Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
174 lines (146 loc) · 26.3 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

174 lines (146 loc) · 26.3 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for egametang/et

Mitigation Strategy: Rigorous Protocol Design and Review (When Using et for Custom Protocols)

1. Rigorous Protocol Design and Review (When Using et for Custom Protocols)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Rigorous Protocol Design and Review (within et context)
  • Description:
    1. Define Security Requirements for et-based Protocol: When implementing a custom network protocol using et, explicitly document security requirements (confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, authorization) specific to how the protocol is handled within et.
    2. Threat Modeling for et Protocol Implementation: Conduct threat modeling exercises focused on the et implementation of your custom protocol. Identify potential attack vectors and vulnerabilities arising from how et is used to process protocol messages. Consider attacker capabilities and motivations in the context of et's features.
    3. Secure Design Principles in et Protocol Logic: Apply secure protocol design principles within the code that handles your custom protocol using et's API. Focus on least privilege, defense in depth, separation of concerns, and fail-safe defaults within the et event handlers and message processing logic.
    4. Peer Review of et Protocol Code: Have the et protocol implementation code reviewed by multiple developers and security experts. Focus on logic flaws, edge cases, and potential security weaknesses in how et's API is used and how protocol states are managed within et.
    5. Documentation of et Protocol Usage: Create comprehensive documentation of how your custom protocol is implemented using et, including security considerations, threat models, and rationale behind design choices specifically related to et's features and configurations.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Protocol Logic Flaws in et Implementation (High Severity): Vulnerabilities in the protocol's logic as implemented using et, that can be exploited to bypass security controls, cause denial of service, or gain unauthorized access.
    • Authentication/Authorization Bypasses in et Protocol Handling (High Severity): Weaknesses in authentication or authorization mechanisms within the protocol as implemented using et, allowing unauthorized users to access resources or perform actions.
    • Data Integrity Violations in et Protocol Processing (Medium Severity): Lack of mechanisms to ensure data integrity within the et protocol handling code, leading to potential data manipulation or corruption without detection.
    • Confidentiality Breaches in et Protocol Communication (Medium Severity): Absence of encryption or other confidentiality measures in the protocol as used with et, exposing sensitive data transmitted over the network.
  • Impact: Significantly Reduces risk for all listed threats by proactively addressing vulnerabilities at the design and implementation stage within the et context.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Security requirements are generally considered, but formal threat modeling and dedicated security reviews specifically for the et protocol implementation are not consistently performed. Design documentation exists but lacks detailed security considerations related to et usage.
  • Missing Implementation: Formal threat modeling exercises focused on the et protocol implementation are missing. Dedicated security reviews by security experts with et and network protocol expertise are not consistently performed. Security considerations in protocol documentation need to be significantly expanded and formalized with respect to et's role.

Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization at Protocol Level (Within et Handlers)

2. Input Validation and Sanitization at Protocol Level (Within et Handlers)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Input Validation and Sanitization at Protocol Level (in et handlers)
  • Description:
    1. Identify Input Points in et Handlers: Pinpoint all locations within your et event handlers and message processing logic where external data is received and processed (e.g., message headers, message bodies, parameters received through et).
    2. Define Validation Rules for et Protocol Inputs: For each input point within et handlers, define strict validation rules based on the expected data type, format, length, and allowed values.
    3. Implement Validation Checks in et Handlers: Implement validation checks at the earliest possible stage of data processing within your et handlers, before the data is used in application logic.
    4. Sanitize Input in et Handlers: If input needs to be processed further (e.g., for display or storage), sanitize it within your et handlers to neutralize potentially harmful characters or sequences (e.g., HTML escaping, SQL parameterization).
    5. Handle Invalid Input in et Handlers: Define clear error handling for invalid input detected within et handlers. Reject invalid input, log the event (for security monitoring), and return informative error messages (without revealing sensitive internal details) through et's response mechanisms.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Injection Attacks via et Protocol Inputs (High Severity): Prevents various injection attacks (e.g., command injection, SQL injection, log injection) by sanitizing and validating input received and processed through et before further processing.
    • Buffer Overflow in et Protocol Handling (High Severity): Mitigates buffer overflow vulnerabilities by validating input lengths within et handlers and preventing excessively long inputs from overflowing buffers.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) via Malformed et Protocol Messages (Medium Severity): Reduces DoS risks by rejecting malformed or excessively large inputs received through et that could consume excessive resources or crash the application.
    • Protocol Confusion Exploiting et Protocol Handling (Medium Severity): Prevents protocol confusion attacks by strictly validating message formats within et handlers and ensuring adherence to the defined protocol.
  • Impact: Significantly Reduces risk for injection attacks and buffer overflows related to et protocol handling. Moderately Reduces risk for DoS and protocol confusion exploiting et's protocol processing.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Basic input validation exists for some message types handled by et, but it's not consistently applied across all input points within et handlers. Sanitization is not systematically implemented in et handlers.
  • Missing Implementation: Comprehensive input validation is missing for all protocol message types and parameters processed by et handlers. Systematic input sanitization is not implemented within et handlers. Error handling for invalid input detected in et handlers needs to be improved to be more secure and informative.

