Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
77 lines (68 loc) · 8.37 KB

File metadata and controls

77 lines (68 loc) · 8.37 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for dotnet/maui

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Platform-Specific Security Testing * Description: 1. Identify Target Platforms: Define all platforms your MAUI application supports (iOS, Android, Windows, macOS). 2. Establish Testing Environments: Set up testing environments for each platform (devices, emulators/simulators). 3. Utilize Platform-Specific Tools: Use security tools tailored to each platform (static/dynamic analyzers, penetration testing tools). 4. Focus on Platform-Specific Vulnerabilities: Prioritize testing for vulnerabilities unique to each OS (iOS sandbox escapes, Android intent issues, Windows privilege escalation, macOS bypasses). 5. Document and Remediate: Document findings and prioritize remediation based on severity and platform impact. 6. Integrate into CI/CD: Include platform-specific security testing in your CI/CD pipeline. * Threats Mitigated: * Platform-Specific Vulnerabilities (High Severity): Exploits unique to an OS leading to data leaks, unauthorized access, or code execution. * Inconsistent Security Posture (Medium Severity): Security variations across platforms leading to weaker security on some. * Impact: Significantly reduces platform-specific vulnerability risks and ensures consistent security across platforms. * Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic functional tests across platforms exist in CI/CD. Dedicated platform security testing is missing. * Location: CI/CD pipeline has functional tests, lacks platform-specific security stages. * Missing Implementation: Dedicated security testing stages per platform in CI/CD. Integration of platform-specific security tools. Specialized platform security expertise.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure P/Invoke Usage

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Secure Practices for Platform Invoke (P/Invoke) * Description: 1. Minimize P/Invoke Usage: Reduce reliance on P/Invoke, use MAUI/.NET libraries if possible. 2. Input Validation and Sanitization: Rigorously validate and sanitize inputs before P/Invoke calls to prevent injection attacks. 3. Output Validation: Validate and sanitize data received from native code after P/Invoke calls. 4. Error Handling: Implement robust error handling for P/Invoke calls to prevent unexpected behavior and security issues. 5. Security Reviews: Conduct security reviews specifically for P/Invoke implementations, focusing on data flow and vulnerabilities. 6. Principle of Least Privilege (Native Code): If using custom native libraries, ensure they have minimal privileges and follow secure native coding practices. * Threats Mitigated: * Injection Vulnerabilities (High Severity): SQL Injection, Command Injection, Buffer Overflows via insecure data handling at managed-native boundary. * Data Corruption/Unexpected Behavior (Medium Severity): Incorrect data to native code causing crashes, data corruption, potentially exploitable for DoS. * Impact: Significantly reduces injection risks and data integrity issues from P/Invoke. Enhances stability and security when interacting with native components. * Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic input validation exists in some areas, but security-focused validation for P/Invoke is inconsistent. Error handling for P/Invoke is present but may lack security focus. * Location: Input validation in some UI fields, not specifically for P/Invoke data exchange. * Missing Implementation: Systematic input/output validation for all P/Invoke calls. Dedicated security reviews of P/Invoke. Robust error handling for security in P/Invoke interactions.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Robust NuGet Package Security Management * Description: 1. Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Integrate an SCA tool to scan NuGet dependencies for vulnerabilities in MAUI projects. 2. Vulnerability Database Integration: Ensure SCA uses up-to-date vulnerability databases (NVD). 3. Automated Dependency Scanning: Automate NuGet scanning in CI/CD for early vulnerability detection in MAUI projects. 4. Prioritize Vulnerability Remediation: Process to prioritize and fix vulnerabilities based on severity and exploitability in MAUI dependencies. 5. Package Source Control: Use reputable NuGet sources. Consider private feeds for curated packages in MAUI projects. 6. Regular Updates: Keep NuGet packages updated in MAUI projects. Regularly review and update dependencies for security patches. 7. Dependency Review: Periodically review NuGet dependencies in MAUI projects, remove unnecessary/outdated packages. * Threats Mitigated: * Vulnerable Dependencies (High Severity): Exploitable vulnerabilities in third-party NuGet packages used in MAUI apps. * Supply Chain Attacks (Medium Severity): Compromised/malicious NuGet packages in MAUI dependencies, leading to backdoors/malware. * Impact: Significantly reduces risks from vulnerable NuGet packages in MAUI apps. Proactively manages dependency-related risks. * Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Developers aware of updates, occasional manual updates. No automated SCA or systematic dependency management for MAUI projects. * Location: Manual package updates during bug fixes or when prompted. * Missing Implementation: SCA tool in CI/CD for MAUI projects. Automated vulnerability scanning and reporting for NuGet. Formal process for dependency review, updates, and remediation in MAUI projects.

Mitigation Strategy: WebView Security Hardening

Mitigation Strategy: Implement WebView Security Hardening * Description: 1. Minimize WebView Usage: Reduce/eliminate WebView use in MAUI apps if possible. Consider native UI or custom rendering. 2. Input Sanitization: Sanitize all input loaded into WebView in MAUI apps, especially from external/user sources. Prevent script injection. 3. Disable Unnecessary Features: Disable non-essential WebView features in MAUI apps (JavaScript execution if not needed, file access, restrict navigation). 4. Content Security Policy (CSP): Implement CSP headers for WebView content in MAUI apps to mitigate XSS by controlling resource sources. 5. Secure Communication (HTTPS): Ensure WebView content in MAUI apps is loaded over HTTPS to protect data in transit. 6. WebView Updates: Keep WebView component updated in MAUI apps. Update MAUI framework and platform SDKs for WebView security patches. 7. JavaScript Bridge Security (If used): Secure JavaScript bridges in MAUI apps. Validate data exchanged through bridges. * Threats Mitigated: * Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (High Severity): Script injection in WebView in MAUI apps, leading to data theft, session hijacking, or defacement. * Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (Medium Severity): If WebView content in MAUI apps is HTTP, attackers can intercept/modify communication. * Code Execution (Medium to High Severity): Attackers executing code within MAUI app context via WebView vulnerabilities. * Impact: Significantly reduces XSS and web-based vulnerabilities in MAUI WebView components. Enhances security of displayed content. * Currently Implemented: Not implemented. WebView used for dynamic content, but security hardening (CSP, JavaScript disabling, sanitization) is missing in MAUI apps. HTTPS used, but further WebView security configurations are absent. * Location: WebView for dynamic help and external links in MAUI app. * Missing Implementation: CSP headers for WebView content in MAUI apps. Disabling unnecessary WebView features. Input sanitization for WebView content. Regular security audits of WebView configurations in MAUI apps.