Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
141 lines (118 loc) · 9.76 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

141 lines (118 loc) · 9.76 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for dotnet/roslyn

Objective: To compromise application using Roslyn by exploiting high-risk vulnerabilities or critical weaknesses.

Attack Tree Visualization

Attack Goal: Compromise Application Using Roslyn (Focused)

    └── 1. Exploit Input Processing via Roslyn
        ├── 1.1. Malicious Code Injection via Roslyn Compilation
        │   ├── 1.1.1. Inject Malicious Code through User-Provided Code Snippets **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
        │   └── 1.1.3. Leverage Roslyn Compiler Bugs for Code Injection **[CRITICAL NODE]**

    └── 2. Exploit Roslyn Compilation/Analysis Process
        ├── 2.1. Compiler Bug Exploitation
        │   └── 2.1.3. Exploit Compiler Bugs for Code Execution during Compilation **[CRITICAL NODE]**

    └── 3. Exploit Code Generation/Output from Roslyn
        ├── 3.1. Manipulation of Generated Code
        │   └── 3.1.2. Generate Code with Inherent Vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL Injection if generating SQL) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**

    └── 4. Exploit Roslyn API Vulnerabilities
        ├── 4.1. Insecure API Usage by Application
        │   └── 4.1.1. Misuse of Powerful Roslyn APIs (e.g., Reflection, Code Execution) **[HIGH-RISK PATH]**
        ├── 4.2. Vulnerabilities in Roslyn API Implementation
        │   └── 4.2.1. API Input Validation Bugs in Roslyn Itself **[CRITICAL NODE]**

    └── 5. Supply Chain Attacks Targeting Roslyn Dependencies
        └── 5.1. Compromised Roslyn NuGet Packages **[CRITICAL NODE]**

Attack Tree Path: 1. High-Risk Path: 1.1.1. Inject Malicious Code through User-Provided Code Snippets

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker provides malicious code snippets as input to the application.
    • Application uses Roslyn to compile and potentially execute these snippets.
    • Malicious code executes within the application's context.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Arbitrary Code Execution)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Input Sanitization: Implement strict input validation and sanitization to remove or neutralize potentially malicious code constructs. Use whitelisting of allowed code elements.
    • Sandboxing: Execute compiled code snippets in a secure sandbox environment with restricted permissions to limit the damage from successful code injection.
    • Static Analysis: Perform static analysis on user-provided code snippets before compilation to detect suspicious patterns or potentially harmful code.

Attack Tree Path: 2. Critical Node: 1.1.3. Leverage Roslyn Compiler Bugs for Code Injection

  • Attack Vector:
    • Attacker discovers and exploits a vulnerability within the Roslyn compiler itself.
    • Crafted input (code snippet, project file, etc.) triggers the compiler bug.
    • Exploitation of the bug leads to arbitrary code injection during the compilation process.
  • Likelihood: Very Low
  • Impact: Very High (Code Execution at Compiler Level)
  • Effort: Very High
  • Skill Level: Very High
  • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Roslyn Version Management: Maintain Roslyn at the latest stable version and promptly apply security updates and patches released by the Roslyn team.
    • Security Monitoring: Monitor Roslyn security advisories and CVEs for reported vulnerabilities and apply mitigations as soon as available.
    • Sandboxed Compilation Environment: Consider running the Roslyn compilation process in a sandboxed environment to limit the potential impact of a compiler-level exploit.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Critical Node: 2.1.3. Exploit Compiler Bugs for Code Execution during Compilation

  • Attack Vector:
    • Similar to 1.1.3, but focuses on bugs specifically leading to code execution during the compilation phase itself.
    • Exploitation occurs when Roslyn is processing input, not necessarily from user-provided code, but potentially from crafted project structures or complex code scenarios that trigger a compiler flaw.
  • Likelihood: Very Low
  • Impact: Very High (Code Execution during Compilation)
  • Effort: Very High
  • Skill Level: Very High
  • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Sandboxed Compilation Environment: Crucially important to isolate the compilation process.
    • Least Privilege: Run the compilation process with the minimum necessary privileges.
    • Roslyn Version Management: Stay updated with Roslyn releases and security patches.

