Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
149 lines (106 loc) · 12.4 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

149 lines (106 loc) · 12.4 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for egametang/et

Mitigation Strategy: Configuration Validation (et-Specific)

Mitigation Strategy: Configuration Validation (et-Specific)

Description:

  1. Define an et-Specific Configuration Struct: Create a Go struct that specifically represents the configuration options used by the et library. This might be a subset of a larger configuration struct, or it might be a separate struct entirely. Include fields for all et-specific parameters, such as those related to connection, TLS, authentication, and any custom options provided by et.
  2. Implement et-Specific Validation: Use a validation library (e.g., go-playground/validator) or custom validation functions to add validation tags/logic to the et-specific configuration struct. Focus on validating parameters that are directly passed to et.
    • Endpoint URLs: Validate that endpoints are valid URLs (scheme, host, port).
    • TLS Settings: Validate paths to certificate and key files (existence, permissions), and ensure that TLS is enabled if required.
    • Authentication Credentials: Validate the format and strength of credentials (if applicable).
    • et-Specific Options: Validate any custom configuration options provided by the et library, ensuring they are within acceptable ranges or formats.
  3. Validate Before et Initialization: Before initializing or using any et functions, validate the et-specific configuration struct.
  4. Handle Validation Errors: If validation fails, log the errors securely and prevent the application from using et with the invalid configuration.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Improper Etcd Cluster Configuration (via et) (Severity: High): Prevents misconfigurations that are directly passed to the et library, reducing the risk of unauthorized access or insecure communication with etcd.

Impact:

  • Improper Etcd Cluster Configuration: Significantly reduces the risk by ensuring that only valid configurations are used with the et library.

Currently Implemented:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Partially implemented. Basic URL validation is done, but TLS settings and et-specific options are not validated."

Missing Implementation:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Missing validation for TLS certificate paths, key paths, and et-specific timeout settings within the etConfig struct in etcd_client.go."

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Defaults Enforcement (et-Specific)

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Defaults Enforcement (et-Specific)

Description:

  1. Identify All et Configuration Options: Thoroughly examine the et library's documentation and code to identify all configurable parameters that it uses, including those with default values.
  2. Define Secure Defaults for et: For each et-specific parameter, determine a secure default value. Prioritize security over convenience. Focus on:
    • Enabling TLS by default.
    • Requiring client certificate authentication by default.
    • Setting reasonable timeouts (not too long, not too short) by default.
  3. Explicitly Set et Defaults: In your application code, before initializing or using the et library, explicitly set these secure defaults for all et-specific parameters. Do not rely on et's built-in defaults without verifying them. This overrides any potentially insecure defaults within et.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Improper Etcd Cluster Configuration (via et) (Severity: High): Ensures that even if the user provides an incomplete configuration to the parts of the application that use et, secure defaults are used for the et library, reducing the risk of accidental misconfiguration.

Impact:

  • Improper Etcd Cluster Configuration: Significantly reduces the risk, especially if users are unaware of all the security implications of et's configuration options.

Currently Implemented:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Not implemented. The application relies on et's default settings without explicitly setting secure defaults for et-specific parameters."

Missing Implementation:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Secure defaults need to be defined and explicitly set for all relevant et configuration parameters before initializing the et client in etcd_client.go."

Mitigation Strategy: Comprehensive Error Handling (et-Specific)

Mitigation Strategy: Comprehensive Error Handling (et-Specific)

Description:

  1. Identify All et Function Calls: Identify all places in your code where you call functions from the et library.
  2. Check for Errors Returned by et: After every call to an et function, check the returned error value. Do not assume that et operations will always succeed.
  3. Handle et-Specific Errors: Use errors.Is or errors.As (in Go) to check for specific error types that might be returned by et or that et might wrap from the underlying etcd client. Handle these errors appropriately:
    • Connection Errors (from et): Implement retry logic with exponential backoff (up to a limit) if et reports connection problems.
    • Authentication Errors (from et): Log securely and take corrective action (e.g., terminate, re-authenticate if possible).
    • et-Specific Errors: Handle any errors specific to the et library's functionality (e.g., errors related to its cluster management features).
  4. Secure Logging: Log errors securely, without exposing sensitive information.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Improper Error Handling with et (Severity: Medium): Prevents application instability, information leaks, and potential denial-of-service due to unhandled errors returned by the et library.

Impact:

  • Improper Error Handling: Significantly improves the application's robustness and resilience to errors originating from the et library.

Currently Implemented:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Partially implemented. Basic error checking is done, but specific et error types are not always handled, and retry logic is missing."

