution, privilege escalation within application)
      • Effort: Medium (Identifying misconfigurations and exploiting file system access)
      • Skill Level: Medium (Understanding file system permissions and exploitation techniques)
      • Detection Difficulty: Medium (File system monitoring and access control logging can help)
      • Mitigation Strategies:
        • Principle of Least Privilege: Grant only necessary file system permissions to the application.
        • Code Reviews: Conduct code reviews to identify potential misconfigurations related to file system access.
        • Security Testing: Perform security testing to identify and exploit overly permissive file system access.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Exploit Third-Party Dependencies (NuGet Packages) -> 4.1. Vulnerable NuGet Packages -> 4.1.2. Exploit Known Vulnerabilities in NuGet Packages -> 4.1.2.1. Leverage Publicly Available Exploits for NuGet Package Vulnerabilities (Critical Node & High-Risk Path)

  • Attack Vector Description: Attackers exploit known vulnerabilities in third-party NuGet packages used by the MAUI application. Public exploits for these vulnerabilities may be readily available. Exploiting a vulnerable package can lead to code execution, data breaches, or other forms of compromise within the application's context.
  • Likelihood: Medium (Vulnerable packages are common in software projects)
  • Impact: High to Critical (Code execution, data breach, application compromise)
  • Effort: Low to Medium (Public exploits might be readily available or easily adaptable)
  • Skill Level: Medium (Understanding exploits and adapting them to the application's context)
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium (Vulnerability scanning and monitoring can detect vulnerable packages, but exploit attempts might be harder to detect in real-time)
  • Mitigation Strategies:
    • Dependency Scanning: Implement automated dependency scanning tools to identify vulnerable NuGet packages.
    • Keep Dependencies Updated: Regularly update NuGet packages to the latest versions, including security patches.
    • Vulnerability Management: Establish a process for tracking and patching vulnerabilities in NuGet packages.
    • Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Integrate SCA tools into the development pipeline to continuously monitor and manage dependencies.