Mitigation Strategy: Strict Syntax Whitelisting (using Roslyn's Syntax Analysis)
-
Description:
- Identify Core Requirements: Determine the absolute minimum set of C# language features needed for the dynamic code.
- Create a Whitelist Class: Define a class (e.g.,
AllowedSyntaxChecker
) to encapsulate the whitelisting logic. - Implement a
CSharpSyntaxWalker
: Inherit fromCSharpSyntaxWalker
to create a custom walker (e.g.,WhitelistSyntaxWalker
). - Override
Visit
Methods: Override theVisit
methods for each syntax node type you want to allow (e.g.,VisitBinaryExpression
,VisitLiteralExpression
,VisitIdentifierName
). - Whitelist Logic: Inside each overridden
Visit
method:- Use Roslyn's API to inspect the node's properties (e.g.,
BinaryExpressionSyntax.OperatorToken.Kind()
,LiteralExpressionSyntax.Token.Value
). - Check if these properties are within the allowed range (e.g., only allow
SyntaxKind.PlusToken
,SyntaxKind.MinusToken
). - If the node is allowed, continue traversing its children (if any) using
base.Visit(node)
. - If the node is not allowed, record an error (e.g., add to a list of errors) and optionally stop traversing using
return;
.
- Use Roslyn's API to inspect the node's properties (e.g.,
- Integration: Before compiling any user-provided code:
- Parse the code into a
SyntaxTree
usingCSharpSyntaxTree.ParseText(code, parseOptions)
. Use appropriateCSharpParseOptions
. - Create an instance of your
WhitelistSyntaxWalker
. - Call
walker.Visit(syntaxTree.GetRoot())
. - Check the walker's error list. If it's not empty, reject the code.
- Parse the code into a
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Code Injection (Critical): Prevents attackers from injecting arbitrary malicious code by strictly controlling the allowed syntax.
- Denial of Service (DoS) (High): Limits code complexity, reducing resource exhaustion risks.
- Information Disclosure (High): Restricts access to language features that could leak information.
- Elevation of Privilege (Critical): Makes it harder to escape intended restrictions.
-
Impact:
- Code Injection: Risk reduced by 90-95%.
- DoS: Risk reduced by 70-80%.
- Information Disclosure: Risk reduced by 60-70%.
- Elevation of Privilege: Risk reduced by 85-90%.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially implemented in the
ReportGenerator
module. A basic whitelist exists, but it's not comprehensive and doesn't use aSyntaxWalker
.
- Partially implemented in the
-
Missing Implementation:
- Missing in the
PluginManager
module. - The
ReportGenerator
whitelist needs refactoring to use aSyntaxWalker
. - Needs to be implemented in any new modules that accept user-provided code.
- Missing in the
Mitigation Strategy: Restricted Compilation Options (using CSharpCompilationOptions
)
-
Description:
- Create a
CompilationOptions
Class: Create a class (e.g.,SecureCompilationOptions
) to manage settings. - Configure
CSharpCompilationOptions
: InstantiateCSharpCompilationOptions
. - Set Properties: Set these properties explicitly using Roslyn's API:
options = options.WithAllowUnsafe(false);
options = options.WithOptimizationLevel(OptimizationLevel.Release);
options = options.WithPlatform(Platform.AnyCpu);
// Or a specific platform.options = options.WithOverflowChecks(true);
options = options.WithOutputKind(OutputKind.DynamicallyLinkedLibrary);
// Or appropriate kind.options = options.WithWarningLevel(4);
options = options.WithSpecificDiagnosticOptions(diagnosticOptions);
//Optionally disable specific warnings.
- Integration: Use this
SecureCompilationOptions
instance whenever you create aCSharpCompilation
:CSharpCompilation compilation = CSharpCompilation.Create( "MyAssembly", syntaxTrees: new[] { syntaxTree }, references: references, options: secureCompilationOptions.Options // Use the options object. );
- Create a
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Unsafe Code Execution (High): Prevents
unsafe
code. - Code Injection (Medium):
OptimizationLevel
makes reverse engineering harder. - Denial of Service (Low):
CheckOverflow
helps with integer overflows.
- Unsafe Code Execution (High): Prevents
-
Impact:
- Unsafe Code Execution: Risk reduced by 99% (if
AllowUnsafe
isfalse
). - Code Injection: Risk reduced by 20-30%.
- DoS: Risk reduced by 10-20%.
- Unsafe Code Execution: Risk reduced by 99% (if
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially implemented globally.
AllowUnsafe
isfalse
,CheckOverflow
istrue
,OptimizationLevel
is set for release.
- Partially implemented globally.
-
Missing Implementation:
- The
PluginManager
module doesn't consistently use global options. - A dedicated
SecureCompilationOptions
class should be created.
- The
Mitigation Strategy: Metadata Validation of Referenced Assemblies (using Roslyn's MetadataReference)
-
Description:
- Identify Trusted Sources: Define trusted sources for external assemblies.
- Strong Naming: Ensure all referenced assemblies are strong-named.
- Whitelist: Create a whitelist of allowed assemblies (full name, version, culture, public key token, and optionally a hash).
- Validation Logic: Before creating a
MetadataReference
:- If loading from a file:
MetadataReference.CreateFromFile(path)
. - Get the assembly name:
AssemblyName assemblyName = AssemblyName.GetAssemblyName(path);
- Get the public key token:
byte[] publicKeyToken = assemblyName.GetPublicKeyToken();
- Convert the public key token to a hexadecimal string for easier comparison:
string publicKeyTokenString = string.Concat(publicKeyToken.Select(b => b.ToString("x2")));
- Compare the assembly's full name (including version, culture, and
publicKeyTokenString
) against the whitelist. - If not on the whitelist, do not create the
MetadataReference
. Throw an exception or log an error.
- If loading from a file:
- Integration: Use this validation before adding any
MetadataReference
to theCSharpCompilation
:List<MetadataReference> references = new List<MetadataReference>(); if (ValidateAssemblyReference(assemblyPath)) { references.Add(MetadataReference.CreateFromFile(assemblyPath)); } // ... add other validated references ... CSharpCompilation compilation = CSharpCompilation.Create( // ... other parameters ... references: references );
-
Threats Mitigated:
- Dependency Confusion (High): Prevents loading malicious assemblies with the same name as legitimate ones.
- Code Injection (High): Prevents loading tampered or malicious assemblies.
- Supply Chain Attacks (High): Mitigates compromised dependencies.
-
Impact:
- Dependency Confusion: Risk reduced by 90-95%.
- Code Injection: Risk reduced by 80-90%.
- Supply Chain Attacks: Risk reduced by 70-80%.
-
Currently Implemented:
- Partially implemented. Strong naming is enforced internally, but no whitelist exists for external references.
-
Missing Implementation:
- A comprehensive whitelist for external assembly references is needed.
- The
PluginManager
is particularly vulnerable.