Missing Implementation:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Need to implement specific error handling for different error types returned by et and implement retry logic with exponential backoff for connection errors reported by et in etcd_client.go."

Mitigation Strategy: Key and Value Sanitization (et Input)

Mitigation Strategy: Key and Value Sanitization (et Input)

Description:

  1. Identify Input to et: Identify all places where data (especially user-provided data) is used to construct keys or values that are passed to functions in the et library.
  2. Define Allowed Characters for Keys (for et): Define a strict whitelist of allowed characters for etcd keys, considering any restrictions imposed by et or your application's key structure.
  3. Implement Sanitization Functions (for et Input): Create functions to sanitize input before it's used in calls to et. These functions should:
    • Remove or replace disallowed characters.
    • Enforce length limits.
    • Validate the format of the input, if applicable.
  4. Apply Sanitization Before et Calls: Always call the sanitization functions before using any data as input to et functions that interact with etcd (e.g., setting keys, getting values).

Threats Mitigated:

  • Injection Attacks (Indirectly via et) (Severity: Medium): Prevents attackers from injecting malicious characters or patterns into etcd keys or values through the et library, which could lead to unauthorized access or data modification.

Impact:

  • Injection Attacks: Significantly reduces the risk by ensuring that only safe and validated data is passed as input to et functions.

Currently Implemented:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Not implemented. Data is passed directly to et functions without sanitization."

Missing Implementation:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Need to implement sanitization functions for keys and values and apply them consistently before any calls to et functions that take keys or values as input, specifically in data_access.go."

Mitigation Strategy: Strong TLS and Certificate Validation (et Configuration)

Mitigation Strategy: Strong TLS and Certificate Validation (et Configuration)

Description:

  1. Use TLS 1.3 (or Latest) with et: Configure the et library to use TLS 1.3 (or the latest secure version supported by both et and the etcd server). Ensure this is done through et's configuration mechanisms.
  2. Disable Weak Ciphers (via et Config): Explicitly disable weak or outdated ciphers and protocols in the et library's configuration. Use a well-vetted list of strong ciphers. This should be done through the configuration options provided by et.
  3. Require Client Certificates (via et Config): Configure et to require client certificate authentication, if supported. This adds an extra layer of security.
  4. Validate Server Certificate (Enforced by et): Ensure that the et library is configured to always validate the etcd server's TLS certificate. Do not disable certificate verification through any et settings.
  5. Use Trusted CA (with et): If possible, use a trusted CA, and configure et to use this CA for certificate validation.
  6. Self-Signed Certificates (Testing, with et): If using self-signed certificates for testing, configure et to trust the specific self-signed certificate or its CA certificate, using et's configuration options.
  7. Certificate Pinning (If Supported by et): If the et library supports certificate pinning, consider using it for enhanced security.

Threats Mitigated:

  • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks (Severity: High): Prevents attackers from intercepting or modifying communication between the application (via et) and the etcd cluster.

Impact:

  • Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) Attacks: Significantly reduces the risk by ensuring that et uses a secure and properly validated TLS connection.

Currently Implemented:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Partially implemented. TLS is enabled in the et configuration, but weak ciphers are not explicitly disabled, and it's unclear if certificate validation is consistently enforced by et."

Missing Implementation:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Need to explicitly disable weak ciphers in the et configuration. Verify that et is enforcing certificate validation and consider implementing certificate pinning if supported by et."

Mitigation Strategy: Circuit Breaker (for et calls)

Mitigation Strategy: Circuit Breaker (for et calls)

Description:

  1. Choose a Circuit Breaker Library: Select a Go circuit breaker library (e.g., gobreaker, handybreaker).
  2. Wrap et Function Calls: Wrap all calls to functions within the et library that interact with etcd within the circuit breaker. This is crucial; the circuit breaker should protect against failures originating from et.
  3. Configure Thresholds: Configure appropriate thresholds for failure count, timeout, half-open state, and reset timeout.
  4. Handle Circuit Open State: Implement logic to handle the case where the circuit breaker is open (indicating that et's connection to etcd is likely unavailable).

Threats Mitigated:

  • Improper Error Handling with et (Severity: Medium): Prevents cascading failures if the et library is unable to communicate with the etcd cluster. Improves application resilience.

Impact:

  • Improper Error Handling: Significantly improves the application's ability to handle et-related communication failures gracefully.

Currently Implemented:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Not implemented. Calls to et are not wrapped in a circuit breaker."

Missing Implementation:

  • [PROJECT SPECIFIC]: e.g., "Need to integrate a circuit breaker library and wrap all calls to et functions that interact with etcd within the circuit breaker, specifically in etcd_client.go."