Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
154 lines (111 loc) · 10.7 KB

mitigations.md

File metadata and controls

154 lines (111 loc) · 10.7 KB

Mitigation Strategies Analysis for hangfireio/hangfire

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Authentication for Hangfire Dashboard

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Authentication for Hangfire Dashboard

  • Description:

    1. Choose an Authentication Method: Decide on an authentication method that aligns with your application's existing security infrastructure.
    2. Configure Hangfire Dashboard Options: In your application's startup code, configure DashboardOptions for Hangfire.
    3. Add Authorization Filter: Within DashboardOptions, add an authorization filter using DashboardOptions.Authorization = new [] { ... }.
    4. Implement Authorization Filter Logic: Create a class that implements IDashboardAuthorizationFilter. Inside this filter, check user authentication status using context.GetHttpContext().User.Identity.IsAuthenticated. Return false to deny access for unauthenticated users, true to allow (or proceed to authorization checks).
    5. Register the Authorization Filter: Register your custom authorization filter within the DashboardOptions.Authorization array.
    6. Test Authentication: Verify that unauthenticated users are denied access to the Hangfire Dashboard.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access to Dashboard (High Severity): Anyone can access the dashboard without authentication.
    • Information Disclosure (High Severity): Job details and server status are exposed.
    • Data Manipulation (Medium Severity): Unauthorized users could delete or trigger jobs.
    • Denial of Service (DoS) (Medium Severity): Potential for dashboard abuse to overload the system.

  • Impact: Significantly reduces unauthorized access and related threats to the Hangfire Dashboard.

  • Currently Implemented: Yes, implemented in Startup.cs using ASP.NET Core Identity and a custom authorization filter.

  • Missing Implementation: No missing implementation for basic authentication, but role-based authorization is needed (see next strategy).

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Authorization for Hangfire Dashboard (Role-Based)

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Role-Based Authorization for Hangfire Dashboard

  • Description:

    1. Define Roles/Permissions: Define roles like "HangfireAdmin", "HangfireViewer".
    2. Assign Roles to Users: Manage user roles within your application.
    3. Modify Authorization Filter: Update the IDashboardAuthorizationFilter.
    4. Check User Roles/Permissions: In the filter, after authentication, check if the user has authorized roles using methods like user.IsInRole("HangfireAdmin").
    5. Grant/Deny Access Based on Roles: Return true only if the user is authenticated AND has an authorized role.
    6. Test Authorization: Verify role-based access control to the dashboard.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Unauthorized Access by Authenticated Users (Medium Severity): All authenticated users have full dashboard access.
    • Privilege Escalation (Medium Severity): Users with limited app privileges might gain elevated Hangfire privileges.

  • Impact: Moderately reduces unauthorized actions by authenticated users within the Hangfire Dashboard.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Authentication is present, but role-based authorization is not.

  • Missing Implementation: Role-based logic needs to be added to the custom authorization filter in Startup.cs.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Job Argument Serialization - Avoid Serializing Sensitive Data Directly

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Job Argument Serialization - Avoid Serializing Sensitive Data Directly

  • Description:

    1. Identify Sensitive Data: Review Hangfire jobs for sensitive arguments.
    2. Refactor Job Logic: Modify jobs to avoid direct serialization of sensitive data.
    3. Indirectly Reference Sensitive Data: Pass identifiers instead of sensitive data itself.
    4. Secure Storage for Sensitive Data: Use secure storage like encrypted config, secrets management, or encrypted databases.
    5. Retrieve Data in Job: Jobs retrieve sensitive data using identifiers from secure storage.
    6. Verify No Direct Serialization: Ensure no sensitive data is directly passed to BackgroundJob.Enqueue or BackgroundJob.Schedule.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure through Job Storage (High Severity): Sensitive data in job storage is vulnerable if compromised.
    • Exposure in Logs (Medium Severity): Serialized arguments might be logged, exposing sensitive data.

  • Impact: Significantly reduces information disclosure of sensitive data in Hangfire job data and logs.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Developers are generally aware, but systematic review is needed.

