Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
189 lines (146 loc) · 15.2 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

189 lines (146 loc) · 15.2 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for dotnet/orleans

Mitigation Strategy: Strong Grain IDs

Mitigation Strategy: Use GUIDs for Grain IDs within Orleans.

Description:

  1. Grain Class Review: Examine all Orleans grain classes (Grain subclasses).
  2. Grain ID Type Enforcement: Ensure the grain ID type is Guid for all grains requiring unique, unpredictable identifiers (almost always the case). Use GrainFactory.GetGrain<T>(Guid id).
  3. Grain ID Generation: When creating new grain instances, use Guid.NewGuid() to generate a new, random GUID. Never reuse GUIDs.
  4. Client-Side Usage: Update any client code interacting with Orleans grains to use GUIDs for grain references.
  5. Testing: Thoroughly test all grain interactions to confirm correct GUID usage throughout the Orleans system.
  6. String IDs (Exceptional Cases): If string IDs must be used (e.g., legacy reasons, external system integration), and only after exhausting all other options:
    • Cryptographic Randomness: Use System.Security.Cryptography.RandomNumberGenerator to generate a byte array, then Base64 encode it for the string ID. Ensure at least 32 bytes of randomness.
    • Strict Input Validation: If the string ID is derived from any external input, implement extremely rigorous input validation before using it to get a grain reference. Reject anything that doesn't match a strict whitelist.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Grain Impersonation (High Severity): Attackers guessing or predicting grain IDs to access unauthorized data/functionality within Orleans. GUIDs make this computationally infeasible.
  • Unintended Grain Activation (Medium Severity): Attackers triggering specific grain activations with predictable IDs. GUIDs significantly reduce this risk.
  • Information Disclosure (Medium Severity): Predictable IDs could leak information about the Orleans system (e.g., user counts).

Impact:

  • Grain Impersonation: Risk reduced to near zero.
  • Unintended Grain Activation: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Information Disclosure: Risk significantly reduced.

Currently Implemented: [Placeholder: Specify where GUIDs are used for grain IDs in your Orleans project. E.g., "All grain classes except LegacyUserGrain use GUIDs."]

Missing Implementation: [Placeholder: Specify where GUIDs are not used in your Orleans project. E.g., "LegacyUserGrain still uses sequential integer IDs. Refactor to use GUIDs."]

Mitigation Strategy: Controlled Grain Activation (Authorization in OnActivateAsync)

Mitigation Strategy: Implement authorization checks within the OnActivateAsync method of each Orleans grain.

Description:

  1. Identify Sensitive Grains: Determine which Orleans grains handle sensitive data or operations.
  2. Authorization Context (Orleans-Specific): Use Orleans.Runtime.RequestContext to store and retrieve authorization data (e.g., user ID, security token). This context is automatically propagated with Orleans grain calls. This is the preferred Orleans mechanism.
  3. OnActivateAsync Implementation: Within the OnActivateAsync method of each sensitive grain:
    • Retrieve Context: Get the authorization data from RequestContext.Get("YourAuthKey").
    • Authorization Check: Perform the authorization check based on the retrieved context. This might involve checking roles, permissions, or calling an authorization service.
    • Unauthorized Activation Handling: If unauthorized:
      • Throw an UnauthorizedAccessException (or a custom exception). This prevents the grain from activating.
      • Log the failed activation attempt (using Orleans logging).
  4. Testing (Orleans-Specific): Write unit tests that specifically test the OnActivateAsync authorization logic, including simulating different RequestContext values.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Unauthorized Grain Activation (High Severity): Prevents Orleans grains from activating for unauthorized requests, even with a valid grain ID.
  • Data Leakage (High Severity): Protects sensitive data within the grain from being accessed during unauthorized activation.
  • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Prevents attackers from gaining elevated privileges by activating a grain they shouldn't.

Impact:

  • Unauthorized Grain Activation: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Data Leakage: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Privilege Escalation: Risk significantly reduced.

Currently Implemented: [Placeholder: Specify which Orleans grains have authorization in OnActivateAsync. E.g., "UserGrain and OrderGrain check RequestContext."]

Missing Implementation: [Placeholder: Specify which Orleans grains lack this. E.g., "ProductGrain needs OnActivateAsync authorization."]