Attack Tree Path: 4. High-Risk Path: 3.1.2. Generate Code with Inherent Vulnerabilities (e.g., SQL Injection if generating SQL)

  • Attack Vector:
    • Application uses Roslyn to generate code, for example, to interact with databases or other systems.
    • Code generation logic or templates are flawed and do not properly sanitize or parameterize data.
    • Generated code contains vulnerabilities like SQL Injection, Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), or Command Injection.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Data Breach, System Compromise)
  • Effort: Low
  • Skill Level: Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Secure Code Templates: Design and use secure code templates that enforce secure coding practices by default (e.g., using parameterized queries for database interactions).
    • Static Analysis on Generated Code: Perform static analysis on the code generated by Roslyn to identify potential vulnerabilities before deployment.
    • Code Review of Generation Logic: Thoroughly review the code generation logic and templates to ensure they are not introducing vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 5. High-Risk Path: 4.1.1. Misuse of Powerful Roslyn APIs (e.g., Reflection, Code Execution)

  • Attack Vector:
    • Application developers misuse powerful Roslyn APIs, such as those for reflection, dynamic code execution, or assembly manipulation.
    • This misuse creates vulnerabilities, for example, by allowing execution of untrusted code or bypassing security controls.
  • Likelihood: Medium
  • Impact: High (Arbitrary Code Execution, Privilege Escalation)
  • Effort: Medium
  • Skill Level: Medium
  • Detection Difficulty: Medium
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Secure API Usage Guidelines: Develop and enforce clear guidelines for the secure usage of Roslyn APIs within the development team.
    • Least Privilege API Access: Restrict access to powerful Roslyn APIs to only the parts of the application that absolutely require them.
    • Code Review for API Usage: Conduct thorough code reviews, specifically focusing on the usage of Roslyn APIs, to identify and correct potential misuses.

Attack Tree Path: 6. Critical Node: 4.2.1. API Input Validation Bugs in Roslyn Itself

  • Attack Vector:
    • A vulnerability exists in the input validation logic of a Roslyn API.
    • Attacker crafts malicious input to a Roslyn API call that bypasses validation or triggers a bug.
    • Exploitation of the API vulnerability leads to unexpected behavior, information disclosure, or potentially code execution within the application or even the Roslyn process.
  • Likelihood: Very Low
  • Impact: High (Potentially Code Execution, Information Disclosure)
  • Effort: Very High
  • Skill Level: Very High
  • Detection Difficulty: Very Hard
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Roslyn Version Management: Stay updated with Roslyn releases and security patches to benefit from fixes for API vulnerabilities.
    • Thorough Testing of API Interactions: Conduct thorough testing of the application's interactions with Roslyn APIs, including providing unexpected or malformed inputs to identify potential API-level vulnerabilities.

Attack Tree Path: 7. Critical Node: 5.1. Compromised Roslyn NuGet Packages

  • Attack Vector:
    • The official Roslyn NuGet packages or related packages are compromised in the supply chain (e.g., through account hijacking, malicious package injection).
    • Developers unknowingly download and use compromised packages in their application.
    • Malicious code within the compromised packages is integrated into the application, leading to various forms of compromise.
  • Likelihood: Very Low
  • Impact: Very High (Full Application Compromise)
  • Effort: High
  • Skill Level: Medium (for consuming compromised package, Very High for compromising package itself)
  • Detection Difficulty: Hard
  • Actionable Insights:
    • NuGet Package Verification: Enable and utilize NuGet package signing and verify package signatures to ensure authenticity and integrity.
    • Dependency Scanning: Regularly scan application dependencies, including Roslyn packages, for known vulnerabilities and potential supply chain risks.
    • Reputable Sources: Download NuGet packages only from trusted and reputable sources.