Mitigation Strategy: Security Audits of Protocol Implementation (Using et)

3. Security Audits of Protocol Implementation (Using et)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Security Audits of Protocol Implementation (using et)
  • Description:
    1. Plan Regular Audits for et Protocol Implementation: Schedule regular security audits of the custom protocol implementation specifically focusing on the code using et. Audits should be conducted at least annually, and more frequently after significant code changes involving et protocol handling.
    2. Engage Security Experts for et Protocol Audits: Engage external security experts or penetration testers with experience in network protocol security and familiarity with et or similar network libraries to conduct audits.
    3. Focus on et-Specific Protocol Vulnerabilities: Direct audits to specifically target protocol-related vulnerabilities arising from the use of et, such as injection flaws, buffer overflows, logic errors, authentication/authorization weaknesses, and DoS vulnerabilities within the et protocol implementation.
    4. Automated and Manual Testing for et Protocol Code: Utilize a combination of automated security scanning tools and manual penetration testing techniques during audits specifically targeting the et protocol handling code.
    5. Remediation and Verification of et Protocol Vulnerabilities: Address identified vulnerabilities promptly. Implement fixes in the et protocol implementation and conduct re-testing to verify the effectiveness of remediation efforts.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Undiscovered Protocol Vulnerabilities in et Usage (High Severity): Identifies and mitigates previously unknown vulnerabilities in the protocol implementation specifically related to how et is used before they can be exploited.
    • Implementation Errors in et Protocol Handlers (Medium Severity): Detects coding errors and logic flaws in the protocol handling code that uses et that could lead to security weaknesses.
    • Configuration Issues in et Protocol Setup (Low Severity): Uncovers misconfigurations in the protocol implementation or et setup that weaken security.
  • Impact: Significantly Reduces risk of undiscovered protocol vulnerabilities in the et implementation. Moderately Reduces risk of implementation errors in et protocol handlers and configuration issues related to et protocol setup.
  • Currently Implemented: Not Implemented. Security audits are performed on the overall application, but specific audits focusing on the custom protocol implementation using et are not regularly conducted.
  • Missing Implementation: Establish a process for regular security audits specifically targeting the custom protocol implementation using et. Budget and schedule penetration testing by security experts with protocol security and et library expertise.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure et Connection Configuration

4. Secure et Connection Configuration

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure et Connection Configuration
  • Description:
    1. Set Appropriate et Timeouts: Configure connection timeouts within et's configuration (connect timeout, read timeout, write timeout) to prevent indefinite connection hangs and resource exhaustion when using et.
    2. Manage et Keep-Alive Settings: Carefully configure keep-alive settings within et or application logic using et to balance connection reuse benefits with potential risks of long-lived connections managed by et. Limit keep-alive timeouts if necessary in et's configuration.
    3. Limit et Maximum Connections: Set appropriate limits on the maximum number of concurrent connections handled by et to prevent resource exhaustion and DoS attacks targeting the et server.
    4. Secure Socket Options for et Connections: Configure secure socket options when creating connections using et where applicable (e.g., TCP_NODELAY, SO_REUSEADDR with caution, SO_LINGER appropriately).
    5. Resource Limits for et Application: Implement operating system level resource limits (e.g., file descriptor limits, process limits) to further restrict resource consumption by the et application and its underlying connections.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Resource Exhaustion DoS via et Connections (High Severity): Prevents resource exhaustion DoS attacks by limiting connection resources managed by et and setting timeouts in et configuration.
    • Connection Hang DoS affecting et (Medium Severity): Mitigates connection hang DoS attacks by enforcing connection timeouts in et and preventing indefinite waits in et connection handling.
    • Connection Reuse Vulnerabilities in et (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of connection reuse vulnerabilities within et's connection pooling by carefully managing keep-alive settings and connection pooling configurations in et.
  • Impact: Significantly Reduces risk of resource exhaustion DoS related to et connections. Moderately Reduces risk of connection hang DoS affecting et and connection reuse vulnerabilities within et.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Basic timeouts are configured in some parts of the et usage, but maximum connection limits and detailed keep-alive settings are not explicitly managed within et's configuration. Socket options are mostly default when using et.
  • Missing Implementation: Implement explicit configuration of maximum connection limits within et or application logic using et. Fine-tune keep-alive settings in et configuration based on application needs and security considerations. Review and configure secure socket options when establishing connections via et. Implement OS-level resource limits for the application process running et.