Mitigation Strategy: Authorization within Grain Methods

Mitigation Strategy: Implement authorization checks within each Orleans grain method, not just at activation.

Description:

  1. Identify Sensitive Methods: For each Orleans grain, identify methods performing sensitive actions or accessing sensitive data.
  2. Authorization Context (Orleans-Specific): Continue using Orleans.Runtime.RequestContext (as in strategy #2) to propagate authorization data with each grain call.
  3. Method Implementation: At the beginning of each sensitive grain method:
    • Retrieve Context: Get the authorization data from RequestContext.Get("YourAuthKey").
    • Authorization Check: Perform an authorization check specific to the method being called. This is crucial; different methods may have different authorization requirements.
    • Unauthorized Access Handling: If unauthorized:
      • Throw an UnauthorizedAccessException (or a custom exception).
      • Log the failed access attempt (using Orleans logging).
  4. Testing (Orleans-Specific): Write unit tests that specifically target each sensitive grain method, simulating different RequestContext values to test authorization.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Unauthorized Method Invocation (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized calls to sensitive grain methods, even with a valid grain reference.
  • Data Leakage (High Severity): Protects sensitive data accessed by grain methods.
  • Privilege Escalation (High Severity): Prevents attackers from gaining privileges by calling unauthorized methods.
  • Lateral Movement (Medium Severity): Limits an attacker's ability to interact with other grains if one grain is compromised.

Impact:

  • Unauthorized Method Invocation: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Data Leakage: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Privilege Escalation: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Lateral Movement: Risk reduced.

Currently Implemented: [Placeholder: Specify which Orleans grain methods have authorization. E.g., "UserGrain.UpdateProfile checks roles in RequestContext."]

Missing Implementation: [Placeholder: Specify which Orleans grain methods lack authorization. E.g., "OrderGrain methods need per-method authorization."]

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Silo Communication (TLS)

Mitigation Strategy: Enforce TLS for all inter-silo communication within the Orleans cluster.

Description:

  1. Certificate Management: Obtain or generate TLS certificates for each Orleans silo. Use a trusted CA for production.
  2. Orleans Configuration (Specific): Configure Orleans to use TLS:
    • SiloPort and GatewayPort: Configure these ports to use TLS. This is often done through the Orleans configuration (e.g., GlobalConfiguration or ClusterConfiguration).
    • Certificate Specification: Provide the certificate details (path, thumbprint, etc.) to the Orleans configuration.
    • Client Certificate Authentication (Optional, Recommended): Enable client certificate authentication for enhanced security between silos. This requires configuring Orleans to trust the client certificates.
  3. Firewall Rules: Ensure firewalls allow traffic on the configured TLS ports only between Orleans silos.
  4. Testing (Orleans-Specific): Verify TLS usage by inspecting network traffic between silos (e.g., with Wireshark) or by using Orleans' built-in diagnostics.
  5. Certificate Rotation: Establish a process for regularly rotating certificates.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (High Severity): TLS prevents attackers from intercepting/modifying communication between Orleans silos.
  • Eavesdropping (High Severity): TLS encrypts inter-silo communication.
  • Data Tampering (High Severity): TLS ensures the integrity of inter-silo communication.
  • Silo Impersonation (High Severity): Client certificate authentication prevents unauthorized silos from joining the Orleans cluster.

Impact:

  • MitM Attacks: Risk reduced to near zero.
  • Eavesdropping: Risk reduced to near zero.
  • Data Tampering: Risk reduced to near zero.
  • Silo Impersonation: Risk significantly reduced (especially with client certificate authentication).

Currently Implemented: [Placeholder: State whether TLS is enabled for inter-silo communication in your Orleans deployment. E.g., "TLS is enabled using certificates from Let's Encrypt."]

Missing Implementation: [Placeholder: Specify any gaps. E.g., "Client certificate authentication is not yet enabled for Orleans silos."]

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Membership Provider

Mitigation Strategy: Use a secure and properly configured membership provider for your Orleans cluster.