  • Missing Implementation: Systematic review of job enqueues and implementation of a secrets management system.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Job Queue Monitoring

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Job Queue Monitoring

  • Description:

    1. Choose Monitoring Tools: Use Hangfire Dashboard, APM tools, or custom solutions.
    2. Monitor Key Metrics: Track queue length, processing time, enqueued rate, failed job rate, worker status.
    3. Set Up Alerts: Configure alerts for metric thresholds (e.g., queue length exceeding limit).
    4. Regularly Review Monitoring Data: Periodically check dashboards and logs for anomalies.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Queue Flooding (Medium Severity): Detect and respond to queue overload.
    • Performance Degradation (Medium Severity): Identify performance bottlenecks.
    • Application Instability (Low to Medium Severity): Detect issues causing job failures.

  • Impact: Moderately reduces DoS, performance degradation, and instability by providing queue health visibility.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Basic monitoring via Hangfire Dashboard, manual checks.

  • Missing Implementation: Integrate Hangfire metrics into APM (Application Insights) for automated monitoring and alerting.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Job Queue Throttling/Rate Limiting

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Job Queue Throttling/Rate Limiting

  • Description:

    1. Identify Throttling Needs: Determine job types needing throttling.
    2. Choose Throttling Mechanism: Queue-based, time-based (rate limiting), or resource-based.
    3. Implement Throttling Logic: Implement throttling at job enqueue points.
      • Queue-based: Check queue length before enqueueing.
      • Time-based: Use rate limiting algorithms.
    4. Configure Throttling Parameters: Set limits based on application capacity.
    5. Test Throttling: Verify throttling effectiveness and impact on legitimate jobs.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Denial of Service (DoS) due to Queue Flooding (High Severity): Prevent queue flooding attacks.
    • Resource Exhaustion (Medium Severity): Prevent excessive resource consumption.
    • Performance Degradation (Medium Severity): Maintain predictable processing times.

  • Impact: Significantly reduces DoS, resource exhaustion, and performance degradation from queue flooding.

  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. No throttling or rate limiting in place.

  • Missing Implementation: Implement time-based throttling for frequently triggered job types.

Mitigation Strategy: Secure Hangfire Logs - Restrict Access and Sanitize

  • Mitigation Strategy: Secure Hangfire Logs - Restrict Access and Sanitize

  • Description:

    1. Restrict Log Access: Limit access to authorized personnel.
    2. Log Storage Security: Store logs securely, consider centralized logging with access controls.
    3. Log Sanitization: Prevent sensitive data logging.
      • Avoid logging sensitive data.
      • Mask/redact sensitive data if logging is necessary.
      • Filter sensitive parameters.
    4. Regular Log Review: Review logs for security events and anomalies.
    5. Secure Log Transmission: Encrypt log transmission (TLS/SSL).

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Information Disclosure through Logs (Medium to High Severity): Unauthorized access to logs with sensitive data.
    • Compliance Violations (Medium Severity): Logging sensitive data without security measures.

  • Impact: Moderately to significantly reduces information disclosure through logs and aids compliance.

  • Currently Implemented: Partially implemented. Access restricted to teams, but sanitization is inconsistent. Centralized logging is used, access control needs refinement.

  • Missing Implementation: Systematic log sanitization and refined access controls in centralized logging.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement Auditing for Dashboard Actions

  • Mitigation Strategy: Implement Auditing for Hangfire Dashboard Actions

  • Description:

    1. Choose Auditing Mechanism: Custom code or auditing libraries.
    2. Identify Auditable Actions: Audit job deletion, retries, server/queue management, recurring job changes.
    3. Log Audit Events: Log timestamp, user, action type, affected resource, action details.
    4. Secure Audit Log Storage: Store audit logs securely, separate from application logs, with access controls.
    5. Regular Audit Log Review: Review audit logs for suspicious activity.

  • List of Threats Mitigated:

    • Lack of Accountability (Medium Severity): Difficulty tracking dashboard actions.
    • Unauthorized Actions Going Undetected (Medium Severity): Undetected malicious dashboard actions.
    • Compliance Requirements (Medium Severity): Auditing often required for compliance.

  • Impact: Moderately reduces undetected unauthorized actions, improves accountability, and aids compliance.

  • Currently Implemented: Not implemented. No auditing for Hangfire Dashboard actions.

  • Missing Implementation: Implement auditing for dashboard actions and secure audit log storage.