Mitigation Strategy: Connection Isolation and Context Awareness (Using et Connection Management)

5. Connection Isolation and Context Awareness (Using et Connection Management)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Connection Isolation and Context Awareness (with et connection management)
  • Description:
    1. Session Management with et Connections: Implement robust session management to associate each connection managed by et with a specific user session or context.
    2. Contextual Data Storage per et Connection: Store session-specific data (user ID, permissions, etc.) in a way that is securely associated with the et connection and isolated from other connections managed by et.
    3. Authorization Checks per et Connection Request: Perform authorization checks for every request received through an et connection, based on the associated user context. Do not rely on connection identity alone for authorization within et handlers.
    4. Prevent Cross-Connection Data Leakage in et: Ensure that data or resources associated with one et connection are not inadvertently accessible or leaked to other et connections, especially in connection pooling scenarios managed by et.
    5. et Connection Termination on Session Logout: Properly terminate et connections when a user session ends (logout, timeout) to prevent unauthorized access through lingering connections managed by et.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Cross-User Data Access via Shared et Connections (High Severity): Prevents unauthorized access to data belonging to other users due to improper connection isolation within et's connection management.
    • Session Hijacking Exploiting et Connections (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of session hijacking by enforcing proper session management and connection termination for et connections.
    • Privilege Escalation through et Connection Reuse (Medium Severity): Mitigates privilege escalation risks by ensuring authorization checks are performed based on the correct user context for each request received via an et connection.
  • Impact: Significantly Reduces risk of cross-user data access related to et connection management. Moderately Reduces risk of session hijacking exploiting et connections and privilege escalation through et connection reuse.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Session management exists, but connection isolation within et's context is primarily based on session IDs. Contextual data storage and authorization checks are implemented, but could be more robust in relation to et connection handling.
  • Missing Implementation: Strengthen connection isolation mechanisms within the application's usage of et to ensure complete separation of user contexts. Review and enhance authorization checks to be strictly connection-context aware when processing requests from et connections. Implement more proactive et connection termination on session logout or timeout.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Middleware Development Practices (If et Provides Middleware)

6. Secure Middleware Development Practices (If et Provides Middleware)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Middleware Development Practices (for et middleware)
  • Description:
    1. Input Validation in et Middleware: Implement input validation and sanitization within custom et middleware components to protect against vulnerabilities introduced by middleware logic.
    2. Secure Coding Principles for et Middleware: Follow secure coding principles when developing custom et middleware (e.g., least privilege, avoid hardcoded secrets, proper error handling).
    3. Regular Security Reviews of et Middleware: Conduct security reviews of custom et middleware code to identify potential vulnerabilities.
    4. Unit and Integration Testing for et Middleware: Implement thorough unit and integration tests for et middleware components, including security-focused test cases.
    5. Dependency Management for et Middleware: Manage dependencies of et middleware components and keep them updated to address known vulnerabilities.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Middleware-Introduced Vulnerabilities in et (High Severity): Prevents vulnerabilities (e.g., injection flaws, authorization bypasses) from being introduced through custom et middleware code.
    • Compromised et Middleware Functionality (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of et middleware components being compromised and used to attack the application.
    • Data Leakage through et Middleware (Medium Severity): Prevents unintentional data leakage or exposure through insecure et middleware logic.
  • Impact: Significantly Reduces risk of middleware-introduced vulnerabilities in et. Moderately Reduces risk of compromised et middleware and data leakage through et middleware.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Basic secure coding practices are followed in middleware development, but dedicated security reviews and security-focused testing for et middleware are not consistently performed.
  • Missing Implementation: Establish a process for regular security reviews of custom et middleware code. Implement security-focused unit and integration tests for et middleware. Formalize dependency management for et middleware components.

Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege for Middleware (If et Provides Middleware)