Description:

  1. Provider Selection (Orleans-Specific): Choose an Orleans membership provider with strong security features. Examples and Orleans-specific considerations:
    • Azure Table Storage: Use Managed Identities for Orleans silo access (avoid connection strings). Implement strict access control policies.
    • SQL Server: Use a dedicated database with strong passwords, network security, and auditing. Configure Orleans to use secure connection strings.
    • Consul/ZooKeeper: Ensure these services are themselves secured according to best practices. Configure Orleans to connect securely.
  2. Configuration (Orleans-Specific): Configure the chosen provider within your Orleans configuration (e.g., GlobalConfiguration or ClusterConfiguration):
    • Least Privilege: Grant the Orleans cluster only the necessary permissions to the membership data.
    • Network Security: Restrict network access to the membership provider to only the Orleans silos.
    • Auditing: Enable auditing to track changes to the Orleans membership data (if supported by the provider).
  3. Custom Provider (If Applicable): If using a custom Orleans membership provider:
    • Security Review: Conduct a thorough security review of the custom provider's code, focusing on Orleans-specific interactions.
    • Penetration Testing: Perform penetration testing targeting the custom provider's integration with Orleans.
  4. Monitoring: Monitor the membership provider for suspicious activity, particularly related to Orleans cluster membership changes.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Unauthorized Silo Joining (High Severity): A compromised membership provider could allow attackers to add malicious silos to the Orleans cluster.
  • Cluster Partitioning (Medium Severity): Attackers could manipulate membership data to cause the Orleans cluster to split.
  • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Attackers could flood the membership provider, making it unavailable to Orleans silos.

Impact:

  • Unauthorized Silo Joining: Risk significantly reduced.
  • Cluster Partitioning: Risk reduced.
  • Denial of Service (DoS): Risk reduced.

Currently Implemented: [Placeholder: Describe the current Orleans membership provider and its security. E.g., "Using Azure Table Storage with Managed Identities."]

Missing Implementation: [Placeholder: Describe any weaknesses. E.g., "Auditing is not enabled for the Azure Table Storage account used by Orleans."]

Mitigation Strategy: Comprehensive Logging and Auditing (Orleans-Specific)

Mitigation Strategy: Implement detailed logging and auditing, focusing on Orleans-specific events and context.

Description:

  1. Logging Framework: Use a structured logging framework (Serilog, NLog) integrated with Orleans.
  2. Orleans-Specific Context: Leverage Orleans.Runtime.RequestContext to include contextual information in log entries:
    • Grain ID
    • Method being invoked
    • User ID (if applicable)
    • Request ID (for tracing)
    • Any other relevant authorization data
  3. Orleans-Specific Events: Log these key Orleans events:
    • Grain Activations/Deactivations: Log every grain activation and deactivation, including the grain type and ID.
    • Method Invocations: Log all method invocations on sensitive grains, including parameters (carefully redact sensitive data) and return values.
    • Authorization Decisions: Log the results of all authorization checks (success and failure), including the context used for the decision.
    • Exceptions: Log all exceptions within the Orleans context, including stack traces.
    • Orleans-Specific Errors: Log any errors or warnings reported by the Orleans runtime itself.
  4. Audit Trails (Orleans Context): For critical operations, create audit trails that include the Orleans-specific context (grain ID, method, etc.).
  5. Log Analysis (Orleans Focus): Regularly review logs, specifically looking for patterns related to Orleans grain activity, authorization failures, and unusual activation patterns.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Intrusion Detection (High Severity): Orleans-specific logs help detect and investigate security incidents within the cluster.
  • Forensic Analysis (High Severity): Logs provide evidence for investigating breaches, including details of grain interactions.
  • Compliance (Medium Severity): Helps meet regulatory requirements for audit logging.
  • Non-Repudiation (Medium Severity): Audit trails with Orleans context can help prove user actions within the system.

Impact:

  • Intrusion Detection: Improved ability to detect Orleans-related security incidents.
  • Forensic Analysis: Enables more thorough investigations of breaches involving Orleans.
  • Compliance: Helps meet regulatory requirements.
  • Non-Repudiation: Provides stronger evidence of actions within the Orleans cluster.

Currently Implemented: [Placeholder: Describe current Orleans logging. E.g., "Basic logging with Serilog, but RequestContext is not consistently used."]

Missing Implementation: [Placeholder: Describe gaps. E.g., "Audit trails are missing. Need to log all grain activations and authorization decisions with full Orleans context."]