Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
83 lines (71 loc) · 6.57 KB

attack-tree.md

File metadata and controls

83 lines (71 loc) · 6.57 KB

Attack Tree Analysis for gui-cs/terminal.gui

Objective: Gain unauthorized control over the application's execution flow or access sensitive data displayed/processed within the terminal.gui application.

Attack Tree Visualization

                                     Gain Unauthorized Control/Access
                                                  |
                                     =====================================
                                     |                                   |
                      1. Input Validation Bypass          **4.  Misconfiguration/Improper Usage**
               [HIGH RISK]                            [HIGH RISK]
                      =====================================          =====================================
                      |                  |                                         |
          1a.  Oversized Input   **1b.  Special Chars**                       **4a.  Insufficient**
               (Crash/DoS)       **(Command Inj.)**                       **Input Sanitization**
               [HIGH RISK]        [HIGH RISK]                                [HIGH RISK]
                                     |
                      3.  Dependency-Related Vulnerabilities
                                     |
                      -------------------------------------
                      |                                   |
          3a.  Vulnerable                    **3c.  Outdated**
               Curses/                         **Version of**
               Terminal                        **Curses/Term**
               Library                         [HIGH RISK]
               [HIGH RISK]

Attack Tree Path: 1. Input Validation Bypass [HIGH RISK]

  • 1a. Oversized Input (Crash/DoS) [HIGH RISK]

    • Description: The attacker sends excessively large input strings to input fields (e.g., TextField, TextView) within the terminal.gui application.
    • Mechanism: Exploits potential lack of input length validation in the application or terminal.gui itself. May trigger buffer overflows, excessive memory allocation, or other resource exhaustion issues.
    • Impact: Denial of service (DoS) by crashing the application or making it unresponsive. In rare cases, a crash might lead to further exploitation, but this is less likely directly.
    • Mitigation:
      • Implement strict input length limits on all input fields.
      • Use input validation functions that check for maximum length.
      • Test with extremely large inputs (fuzz testing).

  • 1b. Special Characters (Command Injection) [HIGH RISK] (Critical Node)

    • Description: The attacker injects special characters (e.g., ;, |, &&, $()) into input fields, aiming to execute arbitrary commands on the system.
    • Mechanism: Exploits the application's failure to properly sanitize user input before using it to construct commands (e.g., shell commands, database queries). This is a critical developer error.
    • Impact: Very High. Complete system compromise is possible if the application runs with sufficient privileges. The attacker could read, modify, or delete data, install malware, or pivot to other systems.
    • Mitigation:
      • Never directly construct commands using unsanitized user input.
      • Use parameterized queries or prepared statements for database interactions.
      • Use safe APIs that handle escaping and quoting automatically.
      • If shell commands are absolutely necessary, use a well-vetted library that handles escaping correctly, and avoid direct string concatenation.
      • Whitelist allowed characters; reject input containing anything else.

Attack Tree Path: 3. Dependency-Related Vulnerabilities

  • 3a. Vulnerable Curses/Terminal Library [HIGH RISK]

    • Description: The application uses an underlying curses or terminal library (e.g., ncurses, PDCurses) that has known security vulnerabilities.
    • Mechanism: The attacker exploits a known vulnerability in the library. This might involve crafting specific input sequences or exploiting weaknesses in how the library handles terminal escape sequences.
    • Impact: High to Very High. The impact depends on the specific vulnerability, but could range from DoS to arbitrary code execution.
    • Mitigation:
      • Keep the curses/terminal library up-to-date.
      • Use a dependency management system to track and update dependencies.
      • Monitor for security advisories related to the library.

  • 3c. Outdated Version of Curses/Terminal [HIGH RISK] (Critical Node)

    • Description: Similar to 3a, but specifically highlights the risk of using an outdated, unpatched version of the curses/terminal library.
    • Mechanism: Exploitation of publicly known vulnerabilities in older versions.
    • Impact: High to Very High, same as 3a.
    • Mitigation: Same as 3a: keep the library updated.

Attack Tree Path: 4. Misconfiguration/Improper Usage [HIGH RISK] (Critical Node)

  • 4a. Insufficient Input Sanitization [HIGH RISK] (Critical Node)
    • Description: This is the overarching category encompassing failures to properly validate and sanitize user input before using it in any sensitive context. It's the root cause of many vulnerabilities, including command injection (1b).
    • Mechanism: The application treats user input as trusted and uses it directly in operations that require safe data (e.g., constructing commands, building file paths, displaying data).
    • Impact: Ranges from Medium to Very High, depending on the specific context. Can lead to command injection, cross-site scripting (XSS) in terminal applications (if output is not properly handled), data corruption, and other vulnerabilities.
    • Mitigation:
      • Implement comprehensive input validation and sanitization for all user input.
      • Use a whitelist approach: define what is allowed, and reject everything else.
      • Use appropriate escaping or encoding techniques when displaying user-supplied data.
      • Use parameterized queries or safe APIs for database interactions and other sensitive operations.
      • Regularly review code for potential input validation bypasses.
      • Perform penetration testing to identify and exploit input validation weaknesses.