7. Principle of Least Privilege for Middleware (If et Provides Middleware)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Principle of Least Privilege for Middleware (for et middleware)
  • Description:
    1. Identify et Middleware Permissions: For each et middleware component, clearly define the minimum permissions and resources it requires to function correctly within the et framework.
    2. Restrict Access for et Middleware: Configure et middleware components to have access only to the necessary resources and APIs provided by et and the application. Avoid granting excessive permissions.
    3. Minimize Scope of et Middleware Operations: Design et middleware to perform only its intended function and avoid unnecessary operations that could expand the attack surface within the et processing pipeline.
    4. Regularly Review et Middleware Permissions: Periodically review the permissions granted to et middleware components and adjust them as needed to maintain the principle of least privilege.
    5. Enforce Access Control for et Middleware: Implement access control mechanisms to enforce the defined permissions and prevent et middleware from exceeding its authorized scope within the et framework.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Lateral Movement after et Middleware Compromise (Medium Severity): Limits the potential damage if an et middleware component is compromised by restricting its access to other parts of the system accessible through et.
    • Privilege Escalation through et Middleware (Medium Severity): Prevents et middleware from being used to escalate privileges due to overly broad permissions within the et context.
    • Data Breach Impact Reduction via et Middleware Restriction (Medium Severity): Reduces the potential impact of a data breach by limiting the scope of data accessible to et middleware components.
  • Impact: Moderately Reduces risk of lateral movement, privilege escalation, and data breach impact related to et middleware.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. et Middleware components are generally designed with specific functions, but explicit permission management and enforcement for et middleware are not rigorously implemented.
  • Missing Implementation: Implement a formal permission management system for et middleware components. Define and enforce least privilege policies for each et middleware component. Regularly review and adjust et middleware permissions.

Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update et and Dependencies

8. Regularly Update et and Dependencies

  • Mitigation Strategy: Regularly Update et and Dependencies
  • Description:
    1. Dependency Tracking for et: Maintain a list of all dependencies of the et library, including its transitive dependencies.
    2. Vulnerability Monitoring for et: Subscribe to security advisories and vulnerability databases for the et library and its dependencies.
    3. et Update Process: Establish a process for regularly checking for updates to the et library and its dependencies and applying them promptly. Automate dependency updates where possible.
    4. Testing After et Updates: After applying updates to et or its dependencies, conduct thorough testing to ensure compatibility and prevent regressions in your application that uses et.
    5. Patch Management for et: Implement a patch management system to track and apply security patches for the et library and its dependencies.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Known Vulnerabilities in et or Dependencies (High Severity): Prevents exploitation of known vulnerabilities in the et library or its dependencies by applying security updates.
    • Zero-Day Vulnerabilities in et (Low Severity): Reduces the window of exposure to zero-day vulnerabilities in et by staying up-to-date with the latest versions and security patches.
  • Impact: Significantly Reduces risk of known vulnerabilities in et and its dependencies. Minimally Reduces risk of zero-day vulnerabilities in et.
  • Currently Implemented: Partially Implemented. Dependency updates including et are performed periodically, but not systematically. Vulnerability monitoring for et and its dependencies is not fully automated.
  • Missing Implementation: Implement automated dependency vulnerability scanning for et and its dependencies. Establish a formal patch management process for the et library and its dependencies. Automate dependency updates for et and its dependencies where feasible.

Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Vulnerability Scanning for et

9. Dependency Vulnerability Scanning for et

  • Mitigation Strategy: Dependency Vulnerability Scanning for et
  • Description:
    1. Tool Integration for et Dependency Scanning: Integrate dependency vulnerability scanning tools into the development pipeline (e.g., CI/CD pipeline, IDE plugins) to scan dependencies of et.
    2. Automated Scanning of et Dependencies: Configure tools to automatically scan dependencies of the et library for known vulnerabilities on a regular basis (e.g., daily, weekly).
    3. Vulnerability Reporting for et Dependencies: Generate reports of identified vulnerabilities in et's dependencies, including severity levels and remediation guidance.
    4. Prioritization and Remediation of et Dependency Vulnerabilities: Prioritize vulnerability remediation based on severity and exploitability of vulnerabilities in et's dependencies. Address high-severity vulnerabilities promptly.
    5. False Positive Management for et Dependency Scans: Implement mechanisms to manage false positives from et dependency scans and focus on addressing real vulnerabilities.
  • Threats Mitigated:
    • Known Vulnerabilities in et Dependencies (High Severity): Proactively identifies and mitigates known vulnerabilities in et's dependencies before they can be exploited.
    • Supply Chain Attacks via et Dependencies (Medium Severity): Reduces the risk of supply chain attacks by identifying vulnerabilities in third-party libraries used by et.
    • Outdated et Dependencies (Low Severity): Ensures dependencies of et are kept up-to-date, reducing the overall attack surface related to et's dependencies.
  • Impact: Significantly Reduces risk of known vulnerabilities in et dependencies. Moderately Reduces risk of supply chain attacks via et dependencies. Minimally Reduces risk of outdated et dependencies.
  • Currently Implemented: Not Implemented. Dependency vulnerability scanning specifically for et's dependencies is not currently integrated into the development pipeline.
  • Missing Implementation: Integrate dependency vulnerability scanning tools into the CI/CD pipeline to scan et's dependencies. Configure automated scans and vulnerability reporting for et dependencies. Establish a process for prioritizing and remediating identified vulnerabilities in et dependencies.